Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deep Transfer Learning for Star Cluster Classification: I. Application to the PHANGS-HST Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.02024 v2 pith:SR6HA3TU submitted 2019-09-04 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IMphysics.data-anphysics.ins-det

Deep Transfer Learning for Star Cluster Classification: I. Application to the PHANGS-HST Survey

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IMphysics.data-anphysics.ins-det
keywords starclassificationclusterclustersperformancephangs-hstsamplestraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the results of a proof-of-concept experiment which demonstrates that deep learning can successfully be used for production-scale classification of compact star clusters detected in HST UV-optical imaging of nearby spiral galaxies (D < 20 Mpc) in the PHANGS-HST survey. Given the relatively small nature of existing, human-labelled star cluster samples, we transfer the knowledge of state-of-the-art neural network models for real-object recognition to classify star clusters candidates into four morphological classes. We perform a series of experiments to determine the dependence of classification performance on: neural network architecture (ResNet18 and VGG19-BN); training data sets curated by either a single expert or three astronomers; and the size of the images used for training. We find that the overall classification accuracies are not significantly affected by these choices. The networks are used to classify star cluster candidates in the PHANGS-HST galaxy NGC 1559, which was not included in the training samples. The resulting prediction accuracies are 70%, 40%, 40-50%, 50-70% for class 1, 2, 3 star clusters, and class 4 non-clusters respectively. This performance is competitive with consistency achieved in previously published human and automated quantitative classification of star cluster candidate samples (70-80%, 40-50%, 40-50%, and 60-70%). The methods introduced herein lay the foundations to automate classification for star clusters at scale, and exhibit the need to prepare a standardized dataset of human-labelled star cluster classifications, agreed upon by a full range of experts in the field, to further improve the performance of the networks introduced in this study.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.