pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00068 · v1 · pith:EJSOL3PVnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-ph · physics.ins-det· quant-ph

Simulation of Axion-Induced Electromagnetic Signal Detection Using Plasmonic Metasurfaces and Diamond NV Centers

James L. Webb This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 18:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph physics.ins-detquant-ph
keywords axion detectionplasmonic metasurfaceNV centersdiamond quantum sensingdark matterTHz sensorheterodyne detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

Numerical simulations show plasmonic metasurfaces paired with diamond NV centers can detect axions in the 0.01-1 eV range.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates a lab-based method to search for axions as dark matter candidates in the higher mass range of 0.01-1 eV, where field oscillations occur at THz frequencies that have been difficult to probe. It models a sensor that uses nanostructured metasurfaces to enhance electric fields from axion-induced anomalous signals, combined with heterodyne detection and readout via nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Simulations focus on Ti/Au nanopillars on LiNb substrate at around 0.8 eV and explore lower masses with materials like CdTe. The work aims to establish that such a device could reach high sensitivity in this parameter space.

Core claim

Numerical simulations indicate the feasibility of a high-sensitivity lab-based axion sensor operating in the 0.01–1 eV range based on plasmonic electric-field enhancement by a nanostructured metasurface combined with heterodyne detection and quantum sensing via NV centers in diamond. Estimates of the sensor response to anomalous electromagnetic fields resulting from axion coupling are given using Ti/Au nanopillars on LiNb at axion mass corresponding to telecommunications wavelength (≈0.8 eV, 196 THz). The possibility of sensing in the lower axion mass <10^{-2} to 10^{-1} eV range is explored using alternative materials, with CdTe as an example.

What carries the argument

Plasmonic metasurface of Ti/Au nanopillars on LiNb substrate that enhances axion-induced anomalous electromagnetic fields, read out via heterodyne detection with NV centers in diamond.

If this is right

  • Axion-photon coupling in the 0.01-1 eV window becomes accessible to direct lab measurement at THz frequencies.
  • Plasmonic field enhancement enables usable signal levels from weak axion-induced fields that would otherwise fall below detector thresholds.
  • Heterodyne readout combined with NV quantum sensing provides the frequency selectivity needed to distinguish axion oscillations from background.
  • Switching to materials such as CdTe extends the approach to axion masses below 0.1 eV without changing the core detection architecture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful operation would allow cross-checks against astrophysical bounds by supplying independent laboratory limits on the same axion parameter space.
  • The THz operating band aligns with existing telecommunications hardware, potentially allowing reuse of amplifiers and sources developed for that industry.
  • Noise modeling in future work could incorporate realistic fabrication tolerances to set tighter bounds on required metasurface uniformity.

Load-bearing premise

The simulation assumes that the modeled axion-induced anomalous electromagnetic fields, plasmonic enhancement factors, and NV-center response accurately represent real-device behavior without unaccounted losses, fabrication imperfections, or background noise sources that would appear in an actual experiment.

What would settle it

Fabrication and operation of the proposed Ti/Au nanopillar metasurface on LiNb with NV diamond readout that either measures the predicted signal strength from axion coupling or shows no detectable response above the simulated noise floor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00068 by James L. Webb.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Adapted from [13], the regions shaded are those ruled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch of the sensor concept (simplified, not to scale) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Enhancement factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Simulation of the enhancement factor E/E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Normalised peak input current density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Taper length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The imaginary component of current capture copla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows a plot of normalised peak current den￾sity coming from the array at the start of the taper Jstart as a function of sgap and taper length t. The peak in input current occurs when the taper reactance matches that of the array, with longer tapers requiring less of a change in CPW gap from start to end. The relation be￾tween taper reactance and taper length can be seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The ratio of current density at the start of the taper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The current ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Time required for SNR=1 in days varying factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Time required for SNR=1 in days using only cur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Variance in the NV readout signal due to the cur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Power spectral density of all noise sources in A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Plot of pillar radius versus height for CdTe, mod [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Time required for SNR=1 in days using CdTe in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Time required for SNR=1 as a function of the di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Time required as a function of the resistive and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The axion represents a strong candidate for weakly interacting dark matter. To date, high sensitivity lab based experiments and astrophysical observations have ruled out a substantial part of the axion mass and photon coupling parameter space. However, a challenge remains in searching for the presence of the axion in the higher mass range 0.01-1eV corresponding approximately to axion field oscillation at THz frequencies. This work investigates via numerical simulation the feasibility of a high sensitivity, lab-based axion sensor operating in this range, based on plasmonic electric field enhancement by a nanostructured metasurface, combined with heterodyne detection and quantum sensing via nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. Estimates of the sensor response to anomalous electromagnetic fields resulting from axion coupling are given using Ti/Au nanopillars on LiNb at axion mass corresponding to telecommunications wavelength ($\approx$0.8eV, 196 THz). Finally, the possibility of sensing in the lower axion mass $<$10$^{-2}$ to 10$^{-1}$eV range is explored using alternative materials, with CdTe as an example.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that numerical simulations demonstrate the feasibility of a high-sensitivity lab-based axion sensor for the 0.01–1 eV mass range. The approach combines plasmonic electric-field enhancement via a nanostructured metasurface (Ti/Au nanopillars on LiNbO3 at ~196 THz / 0.8 eV), heterodyne detection, and quantum readout with NV centers in diamond. Estimates of the sensor response to axion-induced anomalous EM fields are presented, and the lower-mass regime is explored with alternative materials such as CdTe.

Significance. If the modeled enhancement factors and NV response translate to real devices, the work would address an experimentally difficult axion-mass window where existing haloscope and helioscope bounds are weakest. The hybrid plasmonic–quantum-sensing concept is novel for THz axion searches. However, the absence of error budgets, analytic validation, or noise modeling limits the immediate impact; the result is primarily a proof-of-principle simulation study.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Simulation section] Abstract and simulation description: The central feasibility claim rests on forward-modeled axion-induced E-fields, plasmonic enhancement, and NV response, yet no error budgets, parameter-sensitivity studies, or comparison to analytic limits (e.g., ideal Fabry–Pérot or Drude damping) are provided. This omission directly affects whether the quoted sensor response remains detectable once realistic losses are included.
  2. [Methods / Results] Methods / Results: The transition from ideal metasurface simulation (Ti/Au on LiNbO3 at 196 THz) to achievable experimental sensitivity is not quantified; fabrication roughness, material damping, and THz background noise are stated as unaccounted but their degradation of the enhancement factor is not bounded. This is load-bearing for the claim that the device is feasible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the axion–photon coupling and the heterodyne mixing frequency should be defined explicitly on first use rather than assumed from context.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (if present) should state the exact simulation parameters (mesh density, boundary conditions, material dispersion models) used to generate the enhancement factors.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback on our simulation study of a plasmonic metasurface axion detector. We agree that the manuscript would benefit from additional analysis to strengthen the feasibility claims, and we will revise accordingly by adding comparisons to analytic models and order-of-magnitude bounds on unmodeled effects. Our point-by-point responses to the major comments are below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Simulation section] Abstract and simulation description: The central feasibility claim rests on forward-modeled axion-induced E-fields, plasmonic enhancement, and NV response, yet no error budgets, parameter-sensitivity studies, or comparison to analytic limits (e.g., ideal Fabry–Pérot or Drude damping) are provided. This omission directly affects whether the quoted sensor response remains detectable once realistic losses are included.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of these additions for a more robust assessment. The present work is a numerical proof-of-principle demonstration. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection comparing the simulated enhancement factors to analytic Drude damping and ideal Fabry-Pérot cavity expectations. We will also include a parameter-sensitivity study on geometry and material parameters, along with an estimate of how additional losses would affect the quoted NV response and detectability. These changes will directly address whether the signal remains viable under realistic conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods / Results] Methods / Results: The transition from ideal metasurface simulation (Ti/Au on LiNbO3 at 196 THz) to achievable experimental sensitivity is not quantified; fabrication roughness, material damping, and THz background noise are stated as unaccounted but their degradation of the enhancement factor is not bounded. This is load-bearing for the claim that the device is feasible.

    Authors: We agree that bounding these effects strengthens the bridge from simulation to experiment. While a full experimental error budget exceeds the scope of this simulation paper, the revised Discussion will incorporate literature-based estimates: typical roughness from e-beam lithography (affecting enhancement by <20%), additional material damping from measured THz permittivities, and background noise levels mitigated by heterodyne readout. These will provide quantitative bounds on degradation of the enhancement factor and clarify the path to experimental sensitivity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward numerical simulation from standard physical models with no self-referential fits or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper presents numerical simulations of axion-induced EM fields interacting with a plasmonic metasurface and NV-center readout. All described elements (Ti/Au nanopillars on LiNbO3 at ~196 THz, heterodyne detection, NV response) are modeled from established Maxwell equations, material permittivities, and NV spin physics without any parameter fitted to the target sensitivity or any result defined in terms of the output. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are shown to reduce to prior author work or to the claimed feasibility metric by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the feasibility estimate implicitly relies on standard electromagnetic and quantum-sensing models whose validity is not audited here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5729 in / 1192 out tokens · 24888 ms · 2026-07-02T18:59:05.628677+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Simulation of Axion-Induced Electromagnetic Signal Detection Using Plasmonic Metasurfaces and Diamond NV Centers

    in tandem with astrophysical observations [12]. Fig- ure 1 shows a portion of the area of thegaγγversus axion massm a parameter space ruled out by these past mea- surements. FIG. 1. Adapted from [13], the regions shaded are those ruled out by previous experiments. The region in the 10 −3 to 0.1eV range has yet to be extensively explored, yet the theoretic...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Q =-Re(ϵm)/Im(ϵm), takingϵm=-115+11i for gold at 196THz. FIG. 3. Enhancement factorE/E 0 for Ti/Au pillars on LiNb at 196THz, varying pillar radius and height. Maximum en- hancement factor 480.4 is reached at radiusr=60nm, height h=280nm. FIG. 4. Simulation of the enhancement factor E/E 0 in a nanogap as a function of axion field frequency deviation from ...

  3. [3]

    Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons.Physical Review Letters, 40(5):279–282, 1978

    Frank Wilczek. Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons.Physical Review Letters, 40(5):279–282, 1978

    1978

  4. [4]

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn.CPConservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles.Physical Review Letters, 38(25):1440–1443, June 1977

    1977

  5. [5]

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. Constraints imposed byCPconservation in the presence of pseudoparticles. Physical Review D, 16(6):1791–1797, September 1977

    1977

  6. [6]

    Two applications of axion electrody- namics.Physical Review Letters, 58(18):1799–1802, May 1987

    Frank Wilczek. Two applications of axion electrody- namics.Physical Review Letters, 58(18):1799–1802, May 1987

    1987

  7. [7]

    invisible

    P. Sikivie. Experimental tests of the “invisible” ax- ion.Physical Review Letters, 51(16):1415–1417, October 1983

    1983

  8. [8]

    David J.E. Marsh. Axion cosmology.Physics Reports, 643:1–79, 2016

    2016

  9. [9]

    invisible

    P. Sikivie. Detection rates for “invisible”-axion searches. Physical Review D, 32(11):2988–2991, December 1985

    1985

  10. [10]

    Direct detection searches for axion dark matter.Physics of the Dark Universe, 4:14–16, 2014

    Gray Rybka. Direct detection searches for axion dark matter.Physics of the Dark Universe, 4:14–16, 2014

    2014

  11. [11]

    Bartram et al

    C. Bartram et al. Search for invisible axion dark matter in the 3.3–4.2µev mass range.Physical Review Letters, 127(26):261803, December 2021

    2021

  12. [12]

    Van Bibber, N

    K. Van Bibber, N. R. Dagdeviren, S. E. Koonin, A. K. Kerman, and H. N. Nelson. Proposed experiment to pro- duce and detect light pseudoscalars.Physical Review Let- ters, 59(7):759–762, August 1987

    1987

  13. [13]

    M. B. Schneider, F. P. Calaprice, A. L. Hallin, D. W. MacArthur, and D. F. Schreiber. Limit on im(csc∗ a) from a test oftinvariance in 19ne beta decay.Physical Review Letters, 52(8):695–695, February 1984

    1984

  14. [14]

    Raffelt and A

    G. Raffelt and A. Caputo. Astrophysical axion bounds: The 2024 edition. InProceedings of 1st General Meeting and 1st Training School of the COST Action COSMIC WSIPers — PoS(COSMICWISPers), COS- MICWISPers, page 041. Sissa Medialab, March 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, 2020

    Ciaran O’HARE. cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Graham and Surjeet Rajendran

    Peter W. Graham and Surjeet Rajendran. Axion dark matter detection with cold molecules.Physical Review D, 84(5):055013, September 2011

    2011

  17. [17]

    Jihn E. Kim. Weak-interaction singlet and strongCP invariance.Physical Review Letters, 43:103–107, 1979

    1979

  18. [18]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, and V.I. Zakharov. Can confinement ensure naturalCPinvariance of strong in- teractions?Nuclear Physics B, 166(3):493–506, 1980

    1980

  19. [19]

    Sensitivity of jwst to ev-scale decaying axion dark matter

    Saptak Roy, Carlos Blanco, Christopher Dessert, Anirudh Prabhu, and Tea Temim. Sensitivity of jwst to ev-scale decaying axion dark matter. 2023

    2023

  20. [20]

    Dielectric halo- scopes: A new way to detect axion dark matter.Physical Review Letters, 118(9), March 2017

    Allen Caldwell, Gia Dvali, B´ ela Majorovits, Alexander Millar, Georg Raffelt, Javier Redondo, Olaf Reimann, Frank Simon, and Frank and Steffen. Dielectric halo- scopes: A new way to detect axion dark matter.Physical Review Letters, 118(9), March 2017

    2017

  21. [21]

    Ax- ion and hidden photon dark matter detection with multi- layer optical haloscopes.Phys

    Masha Baryakhtar, Robert Lasenby, and Jessie Teo. Ax- ion and hidden photon dark matter detection with multi- layer optical haloscopes.Phys. Rev. D, 98:035006, 2018

    2018

  22. [22]

    Berggren, et al

    Jesse Liu, Kristin Dona, Gabe Hoshino, Stefan Knirck, Noah Kurinsky, Matthew Malaker, David Miller, An- drew Sonnenschein, Peter Barry, Karl K. Berggren, et al. Broadband solenoidal haloscope for terahertz axion de- tection. 2021

    2021

  23. [23]

    Axion electro- dynamics in topological materials.Journal of Applied Physics, 129(14), April 2021

    Akihiko Sekine and Kentaro Nomura. Axion electro- dynamics in topological materials.Journal of Applied Physics, 129(14), April 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    T-rax: Transversely res- onant axion experiment.Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics, 2022(09):007, 2022

    Chang Lee and Olaf Reimann. T-rax: Transversely res- onant axion experiment.Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics, 2022(09):007, 2022

    2022

  25. [25]

    PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Den- mark, April 2020

    Katrine Domino.New Advances in Transition Metal Cat- alyzed Reactions using Gaseous- and Fluorinated Build- ing Blocks. PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Den- mark, April 2020. PhD dissertation, Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Double resonance strategy for interferometric detection of axions

    Spencer Green and Frank Wilczek. Double resonance strategy for interferometric detection of axions. 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    McMahon, Stephen K

    Jeffrey M. McMahon, Stephen K. Gray, and George C. Schatz. Fundamental behavior of electric field enhance- ments in the gaps between closely spaced nanostructures. Physical Review B, 83(11), March 2011

    2011

  28. [28]

    Ward, Falco H¨ user, Fabian Pauly, Juan Car- los Cuevas, and Douglas Natelson

    Daniel R. Ward, Falco H¨ user, Fabian Pauly, Juan Car- los Cuevas, and Douglas Natelson. Optical rectification and field enhancement in a plasmonic nanogap.Nature Nanotechnology, 5(10):732–736, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, D

    A. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, D. R. Ward, D. Natelson, and J. C. Cuevas. Field enhancement in subnanometer metallic gaps.Physical Review B, 83(19), May 2011

    2011

  30. [30]

    Baumberg, Javier Aizpurua, Maiken H

    Jeremy J. Baumberg, Javier Aizpurua, Maiken H. Mikkelsen, and David R. Smith. Extreme nanopho- tonics from ultrathin metallic gaps.Nature Materials, 18(7):668–678, April 2019

    2019

  31. [31]

    Ziegler, and Ji-Xin Cheng

    Cheng Zong, Ranjith Premasiri, Haonan Lin, Yimin Huang, Chi Zhang, Chen Yang, Bin Ren, Lawrence D. Ziegler, and Ji-Xin Cheng. Plasmon-enhanced stimulated raman scattering microscopy with single-molecule detec- tion sensitivity.Nature Communications, 10(1), Novem- ber 2019

    2019

  32. [32]

    Maier.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Appli- cations

    Stefan A. Maier.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Appli- cations. Springer, 2007

    2007

  33. [33]

    28 ghz 5g radio over fibre using uf- ofdm with optical heterodyning

    Eamonn Martin, Colm Browning, Liam Barry, Arman Farhang, Linda Doyle, Manh Ha Hoang, Matthias John, and Max Ammann. 28 ghz 5g radio over fibre using uf- ofdm with optical heterodyning. In2017 International Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics (MWP), page 1–4. IEEE, October 2017

    2017

  34. [34]

    Juneghani, Milad G

    Farzaneh A. Juneghani, Milad G. Vazimali, Kim F. Lee, Ectis Velazquez, Xun Gong, Gregory S. Kanter, and Sasan Fathpour. Wireless microwave-to-optical conver- sion on thin-film lithium niobate.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 42(16):5583–5590, 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    Coherent fir/thz wave generation and steering via surface-emitting thin film lithium niobate waveguides.Opt

    Valerie Yoshioka, Jicheng Jin, and Bo Zhen. Coherent fir/thz wave generation and steering via surface-emitting thin film lithium niobate waveguides.Opt. Express, 32(1):639–651, Jan 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    Boyd.Nonlinear Optics

    Robert W. Boyd.Nonlinear Optics. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 4th edition, 2020

    2020

  37. [37]

    Baer, Folkert Horst, Daniele Caimi, Lukas Bedner, Marilyne Podpod, Radu Grigorescu, Chiara Marchiori, and Jean Fompeyrine

    Stefan Abel, Felix Eltes, Juerg E. Baer, Folkert Horst, Daniele Caimi, Lukas Bedner, Marilyne Podpod, Radu Grigorescu, Chiara Marchiori, and Jean Fompeyrine. Large pockels effect in micro-structured barium titanate thin films on silicon.Nature Materials, 18(1):42–47, 2019. 15

    2019

  38. [38]

    X. Zhou, T. M. Crawford, S. S. Eaton, and J. More- land. Microwave dielectric properties of lithium niobate at cryogenic temperatures.Journal of Applied Physics, 77(12):6471–6475, 1995

    1995

  39. [39]

    Tagantsev, Vladimir O

    Alexander K. Tagantsev, Vladimir O. Sherman, Kon- stantin F. Astafiev, J. Venkatesh, and Nava Setter. Fer- roelectric materials for microwave tunable applications. Journal of Electroceramics, 11(1):5–66, 2003

    2003

  40. [40]

    Dean, and Tony F

    Yilei Li, Yi Rao, Kin Fai Mak, Yumeng You, Shuyuan Wang, Cory R. Dean, and Tony F. Heinz. Probing sym- metry properties of few-layer mos2 and h-bn by optical second-harmonic generation.Nano Letters, 13(7):3329– 3333, 2013

    2013

  41. [41]

    Rah- man, and Zhiwen Liu

    Corey Janisch, Haomin Wang, Wonho Cho, Talat S. Rah- man, and Zhiwen Liu. Extraordinary second-harmonic generation in tungsten disulfide monolayers.Scientific Reports, 4:5530, 2014

    2014

  42. [42]

    Kaplan, Surjeet Rajendran, and Ronald L

    Reza Ebadi, David E. Kaplan, Surjeet Rajendran, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Galileo: Galactic axion laser in- terferometer leveraging electro-optics.Physical Review Letters, 132(10), March 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Semertzidis

    Hooman Davoudiasl and Yannis K. Semertzidis. Cosmic axions revealed via amplified modulation of the ellipticity of a laser.Physical Review D, 113(3), February 2026

    2026

  44. [44]

    Marchiori, L

    E. Marchiori, L. Ceccarelli, N. Rossi, G. Romagnoli, J. Herrmann, J.-C. Besse, S. Krinner, A. Wallraff, and M. Poggio. Magnetic imaging of superconducting qubit devices with scanning squid-on-tip.Applied Physics Let- ters, 121(5), August 2022

    2022

  45. [45]

    M. A. Beck, J. A. Isaacs, D. Booth, J. D. Pritchard, M. Saffman, and R. McDermott. Optimized coplanar waveguide resonators for a superconductor–atom inter- face.Applied Physics Letters, 109(9), August 2016

    2016

  46. [46]

    R. W. Klopfenstein. A transmission line taper of im- proved design.Proceedings of the IRE, 44(1):31–35, 1956

    1956

  47. [47]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. Gu- rudev Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin. Nanoscale magnetic sens- ing with an individual electronic spin in diamond.Nature, 455(7213):644–647, October 2008

    2008

  48. [48]

    J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Budker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin. High-sensitivity diamond magne- tometer with nanoscale resolution.Nature Physics, 4(10):810–816, 2008

    2008

  49. [49]

    Doherty, Neil B

    Marcus W. Doherty, Neil B. Manson, Paul Delaney, Fe- dor Jelezko, J¨ org Wrachtrup, and Lloyd C.L. Hollenberg. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond.Physics Reports, 528(1):1–45, 2013

    2013

  50. [50]

    Broadband characterization of congruent lithium nio- bate from mhz to optical frequencies.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(36):36LT01, August 2017

    Charlotte Cochard, Thiemo Spielmann, Naoufal Bahlawane, Alexei Halpin, and Torsten Granzow. Broadband characterization of congruent lithium nio- bate from mhz to optical frequencies.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(36):36LT01, August 2017

    2017

  51. [51]

    Driscoll, J.T

    M.M. Driscoll, J.T. Haynes, R.A. Jelen, R.W. Weinert, J.R. Gavaler, J. Talvacchio, G.R. Wagner, K.A. Zaki, and X.-P. Liang. Cooled, ultrahigh q, sapphire dielec- tric resonators for low-noise, microwave signal genera- tion.IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 39(3):405–411, May 1992

    1992

  52. [52]

    McAllister, Graeme Flower, Lucas E

    Ben T. McAllister, Graeme Flower, Lucas E. Tobar, and Michael E. Tobar. Tunable supermode dielectric res- onators for axion dark-matter haloscopes.Physical Re- view Applied, 9(1), January 2018

    2018

  53. [53]

    Kuznetsov, Andrey E

    Alexander I. Kuznetsov, Andrey E. Miroshnichenko, Mark L. Brongersma, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Boris Luk’yanchuk. Optically resonant dielectric nanostruc- tures.Science, 354(6314):aag2472, 2016

    2016

  54. [54]

    Baptiste Augui´ e and William L. Barnes. Collective reso- nances in gold nanoparticle arrays.Physical Review Let- ters, 101(14):143902, September 2008

    2008

  55. [55]

    Maier.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Appli- cations

    Stefan A. Maier.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Appli- cations. Springer, New York, 2007

    2007

  56. [56]

    Optical antennas driven by quantum tunneling.ACS Photonics, 2:1495– 1503, 2015

    Marco Parzefall and Lukas Novotny. Optical antennas driven by quantum tunneling.ACS Photonics, 2:1495– 1503, 2015

    2015

  57. [57]

    V. B. Svetovoy and G. Palasantzas. Optical rectifica- tion in metal-insulator-metal tunnel junctions.Physical Review Applied, 2:024005, 2014

    2014

  58. [58]

    Toward wafer-scale diamond nano- and quantum technologies.APL Materials, 7(1), January 2019

    Richard Nelz, Johannes G¨ orlitz, Dennis Herrmann, Ab- dallah Slablab, Michel Challier, Mariusz Radtke, Mar- tin Fischer, Stefan Gsell, Matthias Schreck, Christoph Becher, and Elke Neu. Toward wafer-scale diamond nano- and quantum technologies.APL Materials, 7(1), January 2019

    2019