Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.08064 v2 pith:NKE5QJP7 submitted 2022-11-15 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVcs.NAmath.NA

Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applications

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVcs.NAmath.NA
keywords learningmachinephysicalphysics-informedpriordataproblemsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances of data-driven machine learning have revolutionized fields like computer vision, reinforcement learning, and many scientific and engineering domains. In many real-world and scientific problems, systems that generate data are governed by physical laws. Recent work shows that it provides potential benefits for machine learning models by incorporating the physical prior and collected data, which makes the intersection of machine learning and physics become a prevailing paradigm. By integrating the data and mathematical physics models seamlessly, it can guide the machine learning model towards solutions that are physically plausible, improving accuracy and efficiency even in uncertain and high-dimensional contexts. In this survey, we present this learning paradigm called Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) which is to build a model that leverages empirical data and available physical prior knowledge to improve performance on a set of tasks that involve a physical mechanism. We systematically review the recent development of physics-informed machine learning from three perspectives of machine learning tasks, representation of physical prior, and methods for incorporating physical prior. We also propose several important open research problems based on the current trends in the field. We argue that encoding different forms of physical prior into model architectures, optimizers, inference algorithms, and significant domain-specific applications like inverse engineering design and robotic control is far from being fully explored in the field of physics-informed machine learning. We believe that the interdisciplinary research of physics-informed machine learning will significantly propel research progress, foster the creation of more effective machine learning models, and also offer invaluable assistance in addressing long-standing problems in related disciplines.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OrthoReg: Orthogonal Regularization for Hybrid Symbolic-Neural Dynamical Systems

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OrthoReg applies orthogonal regularization to enforce complementary decomposition in hybrid symbolic-neural dynamical models, improving symbolic recovery and out-of-distribution performance on benchmarks with partial ...

  2. A Hybrid GNN-FEM Framework for Phase-Field Fracture Simulation. Physics-Preserving Hybridization for Generalizable Surrogate Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Hybrid GNN-FEM surrogate replaces only the phase-field update step in a staggered incremental scheme for phase-field fracture, using dimensionless mesh features and physics-informed loss to generalize across geometrie...

  3. LLM-driven design of physics-constrained constitutive models: two agents are better than one

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Creator-Inspector multi-agent LLM pipeline for constitutive artificial neural networks increases the rate of models satisfying all nine physical constraints to 100% or 56% depending on the LLM backbone.

  4. A Physics-Informed Fourier-Wavelet Transformer for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics Surrogate Modeling

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A physics-informed Fourier-wavelet transformer model reports the lowest normalized mean-squared error on cylinder-wake and fluid-structure interaction velocity-field benchmarks compared with spectral, transformer, ope...

  5. AOT-POT: Adaptive Operator Transformation for Large-Scale PDE Pre-training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AOT-POT adaptively reshapes complex PDE solution operators via input-dependent transformations and parallel stream mixing to enable effective large-scale pre-training, yielding SOTA results on 12 benchmarks with minim...

  6. Exploring the Potential of Probabilistic Transformer for Time Series Modeling: A Report on the ST-PT Framework

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ST-PT turns transformers into explicit factor graphs for time series, enabling structural injection of symbolic priors, per-sample conditional generation, and principled latent autoregressive forecasting via MFVI iterations.

  7. Mapping-based Hard-constrained Physics-Informed Neural Networks for unbounded wave problems

    math.NA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MH-PINN compactifies unbounded domains with mapping and enforces wave boundary conditions through network architecture for efficient, accurate simulations.

  8. Accelerating 4D Hyperspectral Imaging through Physics-Informed Neural Representation and Adaptive Sampling

    eess.IV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A physics-informed MLP reconstructs high-fidelity 4D spectra from only 1/32 of the samples in experimental 2DIR hyperspectral imaging.

  9. Graph-based Summary Statistics for Revealing the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in Pulsar Timing Arrays

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Graph-based summary statistics on pulsar timing residuals detect SGWB down to strain amplitude 1.2e-15 and yield 2.3 sigma evidence in NANOGrav 15-year data via clustering coefficient and edge weight measures.

  10. Bayesian Reasoning for Physics Informed Neural Networks

    physics.comp-ph 2023-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces Laplace-approximated Bayesian PINNs for automatic loss-weight optimization when solving PDEs such as heat, wave, and Burgers equations.

  11. PINNsur: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for PDEs on Curved Surfaces

    cs.GR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    PINNSur applies PINNs to surface PDEs by neural approximation of normals and operator projection, with an added empirical test for convergence behavior.

  12. A Scoping Review of Physics Informed Machine Learning for Wave Propagation Modeling in Seismology

    physics.comp-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    A scoping review of physics-informed machine learning for seismic wave propagation finds applications in forward and inverse problems with often comparable accuracy at lower cost, while identifying gaps in benchmarkin...