Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.06624 v2 pith:JDUQSVIZ submitted 2021-03-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CRstat.ML

Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verification

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CRstat.ML
keywords crownverificationbetaincompleteboundefficientpropagationverifiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bound propagation based incomplete neural network verifiers such as CROWN are very efficient and can significantly accelerate branch-and-bound (BaB) based complete verification of neural networks. However, bound propagation cannot fully handle the neuron split constraints introduced by BaB commonly handled by expensive linear programming (LP) solvers, leading to loose bounds and hurting verification efficiency. In this work, we develop $\beta$-CROWN, a new bound propagation based method that can fully encode neuron splits via optimizable parameters $\beta$ constructed from either primal or dual space. When jointly optimized in intermediate layers, $\beta$-CROWN generally produces better bounds than typical LP verifiers with neuron split constraints, while being as efficient and parallelizable as CROWN on GPUs. Applied to complete robustness verification benchmarks, $\beta$-CROWN with BaB is up to three orders of magnitude faster than LP-based BaB methods, and is notably faster than all existing approaches while producing lower timeout rates. By terminating BaB early, our method can also be used for efficient incomplete verification. We consistently achieve higher verified accuracy in many settings compared to powerful incomplete verifiers, including those based on convex barrier breaking techniques. Compared to the typically tightest but very costly semidefinite programming (SDP) based incomplete verifiers, we obtain higher verified accuracy with three orders of magnitudes less verification time. Our algorithm empowered the $\alpha,\!\beta$-CROWN (alpha-beta-CROWN) verifier, the winning tool in VNN-COMP 2021. Our code is available at http://PaperCode.cc/BetaCROWN

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantitative Linear Logic for Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Verification

    cs.LO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    QLL is a novel logic for neuro-symbolic learning that uses ML-native operations (sum, log-sum-exp) on logits to embed constraints, satisfying most linear logic properties and showing stronger correlation between empir...

  2. Scaling Neural Network Verification with Tensor Parallelism and Fully Sharded Data Parallelism

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Adapts TP and FSDP to bound-propagation verification, with FSDP delivering bitwise-identical bounds and 80-90% baseline memory reduction while TP trades some tightness for ~2x peak-memory savings.

  3. Quantitative Linear Logic for Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Verification

    cs.LO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quantitative Linear Logic interprets logical connectives via natural ML operations on logits to embed constraints in neural training while satisfying most linear logic laws and correlating performance with independent...

  4. Adversarial Robustness of Time-Series Classification for Crystal Collimator Alignment

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A CNN for LHC beam-loss time-series classification gains up to 18.6% higher robust accuracy via a differentiable preprocessing wrapper and adversarial fine-tuning, with extension to sequence-level temporal robustness.