Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

REMSA: Foundation Model Selection for Remote Sensing via a Constraint-Aware Agent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2511.17442 v3 pith:HVDYOMVR submitted 2025-11-21 cs.CV cs.AI

REMSA: Foundation Model Selection for Remote Sensing via a Constraint-Aware Agent

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords remsamodelsdatafoundationremotersfmselectionsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation Models (FMs) are increasingly integrated into remote sensing (RS) pipelines. These models include unimodal vision encoders and multimodal architectures. FMs are adapted to diverse perception tasks, such as image classification, change detection, and visual question answering. However, selecting the most suitable remote sensing foundation model (RSFM) for a specific task remains challenging due to scattered documentation, heterogeneous formats, and complex deployment constraints. To address this, we first introduce the RSFM Database (RS-FMD), the first structured and schema-guided resource covering over 160 RSFMs trained on various data modalities, spanning different spatial, spectral, and temporal resolutions, considering different learning paradigms. Built upon RS-FMD, we further present REMSA, a constraint-aware agent that enables automated RSFM selection from natural language queries. REMSA combines structured FM metadata retrieval with a task-driven decision workflow. In detail, it interprets user input, clarifies missing constraints, ranks models via in-context learning, and provides transparent justifications. Our system supports various RS tasks and data modalities, enabling personalized, reproducible, and efficient FM selection. To evaluate REMSA, we construct a benchmark of 100 expert-verified RS query scenarios. Each query is evaluated across 4 systems and 3 LLM backbones, with the top-3 selected models manually assessed by domain experts. This results in 3,000 expert-scored task--system--model configurations under our novel expert-centered evaluation protocol. REMSA outperforms multiple baselines, showing its practical utility in real decision-making applications. REMSA operates entirely on publicly available metadata of open source RSFMs, without accessing private or sensitive data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GeoAgentBench: A Dynamic Execution Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Agents in Spatial Analysis

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GeoAgentBench supplies a live execution environment and Plan-and-React architecture that lets tool-using AI agents handle multi-step GIS tasks more robustly than prior static evaluation methods.

  2. Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Agentic AI faces structural challenges in remote sensing due to geospatial data properties and workflow constraints, requiring EO-native agents built around structured state, tool-aware reasoning, and validity-aware e...

  3. Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Agentic AI for remote sensing requires new designs centered on structured geospatial state, tool-aware reasoning, verifier-guided execution, and physical validity rather than generic extensions.

  4. Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Position paper identifies structural challenges in applying generic agentic AI to Earth Observation and outlines design principles for EO-native agents focused on geospatial state and validity.