Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00455 v1 pith:43MS5NDU submitted 2022-05-31 q-bio.QM cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGq-bio.GN

A robust and lightweight deep attention multiple instance learning algorithm for predicting genetic alterations

classification q-bio.QM cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGq-bio.GN
keywords amimlmodelsgenespredictingalgorithmsalterationsbeengenetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep-learning models based on whole-slide digital pathology images (WSIs) become increasingly popular for predicting molecular biomarkers. Instance-based models has been the mainstream strategy for predicting genetic alterations using WSIs although bag-based models along with self-attention mechanism-based algorithms have been proposed for other digital pathology applications. In this paper, we proposed a novel Attention-based Multiple Instance Mutation Learning (AMIML) model for predicting gene mutations. AMIML was comprised of successive 1-D convolutional layers, a decoder, and a residual weight connection to facilitate further integration of a lightweight attention mechanism to detect the most predictive image patches. Using data for 24 clinically relevant genes from four cancer cohorts in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) studies (UCEC, BRCA, GBM and KIRC), we compared AMIML with one popular instance-based model and four recently published bag-based models (e.g., CHOWDER, HE2RNA, etc.). AMIML demonstrated excellent robustness, not only outperforming all the five baseline algorithms in the vast majority of the tested genes (17 out of 24), but also providing near-best-performance for the other seven genes. Conversely, the performance of the baseline published algorithms varied across different cancers/genes. In addition, compared to the published models for genetic alterations, AMIML provided a significant improvement for predicting a wide range of genes (e.g., KMT2C, TP53, and SETD2 for KIRC; ERBB2, BRCA1, and BRCA2 for BRCA; JAK1, POLE, and MTOR for UCEC) as well as produced outstanding predictive models for other clinically relevant gene mutations, which have not been reported in the current literature. Furthermore, with the flexible and interpretable attention-based MIL pooling mechanism, AMIML could further zero-in and detect predictive image patches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.