Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Private optimization in the interpolation regime: faster rates and hardness results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.17070 v1 pith:LBG45DPR submitted 2022-10-31 cs.LG cs.CRmath.OCstat.ML

Private optimization in the interpolation regime: faster rates and hardness results

classification cs.LG cs.CRmath.OCstat.ML
keywords problemssamplealphacomplexityfracinterpolationprivateachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In non-private stochastic convex optimization, stochastic gradient methods converge much faster on interpolation problems -- problems where there exists a solution that simultaneously minimizes all of the sample losses -- than on non-interpolating ones; we show that generally similar improvements are impossible in the private setting. However, when the functions exhibit quadratic growth around the optimum, we show (near) exponential improvements in the private sample complexity. In particular, we propose an adaptive algorithm that improves the sample complexity to achieve expected error $\alpha$ from $\frac{d}{\varepsilon \sqrt{\alpha}}$ to $\frac{1}{\alpha^\rho} + \frac{d}{\varepsilon} \log\left(\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)$ for any fixed $\rho >0$, while retaining the standard minimax-optimal sample complexity for non-interpolation problems. We prove a lower bound that shows the dimension-dependent term is tight. Furthermore, we provide a superefficiency result which demonstrates the necessity of the polynomial term for adaptive algorithms: any algorithm that has a polylogarithmic sample complexity for interpolation problems cannot achieve the minimax-optimal rates for the family of non-interpolation problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.