Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reduction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.03041 v3 pith:IVHZQLW7 submitted 2020-06-04 cs.LG eess.SPmath.OCmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reduction

classification cs.LG eess.SPmath.OCmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords mathcalgammasampletrajectoryasynchronouscomplexityfactorfrac
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Asynchronous Q-learning aims to learn the optimal action-value function (or Q-function) of a Markov decision process (MDP), based on a single trajectory of Markovian samples induced by a behavior policy. Focusing on a $\gamma$-discounted MDP with state space $\mathcal{S}$ and action space $\mathcal{A}$, we demonstrate that the $\ell_{\infty}$-based sample complexity of classical asynchronous Q-learning --- namely, the number of samples needed to yield an entrywise $\varepsilon$-accurate estimate of the Q-function --- is at most on the order of $\frac{1}{\mu_{\min}(1-\gamma)^5\varepsilon^2}+ \frac{t_{mix}}{\mu_{\min}(1-\gamma)}$ up to some logarithmic factor, provided that a proper constant learning rate is adopted. Here, $t_{mix}$ and $\mu_{\min}$ denote respectively the mixing time and the minimum state-action occupancy probability of the sample trajectory. The first term of this bound matches the sample complexity in the synchronous case with independent samples drawn from the stationary distribution of the trajectory. The second term reflects the cost taken for the empirical distribution of the Markovian trajectory to reach a steady state, which is incurred at the very beginning and becomes amortized as the algorithm runs. Encouragingly, the above bound improves upon the state-of-the-art result \cite{qu2020finite} by a factor of at least $|\mathcal{S}||\mathcal{A}|$ for all scenarios, and by a factor of at least $t_{mix}|\mathcal{S}||\mathcal{A}|$ for any sufficiently small accuracy level $\varepsilon$. Further, we demonstrate that the scaling on the effective horizon $\frac{1}{1-\gamma}$ can be improved by means of variance reduction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finite-Time Analysis of Q-Value Iteration for General-Sum Stackelberg Games

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Provides the first finite-time convergence guarantees for Q-value iteration in general-sum Stackelberg Markov games.

  2. Toward a Unified Lyapunov-Certified ODE Convergence Analysis of Smooth Q-Learning with p-Norms

    cs.LG 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Unified ODE convergence analysis for smooth Q-learning variants via p-norm Lyapunov functions, valid even when the Bellman operator is not a contraction.