Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learning model-based planning from scratch

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.06170 v1 pith:HONFNTL2 submitted 2017-07-19 cs.AI cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML

Learning model-based planning from scratch

classification cs.AI cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords imaginedmodel-basedactionsimaginationlearnplanplanningagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that model-based planning is a powerful approach to sequential decision-making. It is often very challenging in practice, however, because while a model can be used to evaluate a plan, it does not prescribe how to construct a plan. Here we introduce the "Imagination-based Planner", the first model-based, sequential decision-making agent that can learn to construct, evaluate, and execute plans. Before any action, it can perform a variable number of imagination steps, which involve proposing an imagined action and evaluating it with its model-based imagination. All imagined actions and outcomes are aggregated, iteratively, into a "plan context" which conditions future real and imagined actions. The agent can even decide how to imagine: testing out alternative imagined actions, chaining sequences of actions together, or building a more complex "imagination tree" by navigating flexibly among the previously imagined states using a learned policy. And our agent can learn to plan economically, jointly optimizing for external rewards and computational costs associated with using its imagination. We show that our architecture can learn to solve a challenging continuous control problem, and also learn elaborate planning strategies in a discrete maze-solving task. Our work opens a new direction toward learning the components of a model-based planning system and how to use them.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems

    cs.AI 2019-06 accept novelty 9.0

    Mesa-optimization arises when learned models act as optimizers with objectives that can differ from their training loss, creating alignment risks in advanced machine learning.

  2. On the Feasibility of Learning, Rather than Assuming, Human Biases for Reward Inference

    cs.LG 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Learning the demonstrator's planning algorithm via a differentiable planner improves IRL reward inference over incorrect bias assumptions but underperforms exact planners.