pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05092 · v2 · pith:ZB3SHAAPnew · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.CV

Driver-WM: A Driver-Centric Traffic-Conditioned Latent World Model for In-Cabin Dynamics Rollout

Haozhuang Chi , Daosheng Qiu , Hao Su , Haochen Liu , Zirui Li , Haoruo Zhang , Chen Lv This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 23:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV
keywords driver world modellatent world modelin-cabin dynamicstraffic-conditioned forecastinggated causal injectionvision-language featuresshared-control drivingdriver behavior prediction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Driver-WM forecasts in-cabin driver dynamics causally conditioned on out-cabin traffic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Driver-WM, a driver-centric latent world model for rolling out in-cabin dynamics. It conditions these forecasts on external traffic context through a dual-stream setup in latent space. This unifies kinematics forecasting with semantic recognition of behavior and emotion. A reader would care because it addresses the gap in anticipating human reactions for safe automated driving.

Core claim

Driver-WM is a driver-centric latent world model that rolls out in-cabin dynamics causally conditioned on out-cabin traffic context. This formulation unifies physical kinematics forecasting with auxiliary behavioral and emotional semantic recognition. Operating in a compact latent space constructed from frozen vision-language features, it adopts a dual-stream architecture to separately encode external traffic and internal driver states, directionally coupled via a gated causal injection mechanism using a learned vector gate to modulate external contextual perturbations while strictly enforcing temporal causality.

What carries the argument

Gated causal injection mechanism that couples dual streams for external traffic and internal driver states using a learned vector gate.

Load-bearing premise

The learned vector gate can modulate external perturbations while enforcing temporal causality when coupling the dual streams.

What would settle it

If experiments on the AIDE dataset show that a model without the gated causal injection achieves similar performance in long-horizon forecasting and semantic alignment, the value of the proposed mechanism would be questioned.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05092 by Chen Lv, Daosheng Qiu, Haochen Liu, Haoruo Zhang, Hao Su, Haozhuang Chi, Zirui Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The comparison of three paradigms: (a) Regular driver monitoring systems (DMS) for driver-state recognition. (b) Standard world models for future environment forecasting. (c) Driver-WM (ours) that performs multi-step rollout of internal driver dynamics explicitly conditioned on synchronized external traffic observations. human supervision in a shared-control (mixed-autonomy) setting [31]. Although recent a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overall Architecture of Driver-WM. From synchronized in/out-cabin videos, a frozen Qwen3-VL extracts dual-stream latent features. Pooled external history Z ˆ¯ ext ≤t perturbs the internal transition via a directed Gated Causal Injection with a vector gate gt, yielding an updated internal latent zˆ int t+1. Internal latents are autoregressively rolled out to forecast future states, decoded into skeleton tra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mechanism and dynamics. (a) Controlled interventions: On the same clip, swapping the out-cabin context or disabling injection (λCA=0) alters reactive hand motion; frames are aligned to the maximal injection step. (b) High-Motion tail: Horizon-wise MPJPE shows the zero-velocity baseline degrades with horizon, while Driver-WM substantially reduces long-horizon error compared to motion-only baselines. Pathway… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative results of driver dynamics rollout and causal interventions. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Additional post-hoc visualizations with the optional frozen renderer. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Safe L2/L3 driving automation requires anticipating human-in-the-loop reactions during shared-control transitions. While most driving world models forecast the external environment, in-cabin intelligence remains strictly recognition-oriented and lacks multi-step rollout capabilities for driver dynamics. We introduce Driver-WM, a driver-centric latent world model that rolls out in-cabin dynamics causally conditioned on out-cabin traffic context. This formulation unifies physical kinematics forecasting with auxiliary behavioral and emotional semantic recognition. Operating in a compact latent space constructed from frozen vision-language features, Driver-WM adopts a dual-stream architecture to separately encode external traffic and internal driver states. These streams are directionally coupled via a gated causal injection mechanism, which uses a learned vector gate to modulate external contextual perturbations while strictly enforcing temporal causality. Experiments on AIDE show robust long-horizon forecasting on reactive high-motion clips, improved driver/traffic semantic alignment, and controlled interventions that expose the external-to-internal mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Driver-WM, a driver-centric latent world model for multi-step rollout of in-cabin driver dynamics causally conditioned on out-cabin traffic context. It uses a dual-stream architecture operating in a compact latent space from frozen vision-language features, with the streams directionally coupled via a gated causal injection mechanism employing a learned vector gate. The model unifies physical kinematics forecasting with auxiliary behavioral and emotional semantic recognition. Experiments on the AIDE dataset are reported to demonstrate robust long-horizon forecasting on reactive high-motion clips, improved driver/traffic semantic alignment, and results from controlled interventions exposing the external-to-internal mechanism.

Significance. If the causal conditioning holds without leakage and the long-horizon forecasts are accurate, the work could meaningfully advance in-cabin intelligence for L2/L3 shared-control automation by enabling predictive modeling of driver reactions to external traffic. The unification of kinematics rollout with semantic recognition tasks and the use of controlled interventions for mechanism analysis represent constructive elements.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (gated causal injection mechanism): the claim that the learned vector gate 'modulate[s] external contextual perturbations while strictly enforcing temporal causality' when coupling the dual streams is load-bearing for the central claim of causally conditioned rollout. A learned vector gate (typically a sigmoid or softmax modulator) applied to concatenated or cross-attended latents does not by itself prevent non-causal flow from future external frames during multi-step rollout, unless the implementation includes explicit autoregressive masking, causal attention masks, or future-state blocking. The manuscript must provide the precise coupling equations, pseudocode, or architectural diagram to substantiate the strict enforcement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive evaluation of the work's significance for L2/L3 automation. We address the single major comment below regarding the need to substantiate the causal enforcement claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (gated causal injection mechanism): the claim that the learned vector gate 'modulate[s] external contextual perturbations while strictly enforcing temporal causality' when coupling the dual streams is load-bearing for the central claim of causally conditioned rollout. A learned vector gate (typically a sigmoid or softmax modulator) applied to concatenated or cross-attended latents does not by itself prevent non-causal flow from future external frames during multi-step rollout, unless the implementation includes explicit autoregressive masking, causal attention masks, or future-state blocking. The manuscript must provide the precise coupling equations, pseudocode, or architectural diagram to substantiate the strict enforcement.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's phrasing is high-level and that the manuscript requires explicit details to substantiate the strict causality claim. The dual-stream coupling does employ autoregressive masking and future-state blocking in the gated injection (applied only to past and current external latents), but these elements are described at a high level in Section 3.2 without the requested equations or diagram. In the revision we will add the precise coupling equations (showing the learned gate applied after causal masking), pseudocode for the multi-step rollout procedure, and an updated Figure 2 that explicitly annotates the masking and blocking mechanisms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes that reduce any claimed result to its inputs by construction. The gated causal injection is described as a design mechanism without any derivation chain shown that would qualify under the enumerated patterns. No load-bearing steps reduce to prior fitted quantities or self-referential definitions. The paper's claims about latent space construction and rollout remain independent of the circularity criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the adequacy of frozen vision-language features for representing both traffic and driver states, plus the effectiveness of the learned gate for causal modulation; these are introduced without independent evidence in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • learned vector gate
    A learned vector gate is used to modulate external contextual perturbations in the causal injection mechanism.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Frozen vision-language features provide a compact latent space sufficient for encoding both external traffic and internal driver states.
    The model operates in a compact latent space constructed from frozen vision-language features.
  • domain assumption Temporal causality can be strictly enforced via directional coupling in the dual-stream architecture.
    The gated causal injection mechanism is described as strictly enforcing temporal causality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5720 in / 1472 out tokens · 30962 ms · 2026-06-30T23:30:27.480658+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Risk-Aware Selective Multimodal Driver Monitoring with Driver-State World Modeling

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A cost-aware selective inference framework combines a lightweight multimodal student model and driver-state world modeling to reduce unsafe false negatives in driver monitoring while keeping low latency.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In: 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

    Adeli, V., Ehsanpour, M., Reid, I., Niebles, J.C., Savarese, S., Adeli, E., Rezatofighi, H.: TRiPOD: Human Trajectory and Pose Dynamics Forecasting in the Wild . In: 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 13370– 13380. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (Oct 2021).https://doi. org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01314, http...

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01314 2021

  2. [2]

    Bai, J., Bai, S., Yang, S., Wang, S., Tan, S., Wang, P., Lin, J., Zhou, C., Zhou, J.: Qwen-VL: A versatile vision-language model for understanding, localization, text reading, and beyond (2024),https://openreview.net/forum?id=qrGjFJVl3m

    2024

  3. [3]

    Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., Ge, W., Guo, Z., Huang, Q., Huang, J., Huang, F., Hui, B., Jiang, S., Li, Z., Li, M., Li, M., Li, K., Lin, Z., Lin, J., Liu, X., Liu, J., Liu, C., Liu, Y., Liu, D., Liu, S., Lu, D., Luo, R., Lv, C., Men, R., Meng, L., Ren, X., Ren, X., Song, S., Sun, Y., Tang, ...

    2025

  4. [4]

    IEEE Trans

    Chen, L., Wu, P., Chitta, K., Jaeger, B., Geiger, A., Li, H.: End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.46(12), 10164–10183 (Dec 2024).https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3435937, https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3435937

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3435937 2024

  5. [5]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles10(4), 2905–2914 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV

    Chen, L., Li, Y., Huang, C., Li, B., Xing, Y., Tian, D., Li, L., Hu, Z., Na, X., Li, Z., Teng, S., Lv, C., Wang, J., Cao, D., Zheng, N., Wang, F.Y.: Milestones in autonomous driving and intelligent vehicles: Survey of surveys. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(2), 1046–1056 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV. 2022.3223131

    work page doi:10.1109/tiv 2023

  6. [6]

    In: 2025 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Sym- posium (IV)

    Chi, H., Yang, H., Yang, L., Lv, C.: Vlm-dm: Visual language models for multitask domain adaptation in driver monitoring. In: 2025 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Sym- posium (IV). pp. 1280–1285 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/IV64158.2025. 11097620

    work page doi:10.1109/iv64158.2025 2025

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning

    Driess, D., Xia, F., Sajjadi, M.S.M., Lynch, C., Chowdhery, A., Ichter, B., Wahid, A., Tompson, J., Vuong, Q., Yu, T., Huang, W., Chebotar, Y., Sermanet, P., Duckworth, D., Levine, S., Vanhoucke, V., Hausman, K., Toussaint, M., Greff, K., Zeng, A., Mordatch, I., Florence, P.: Palm-e: an embodied multimodal language model. In: Proceedings of the 40th Inter...

    2023

  8. [8]

    In: Globerson, A., Mackey, L., Belgrave, D., Fan, A., Paquet, U., Tomczak, J., Zhang, C

    Gao, S., Yang, J., Chen, L., Chitta, K., Qiu, Y., Geiger, A., Zhang, J., Li, H.: Vista: A generalizable driving world model with high fidelity and versatile con- trollability. In: Globerson, A., Mackey, L., Belgrave, D., Fan, A., Paquet, U., Tomczak, J., Zhang, C. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems. vol. 37, pp. 91560–91596. Curran...

    work page doi:10.52202/079017-2906 2024

  9. [9]

    In: IEEE/CVF Winter Conf

    Guo, W., Du, Y., Shen, X., Lepetit, V., Alameda-Pineda, X., Moreno-Noguer, F.: Back to mlp: A simple baseline for human motion prediction. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). pp. 4798–4808 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV56688.2023.00479

    work page doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00479 2023

  10. [10]

    GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving

    Hu, A., Russell, L., Yeo, H., Murez, Z., Fedoseev, G., Kendall, A., Shotton, J., Corrado, G.: GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2309.17080 (Sep 2023).https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309. 17080

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309 2023

  11. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Hu, Y., Yang, J., Chen, L., Li, K., Sima, C., Zhu, X., Chai, S., Du, S., Lin, T., Wang, W., Lu, L., Jia, X., Liu, Q., Dai, J., Qiao, Y., Li, H.: Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 17853–17862 (June 2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Jain, A., Koppula, H.S., Soh, S., Raghavan, B., Singh, A., Saxena, A.: Brain4cars: Car that knows before you do via sensory-fusion deep learning architecture (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00740

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    DOLCE: A model-based probabilistic diffusion framework for limited-angle CT reconstruction,

    Jiang, B., Chen, S., Xu, Q., Liao, B., Chen, J., Zhou, H., Zhang, Q., Liu, W., Huang, C., Wang, X.: Vad: Vectorized scene representation for efficient autonomous driving. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 8306–8316 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00766

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00766 2023

  14. [14]

    2025.3D and 4D world modeling: a survey

    Kong, L., Yang, W., Mei, J., Liu, Y., Liang, A., Zhu, D., Lu, D., Yin, W., Hu, X., Jia, M., Deng, J., Zhang, K., Wu, Y., Yan, T., Gao, S., Wang, S., Li, L., Pan, L., Liu, Y., Zhu, J., Tsang Ooi, W., Hoi, S.C.H., Liu, Z.: 3D and 4D World Modeling: A Survey. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2509.07996 (Sep 2025).https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2509.07996

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning

    Li, J., Li, D., Savarese, S., Hoi, S.: Blip-2: bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML’23, JMLR.org (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Latent World Model

    Li, Y., Fan, L., He, J., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Tan, T.: Enhancing End-to- End Autonomous Driving with Latent World Model. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2406.08481 (Jun 2024).https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.08481

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08481 2024

  17. [17]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(4), 2597–2614 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/ TPAMI.2025.3526936

    Liu, H., Huang, Z., Huang, W., Yang, H., Mo, X., Lv, C.: Hybrid-prediction integrated planning for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence47(4), 2597–2614 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/ TPAMI.2025.3526936

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    Liu, H., Li, C., Wu, Q., Lee, Y.J.: Visual instruction tuning. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS ’23, Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Liu, W., Guo, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, W., Yang, L., Qiao, Y., Wang, L., Li, Z., Lv, C., Zhang, S., Xi, J., Liu, H.: Uv-m3tl: A unified and versatile multimodal multi-task learning framework for assistive driving perception (2026),https://arxiv.org/ abs/2602.01594

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Liu, W., Qiao, Y., Wang, Z., Guo, Q., Chen, Z., Zhou, M., Li, X., Wang, L., Li, Z., Liu, H., Wang, W.: Tem3-learning: Time-efficient multimodal multi-task Driver-WM 17 learning for advanced assistive driving. In: Laugier, C., Renzaglia, A., Atanasov, N., Birchfield, S., Cielniak, G., {De Mattos}, L., Fiorini, L., Giguere, P., Hashimoto, K., Ibanez-Guzman,...

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Liu, W., Wang, W., Qiao, Y., Guo, Q., Zhu, J., Li, P., Chen, Z., Yang, H., Li, Z., Wang, L., Tan, T., Liu, H.: MMTL-UniAD: A Unified Framework for Multimodal and Multi-Task Learning in Assistive Driving Perception . In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 6864–6874. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (...

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    In: 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

    Martin, M., Roitberg, A., Haurilet, M., Horne, M., Reiß, S., Voit, M., Stiefelhagen, R.: Drive&act: A multi-modal dataset for fine-grained driver behavior recognition in autonomous vehicles. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 2801–2810 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019. 00289

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv.2019 2019

  23. [23]

    In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Martinez, J., Black, M.J., Romero, J.: On Human Motion Prediction Using Recurrent Neural Networks . In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 4674–4683. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (Jul 2017).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.497, https: //doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.497

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.497 2017

  24. [24]

    Rahimi, A., Gerard, V., Zablocki, E., Cord, M., Alahi, A.: Mad: Motion appearance decoupling for efficient driving world models (2026),https://arxiv.org/abs/2601. 09452

    2026

  25. [25]

    SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee: Taxonomy and definitions fortermsrelated toon-roadmotorvehicle automated drivingsystems.SAE Standard J3016 (2014)

    2014

  26. [26]

    In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part LII

    Sima, C., Renz, K., Chitta, K., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Xie, C., Beißwenger, J., Luo, P., Geiger, A., Li, H.: Drivelm: Driving with graph visual question answering. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part LII. p. 256–274. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2024). https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72943-0_15 2024

  27. [27]

    Wang, P., Bai, S., Tan, S., Wang, S., Fan, Z., Bai, J., Chen, K., Liu, X., Wang, J., Ge, W., Fan, Y., Dang, K., Du, M., Ren, X., Men, R., Liu, D., Zhou, C., Zhou, J., Lin, J.: Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution (2024),https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12191

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Wang, W., Wang, L., Zhang, C., Liu, C., Sun, L.: Social interactions for au- tonomous driving: A review and perspectives. Found. Trends Robot10(3–4), 198–376 (Nov 2022).https://doi.org/10.1561/2300000078, https://doi.org/ 10.1561/2300000078 18 H. Chi et al

    work page doi:10.1561/2300000078 2022

  29. [29]

    In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part XLVIII

    Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Huang, G., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Lu, J.: Drivedreamer: Towards real- world-drive world models for autonomous driving. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part XLVIII. p. 55–72. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73195-...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73195-2_4 2024

  30. [30]

    Human Factors64(7), 1227– 1260 (2022)

    Weaver, B.W., DeLucia, P.R.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of takeover performance during conditionally automated driving. Human Factors64(7), 1227– 1260 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies128, 103199 (2021).https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103199

    Xing,Y.,Lv,C.,Cao,D.,Hang,P.:Towardhuman-vehiclecollaboration:Reviewand perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies128, 103199 (2021).https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103199

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103199 2021

  32. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology68(6), 5379–5390 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT

    Xing, Y., Lv, C., Wang, H., Cao, D., Velenis, E., Wang, F.Y.: Driver activity recognition for intelligent vehicles: A deep learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology68(6), 5379–5390 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT. 2019.2908425

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt 2019

  33. [33]

    Yan, S., Xiong, Y., Lin, D.: Spatial temporal graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AAAI’18/I...

    2018

  34. [34]

    DOLCE: A model-based probabilistic diffusion framework for limited-angle CT reconstruction,

    Yang, D., Huang, S., Xu, Z., Li, Z., Wang, S., Li, M., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, K., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, P., Zhai, P., Zhang, L.: Aide: A vision-driven multi-view, multi-modal, multi-tasking dataset for assistive driving perception. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 20402–20413 (2023).https://doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01871 2023

  35. [35]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems25(2), 2034–2045 (2024)

    Yang, H., Liu, H., Hu, Z., Nguyen, A.T., Guerra, T.M., Lv, C.: Quantitative identi- fication of driver distraction: A weakly supervised contrastive learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems25(2), 2034–2045 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3316203

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3316203 2034

  36. [36]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Zhao, G., Ni, C., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Huang, G., Chen, X., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., Mei, W., Wang, X.: Drivedreamer4d: World models are effective data machines for 4d driving scene representation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 12015–12026 (June 2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Zhao, G., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Huang, G., Bao, X., Wang, X.: Drivedreamer- 2: Llm-enhanced world models for diverse driving video generation (2024),https: //arxiv.org/abs/2403.06845

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

    Zheng, Y., Yang, P., Xing, Z., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Y., Gao, Y., Li, P., Zhang, T., Xia, Z., Jia, P., Lang, X., Zhao, D.: World4drive: End-to-end autonomous driving via intention-aware physical latent world model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 28632–28642 (October 2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Zhu, G., Fan, S., Dai, H., Ho, E.S.L.: Waymo-3dskelmo: A multi-agent 3d skele- tal motion dataset for pedestrian interaction modeling in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. p. 13184–13190. MM ’25, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2025). https://doi.org/10.1145/3746027.3758273, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3746027.3758273 2025

  40. [40]

    DOLCE: A model-based probabilistic diffusion framework for limited-angle CT reconstruction,

    Zhu, W., Ma, X., Liu, Z., Liu, L., Wu, W., Wang, Y.: MotionBERT: A Unified Perspective on Learning Human Motion Representations . In: 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 15039–15053. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (Oct 2023).https://doi.org/10. 1109/ICCV51070.2023.01385, https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/1...

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    maximal injection step

    Zitkovich, B., Yu, T., Xu, S., Xu, P., Xiao, T., Xia, F., Wu, J., Wohlhart, P., Welker, S., Wahid, A., Vuong, Q., Vanhoucke, V., Tran, H., Soricut, R., Singh, A., Singh, J., Sermanet, P., Sanketi, P.R., Salazar, G., Ryoo, M.S., Reymann, K., Rao, K., Pertsch, K., Mordatch, I., Michalewski, H., Lu, Y., Levine, S., Lee, L., Lee, T.W.E., Leal, I., Kuang, Y., ...

    2023