Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Wall Street Neophyte: A Zero-Shot Analysis of ChatGPT Over MultiModal Stock Movement Prediction Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.05351 v2 pith:UV4EZDPP submitted 2023-04-10 cs.CL cs.LGq-fin.ST

The Wall Street Neophyte: A Zero-Shot Analysis of ChatGPT Over MultiModal Stock Movement Prediction Challenges

classification cs.CL cs.LGq-fin.ST
keywords chatgptstockanalysispredictioncapabilitiesfinancialhistoricallanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have demonstrated remarkable performance across a variety of natural language processing tasks. However, their effectiveness in the financial domain, specifically in predicting stock market movements, remains to be explored. In this paper, we conduct an extensive zero-shot analysis of ChatGPT's capabilities in multimodal stock movement prediction, on three tweets and historical stock price datasets. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT is a "Wall Street Neophyte" with limited success in predicting stock movements, as it underperforms not only state-of-the-art methods but also traditional methods like linear regression using price features. Despite the potential of Chain-of-Thought prompting strategies and the inclusion of tweets, ChatGPT's performance remains subpar. Furthermore, we observe limitations in its explainability and stability, suggesting the need for more specialized training or fine-tuning. This research provides insights into ChatGPT's capabilities and serves as a foundation for future work aimed at improving financial market analysis and prediction by leveraging social media sentiment and historical stock data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fin-Bias: Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM Decision-Making under human bias in Finance Domain

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs copy biased analyst ratings in investment decisions but a new detection method encourages independent reasoning and can improve stock return predictions beyond human levels.

  2. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MetaGraph uses ontology-guided LLM extraction to build knowledge graphs from 681 papers on GenAI in financial NLP, identifying three distinct phases of development from 2022 to 2025.

  3. A Review of Large Language Models for Stock Price Forecasting from a Hedge-Fund Perspective

    q-fin.PR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    This review synthesizes LLM uses in stock forecasting and catalogs key practical pitfalls from a hedge-fund viewpoint.