Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RAILS: A Robust Adversarial Immune-inspired Learning System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.02840 v2 pith:GESHZ2O4 submitted 2021-06-27 cs.NE cs.CRcs.LG

RAILS: A Robust Adversarial Immune-inspired Learning System

classification cs.NE cs.CRcs.LG
keywords adversarialrailssystemimmune-inspiredlearningrobustaccuracyattack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial attacks against deep neural networks (DNNs) are continuously evolving, requiring increasingly powerful defense strategies. We develop a novel adversarial defense framework inspired by the adaptive immune system: the Robust Adversarial Immune-inspired Learning System (RAILS). Initializing a population of exemplars that is balanced across classes, RAILS starts from a uniform label distribution that encourages diversity and uses an evolutionary optimization process to adaptively adjust the predictive label distribution in a manner that emulates the way the natural immune system recognizes novel pathogens. RAILS' evolutionary optimization process explicitly captures the tradeoff between robustness (diversity) and accuracy (specificity) of the network, and represents a new immune-inspired perspective on adversarial learning. The benefits of RAILS are empirically demonstrated under eight types of adversarial attacks on a DNN adversarial image classifier for several benchmark datasets, including: MNIST; SVHN; CIFAR-10; and CIFAR-10. We find that PGD is the most damaging attack strategy and that for this attack RAILS is significantly more robust than other methods, achieving improvements in adversarial robustness by $\geq 5.62\%, 12.5\%$, $10.32\%$, and $8.39\%$, on these respective datasets, without appreciable loss of classification accuracy. Codes for the results in this paper are available at https://github.com/wangren09/RAILS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.