pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30904 · v1 · pith:5JMZNTA3new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.str-el

Quantum sensing of nanoscale electronic phase segregation

Izidor Benedi\v{c}i\v{c} , J. Paul Attfield , Denis Ar\v{c}on This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords quantum sensingNV centersnanodiamondselectronic phase segregationCaFe3O5ODMRspin-lattice relaxationweak ferromagnetism
0
0 comments X

The pith

NV centers in nanodiamonds detect nanoscale electronic phase segregation in Mn-doped CaFe3O5 below its ferromagnetic transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses quantum magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds impressed into a powder pellet of Mn-doped CaFe3O5 to measure local static and dynamic magnetic fields across the weak ferromagnetic transition. The splitting and broadening of the optically detected magnetic resonance spectra increase in an order-parameter-like manner by about 15 MHz upon cooling below Tc. At the same time the spin-lattice relaxation rate 1/T1 shows a divergence-like jump of roughly one order of magnitude at Tc. Lineshape analysis of the spectra and the stretched-exponential form of the magnetization recovery curves indicate that the material separates into charge-ordered and charge-averaged regions on nanometric length scales. A reader would care because bulk spectroscopic methods average over these local inhomogeneities in strongly correlated oxides, while the nanodiamond probes resolve them directly.

Core claim

The splitting and broadening of the ODMR spectra exhibit an order-parameter-like increase by ~15 MHz upon cooling below Tc. Concomitantly, the spin-lattice relaxation rate 1/T1 exhibits a pronounced divergence-like enhancement at Tc, increasing by about one order of magnitude. Detailed lineshape fits together with stretched-exponential recovery curves corroborate electronic phase segregation in charge-ordered and charge-averaged phases at nanometric scales.

What carries the argument

Optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds that locally sense static and dynamic magnetic fields produced by the surrounding oxide.

If this is right

  • The observed spectral changes track an order-parameter-like growth of the segregated phases below Tc.
  • The relaxation-rate divergence at Tc is consistent with critical slowing down associated with the phase separation.
  • Nanodiamond-based probes can resolve spectroscopic features that are averaged out in conventional powder measurements of strongly correlated oxides.
  • The same platform can be applied to other doping-tuned transition-metal oxides that exhibit charge-spin fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the nanometric segregation persists in thin films or single crystals, the same NV technique could map domain boundaries in real space.
  • The method may be extended to measure local currents or electric fields in related materials by using different NV sensing protocols.
  • Confirmation of the segregation would motivate targeted doping strategies to stabilize or suppress specific nanoscale phases.

Load-bearing premise

The observed ODMR splitting, broadening, and 1/T1 divergence arise specifically from nanoscale electronic phase segregation rather than from powder averaging, strain induced by nanodiamond embedding, or extrinsic magnetic impurities.

What would settle it

A spatially resolved measurement on the same material that finds uniform ODMR spectra and single-exponential recovery with no splitting or broadening below Tc would falsify the segregation interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30904 by Denis Ar\v{c}on, Izidor Benedi\v{c}i\v{c}, J. Paul Attfield.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scheme of NV magnetometry experiments. (a) A three-dimensional model of CaFe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temperature dependence of NV ODMR spectra. (a) Representative high-temperature ODMR spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: NV relaxometry. (a) Normalized NV mag￾netization relaxation curves well below Tc (T − Tc = −132 K, blue symbols) and close to the transition tem￾perature (T − Tc = 0.5 K, red symbols). NV spin-lattice relaxation rate, 1/T1, enhancement at Tc can be seen as the translation of the relaxation curve to the shorter times. Comparison with a magnetization relaxation curve for nanodiamonds deposited on a glass (bl… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical simulations of the ODMR spec￾tra. (a) Experimental ODMR spectra recorded above (red symbols) and below (blue symbols) the weak fer￾romagnetic transition of Mn-CaFe3O5. The overlaid black dashed lines correspond to numerical simulations. For fitting the high-temperature spectrum, we only included the uncompensated Earth’s magnetic field of Bearth = 45 µT. For fitting the low-temperature ODMR spect… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reconstruction of electronic phase fractions from numerical fitting of spectra. (a) Two-component fit of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Doping of transition metal oxides such as CaFe$_3$O$_5$ offers a controlled way to tune the interplay of charge, spin, and lattice degrees of freedom, yet local-probe studies remain difficult because strong correlations and dynamic charge-spin fluctuations obscure fine spectroscopic features in powder samples. Here, we employ quantum magnetometry based on nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in nanodiamonds impressed into an Mn-doped CaFe$_3$O$_5$ powder pellet to probe static and dynamic magnetic fields at the nanoscale across the weak ferromagnetic transition. The splitting and broadening of the optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) spectra exhibit an order-parameter-like increase by ~ 15 MHz upon cooling below the critical temperature, T$_{\rm c}$. Concomitantly, the spin-lattice relaxation rate, 1/T$_1$, exhibits a pronounced, divergence-like enhancement at T$_{\rm c}$, increasing by about one order of magnitude from its high-temperature value. Moreover, detailed lineshape fits of ODMR spectra together with the stretched-exponential NV magnetization recovery curves corroborate the proposed electronic phase segregation in charge-ordered and charge-averaged phases at the nanometric scales. The presented study demonstrates the viability of using nanodiamonds as a platform for nanoscale magnetic probing of strongly correlated matter, including phenomena such as electronic phase separation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports NV-center quantum magnetometry on nanodiamonds embedded in a Mn-doped CaFe₃O₅ powder pellet. Across the weak ferromagnetic transition, the authors observe an order-parameter-like ~15 MHz increase in ODMR splitting and broadening below T_c together with an order-of-magnitude divergence-like rise in the spin-lattice relaxation rate 1/T₁ at T_c. Lineshape fits to the ODMR spectra and stretched-exponential recovery curves are presented as evidence that these features arise from nanoscale electronic phase segregation between charge-ordered and charge-averaged domains.

Significance. If the attribution to nanometric phase segregation is substantiated, the work provides a concrete demonstration that nanodiamond NV sensors can resolve static and dynamic magnetic signatures of electronic inhomogeneity in strongly correlated powders, a regime where conventional local probes are limited. The temperature-dependent trends are directly measured and the method itself is portable to other correlated oxides.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the section presenting detailed lineshape fits of ODMR spectra] The central claim that the observed ~15 MHz ODMR splitting, broadening, and 1/T₁ enhancement originate specifically from nanoscale charge-ordered versus charge-averaged domains rests on lineshape analysis whose uniqueness is not demonstrated. No quantitative forward model is supplied that converts the expected local B-field distribution of segregated phases into the measured frequency shift and linewidth; without it the interpretation remains non-unique relative to strain gradients from nanodiamond embedding or powder averaging of anisotropic fields.
  2. [Experimental methods and relaxation-rate analysis] The manuscript does not report control measurements that isolate the contribution of extrinsic paramagnetic centers or embedding-induced strain. Such controls (e.g., reference pellets without Mn doping, or measurements on unembedded powder) are required to establish that the order-of-magnitude 1/T₁ divergence at T_c is intrinsic to the electronic phase segregation rather than extrinsic.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the splitting increases 'by ~15 MHz' but does not specify whether this is the full splitting between the two resonance branches or a half-width; a precise definition should be given when the data are first presented.
  2. [Relaxation-rate section] Error bars or uncertainty estimates on the extracted 1/T₁ values and on the fitted ODMR parameters are not mentioned in the provided text; these should be included to allow assessment of the statistical significance of the reported divergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the positive evaluation of the significance of our work. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and the section presenting detailed lineshape fits of ODMR spectra] The central claim that the observed ~15 MHz ODMR splitting, broadening, and 1/T₁ enhancement originate specifically from nanoscale charge-ordered versus charge-averaged domains rests on lineshape analysis whose uniqueness is not demonstrated. No quantitative forward model is supplied that converts the expected local B-field distribution of segregated phases into the measured frequency shift and linewidth; without it the interpretation remains non-unique relative to strain gradients from nanodiamond embedding or powder averaging of anisotropic fields.

    Authors: We appreciate this comment. The lineshape analysis in the manuscript is based on fits that capture the observed splitting and broadening, and the temperature dependence follows an order-parameter-like behavior at Tc, which is difficult to attribute to strain or powder averaging alone. However, we agree that a quantitative forward model would strengthen the case. In the revised version, we will add a section with a simple model of the local field distribution expected from nanoscale phase segregation and compare it to the data. We will also explicitly address why alternative explanations like strain gradients are inconsistent with the temperature dependence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental methods and relaxation-rate analysis] The manuscript does not report control measurements that isolate the contribution of extrinsic paramagnetic centers or embedding-induced strain. Such controls (e.g., reference pellets without Mn doping, or measurements on unembedded powder) are required to establish that the order-of-magnitude 1/T₁ divergence at T_c is intrinsic to the electronic phase segregation rather than extrinsic.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of control measurements. The pronounced divergence of 1/T1 specifically at Tc strongly suggests an intrinsic origin tied to the magnetic transition, as extrinsic effects would typically not exhibit such a critical behavior. Nevertheless, to address this concern, we will expand the discussion in the revised manuscript to include arguments based on the temperature dependence ruling out dominant extrinsic contributions. We note that performing additional control experiments may require new sample preparation, but we will consider including data from undoped samples if feasible. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental observations of spectral features and relaxation rates

full rationale

The paper reports measured ODMR splitting (~15 MHz increase below Tc), broadening, and 1/T1 divergence (order-of-magnitude enhancement) from NV-center magnetometry on the doped oxide pellet. These are raw spectral and recovery data, not quantities obtained by fitting parameters to a subset and then predicting the same data, nor by any self-referential equations. Lineshape fits and stretched-exponential analysis are post-hoc interpretations of the observed signals; they do not reduce the reported quantities to the target claim by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the derivation chain. The study is self-contained experimental reporting against external temperature and field benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that NV centers embedded in the powder pellet faithfully report local static and dynamic fields without significant spatial averaging or extrinsic contributions; standard NV physics is invoked but no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption NV centers in nanodiamonds respond to local magnetic fields via ODMR splitting and exhibit spin-lattice relaxation sensitive to fluctuating fields
    Standard property of NV centers used throughout quantum sensing literature; invoked implicitly when interpreting ODMR and 1/T1 data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5784 in / 1304 out tokens · 40673 ms · 2026-07-01T01:05:34.138665+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Emergent functions of quantum materials.Nature Physics, 13(11):1056–1068, November 2017

    Yoshinori Tokura, Masashi Kawasaki, and Naoto Nagaosa. Emergent functions of quantum materials.Nature Physics, 13(11):1056–1068, November 2017

    2017

  2. [2]

    Nevidomskyy, and Qimiao Si

    Emilia Morosan, Douglas Natelson, Andriy H. Nevidomskyy, and Qimiao Si. Strongly Correlated Materials. Advanced Materials, 24(36):4896–4923, September 2012

    2012

  3. [3]

    Phase Separation Scenario for Manganese Oxides and Re- lated Materials.Science, 283(5410):2034–2040, March 1999

    Adriana Moreo, Seiji Yunoki, and Elbio Dagotto. Phase Separation Scenario for Manganese Oxides and Re- lated Materials.Science, 283(5410):2034–2040, March 1999

    2034

  4. [4]

    Moritomo, A

    Y. Moritomo, A. Machida, S. Mori, N. Yamamoto, and A. Nakamura. Electronic phase diagram and phase separation in Cr-doped manganites.Physical Review B, 60(13):9220–9223, October 1999

    1999

  5. [5]

    Di- rect experimental evidence of physical origin of electronic phase separation in manganites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(13):7090–7094, March 2020

    Tian Miao, Lina Deng, Wenting Yang, Jinyang Ni, Changlin Zheng, Joanne Etheridge, Shasha Wang, Hao Liu, Hanxuan Lin, Yang Yu, Qian Shi, Peng Cai, Yinyan Zhu, Tieying Yang, Xingmin Zhang, Xingyu Gao, Chuanying Xi, Mingliang Tian, Xiaoshan Wu, Hongjun Xiang, Elbio Dagotto, Lifeng Yin, and Jian Shen. Di- rect experimental evidence of physical origin of elect...

    2020

  6. [6]

    Neutron Diffraction Evidence of Microscopic Charge In- homogeneities in the CuO2 Plane of Superconducting La22xSrxCuO4 (0 l x l 0.30).Physical Review Letters, 84(25), 2000

    E S Božin, G H Kwei, H Takagi, and S J L Billinge. Neutron Diffraction Evidence of Microscopic Charge In- homogeneities in the CuO2 Plane of Superconducting La22xSrxCuO4 (0 l x l 0.30).Physical Review Letters, 84(25), 2000

    2000

  7. [7]

    K. M. Lang, V. Madhavan, J. E. Hoffman, E. W. Hudson, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis. Imaging the granular structure of high-Tc superconductivity in underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ.Nature, 415(6870):412– 416, January 2002

    2002

  8. [8]

    P. M. Singer, A. W. Hunt, and T. Imai. 63 Cu NQR Evidence for Spatial Variation of Hole Concentration in La 2 - x Sr x CuO 4.Physical Review Letters, 88(4):047602, January 2002

    2002

  9. [9]

    Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials.Condensed Matter, 6(4):40, November 2021

    Gaetano Campi and Antonio Bianconi. Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials.Condensed Matter, 6(4):40, November 2021

    2021

  10. [10]

    Complexity in Strongly Correlated Electronic Systems

    Elbio Dagotto. Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems.Science, 309(5732):257–262, July 2005. arXiv: cond-mat/0509041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    Critical features of colossal magnetoresistive manganites.Reports on Progress in Physics, 69(3):797–851, March 2006

    Y Tokura. Critical features of colossal magnetoresistive manganites.Reports on Progress in Physics, 69(3):797–851, March 2006

    2006

  12. [12]

    Ka. H. Hong, Angel M. Arevalo-Lopez, James Cumby, Clemens Ritter, and J. Paul Attfield. Long range elec- tronic phase separation in CaFe3O5.Nature Communications, 9(1):2975, July 2018

    2018

  13. [13]

    Hong, Elena Solana-Madruga, Branislav Viliam Hakala, Midori Amano Patino, Pascal Manuel, Yuichi Shimakawa, and J

    Ka H. Hong, Elena Solana-Madruga, Branislav Viliam Hakala, Midori Amano Patino, Pascal Manuel, Yuichi Shimakawa, and J. Paul Attfield. Substitutional tuning of electronic phase separation in Ca Fe 3 O 5.Physical Review Materials, 5(2):024406, February 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Milton, Branislav V

    Michael J. Milton, Branislav V. Hakala, Ka H. Hong, Maxim Avdeev, Chris D. Ling, Brendan J. Kennedy, Pascal Manuel, and J. Paul Attfield. Proximate electronic and magnetic phase transitions in CaFe3O5.Physi- cal Review Materials, 8(12):124408, December 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Cassidy, Fabio Orlandi, Pascal Manuel, and Simon J

    Simon J. Cassidy, Fabio Orlandi, Pascal Manuel, and Simon J. Clarke. Single phase charge ordered stoi- chiometric CaFe3O5 with commensurate and incommensurate trimeron ordering.Nature Communications, 10(1):5475, December 2019

    2019

  16. [16]

    Savitzky, Alemayehu S

    Ismail El Baggari, Benjamin H. Savitzky, Alemayehu S. Admasu, Jaewook Kim, Sang-Wook Cheong, Robert Hovden, and Lena F. Kourkoutis. Nature and evolution of incommensurate charge order in manganites vi- sualized with cryogenic scanning transmission electron microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(7):1445–1450, February 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    R Di Capua, C A Perroni, V Cataudella, F Miletto Granozio, P Perna, M Salluzzo, U Scotti Di Uccio, and R Vaglio. Direct observation of spectroscopic inhomogeneities on La0.7 Sr0.3 MnO3 thin films by scanning tunnelling spectroscopy.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 18(35):8195–8204, September 2006. 10 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    2006

  18. [18]

    Visualization of a ferromagnetic metallic edge state in manganite strips.Nature Communications, 6(1):6179, February 2015

    Kai Du, Kai Zhang, Shuai Dong, Wengang Wei, Jian Shao, Jiebin Niu, Jinjie Chen, Yinyan Zhu, Hanxuan Lin, Xiaolu Yin, Sy-Hwang Liou, Lifeng Yin, and Jian Shen. Visualization of a ferromagnetic metallic edge state in manganite strips.Nature Communications, 6(1):6179, February 2015

    2015

  19. [19]

    Evolution and control of the phase competition morphology in a manganite film.Nature Communications, 6(1):8980, November 2015

    Haibiao Zhou, Lingfei Wang, Yubin Hou, Zhen Huang, Qingyou Lu, and Wenbin Wu. Evolution and control of the phase competition morphology in a manganite film.Nature Communications, 6(1):8980, November 2015

    2015

  20. [20]

    Allodi, R

    G. Allodi, R. De Renzi, G. Guidi, F. Licci, and M. W. Pieper. Electronic phase separation in lanthanum man- ganites: Evidence from 55 Mn NMR.Physical Review B, 56(10):6036–6046, September 1997

    1997

  21. [21]

    A. W. Hunt, P. M. Singer, K. R. Thurber, and T. Imai. C 63 u NQR Measurement of Stripe Order Parameter in La 2 - x Sr x CuO 4.Physical Review Letters, 82(21):4300–4303, May 1999

    1999

  22. [22]

    Klauss, W

    H.-H. Klauss, W. Wagener, M. Hillberg, W. Kopmann, H. Walf, F. J. Litterst, M. Hücker, and B. Büchner. From Antiferromagnetic Order to Static Magnetic Stripes: The Phase Diagram of ( L a , E u ) 2 - x Sr x CuO 4.Physical Review Letters, 85(21):4590–4593, November 2000

    2000

  23. [23]

    Magnetic field imaging with nitrogen-vacancy ensembles.New Journal of Physics, 13(4):045021, April 2011

    L M Pham, D Le Sage, P L Stanwix, T K Yeung, D Glenn, A Trifonov, P Cappellaro, P R Hemmer, M D Lukin, H Park, A Yacoby, and R L Walsworth. Magnetic field imaging with nitrogen-vacancy ensembles.New Journal of Physics, 13(4):045021, April 2011

    2011

  24. [24]

    Critical fluctuations and noise spectra in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2 magnets.Nature Communications, 16(1):8585, September 2025

    Yuxin Li, Zhe Ding, Chen Wang, Haoyu Sun, Zhousheng Chen, Pengfei Wang, Ya Wang, Ming Gong, Hualing Zeng, Fazhan Shi, and Jiangfeng Du. Critical fluctuations and noise spectra in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2 magnets.Nature Communications, 16(1):8585, September 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Myers, and Ania C

    Amila Ariyaratne, Dolev Bluvstein, Bryan A. Myers, and Ania C. Bleszynski Jayich. Nanoscale electrical con- ductivity imaging using a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond.Nature Communications, 9(1):2406, June 2018

    2018

  26. [26]

    Kolkowitz, A

    S. Kolkowitz, A. Safira, A. A. High, R. C. Devlin, S. Choi, Q. P. Unterreithmeier, D. Patterson, A. S. Zibrov, V. E. Manucharyan, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin. Probing Johnson noise and ballistic transport in normal met- als with a single-spin qubit.Science, 347(6226):1129–1132, March 2015

    2015

  27. [27]

    Chang, A

    K. Chang, A. Eichler, J. Rhensius, L. Lorenzelli, and C. L. Degen. Nanoscale Imaging of Current Density with a Single-Spin Magnetometer.Nano Letters, 17(4):2367–2373, April 2017

    2017

  28. [28]

    Kucsko, P

    G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, N. Y. Yao, M. Kubo, H. J. Noh, P. K. Lo, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin. Nanometre- scale thermometry in a living cell.Nature, 500(7460):54–58, August 2013

    2013

  29. [29]

    Simpson, Cameron Ritchie, Jianing Lu, Paul Mulvaney, and Lloyd C

    Jean-Philippe Tetienne, Alain Lombard, David A. Simpson, Cameron Ritchie, Jianing Lu, Paul Mulvaney, and Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg. Scanning Nanospin Ensemble Microscope for Nanoscale Magnetic and Thermal Imaging.Nano Letters, 16(1):326–333, January 2016

    2016

  30. [30]

    Nanodiamond–Quantum Sensors Reveal Temperature Variation Associated to Hippocampal Neurons Firing

    Giulia Petrini, Giulia Tomagra, Ettore Bernardi, Ekaterina Moreva, Paolo Traina, Andrea Marcantoni, Fed- erico Picollo, Klaudia Kvaková, Petr Cígler, Ivo Pietro Degiovanni, Valentina Carabelli, and Marco Genovese. Nanodiamond–Quantum Sensors Reveal Temperature Variation Associated to Hippocampal Neurons Firing. Advanced Science, 9(28):2202014, October 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    Koichi Momma and Fujio Izumi.VESTA 3for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and mor- phology data.Journal of Applied Crystallography, 44(6):1272–1276, December 2011

    2011

  32. [32]

    Spin-lattice relaxation of NV centers in nanodiamonds adsorbed on conducting and nonconducting surfaces.Physical Review B, 111(23):235421, June 2025

    Izidor Benedičič, Yuri Tanuma, Žiga Gosar, Bastien Anézo, Mariusz Mrózek, Adam Wojciechowski, and Denis Arčon. Spin-lattice relaxation of NV centers in nanodiamonds adsorbed on conducting and nonconducting surfaces.Physical Review B, 111(23):235421, June 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Bucher, Diana P

    Dominik B. Bucher, Diana P. L. Aude Craik, Mikael P. Backlund, Matthew J. Turner, Oren Ben Dor, David R. Glenn, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Quantum diamond spectrometer for nanoscale NMR and ESR spectroscopy.Nature Protocols, 14(9):2707–2747, September 2019

    2019

  34. [34]

    Longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond.EPJ Quantum Technology, 2(1):22, December 2015

    Mariusz Mrózek, Daniel Rudnicki, Pauli Kehayias, Andrey Jarmola, Dmitry Budker, and Wojciech Gawlik. Longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond.EPJ Quantum Technology, 2(1):22, December 2015. 11 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    2015

  35. [35]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, A. Waxman, L.-S. Bouchard, and D. Budker. Temperature De- pendence of the Nitrogen-Vacancy Magnetic Resonance in Diamond.Physical Review Letters, 104(7):070801, February 2010

    2010

  36. [36]

    Chen, C.-H

    X.-D. Chen, C.-H. Dong, F.-W. Sun, C.-L. Zou, J.-M. Cui, Z.-F. Han, and G.-C. Guo. Temperature depen- dent energy level shifts of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.Applied Physics Letters, 99(16):161903, Octo- ber 2011

    2011

  37. [37]

    M. W. Doherty, V. M. Acosta, A. Jarmola, M. S. J. Barson, N. B. Manson, D. Budker, and L. C. L. Hollen- berg. Temperature shifts of the resonances of the NV - center in diamond.Physical Review B, 90(4):041201, July 2014

    2014

  38. [38]

    Tracking Temperature-Dependent Relaxation Times of Ferritin Nanomagnets with a Wideband Quantum Spectrometer.Physical Review Letters, 113(21):217204, November 2014

    Eike Schäfer-Nolte, Lukas Schlipf, Markus Ternes, Friedemann Reinhard, Klaus Kern, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Tracking Temperature-Dependent Relaxation Times of Ferritin Nanomagnets with a Wideband Quantum Spectrometer.Physical Review Letters, 113(21):217204, November 2014

    2014

  39. [39]

    D. C. Johnston. Stretched exponential relaxation arising from a continuous sum of exponential decays.Physi- cal Review B, 74(18):184430, November 2006

    2006

  40. [40]

    A method for robust spin relaxometry in the presence of imperfect state preparation

    Ella P. Walsh, Sepehr Ahmadi, Alexander J. Healey, David A. Simpson, and Liam T. Hall. A method for robust spin relaxometry in the presence of imperfect state preparation, December 2025. arXiv:2512.22739 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Spin-strain coupling in nanodiamonds as a unique cluster identifier.Journal of Applied Physics, 133(14):145103, April 2023

    Asad Awadallah, Inbar Zohar, and Amit Finkler. Spin-strain coupling in nanodiamonds as a unique cluster identifier.Journal of Applied Physics, 133(14):145103, April 2023

    2023

  42. [42]

    Mittiga, S

    T. Mittiga, S. Hsieh, C. Zu, B. Kobrin, F. Machado, P. Bhattacharyya, N. Z. Rui, A. Jarmola, S. Choi, D. Budker, and N. Y. Yao. Imaging the Local Charge Environment of Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond. Physical Review Letters, 121(24):246402, December 2018

    2018

  43. [43]

    Péter Udvarhelyi, V. O. Shkolnikov, Adam Gali, Guido Burkard, and András Pályi. Spin-strain interaction in nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.Physical Review B, 98(7):075201, August 2018

    2018

  44. [44]

    Simulation of ODMR Spectra from Nitrogen-Vacancy Ensembles in Diamond for Electric Field Sensing, January 2023

    Yuchun Zhu, Elena Losero, Christophe Galland, and Valentin Goblot. Simulation of ODMR Spectra from Nitrogen-Vacancy Ensembles in Diamond for Electric Field Sensing, January 2023. arXiv:2301.04106 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Thiel, Z

    L. Thiel, Z. Wang, M. A. Tschudin, D. Rohner, I. Gutiérrez-Lezama, N. Ubrig, M. Gibertini, E. Giannini, A. F. Morpurgo, and P. Maletinsky. Probing magnetism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy.Science, 364(6444):973–976, June 2019

    2019

  46. [46]

    Single spin magnetometry and relaxometry applied to antiferromagnetic materials.APL Materials, 11(10):100901, October 2023

    Aurore Finco and Vincent Jacques. Single spin magnetometry and relaxometry applied to antiferromagnetic materials.APL Materials, 11(10):100901, October 2023

    2023

  47. [47]

    Relaxometry and Dephasing Imaging of Superparamagnetic Magnetite Nanoparticles Using a Single Qubit.Nano Letters, 15(8):4942–4947, August 2015

    Dominik Schmid-Lorch, Thomas Häberle, Friedemann Reinhard, Andrea Zappe, Michael Slota, Lapo Bogani, Amit Finkler, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Relaxometry and Dephasing Imaging of Superparamagnetic Magnetite Nanoparticles Using a Single Qubit.Nano Letters, 15(8):4942–4947, August 2015

    2015

  48. [48]

    Adámas Nanotechnologies Knowledge Base, 2025

    2025

  49. [49]

    Heinz, Marco D

    Nicholas Nunn, Neeraj Prabhakar, Philipp Reineck, Valentin Magidson, Erina Kamiya, William F. Heinz, Marco D. Torelli, Jessica Rosenholm, Alexander Zaitsev, and Olga Shenderova. Brilliant blue, green, yel- low, and red fluorescent diamond particles: synthesis, characterization, and multiplex imaging demonstrations. Nanoscale, 11(24):11584–11595, 2019

    2019

  50. [50]

    Jarmola, A

    A. Jarmola, A. Berzins, J. Smits, K. Smits, J. Prikulis, F. Gahbauer, R. Ferber, D. Erts, M. Auzinsh, and D. Budker. Longitudinal spin-relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy centers in electron irradiated diamond.Applied Physics Letters, 107(24):242403, December 2015. 12

    2015