REVIEW 4 cited by
MedDialog: Two Large-scale Medical Dialogue Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MedDialog: Two Large-scale Medical Dialogue Datasets
read the original abstract
Medical dialogue systems are promising in assisting in telemedicine to increase access to healthcare services, improve the quality of patient care, and reduce medical costs. To facilitate the research and development of medical dialogue systems, we build two large-scale medical dialogue datasets: MedDialog-EN and MedDialog-CN. MedDialog-EN is an English dataset containing 0.3 million conversations between patients and doctors and 0.5 million utterances. MedDialog-CN is an Chinese dataset containing 1.1 million conversations and 4 million utterances. To our best knowledge, MedDialog-(EN,CN) are the largest medical dialogue datasets to date. The dataset is available at https://github.com/UCSD-AI4H/Medical-Dialogue-System
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
ProMedical: Hierarchical Fine-Grained Criteria Modeling for Medical LLM Alignment via Explicit Injection
ProMedical builds a 50k preference dataset with fine-grained rubrics and a multi-dimensional reward model that disentangles safety from proficiency, yielding 22.3% accuracy and 21.7% safety gains on Qwen3-8B via GRPO ...
-
Real-World Doctor Agent with Proactive Consultation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
DoctorAgent-RL trains a Qwen2.5-7B doctor agent via multi-agent RL on the new MTMedDialog dataset to conduct dynamic, question-driven consultations, reaching 70% exact diagnostic match in real-patient trials.
-
Active Evidence-Seeking and Diagnostic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support
Multi-turn evidence seeking reduces LLM diagnostic accuracy by 12.75% and supporting-evidence quality by 24.36% versus full-context evaluation in a new OSCE-inspired benchmark across 468 cases and 15 models.
-
CLIN-LLM: A Safety-Constrained Hybrid Framework for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Generation
CLIN-LLM combines uncertainty-calibrated BioBERT classification with retrieval-augmented FLAN-T5 generation and safety post-processing to reach 98% accuracy on clinical cases while cutting unsafe antibiotic suggestion...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.