pith. sign in

arxiv: 1706.04965 · v2 · pith:YZ7QN7K3new · submitted 2017-06-15 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · hep-ex

Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 17:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det hep-ex
keywords particle-flow reconstructionCMS detectorjet reconstructionhadronic taumissing transverse momentumpileup mitigationLHC collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

The particle-flow algorithm reconstructs every final-state particle in CMS collisions to deliver superior jet, tau, and missing-momentum measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a particle-flow reconstruction algorithm developed for the CMS detector at the LHC. It combines data from the tracker, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters, and muon spectrometer to produce a complete list of identified particles for each collision. This global event description improves reconstruction of jets, hadronic tau decays, missing transverse momentum, electrons, and muons beyond previous methods. The algorithm also tags particles from pileup interactions, supporting effective mitigation techniques. Collision data at 8 TeV matches simulation predictions and confirms the performance gains hold up to an average of 20 pileup interactions.

Core claim

The comprehensive list of final-state particles identified and reconstructed by the particle-flow algorithm provides a global event description that leads to unprecedented CMS performance for jet and hadronic tau decay reconstruction, missing transverse momentum determination, and electron and muon identification, while enabling efficient pileup mitigation.

What carries the argument

The particle-flow reconstruction algorithm, which links tracker tracks to calorimeter energy deposits and muon signals to classify and measure all particles in each event.

If this is right

  • Jet energy and direction measurements achieve higher precision and resolution than calorimeter-only methods.
  • Hadronic tau decay identification and efficiency improve for analyses involving tau leptons.
  • Missing transverse momentum estimates become more accurate by accounting for all visible particles.
  • Electrons and muons receive additional identification power from combined tracking and calorimeter information.
  • Particles from pileup can be identified and removed, reducing their impact on physics observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same particle list could streamline simultaneous use of multiple object types in a single physics analysis.
  • Performance validated up to 20 pileup interactions suggests the approach scales to the higher densities expected in future LHC runs.
  • The method's reliance on detector segmentation implies similar gains may appear in other experiments with comparable tracking and calorimetry.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo simulation used to tune and validate the algorithm accurately reproduces the detector response, particle interactions, and pileup conditions in the real 8 TeV data.

What would settle it

A significant mismatch between data and simulation in metrics such as jet energy resolution, hadronic tau identification efficiency, or missing transverse momentum resolution after particle-flow reconstruction would indicate the claim does not hold.

read the original abstract

The CMS apparatus was identified, a few years before the start of the LHC operation at CERN, to feature properties well suited to particle-flow (PF) reconstruction: a highly-segmented tracker, a fine-grained electromagnetic calorimeter, a hermetic hadron calorimeter, a strong magnetic field, and an excellent muon spectrometer. A fully-fledged PF reconstruction algorithm tuned to the CMS detector was therefore developed and has been consistently used in physics analyses for the first time at a hadron collider. For each collision, the comprehensive list of final-state particles identified and reconstructed by the algorithm provides a global event description that leads to unprecedented CMS performance for jet and hadronic tau decay reconstruction, missing transverse momentum determination, and electron and muon identification. This approach also allows particles from pileup interactions to be identified and enables efficient pileup mitigation methods. The data collected by CMS at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV show excellent agreement with the simulation and confirm the superior PF performance at least up to an average of 20 pileup interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the development and implementation of a fully-fledged particle-flow (PF) reconstruction algorithm for the CMS detector at the LHC. The algorithm exploits the detector's highly-segmented tracker, fine-grained ECAL, hermetic HCAL, strong magnetic field, and muon spectrometer to reconstruct a comprehensive list of final-state particles for each collision event. This global event description enables improved performance in jet and hadronic tau reconstruction, missing transverse momentum determination, electron and muon identification, and pileup mitigation. The paper details the algorithm tuning, particle identification and linking procedures, and validates the approach using 8 TeV collision data, reporting excellent agreement with Monte Carlo simulation up to an average of 20 pileup interactions.

Significance. If the validations hold, this work is significant for documenting the PF method that has become central to CMS physics analyses, providing a detailed, reproducible description of how individual particle reconstruction yields superior global event performance compared to traditional approaches. The direct data-MC comparisons for jet energy resolution, MET, tau ID, and lepton reconstruction, along with explicit testing of pileup modeling, strengthen the claims by grounding them in external 8 TeV benchmarks rather than unverified simulation assumptions. This enables better understanding and further development of event reconstruction techniques at hadron colliders.

major comments (2)
  1. [Performance validation section] Section on performance validation (likely around the data-MC comparison figures): while excellent agreement is reported, the manuscript should explicitly quantify the improvement over non-PF methods (e.g., calorimeter-only jets or track-based MET) in the same 8 TeV dataset to substantiate the 'unprecedented' and 'superior' performance claims; without these side-by-side metrics, the central assertion of global event description benefits rests partly on qualitative statements.
  2. [Algorithm implementation and tuning] Description of the PF algorithm tuning and particle linking (early sections on implementation): the procedure for handling neutral hadrons and photons in high pileup relies on specific energy and position resolutions; if these parameters are derived from simulation, the paper must demonstrate that residual data-MC discrepancies do not propagate into the final-state particle list at a level that affects downstream physics observables like jet substructure or tau decay modes.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for data-MC comparison plots should include the specific pileup range and selection criteria used, to allow readers to assess the scope of the 'up to 20 pileup' validation.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for particle-flow objects (e.g., PF candidates vs. reconstructed particles) should be standardized throughout to avoid ambiguity in the global event description sections.
  3. [Results section] A brief table summarizing key performance metrics (e.g., jet resolution, MET resolution) with and without PF would improve clarity and support the significance claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the PF algorithm and its performance.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Performance validation section] Section on performance validation (likely around the data-MC comparison figures): while excellent agreement is reported, the manuscript should explicitly quantify the improvement over non-PF methods (e.g., calorimeter-only jets or track-based MET) in the same 8 TeV dataset to substantiate the 'unprecedented' and 'superior' performance claims; without these side-by-side metrics, the central assertion of global event description benefits rests partly on qualitative statements.

    Authors: We agree that explicit side-by-side quantitative comparisons with non-PF methods on the same 8 TeV dataset would better substantiate the performance claims. The manuscript validates the PF algorithm through detailed data-MC agreement for jets, MET, taus, and leptons, but does not include direct numerical comparisons to calorimeter-only or track-based alternatives in the presented figures. We will add a dedicated paragraph and updated figures in the performance validation section that quantify the improvements (e.g., jet energy resolution and MET resolution) relative to non-PF approaches using the identical dataset. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Algorithm implementation and tuning] Description of the PF algorithm tuning and particle linking (early sections on implementation): the procedure for handling neutral hadrons and photons in high pileup relies on specific energy and position resolutions; if these parameters are derived from simulation, the paper must demonstrate that residual data-MC discrepancies do not propagate into the final-state particle list at a level that affects downstream physics observables like jet substructure or tau decay modes.

    Authors: The energy and position resolutions for neutral hadrons and photons are determined from a combination of test-beam data, simulation, and in-situ calibration with collision data. The manuscript already shows that the final PF-based observables (jet substructure, tau decay modes, and MET) agree well between data and simulation up to 20 pileup interactions, which provides indirect evidence that residual discrepancies do not propagate at a level affecting physics results. To address the comment directly, we will expand the algorithm tuning section with additional text describing the data-driven components of the calibration and include a brief sensitivity study showing the impact on downstream observables. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation or claims

full rationale

The paper describes the PF algorithm, its tuning on CMS detector properties, and reports performance metrics through direct comparisons of data and simulation in 8 TeV collisions, with explicit agreement shown up to ~20 pileup interactions. All central claims (global event description, jet/tau/MET/lepton performance) rest on these external empirical benchmarks rather than on any self-definitional loop, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation that reduces the result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain is self-contained against real collision data and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that detector simulation faithfully models real data; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract, and standard particle-physics modeling is invoked without derivation.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The CMS detector response and particle interactions can be accurately modeled by Monte Carlo simulation
    Invoked to tune the PF algorithm and to claim agreement between data and simulation
  • standard math Known physics processes govern how particles interact with detector material
    Standard background assumption in high-energy physics reconstruction

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5463 in / 1377 out tokens · 37908 ms · 2026-05-09T17:31:20.215692+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 54 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for single vector-like quark production in opposite-sign dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    No excess observed in search for vector-like top quark T to tH in opposite-sign dilepton final states; 95% CL upper limits on sigma times BR range from 2.0 pb at 600 GeV to 0.1 pb at 1000 GeV.

  2. Observation of nuclear suppression in coherent $\Upsilon$(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei at the LHC

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The measured cross-section ratio to a no-nuclear-effects baseline is 0.25, yielding a nuclear gluon suppression factor R_g^Pb of 0.55 at x ≈ 10^{-3} and μ² = 22.4 GeV².

  3. Measurement of D$^0$ meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

    nucl-ex 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First measurement of photonuclear D0 production cross section in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions as a function of pT and rapidity, compared to NLO pQCD with nuclear PDFs and CGC predictions.

  4. Observation of electroweak production of pairs of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMS provides first evidence for electroweak ZZjj production in the ℓℓννjj final state with measured cross section 0.37 fb agreeing with SM prediction 0.39 fb at 3.1σ (5.0σ combined), plus limits on anomalous quartic g...

  5. Reweighting Adversarial Networks for Unbinned Unfolding

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RANs generalize moment unfolding to full phase-space unbinned unfolding via detector-level Wasserstein critics without requiring support overlap or multiple iterations.

  6. Search for low-mass resonances decaying to $\tau\tau$ and measurement of the $\Upsilon$ $\to$ $\tau\tau$ decay in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMS measures Υ(1S,2S,3S) → τ⁺τ⁻ with 5.8σ significance and cross section 3.5 ± 0.7 (stat) ± 0.7 (syst) nb while setting 95% CL upper limits of 40-400 pb on spin-zero resonance production to ττ with no observed excess ...

  7. Simultaneous measurements of $N$-subjettiness observables in jets from gluons and light-flavour quarks, and in decays of boosted W bosons and top quarks

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMS reports a simultaneous measurement of 25 N-subjettiness observables in 1-, 2-, and 3-prong jets, unfolded to stable particles with particle-level correlations for QCD modeling.

  8. Evidence of ZZ$\gamma$ production and observation of $4\ell\gamma$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    First evidence for ZZ gamma production at 3.7 sigma and observation of 4 lepton gamma at 5.0 sigma in CMS data at 13 TeV, with measured fiducial cross sections consistent with predictions.

  9. Measurements of electroweak production of a photon in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First observation of electroweak photon plus two jets production yields a cross section of 202 fb consistent with the standard model prediction of 177 fb at greater than 5 sigma significance.

  10. Search for light pseudoscalar bosons, pair-produced in Higgs boson decays in the four-electron final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    No excess observed; first LHC search sets 95% CL upper limits on H to AA to 4e branching fraction down to 10^{-5} for 10-100 MeV masses and short lifetimes.

  11. Search for Higgsinos in final states with low-momentum lepton-track pairs at 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-11 accept novelty 7.0

    CMS excludes Higgsino masses up to 115 GeV for neutralino mass differences down to 1.5 GeV in a nearly degenerate four-state Higgsino scenario using multivariate analysis on LHC data.

  12. Jet fragmentation function and groomed substructure of bottom quark jets in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMS measures soft-drop groomed radius and momentum balance plus a charged fragmentation function for b jets, observing dead-cone suppression compared to inclusive jets.

  13. Observation of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen-oxygen collisions

    nucl-ex 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First measurement of the nuclear modification factor R_AA in OO collisions at 5.36 TeV shows suppression with a minimum of 0.69 at p_T around 6 GeV, favoring models with parton energy loss.

  14. Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.36 TeV

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The ttbar production cross section in PbPb collisions at 5.36 TeV is measured as 3.42 +0.54-0.51 (stat) +0.50-0.43 (syst) μb and is consistent with NNLO pQCD predictions using nuclear PDFs.

  15. Search for electroweakinos in compressed-spectrum scenarios with low-momentum isolated tracks in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No significant excess observed; 95% CL exclusion of higgsino electroweakinos with mass splittings 0.28-1.15 GeV and chargino masses up to 185 GeV using soft-track and neural-network selection.

  16. Search for associated production of a Higgs boson and two vector bosons via vector boson scattering at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CMS excludes κ_VV outside 0.40-1.60 at 95% CL and constrains κ_2W and κ_2Z using VBS events with a boosted Higgs to bb decay.

  17. Search for heavy resonances decaying into four-lepton final states via light bosons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No significant excess observed in four-lepton events from heavy resonances, setting upper limits on production cross sections for dilepton masses 0.4-15 GeV using novel merged-object techniques.

  18. Highly boosted dielectron identification in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CMS develops two multivariate models for identifying boosted dielectrons with γ_L > 20, reporting 80% efficiency for two-track cases from J/ψ data and 60% for single-track from Z conversions, plus an energy correction.

  19. Search for a new heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a neutral scalar boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 6.0

    No excess found in search for T' to top plus phi; excludes T' masses 0.85-1.3 TeV at 95% CL for SM Higgs case with 5% width, and sets cross-section limits as low as 0.1 fb.

  20. Particle transformers for identifying Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of W bosons

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PaRT achieves >50% tagging efficiency for boosted H->WW jets at 1% background efficiency, decorrelated from jet mass, with data-to-simulation scale factors of 0.9-1.0 on 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV collisions.

  21. Search for soft unclustered energy patterns produced in association with a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No significant excess is observed in leptonic W/Z plus high-multiplicity soft-particle events, setting limits on Higgs to SUEP decays across a range of model parameters.

  22. First evidence for mixing-induced $CP$ violation in B$^0_\mathrm{s}$ $\to$ J/$\psi\,\phi$(1020) decays in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First evidence for non-zero φ_s in B_s^0 → J/ψ φ decays at 3.2σ from CMS 13 TeV data combined with prior 8 TeV result.

  23. Study of ZZ and ZH production in the bb$\tau\tau$ final state and search for high-mass spin-0 and spin-1 resonances in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CMS sets 95% CL upper limits on σ(X)B(X→ZZ) (300 pb–24 fb) and σ(Z')B(Z'→ZH) (0.4 pb–12 fb) for resonances up to 6 TeV in the bbττ channel with no SM deviation observed.

  24. Search for long-lived particles decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV using data scouting

    hep-ex 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Null result from dimuon scouting search at 13.6 TeV sets 95% CL limits on long-lived particle production in Higgs and b-hadron decay channels across multiple BSM models.

  25. Search for single production of a vector-like B' quark decaying to a top quark and a W boson in the single-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CMS excludes narrow-width singlet vector-like B' quarks with masses 0.8-1.23 TeV in the tW channel using neural-network tagging and data-driven background modeling.

  26. Search for light scalar particles produced in Higgs boson decays in exclusive final states with two muons and two hadrons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CMS obtains O(10^{-4}) upper limits on Higgs branching fraction to light scalars (0.4-2 GeV) decaying to muon-hadron pairs with lifetimes up to ~1 mm.

  27. Search for Higgs boson decays into two neutral scalars with unequal masses in final states with b quarks and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No statistically significant excess is observed in the search for Higgs decays to two neutral scalars with unequal masses, setting 95% CL upper limits between 0.9 and 36.8 pb depending on mass and decay scenario.

  28. Search for pair production of additional neutral scalars within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two electrons or two muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    No significant excess found; new exclusion limits reach m_H = 108 GeV for m_H - m_A = 78 GeV in the Inert Doublet Model.

  29. Search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying into the Higgs boson and a new scalar particle in the $\mathrm{b}\bar{\mathrm{b}}\mathrm{b}\bar{\mathrm{b}}$ final state using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence found for a new heavy scalar resonance X decaying to Higgs plus new scalar Y in the four-bottom-quark final state; 95% CL upper limits set on cross section times branching fraction.

  30. Search for light charged Higgs bosons decaying to charm and strange quarks in $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ events in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence found for light charged Higgs bosons in ttbar events; upper limits set on B(t to H±b) of 0.07-1.12% at 95% CL for masses 40-160 GeV assuming 100% decay to cs.

  31. A search for microscopic black holes, string balls, and sphalerons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence found; excludes semiclassical black holes below 8.4-11.4 TeV and string balls below 9.0-10.7 TeV at 95% CL, and caps the quark-quark sphaleron fraction above 9 TeV at 0.0034.

  32. Measurement of the dineutrino system kinematic variables in dileptonic top quark pair production in proton-proton collisions at$\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Differential cross sections for ttbar production in e+e-, mu+mu-, and e mu channels measured versus dineutrino pT and azimuthal separation using 138 fb-1 of 13 TeV CMS data, unfolded to particle level with unregulariz...

  33. High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment

    hep-ex 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CMS measures the W boson mass as 80360.2 ± 9.9 MeV from 2016 data, consistent with the Standard Model prediction.

  34. Search for new physics using single-lepton events with high multiplicities of jets and b jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    No significant excess found in single-lepton high-multiplicity jet events; gluino masses below 1890 GeV excluded at 95% CL in R-parity violating SUSY model.

  35. Analysis of the $C\!P$ structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Combined CMS result gives α^{Hττ} = 7 ± 16° for the CP mixing angle in H→ττ, consistent with SM expectation of 0 ± 14°.

  36. Search for the nonresonant production of a pair of additional Higgs bosons in the Type-X two-Higgs-doublet model in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    No evidence found for additional Higgs boson pairs in Type-X 2HDM; new limits exclude the model for explaining the muon anomalous magnetic moment anomaly.

  37. First measurements of vector boson scattering in W$^\pm$W$^{\pm}$ and WZ production in all-leptonic final states at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMS observes electroweak W±W± and WZ production with two jets at 13.6 TeV with >5σ significance in all-leptonic final states using 171 fb⁻¹ of data.

  38. Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions using the $\gamma\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Updated constraints from the full Run 2 dataset show no evidence for anomalous Higgs couplings in gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production modes decaying to two photons.

  39. Improved results on Higgs boson pair production in the 4b final state

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMS sets an observed upper limit of 4.4 on the HH signal strength μ_HH in the 4b final state at 13.6 TeV, improving prior LHC results by more than a factor of two in the resolved topology.

  40. Measurement of the Z $\to$ $\mu^+\mu^-$ angular coefficients in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as functions of transverse momentum and rapidity

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New double-differential measurement of angular coefficients A0-A7 in Drell-Yan muon pair production in eight pT and two rapidity bins, compared to NNLO pQCD.

  41. Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into a bottom quark-antiquark pair in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New upper limits exclude mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV for a 50 GeV dark Higgs and up to 2.5 TeV for 150 GeV in a spin-1 mediator dark matter model, the most stringent to date for these masses.

  42. Search for the single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a W boson and a b quark using single-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    No significant excess observed in search for vector-like quark single production to Wb, setting 95% CL upper limits on κ_W as low as 0.086 near 1.4 TeV mass and excluding masses below 2.4 TeV at κ_W=0.2.

  43. High-level hadronic tau lepton triggers of the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV

    physics.ins-det 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMS deployed ML-based high-level triggers for hadronic tau leptons with high efficiency and low compute cost, validated on 62 fb^{-1} of 2022-2023 data.

  44. Search for new physics in the final state with a single photon and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Combined LHC data shows no deviation from the standard model in single-photon plus missing momentum events, establishing the strongest limits to date on simplified dark matter models and large extra dimensions.

  45. DeepMET: Improving missing transverse momentum estimation with a deep neural network

    hep-ex 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    DeepMET is a neural-network-based missing transverse momentum estimator that improves resolution by 10-30% over existing CMS methods across a range of final states.

  46. Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from Higgs boson decays using the 4$\tau$ and 2$\mu$2$\tau$ final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-08 accept novelty 4.0

    No excess observed in search for Higgs to a1 a1 decays; 95% CL upper limits on branching ratio range 0.007-0.079 for a1 masses 4-15 GeV, excluding >16% in Type III 2HD+S for tan beta >2.

  47. Combined effective field theory interpretation of Higgs boson, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multi-jet measurements

    hep-ex 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMS performs a combined SMEFT fit to multiple LHC measurements and precision data, yielding individual constraints on 64 Wilson coefficients and 43 linear combinations.

  48. Search for physics beyond the standard model in four and three top quark production events using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    CMS derives limits on six SMEFT Wilson coefficients, excludes topphilic resonances between 400-1600 GeV, and extracts the top Yukawa coupling from multi-lepton top events in 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV data.

  49. Dependence of two-particle azimuthal correlations on the forward rapidity gap width in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV

    nucl-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    CMS measures V_nΔ in pPb events at √s_NN = 8.16 TeV as a function of forward rapidity gap width, p_T, and multiplicity in γPb and IP Pb enriched samples, comparing to prior pp, pPb, and γp data plus event generators.

  50. Search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 3.0

    No significant excess observed in CMS four-lepton data; 95% CL upper limits set on heavy scalar resonance production cross section times BR(ZZ) ranging 0.05-0.1 pb at low mass to 0 pb at high mass.

  51. Studies of Z $\to$ 4$\ell$ decays in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 and 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Measured inclusive B(Z → 4ℓ) = 4.67 ± 0.21 × 10^{-6} with individual modes, differential distributions, and triple-product asymmetry limits.

  52. Search for new physics in triple boson production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV using the effective field theory approach

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    No excess in VVV production; bounds set on c_W/Λ² (-0.13 to 0.12 TeV^{-2}) and c_Hq3/Λ² (-0.24 to 0.21 TeV^{-2}) at 95% CL.

  53. Inclusive and differential measurements of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\gamma$ cross section and the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\gamma$ / $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ cross section ratio in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-11 accept novelty 3.0

    CMS reports fiducial and differential ttγ cross sections plus ttγ/tt ratios at 13 TeV that agree with Standard Model expectations within uncertainties.

  54. Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    physics.ins-det 2018-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The CMS muon detector after upgrades performs to design specifications or better in 13 TeV collisions, with measurements of resolution, efficiency, and timing matching simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 54 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Schwingel

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  2. [2]

    Buskulic, et al., Performance of the ALEPH detector at LEP, Nucl

    ALEPH Collaboration, “Performance of the ALEPH detector at LEP”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 360 (1995) 481, doi:10.1016/0168-9002(95)00138-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(95)00138-7 1995

  3. [3]

    Particle flow calorimetry and the PandoraPFA algorithm

    M. A. Thomson, “Particle flow calorimetry and the PandoraPFA algorithm”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 611 (2009) 25, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.09.009, arXiv:0907.3577. References 61

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.09.009 2009

  4. [4]

    Arbor, a new approach of the Particle Flow Algorithm

    M. Ruan and H. Videau, “Arbor, a new approach of the Particle Flow Algorithm”, in Proceedings, International Conference on Calorimetry for the High Energy Frontier (CHEF 2013), p. 316. 2013. arXiv:1403.4784

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    First look at the physics case of TLEP

    M. Bicer et al., “First look at the physics case of TLEP”, JHEP 01 (2014) 164, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)164, arXiv:1308.6176

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)164 2014

  6. [6]

    CEPC-SPPC preliminary conceptual design report: Physics and detector

    CEPC-SPPC Study Group, “CEPC-SPPC preliminary conceptual design report: Physics and detector”, Technical Report IHEP-CEPC-DR-2015-01, IHEP-TH-2015-01, IHEP-EP-2015-01, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Performance of the DELPHI detector

    DELPHI Collaboration, “Performance of the DELPHI detector”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 378 (1996) 57, doi:10.1016/0168-9002(96)00463-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(96)00463-9 1996

  8. [8]

    Petit p ´eriple aux confins du mod`ele standard avec HERA

    E. Sauvan, “Petit p ´eriple aux confins du mod`ele standard avec HERA”. PhD thesis, Marseille, CPPM, CPPM-H-2009-3, Appendix A (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Precise measurement of jet energies with the ZEUS detector

    ZEUS Collaboration, M. Wing, “Precise measurement of jet energies with the ZEUS detector”, in Calorimetry in high energy physics. Proceedings, 9th International Conference, CALOR 2000, volume 21, p. 617. Annecy, France, October, 2001. arXiv:hep-ex/0011046. [Frascati Phys. Ser. 21 (2001) 617]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2000

  10. [10]

    Measurement of σ(p ¯p→ Z + X) Br(Z→ τ+τ−) at√s = 1.96 TeV

    D0 Collaboration, “Measurement of σ(p ¯p→ Z + X) Br(Z→ τ+τ−) at√s = 1.96 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2009) 292, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.010, arXiv:0808.1306

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.010 2009

  11. [11]

    Measurement of σ(pp→ z)·B (z→ ττ) in pp collisions at√s = 1.96 TeV

    CDF Collaboration, “Measurement of σ(pp→ z)·B (z→ ττ) in pp collisions at√s = 1.96 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 092004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.092004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.092004 2007

  12. [12]

    Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS”, JINST 6 (2011) P11002, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/6/11/P11002, arXiv:1107.4277

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/6/11/p11002 2011

  13. [13]

    Reconstruction of hadronic decay products of tau leptons with the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Reconstruction of hadronic decay products of tau leptons with the ATLAS experiment”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 295, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4110-0 , arXiv:1512.05955

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4110-0 2016

  14. [14]

    Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector

    A. Collaboration, “Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector”, (2017). arXiv:1703.10485. Submitted to Eur. Phys. J. C

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    CMS, the magnet project: technical design report

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS, the magnet project: technical design report”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 1997. CERN-LHCC-97-10, https://cds.cern.ch/record/331056

    work page 1997

  16. [16]

    The CMS tracker system project: technical design report

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS tracker system project: technical design report”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 1998. CERN-LHCC-98-006, https://cds.cern.ch/record/368412

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    The CMS tracker: addendum to the Technical Design Report

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS tracker: addendum to the Technical Design Report”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 2000. CERN-LHCC-2000-016, https://cds.cern.ch/record/490194. 62 References

    work page 2000

  18. [18]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”, JINST 9 (2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009, arXiv:1405.6569

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  19. [19]

    The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter project: technical design report

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter project: technical design report”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 1997. CERN-LHCC-97-033, https://cds.cern.ch/record/349375

    work page 1997

  20. [20]

    Addendum to the CMS ECAL technical design report: changes to the CMS ECAL electronics

    CMS Collaboration, “Addendum to the CMS ECAL technical design report: changes to the CMS ECAL electronics”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 2002. CERN-LHCC-2002-027, http://cds.cern.ch/record/581342

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Energy resolution of the barrel of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter

    P . Adzic et al., “Energy resolution of the barrel of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter”, JINST 2 (2007) P04004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/2/04/P04004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/2/04/p04004 2007

  22. [22]

    Mitigation of anomalous APD signals in the CMS ECAL

    W. Bialas and D. A. Petyt, “Mitigation of anomalous APD signals in the CMS ECAL”, JINST 8 (2013) C03020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/03/C03020

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/03/c03020 2013

  23. [23]

    CMS: The hadron calorimeter technical design report

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS: The hadron calorimeter technical design report”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 1997. CERN-LHCC-97-31, https://cds.cern.ch/record/357153

    work page 1997

  24. [24]

    The CMS barrel calorimeter response to particle beams from 2 to 350 GeV/c

    CMS HCAL/ECAL Collaboration, “The CMS barrel calorimeter response to particle beams from 2 to 350 GeV/c”, Eur. Phys. J. C 60 (2009) 359, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0959-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0959-5 2009

  25. [25]

    Identification and filtering of uncharacteristic noise in the CMS hadron calorimeter

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification and filtering of uncharacteristic noise in the CMS hadron calorimeter”, JINST 5 (2010) T03014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/T03014, arXiv:0911.4881

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/t03014 2010

  26. [26]

    CMS: The muon project technical design report

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS: The muon project technical design report”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 1997. CERN-LHCC-97-32, https://cds.cern.ch/record/343814

    work page 1997

  27. [27]

    The performance of the CMS muon detector in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 TeV at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The performance of the CMS muon detector in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 TeV at the LHC”, JINST 8 (2013) P11002, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/11/P11002, arXiv:1306.6905

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/11/p11002 2013

  28. [28]

    CMS physics: technical design report volume 1: detector performance and software

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS physics: technical design report volume 1: detector performance and software”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 2006. CERN-LHCC-2006-001, https://cds.cern.ch/record/922757

    work page 2006

  29. [29]

    Track reconstruction in the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Track reconstruction in the CMS tracker”, CMS Note CMS-NOTE-2006-041, 2006

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Track reconstruction performance in CMS

    P . Azzurri, “Track reconstruction performance in CMS”, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. B 197 (2009) 275, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2009.10.084, arXiv:0812.5036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2009.10.084 2009

  31. [31]

    Studies of tracker material in the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Studies of tracker material in the CMS detector”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TRK-10-003, 2010

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    CMS tracking performance results from early LHC operation

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS tracking performance results from early LHC operation”, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 1165, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1491-3 , arXiv:1007.1988. References 63

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1491-3 2010

  33. [33]

    Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV”, JINST 10 (2015) P06005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/06/P06005, arXiv:1502.02701

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/06/p06005 2015

  34. [34]

    Reconstruction of electrons with the gaussian-sum filter in the CMS tracker at the LHC

    W. Adam, R. Fr ¨uhwirth, A. Strandlie, and T. Todorov, “Reconstruction of electrons with the Gaussian-sum filter in the CMS tracker at the LHC”, J. Phys. G 31 (2005) N9, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/9/N01, arXiv:physics/0306087

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/9/n01 2005

  35. [35]

    Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at√s=7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at√s = 7 TeV”, JINST 7 (2012) P10002, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/P10002, arXiv:1206.4071

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/p10002 2012

  36. [36]

    Energy calibration and resolution of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Energy calibration and resolution of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV”, JINST 8 (2013) P09009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/09/P09009, arXiv:1306.2016

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/09/p09009 2013

  37. [37]

    Geant4 developments and appli- cations

    J. Allison et al., “Geant4 developments and applications”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270, doi:10.1109/TNS.2006.869826

    work page doi:10.1109/tns.2006.869826 2006

  38. [38]

    Communications of the ACM , author =

    J. L. Bentley, “Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching”, Commun. ACM 18 (1975) 509, doi:10.1145/361002.361007

    work page doi:10.1145/361002.361007 1975

  39. [39]

    Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at √ (s) = 8 TeV”, JINST 10 (2015) P08010, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/08/P08010, arXiv:1502.02702

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/08/p08010 2015

  40. [40]

    Electron reconstruction in CMS

    S. Baffioni et al., “Electron reconstruction in CMS”, Eur. Phys. J. C 49 (2007) 1099, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0175-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0175-5 2007

  41. [41]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj ¨ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P . Skands, “PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual”, JHEP 05 (2006) 026, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026, arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 2006

  42. [42]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  43. [43]

    Salam, and Gregory Soyez

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP 04 (2008) 063, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063, arXiv:0802.1189

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  44. [44]

    Salam, and Gregory Soyez

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 , arXiv:1111.6097

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  45. [45]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”, JINST 12 (2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014, arXiv:1607.03663

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  46. [46]

    Measurement of the gluon fragmentation function and a comparison of the scaling violation in gluon and quark jets

    DELPHI Collaboration, “Measurement of the gluon fragmentation function and a comparison of the scaling violation in gluon and quark jets”, Eur. Phys. J. C 13 (2000) 573, doi:10.1007/s100520050719

    work page doi:10.1007/s100520050719 2000

  47. [47]

    Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at √s= 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at√s = 8 TeV”, JINST 10 (2015) P02006, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/02/P02006, arXiv:1411.0511

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/02/p02006 2015

  48. [48]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at√s = 7 and 8 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081, arXiv:1303.4571. 64 References

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  49. [49]

    Measurement of the Properties of a Higgs Boson in the Four-Lepton Final State

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state”, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 092007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.092007, arXiv:1312.5353

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.092007 2014

  50. [50]

    Review of Particle Physics

    Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al., “Review of particle physics”, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001 2016

  51. [51]

    Performance of tau-lepton reconstruction and identification in CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of tau-lepton reconstruction and identification in CMS”, JINST 7 (2012) P01001, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/01/P01001, arXiv:1109.6034

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/01/p01001 2012

  52. [52]

    Reconstruction and identification ofτlepton decays to hadrons and ντ at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Reconstruction and identification of τ lepton decays to hadrons and ντ at CMS”, JINST 11 (2016) P01019, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/P01019, arXiv:1510.07488

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/p01019 2016

  53. [53]

    CMS physics technical design report, volume II: Physics performance

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS technical design report, volume II: Physics performance”, J. Phys. G 34 (2007) 995, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/6/S01

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/6/s01 2007

  54. [54]

    Reconstruction and identification performance of τ lepton decays to hadrons and ντ in LHC Run-2

    CMS Collaboration, “Reconstruction and identification performance of τ lepton decays to hadrons and ντ in LHC Run-2”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TAU-16-002, 2016

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  56. [56]

    Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at √s = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at √s = 7 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 5, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.03.024, arXiv:1210.6718

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.03.024 2013

  57. [57]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari and G. P . Salam, “Pileup subtraction using jet areas”, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 119, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077, arXiv:0707.1378

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077 2008

  58. [58]

    The catchment area of jets

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The catchment area of jets”, JHEP 04 (2008) 005, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/005, arXiv:0802.1188

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/005 2008

  59. [59]

    Pileup per particle identification

    D. Bertolini, P . Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”, JHEP 10 (2014) 059, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059, arXiv:1407.6013

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2014)059 2014

  60. [60]

    Study of pileup removal algorithms for jets

    CMS Collaboration, “Study of pileup removal algorithms for jets”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-14-001, 2014

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Measurements of inclusive W and Z cross sections in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of inclusive W and Z cross sections in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV”, JHEP 01 (2011) 080, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2011)080, arXiv:1012.2466

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2011)080 2011

  62. [62]

    CMS luminosity based on pixel cluster counting - Summer 2013 update

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity based on pixel cluster counting - Summer 2013 update”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001, 2013

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Pileup jet identification

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup jet identification”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-13-005, 2013

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 155, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x , arXiv:1512.00815. References 65

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x 2016

  65. [65]

    CMS technical design report for the pixel detector upgrade

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS technical design report for the pixel detector upgrade”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 2012. CERN-LHCC-2012-016, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1481838

    work page arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    CMS technical design report for the phase 1 upgrade of the hadron calorimeter

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS technical design report for the phase 1 upgrade of the hadron calorimeter”. Technical Design Report CMS. CERN, Geneva, 2012. CERN-LHCC-2012-015, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1481837

    work page arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    CMS phase II upgrade scope document

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS phase II upgrade scope document”, Technical Design Report CERN-LHCC-2015-019, Geneva, 2015. 66 References 67 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A.M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, Wien, Austria W. Adam, E. Asilar, T. Bergauer, J. Brandstetter, E. Brondolin, M. Dragicevic, J...

    work page 2015