pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31394 · v2 · pith:4RC2DUUNnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CV· q-bio.QM

Resolving superposition in AI for interpretability and cross-modal alignment in patient-neuronal images

Jisung Park , Seohyeon Kang , Daeun Yoo , Eunsu Lee , Seoin Cho , Wooyeop Choi , Ian Choi , James R. Evan
show 3 more authors
Daesoo Kim Sonia Gandhi Minee L. Choi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 22:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVq-bio.QM
keywords superpositionsparse autoencodersneuron imagesParkinson's diseasecross-modal alignmentsingle-cell analysisGromov-Wassersteinlatent space geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sparse autoencoders resolve superposition to recover geometric fidelity in neuron image representations, enabling adaptation of single-cell RNA methods and de novo cross-modal alignment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that superposition in neural networks not only hinders interpretability but also corrupts the geometry of latent spaces when processing high-dimensional biological image data. By applying sparse autoencoders to over 100,000 multiplexed images of Parkinson's and healthy neurons, the authors show both theoretically and empirically that these models recover the fidelity of representational metric spaces. Treating the resulting purified representations as single-cell state vectors permits direct adaptation of scRNA-seq analysis techniques to the image domain. They further introduce GW-map, based on Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport, to align these image representations with actual scRNA-seq data without needing spatial transcriptomics references. This establishes a method to reconstruct hierarchical neuronal pathology pathways such as the Calcium-AIS scaffold.

Core claim

We theoretically and empirically demonstrate that superposition contaminates representational metric spaces, and thereby SAEs successfully recover geometric fidelity. By treating these geometrically purified representations as single-cell state vectors, we adapted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis methodologies directly to the image domain. Finally, we introduce GW-map, utilizing Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport to align these image representations with authentic scRNA-seq data de novo. This coupling reconstructs hierarchical neuronal pathology pathways such as Calcium-AIS scaffold, without reference spatial transcriptomics.

What carries the argument

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) that resolve superposition to purify geometric representations in latent spaces, combined with Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport (GW-map) for cross-modal alignment between image-derived state vectors and scRNA-seq profiles.

If this is right

  • SAEs recover geometric fidelity in representational metric spaces contaminated by superposition.
  • Geometrically purified image representations can be treated as single-cell state vectors.
  • scRNA-seq data analysis methodologies can be adapted directly to the image domain.
  • GW-map enables de novo alignment of image representations with authentic scRNA-seq data.
  • Hierarchical neuronal pathology pathways such as Calcium-AIS scaffold can be reconstructed without reference spatial transcriptomics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could extend to other high-dimensional biological imaging datasets by using SAEs to enable similar cross-modal alignments.
  • Success would reduce dependence on spatial transcriptomics for pathway discovery in spatial biology.
  • Focusing on geometric fidelity rather than feature attribution may offer a general route to interpretability in other superposition-heavy AI applications.
  • Testing the approach on larger cohorts or different neurological conditions would check whether the single-cell vector analogy holds broadly.

Load-bearing premise

The multiplexed patient-derived neuron images contain sufficient information to treat the SAE-derived representations as directly comparable single-cell state vectors to scRNA-seq profiles.

What would settle it

If applying scRNA-seq analysis methods to the SAE-purified image representations fails to produce biologically meaningful clusters or if the GW-map alignment does not reconstruct the Calcium-AIS scaffold pathway consistent with independent validations, the claims would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31394 by Daesoo Kim, Daeun Yoo, Eunsu Lee, Ian Choi, James R. Evan, Jisung Park, Minee L. Choi, Seohyeon Kang, Seoin Cho, Sonia Gandhi, Wooyeop Choi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) MoCo-based contrastive representation learning framework. (b) Integration of the SAE to CNN. SAE GAP latent vectors were used for pseudo-transcriptomic analysis and multimodal integration. (c) Left: Comparison between entangled CNN attention and disentangled attention of the SAE. Right: SAE more faithfully reflects the data topological relationships. (d) Single-cell methods were applied to SAE represen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a, b) Linear classification performance and confusion matrix of CNN. (c) CKA rep￾resentational similarity between independent models showing robust convergence. (d–e) Ridge regression prediction of cell death rates and effective rank analysis using the final three CNN layer representations. (f–h) UMAP projection of CNN fstage5_out. Panels (f–g) are color-coded by class, showing mutation classes in (g–h), … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The eRank consistently increases from the baseline CNN ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Visual disentanglement of superposed concepts in SAE. Representative original images and bilinear-interpolated attention maps. The SAE reconstruction loss was spatially weighted by the L2 norm of point-wise feature vectors vij ∈ RC to preserve the original CNN spatial activation magnitudes indicative of local token importance.(b). Quantification of mutation-specific feature maps across three pairs of h… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Empirical validation of geometric contamination and its recovery. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Adaptation of single-cell manifold algorithms to SAE representations. All panels display [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cross-modal alignment via GW-map. (a) Label transfer accuracy of unconstrained GW coupling. One-to-one accuracy measures exact maximum-probability matches; barycentric accuracy evaluates probability-weighted matches. (b) Predictive performance (R2 ) of XGBoost and MLP predicting scVI latent dimensions, standard log-transformed genes expressions, and scVI-denoised expressions directly from image representat… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Effect of L2 normalization on feature vectors derivend from CNN which feature vectors were L2 normalized during training. showing It shows sensitivity to image cell-density variation, as quantified R2 for cell death rate prediction using Ridge regression and XGBoost. (b) Effect of L2 normalization on feature vectors derivend from CNN which feature vectors were not L2 normalized during training. SNCA ×3… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: CKA analysis comparing models trained with and without L2 normalization on feature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a). Expression heatmap showing Z-scores (standard log-transformed and denoised) for SNCA×3 and Control intra-class coupling across the top and bottom 25 genes, which were selected based on SNCA × 3 intra-class coupling Z-scores of standard log-normalized HVGs (computed against permutation-based null distributions). (b). Sankey diagram tracking the hierarchical emer￾gence of functional gene modules among … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Illustration of data acquisition. Cortical neurons derived from Parkinson’s disease patients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Overview of the GW-map implementation pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Distribution of geodesic distance between control medoid and mutation Left column shows control samples, while the right column shows mutation saples (A) GBA, (B) SNCAX3, and (C) LRRK2 lines of geodesic distance (pseudotime) from control medoid. 36 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Robustness of DPT to Root Cell Selection To evaluate the stability of our pseudotime estimates, we performed a root permutation analysis by shifting the starting point within the vicinity of the control centroid (n = 10 iterations). For each iteration, the relationship between the distance from the control medoid and the cell death rate within each mutation population was quantified using Spearman’s rank … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Expression patterns of cluster-specific marker genes Dot plot visualizing the expression of the top 10 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for each cell cluster. The size of each dot represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene, and the color intensity indicates the average expression level (scaled) within the cluster 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Statistical summary of top 10 DEGs (Continued on next page) 39 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Statistical summary of top 10 DEGs per cell cluster List of the top 10 most significant differentially expressed genes for each identified cluster. Statistics include gene symbols, average log2 fold-change, and adjusted p-values calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. 40 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Visual illustration of SAE feature map. 42 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Visual illustration of SAE feature map. 43 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Visual illustration of SAE feature map. 44 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Visual illustration of SAE feature map. 45 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Visual illustration of SAE feature map. 46 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_21.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence is transforming our capability to solve biological challenges. In dimensionality bottleneck regimes exacerbated by high-dimensional biological data, neural networks force distinct concepts into the lower dimensions known as superposition. Although this superposition is widely known to hinder interpretability, its impact on corrupting the geometry of latent spaces remains critically overlooked. Here, we utilized sparse autoencoders (SAEs) trained on over 100,000 multiplexed images of patient-derived Parkinson's disease and healthy neurons to resolve superposition. This approach bypasses the mathematical non-uniqueness of feature attribution by shifting to interpretable latent representation analysis. We theoretically and empirically demonstrate that superposition contaminates representational metric spaces, and thereby SAEs successfully recover geometric fidelity. By treating these geometrically purified representations as single-cell state vectors, we adapted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis methodologies directly to the image domain. Finally, we introduce GW-map, utilizing Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport to align these image representations with authentic scRNA-seq data de novo. This coupling reconstructs hierarchical neuronal pathology pathways such as Calcium-AIS scaffold, without reference spatial transcriptomics, establishing a scalable foundation for spatial biology. Code is available at https://github.com/jijihihi/Bio\_superposition

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that superposition in neural network representations contaminates metric spaces in high-dimensional biological data, and that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) trained on over 100,000 multiplexed images of patient-derived Parkinson's disease and healthy neurons can resolve this to recover geometric fidelity. It adapts scRNA-seq analysis methodologies to the image domain by treating the purified SAE latents as single-cell state vectors, and introduces GW-map using Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport to align these image representations with scRNA-seq data de novo, thereby reconstructing hierarchical neuronal pathology pathways such as the Calcium-AIS scaffold without reference spatial transcriptomics. Code is made available.

Significance. If the claims regarding geometric fidelity recovery and valid cross-modal transfer are substantiated, the work could offer a scalable approach for integrating imaging and transcriptomic data in spatial biology and neuroscience. The code availability supports reproducibility. However, the abstract supplies no equations, dataset details, error bars, or validation metrics, so the significance cannot be fully assessed from the provided information.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the theoretical demonstration that superposition contaminates representational metric spaces is asserted without any equations, derivations, or formal arguments, which is load-bearing for the central claim of contamination and recovery.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the empirical demonstration of contamination and recovery by SAEs supplies no dataset details, exclusion criteria, error bars, or quantitative metrics, preventing verification of the geometric fidelity recovery that underpins the subsequent scRNA-seq adaptation and GW-map alignment.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the adaptation of scRNA-seq tools (trajectory inference, differential expression analogs) to SAE-derived image latents and the de novo GW alignment assumes these latents encode state information with statistical properties analogous to transcriptomic profiles, but no matched perturbation experiments, orthogonal validation against known PD markers, or controls falsifying the analogy are described.
minor comments (1)
  1. The GitHub URL contains an escaped underscore (Bio\_superposition) that may hinder direct access.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide point-by-point responses below. Where appropriate, we have revised the abstract to address the concerns about missing details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the theoretical demonstration that superposition contaminates representational metric spaces is asserted without any equations, derivations, or formal arguments, which is load-bearing for the central claim of contamination and recovery.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract does not include the equations. The full paper includes a theoretical analysis in the Methods and Results sections with formal arguments and derivations showing how superposition leads to metric space contamination. We will update the abstract to briefly summarize the key theoretical insight and reference the relevant section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the empirical demonstration of contamination and recovery by SAEs supplies no dataset details, exclusion criteria, error bars, or quantitative metrics, preventing verification of the geometric fidelity recovery that underpins the subsequent scRNA-seq adaptation and GW-map alignment.

    Authors: The abstract is space-constrained, but the manuscript provides extensive details on the dataset (>100,000 images), exclusion criteria in the Methods, and quantitative metrics with error bars in the Results (e.g., fidelity recovery metrics in Figure 2). We will add key quantitative highlights and dataset summary to the abstract in the revision. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the adaptation of scRNA-seq tools (trajectory inference, differential expression analogs) to SAE-derived image latents and the de novo GW alignment assumes these latents encode state information with statistical properties analogous to transcriptomic profiles, but no matched perturbation experiments, orthogonal validation against known PD markers, or controls falsifying the analogy are described.

    Authors: The paper validates the approach by reconstructing known pathology pathways like the Calcium-AIS scaffold, which serves as orthogonal validation against PD markers from literature. While matched perturbation experiments are not included in this study (as it uses existing patient data), we will expand the discussion to address the assumptions and include controls where possible in the revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on standard SAE properties and external OT methods without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper asserts a theoretical demonstration that superposition contaminates metric spaces and that SAEs recover fidelity, then adapts scRNA-seq tools and applies Gromov-Wasserstein alignment to image latents. No equations or steps in the visible text reduce a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The cross-modal analogy is asserted rather than derived from prior self-work, and no renaming of known results or ansatz smuggling appears. The chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as standard SAE literature and OT algorithms.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full methods, equations, and training details unavailable so ledger entries are limited to what is stated or implied.

free parameters (1)
  • SAE sparsity level
    Typical free parameter for sparse autoencoders; value and selection method not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Gromov-Wasserstein distance satisfies the properties of an optimal transport metric between metric spaces
    Invoked for the GW-map alignment step.
invented entities (1)
  • GW-map no independent evidence
    purpose: Method to align image-derived representations with scRNA-seq data using Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport
    New procedure introduced in the paper; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5802 in / 1315 out tokens · 24776 ms · 2026-07-03T22:09:28.770731+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization

    Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 618–626, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

    Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Explainable AI in healthcare: a systematic review of XAI use cases in imaging, diagnostics, and rehabilitation.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, April 2026

    Apoorva Aravindkumar, Marimuthu Ramadoss, Saqhibuddeen Ahmed Fakhruddin Ahmed, Vidhya Sampath, and Kishor Lakshminarayanan. Explainable AI in healthcare: a systematic review of XAI use cases in imaging, diagnostics, and rehabilitation.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, April 2026. ISSN 2624-8212. doi: 10.3389/frai.2026.1749527. URL

    work page doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1749527 2026

  4. [4]

    XAI meets Biology: A Comprehensive Review of Explainable AI in Bioinformatics Applications, December 2023

    Zhongliang Zhou, Mengxuan Hu, Mariah Salcedo, Nathan Gravel, Wayland Yeung, Aarya Venkat, Dongliang Guo, Jielu Zhang, Natarajan Kannan, and Sheng Li. XAI meets Biology: A Comprehensive Review of Explainable AI in Bioinformatics Applications, December 2023. URL . arXiv:2312.06082 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    The Many Shapley Values for Model Explanation

    Mukund Sundararajan and Amir Najmi. The Many Shapley Values for Model Explanation. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9269–9278. PMLR, November 2020. URL

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainability

    Christopher Frye, Colin Rowat, and Ilya Feige. Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainability. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1229–1239. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Fairwashing explanations with off-manifold detergent

    Christopher Anders, Plamen Pasliev, Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel. Fairwashing explanations with off-manifold detergent. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 314–323. PMLR, November 2020. URL

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner’s Perspective

    Satyapriya Krishna, Tessa Han, Alex Gu, Steven Wu, Shahin Jabbari, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner’s Perspective. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024. ISSN 2835-8856. URL

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Impossibility theorems for feature attribution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(2):e2304406120, January 2024

    Blair Bilodeau, Natasha Jaques, Pang Wei Koh, and Been Kim. Impossibility theorems for feature attribution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(2):e2304406120, January 2024. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2304406120. URL . 11

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2304406120 2024

  10. [10]

    On the failings of Shapley values for explainability

    Xuanxiang Huang and Joao Marques-Silva. On the failings of Shapley values for explainability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 171:109112, August 2024. ISSN 0888-613X. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2023.109112. URL

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2023.109112 2024

  11. [11]

    A Mathematical Framework for Transformer Circuits.Trans- former Circuits Thread, 2021

    Nelson Elhage, Neel Nanda, Catherine Olsson, Tom Henighan, Nicholas Joseph, Ben Mann, Amanda Askell, and Yuntao Bai. A Mathematical Framework for Transformer Circuits.Trans- former Circuits Thread, 2021. URL

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Toy Models of Superposition.Transformer Circuits Thread, 2022

    Nelson Elhage, Tristan Hume, Catherine Olsson, Nicholas Schiefer, Tom Henighan, and Shauna Kravec. Toy Models of Superposition.Transformer Circuits Thread, 2022. URL

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Towards Monosemanticity: Decomposing Language Models With Dictionary Learning.Transformer Circuits Thread, 2023

    Trenton Bricken, Adly Templeton, Joshua Batson, Brian Chen, Adam Jermyn, Tom Conerly, and Nicholas L Turner. Towards Monosemanticity: Decomposing Language Models With Dictionary Learning.Transformer Circuits Thread, 2023. URL

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet

    Adly Templeton, Tom Conerly, Jonathan Marcus, Jack Lindsey, Trenton Bricken, and Brian Chen. Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet. Transformer Circuits Thread, 2024. URL

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition

    Chaofan Chen, Oscar Li, Daniel Tao, Alina Barnett, Cynthia Rudin, and Jonathan K Su. This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019. URL

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Concept Bottleneck Models

    Pang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann, Emma Pierson, Been Kim, and Percy Liang. Concept Bottleneck Models. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5338–5348. PMLR, November 2020. URL

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCA V)

    Been Kim, Martin Wattenberg, Justin Gilmer, Carrie Cai, James Wexler, Fernanda Viegas, and Rory Sayres. Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCA V). InProceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2668–2677. PMLR, July 2018. URL

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Bridging the Black Box: A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability in AI.ACM Comput

    Shriyank Somvanshi, Md Monzurul Islam, Amir Rafe, Anannya Ghosh Tusti, Arka Chakraborty, Anika Baitullah, Tausif Islam Chowdhury, Nawaf Alnawmasi, Anandi Dutta, and Subasish Das. Bridging the Black Box: A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability in AI.ACM Comput. Surv., 58(8):210:1–210:35, February 2026. ISSN 0360-0300. doi: 10.1145/3787104. URL

    work page doi:10.1145/3787104 2026

  19. [19]

    Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignment

    André Longon, David Klindt, and Meenakshi Khosla. Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignment. InProceedings of UniReps: the Third Edition of the Workshop on Unifying Representations in Neural Models, pages 342–359. PMLR, February

    work page

  20. [20]

    The linear representation hypothesis and the geometry of large language models

    Kiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, and Victor Veitch. The linear representation hypothesis and the geometry of large language models. InProceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 235 ofICML’24, pages 39643–39666, Vienna, Austria, July 2024. JMLR.org

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Statistics or biology: the zero-inflation controversy about scRNA-seq data.Genome Biology, 23(1):31, January 2022

    Ruochen Jiang, Tianyi Sun, Dongyuan Song, and Jingyi Jessica Li. Statistics or biology: the zero-inflation controversy about scRNA-seq data.Genome Biology, 23(1):31, January 2022. ISSN 1474-760X. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02601-5. URL

    work page doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02601-5 2022

  22. [22]

    Binghao Chai, Christoforos Efstathiou, Haoran Yue, and Viji M. Draviam. Opportunities and challenges for deep learning in cell dynamics research.Trends in Cell Biology, 34(11):955–967, November 2024. ISSN 0962-8924, 1879-3088. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.10.010. URL

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2023.10.010 2024

  23. [23]

    Caicedo, Claire McQuin, Allen Goodman, Shantanu Singh, and Anne E

    Juan C. Caicedo, Claire McQuin, Allen Goodman, Shantanu Singh, and Anne E. Carpenter. Weakly Supervised Learning of Single-Cell Feature Embeddings.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018:9309–9318, June 2018. ISSN 1063-6919. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00970

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00970 2018

  24. [24]

    Now Publishers, February 2019

    Gabriel Peyré and Marco Cuturi.Computational Optimal Transport: With Applications to Data Science, volume 11. Now Publishers, February 2019. doi: 10.1561/2200000073. URL

    work page doi:10.1561/2200000073 2019

  25. [25]

    Gromov–Wasserstein Distances and the Metric Approach to Object Matching

    Facundo Mémoli. Gromov–Wasserstein Distances and the Metric Approach to Object Matching. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 11(4):417–487, August 2011. ISSN 1615-3375, 1615-3383. doi: 10.1007/s10208-011-9093-5. URL

    work page doi:10.1007/s10208-011-9093-5 2011

  26. [26]

    SCOT: Single-Cell Multi-Omics Alignment with Optimal Transport.Journal of Com- putational Biology: A Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology, 29(1):3–18, January

    Pinar Demetci, Rebecca Santorella, Björn Sandstede, William Stafford Noble, and Ritambhara Singh. SCOT: Single-Cell Multi-Omics Alignment with Optimal Transport.Journal of Com- putational Biology: A Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology, 29(1):3–18, January

    work page

  27. [27]

    doi: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0446

    ISSN 1557-8666. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0446. 12

    work page doi:10.1089/cmb.2021.0446 2021

  28. [28]

    Boyi Guo, Wodan Ling, Sang Ho Kwon, Pratibha Panwar, Shila Ghazanfar, Keri Mar- tinowich, and Stephanie C. Hicks. Integrating Spatially-Resolved Transcriptomics Data Across Tissues and Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities.Small Methods, 9(5): 2401194, 2025. ISSN 2366-9608. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401194. URL . _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/do...

    work page doi:10.1002/smtd.202401194 2025

  29. [29]

    A comprehensive review of spatial tran- scriptomics data alignment and integration.Nucleic Acids Research, 53(12):gkaf536, June 2025

    Muiz Khan, Suzan Arslanturk, and Sorin Draghici. A comprehensive review of spatial tran- scriptomics data alignment and integration.Nucleic Acids Research, 53(12):gkaf536, June 2025. ISSN 1362-4962. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf536

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf536 2025

  30. [30]

    Evans, Gurvir S

    Karishma D’Sa, James R. Evans, Gurvir S. Virdi, Giulia Vecchi, Alexander Adam, Ottavia Bertolli, James Fleming, Hojong Chang, Craig Leighton, Mathew H. Horrocks, Dilan Athauda, Minee L. Choi, and Sonia Gandhi. Prediction of mechanistic subtypes of Parkinson’s using patient-derived stem cell models.Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(8):933–946, August 2023. IS...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00702-9 2023

  31. [31]

    Lecun, L

    Y . Lecun, L. Bottou, Y . Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition.Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, January 1998. ISSN 1558-2256. doi: 10.1109/5.726791. URL

    work page doi:10.1109/5.726791 1998

  32. [32]

    emnlp-main.466/

    Chris Olah, Nick Cammarata, Ludwig Schubert, Gabriel Goh, Michael Petrov, and Shan Carter. Zoom In: An Introduction to Circuits.Distill, 5(3):10.23915/distill.00024.001, March 2020. ISSN 2476-0757. doi: 10.23915/distill.00024.001. URL

    work page doi:10.23915/distill.00024.001 2020

  33. [33]

    Metamorphictestingoflarge languagemodelsfornaturallanguageprocessing.doi:10.48550/arXiv

    Tom Burgert, Oliver Stoll, Paolo Rota, and Begüm Demir. ImageNet-trained CNNs are not biased towards texture: Revisiting feature reliance through controlled suppression. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 38, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV .2509.20234. URL . Version Number: 5

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNet

    Wieland Brendel and Matthias Bethge. Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNet. InInternational Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, New Orleans, 2019. URL

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. In9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, V...

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 12116–12128

    Maithra Raghu, Thomas Unterthiner, Simon Kornblith, Chiyuan Zhang, and Alexey Dosovitskiy. Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 12116–12128. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021. URL

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Supervised Contrastive Learning

    Prannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna, Yonglong Tian, Phillip Isola, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu, and Dilip Krishnan. Supervised Contrastive Learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 18661–18673. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning

    Kaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie, and Ross Girshick. Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9729–9738, 2020. doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600. 2020.00975. URL

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr42600 2020

  39. [39]

    Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:775–818, December 2024

    Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Tom Lieberum, Vikrant Varma, János Kramár, Rohin Shah, and Neel Nanda. Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:775–818, December 2024. doi: 10.52202/079017-0024. URL

    work page doi:10.52202/079017-0024 2024

  40. [40]

    Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching.Nature Methods, 13(10):845– 848, October 2016

    Laleh Haghverdi, Maren Büttner, F Alexander Wolf, Florian Buettner, and Fabian J Theis. Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching.Nature Methods, 13(10):845– 848, October 2016. ISSN 1548-7091, 1548-7105. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3971. URL

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.3971 2016

  41. [41]

    Moon, David van Dijk, Zheng Wang, Scott Gigante, Daniel B

    Kevin R. Moon, David van Dijk, Zheng Wang, Scott Gigante, Daniel B. Burkhardt, William S. Chen, Kristina Yim, Antonia van den Elzen, Matthew J. Hirn, Ronald R. Coifman, Natalia B. Ivanova, Guy Wolf, and Smita Krishnaswamy. Visualizing structure and transitions in high- dimensional biological data.Nature Biotechnology, 37(12):1482–1492, December 2019. ISSN...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0336-3 2019

  42. [42]

    Alexander Wolf, Fiona K

    F. Alexander Wolf, Fiona K. Hamey, Mireya Plass, Jordi Solana, Joakim S. Dahlin, Berthold Göttgens, Nikolaus Rajewsky, Lukas Simon, and Fabian J. Theis. PAGA: graph abstraction reconciles clustering with trajectory inference through a topology preserving map of single cells. Genome Biology, 20(1):59, March 2019. ISSN 1474-760X. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1663-x. URL

    work page doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1663-x 2019

  43. [43]

    Ikezu, Justin O’Leary, Manikandan Selvaraj, Yiyang Zhu, Yuka A

    Yunjung Jin, Fuyao Li, Zonghua Li, Tadafumi C. Ikezu, Justin O’Leary, Manikandan Selvaraj, Yiyang Zhu, Yuka A. Martens, Shunsuke Koga, Hannah Santhakumar, Yonghe Li, Wenyan Lu, Yang You, Kiara Lolo, Michael DeTure, Alexandra I. Beasley, Mary D. Davis, Pamela J. McLean, Owen A. Ross, Takahisa Kanekiyo, Tsuneya Ikezu, Thomas Caulfield, Jonathan Carr, Zbigni...

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Cole, Michael I

    Romain Lopez, Jeffrey Regier, Michael B. Cole, Michael I. Jordan, and Nir Yosef. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics.Nature Methods, 15(12):1053–1058, December 2018. ISSN 1548-7105. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2. URL

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 2018

  45. [45]

    Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited

    Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Honglak Lee, and Geoffrey Hinton. Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited. InProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3519–3529. PMLR, May 2019. URL

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Do wide and deep networks learn the same things? Uncovering how neural network representations vary with width and depth

    Thao Nguyen, Maithra Raghu, and Simon Kornblith. Do wide and deep networks learn the same things? Uncovering how neural network representations vary with width and depth. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. arXiv:2010.15327 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Correcting biased centered kernel alignment measures in biological and artificial neural networks, 2024

    Alex Murphy, Joel Zylberberg, and Alona Fyshe. Correcting biased centered kernel alignment measures in biological and artificial neural networks, 2024. URL . arXiv:2405.01012 [q- bio.NC]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System.Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,

    Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System.Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,

    work page

  49. [49]

    Vardan Papyan, X. Y . Han, and David L. Donoho. Prevalence of neural collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (40):24652–24663, October 2020. ISSN 0027-8424, 1091-6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015509117. URL

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2015509117 2020

  50. [50]

    The effective rank: A measure of effective dimensionality

    Olivier Roy and Martin Vetterli. The effective rank: A measure of effective dimensionality. In 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference, pages 606–610, September 2007. URL

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    A. B. Singleton, M. Farrer, J. Johnson, A. Singleton, S. Hague, J. Kachergus, M. Hulihan, T. Peuralinna, A. Dutra, R. Nussbaum, S. Lincoln, A. Crawley, M. Hanson, D. Maraganore, C. Adler, M. R. Cookson, M. Muenter, M. Baptista, D. Miller, J. Blancato, J. Hardy, and K. Gwinn-Hardy. alpha-Synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease.Science, 302 ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1090278 2003

  52. [52]

    Alpha- synuclein locus duplication as a cause of familial Parkinson’s disease.Lancet, 364(9440): 1167–1169, October 2004

    Marie-Christine Chartier-Harlin, Jennifer Kachergus, Christophe Roumier, Vincent Mouroux, Xavier Douay, Sarah Lincoln, Clotilde Levecque, Lydie Larvor, Joris Andrieux, Mary Hulihan, Nawal Waucquier, Luc Defebvre, Philippe Amouyel, Matthew Farrer, and Alain Destée. Alpha- synuclein locus duplication as a cause of familial Parkinson’s disease.Lancet, 364(94...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17103-1 2004

  53. [53]

    Marthe H. R. Ludtmann, Plamena R. Angelova, Mathew H. Horrocks, Minee L. Choi, Mar- garida Rodrigues, Artyom Y . Baev, Alexey V . Berezhnov, Zhi Yao, Daniel Little, Blerida Banushi, Afnan Saleh Al-Menhali, Rohan T. Ranasinghe, Daniel R. Whiten, Ratsuda Yapom, Karamjit Singh Dolt, Michael J. Devine, Paul Gissen, Tilo Kunath, Morana Jaganjac, Evgeny V . Pav...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04422-2 2018

  54. [54]

    Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks

    Marco Ancona, Enea Ceolini, Cengiz Öztireli, and Markus Gross. Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Vancouver, Canada, 2018. 14

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    J.A. Tropp. Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(10):2231–2242, October 2004. ISSN 1557-9654. doi: 10.1109/TIT. 2004.834793. URL

    work page doi:10.1109/tit 2004

  56. [56]

    Livezey, Alejandro F

    Jesse A. Livezey, Alejandro F. Bujan, and Friedrich T. Sommer. Learning Overcomplete, Low Coherence Dictionaries with Linear Inference.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(174): 1–42, 2019. ISSN 1533-7928. URL

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    L. Welch. Lower bounds on the maximum cross correlation of signals (Corresp.).IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 20(3):397–399, May 1974. ISSN 1557-9654. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1974.1055219. URL

    work page doi:10.1109/tit.1974.1055219 1974

  58. [58]

    S. Waldron. Generalized Welch bound equality sequences are tight frames.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(9):2307–2309, September 2003. ISSN 1557-9654. doi: 10.1109/ TIT.2003.815788. URL

    work page arXiv 2003

  59. [59]

    Mixon, Chong You, and Zhihui Zhu

    Jiachen Jiang, Jinxin Zhou, Peng Wang, Qing Qu, Dustin G. Mixon, Chong You, and Zhihui Zhu. Generalized neural collapse for a large number of classes. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 235 ofICML’24, pages 22010–22041, Vienna, Austria, July 2024. JMLR.org

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    O’Flanagan, Kieran R

    Ciara H. O’Flanagan, Kieran R. Campbell, Allen W. Zhang, Farhia Kabeer, Jamie L. P. Lim, Justina Biele, Peter Eirew, Daniel Lai, Andrew McPherson, Esther Kong, Cherie Bates, Kelly Borkowski, Matt Wiens, Brittany Hewitson, James Hopkins, Jenifer Pham, Nicholas Ceglia, Richard Moore, Andrew J. Mungall, Jessica N. McAlpine, Sohrab P. Shah, and Samuel Aparici...

    work page doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1830-0 2019

  61. [61]

    Kopylova, Artem B

    Irina V . Kopylova, Artem B. Ivanov, Lev R. Eidelman, Ekaterina N. Zaitseva, Ekaterina D. Kulikova, Dmitriy A. Grehnyov, Alexandra N. Bogomazova, Vladimir A. Vigont, Elena V . Kaznacheyeva, Maria A. Lagarkova, Olga S. Lebedeva, and Evgenii I. Olekhnovich. Convergent transcriptomic signature in iPSC-dopaminergic neurons of hereditary Parkinson’s disease.Li...

    work page doi:10.26508/lsa.202503551 2026

  62. [62]

    Teichmann, and John C

    Oliver Stegle, Sarah A. Teichmann, and John C. Marioni. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics.Nature Reviews Genetics, 16(3):133–145, March 2015. ISSN 1471-0064. doi: 10.1038/nrg3833. URL

    work page doi:10.1038/nrg3833 2015

  63. [63]

    Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments.Biostatistics, 19(4):562–578, October 2018

    Stephanie C Hicks, F William Townes, Mingxiang Teng, and Rafael A Irizarry. Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments.Biostatistics, 19(4):562–578, October 2018. ISSN 1465-4644. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053. URL

    work page doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053 2018

  64. [64]

    Wolock, Romain Lopez, and Allon M

    Samuel L. Wolock, Romain Lopez, and Allon M. Klein. Scrublet: Computational Identification of Cell Doublets in Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data.Cell Systems, 8(4):281–291.e9, April

    work page

  65. [65]

    doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005

    ISSN 2405-4720. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005 2018

  66. [66]

    van den Brink, Fanny Sage, Ábel Vértesy, Bastiaan Spanjaard, Josi Peterson-Maduro, Chloé S

    Susanne C. van den Brink, Fanny Sage, Ábel Vértesy, Bastiaan Spanjaard, Josi Peterson-Maduro, Chloé S. Baron, Catherine Robin, and Alexander van Oudenaarden. Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations.Nature Methods, 14(10): 935–936, October 2017. ISSN 1548-7105. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4437. URL

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.4437 2017

  67. [67]

    Dijkstra, Angela Ingrassia, Renee X

    Anke A. Dijkstra, Angela Ingrassia, Renee X. de Menezes, Ronald E. van Kesteren, Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller, Peter Heutink, and Wilma D. J. van de Berg. Evidence for Immune Response, Axonal Dysfunction and Reduced Endocytosis in the Substantia Nigra in Early Stage Parkinson’s Disease.PLOS ONE, 10(6):e0128651, 2015. ISSN 1932-6203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pon...

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone 2015

  68. [68]

    Donoho and Michael Elad

    David L. Donoho and Michael Elad. Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5): 2197–2202, March 2003. ISSN 0027-8424, 1091-6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437847100. URL

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0437847100 2003

  69. [69]

    D.L. Donoho. Compressed sensing.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(4):1289– 1306, April 2006. ISSN 0018-9448. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582. URL

    work page doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 2006

  70. [70]

    Trajectories of cell-cycle progression from fixed cell populations.Nature Methods, 12(10):951–954, October

    Gabriele Gut, Michelle D Tadmor, Dana Pe’er, Lucas Pelkmans, and Prisca Liberali. Trajectories of cell-cycle progression from fixed cell populations.Nature Methods, 12(10):951–954, October

    work page

  71. [71]

    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3545

    ISSN 1548-7091, 1548-7105. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3545. URL . 15

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.3545

  72. [72]

    Integrating spatial gene expression and breast tumour morphology via deep learning.Nature Biomedical Engineering, 4(8):827–834, August 2020

    Bryan He, Ludvig Bergenstråhle, Linnea Stenbeck, Abubakar Abid, Alma Andersson, Åke Borg, Jonas Maaskola, Joakim Lundeberg, and James Zou. Integrating spatial gene expression and breast tumour morphology via deep learning.Nature Biomedical Engineering, 4(8):827–834, August 2020. ISSN 2157-846X. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-0578-x. URL

    work page doi:10.1038/s41551-020-0578-x 2020

  73. [73]

    Ronald Xie, Kuan Pang, Sai Chung, Catia Perciani, Sonya MacParland, Bo Wang, and Gary Bader. Spatially Resolved Gene Expression Prediction from Histology Images via Bi-modal Contrastive Learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:70626–70637, December 2023. URL

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Shuailin Xue, Fangfang Zhu, Jinyu Chen, and Wenwen Min. Inferring single-cell resolution spatial gene expression via fusing spot-based spatial transcriptomics, location, and histology using GCN.Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(1):bbae630, January 2025. ISSN 1477-4054. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae630. URL

    work page doi:10.1093/bib/bbae630 2025

  75. [75]

    Way, Ted Natoli, Adeniyi Adeboye, Lev Litichevskiy, Andrew Yang, Xiaodong Lu, Juan C

    Gregory P. Way, Ted Natoli, Adeniyi Adeboye, Lev Litichevskiy, Andrew Yang, Xiaodong Lu, Juan C. Caicedo, Beth A. Cimini, Kyle Karhohs, David J. Logan, Mohammad H. Rohban, Maria Kost-Alimova, Kate Hartland, Michael Bornholdt, Srinivas Niranj Chandrasekaran, Marzieh Haghighi, Erin Weisbart, Shantanu Singh, Aravind Subramanian, and Anne E. Carpenter. Morpho...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cels.2022.10.001 2022

  76. [76]

    Early synaptic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: Insights from animal models.Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 31(6):802–813, June 2016

    Tommaso Schirinzi, Graziella Madeo, Giuseppina Martella, Marta Maltese, Barbara Picconi, Paolo Calabresi, and Antonio Pisani. Early synaptic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: Insights from animal models.Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 31(6):802–813, June 2016. ISSN 1531-8257. doi: 10.1002/mds.26620

    work page doi:10.1002/mds.26620 2016

  77. [77]

    Manfredsson, Matthew J

    Seong Su Kang, Zhentao Zhang, Xia Liu, Fredric P. Manfredsson, Matthew J. Benskey, Xuebing Cao, Jun Xu, Yi E. Sun, and Keqiang Ye. TrkB neurotrophic activities are blocked by α- synuclein, triggering dopaminergic cell death in Parkinson’s disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(40):10773–10778, October

    work page

  78. [78]

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713969114

    ISSN 1091-6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713969114

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1713969114

  79. [79]

    Morfini, Lori B

    Yaping Chu, Gerardo A. Morfini, Lori B. Langhamer, Yinzhen He, Scott T. Brady, and Jef- frey H. Kordower. Alterations in axonal transport motor proteins in sporadic and experimental Parkinson’s disease.Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 135(Pt 7):2058–2073, July 2012. ISSN 1460-2156. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws133

    work page doi:10.1093/brain/aws133 2058

  80. [80]

    The Axon Initial Segment: An Updated Viewpoint.The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 38(9):2135–2145, February

    Christophe Leterrier. The Axon Initial Segment: An Updated Viewpoint.The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 38(9):2135–2145, February

    work page

Showing first 80 references.