REVIEW 5 cited by
ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoning
read the original abstract
Recent powerful pre-trained language models have achieved remarkable performance on most of the popular datasets for reading comprehension. It is time to introduce more challenging datasets to push the development of this field towards more comprehensive reasoning of text. In this paper, we introduce a new Reading Comprehension dataset requiring logical reasoning (ReClor) extracted from standardized graduate admission examinations. As earlier studies suggest, human-annotated datasets usually contain biases, which are often exploited by models to achieve high accuracy without truly understanding the text. In order to comprehensively evaluate the logical reasoning ability of models on ReClor, we propose to identify biased data points and separate them into EASY set while the rest as HARD set. Empirical results show that state-of-the-art models have an outstanding ability to capture biases contained in the dataset with high accuracy on EASY set. However, they struggle on HARD set with poor performance near that of random guess, indicating more research is needed to essentially enhance the logical reasoning ability of current models.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
LGMT: Logic-Grounded Metamorphic Testing for Evaluating the Reasoning Reliability of LLMs
LGMT applies metamorphic testing derived from first-order logic equivalences to detect reasoning inconsistencies in LLMs that static benchmarks miss.
-
LGMT: Logic-Grounded Metamorphic Testing for Evaluating the Reasoning Reliability of LLMs
LGMT is a logic-grounded metamorphic testing framework that detects hidden reasoning defects in LLMs by checking consistency on semantically invariant inputs derived from FOL equivalences.
-
The Persuasion Paradox: When LLM Explanations Fail to Improve Human-AI Team Performance
LLM explanations create a persuasion paradox by increasing confidence without accuracy gains in visual tasks while aiding logical tasks, with uncertainty displays and selective automation outperforming explanations in...
-
Measuring AI Reasoning: A Guide for Researchers
Reasoning in language models should be measured by the faithfulness and validity of their multi-step search processes and intermediate traces, not final-answer accuracy.
-
The nextAI Solution to the NeurIPS 2023 LLM Efficiency Challenge
A competition entry achieved efficient fine-tuning of LLaMa2 70B on one GPU in 24 hours with competitive QA benchmark performance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.