Pith. sign in

REVIEW

ASK: Adversarial Soft k-Nearest Neighbor Attack and Defense

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.14300 v4 pith:MF4M6XXA submitted 2021-06-27 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR

ASK: Adversarial Soft k-Nearest Neighbor Attack and Defense

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR
keywords attacklossask-atkadversarialmethodpreviousask-defattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN)-based deep learning methods have been applied to many applications due to their simplicity and geometric interpretability. However, the robustness of kNN-based classification models has not been thoroughly explored and kNN attack strategies are underdeveloped. In this paper, we propose an Adversarial Soft kNN (ASK) loss to both design more effective kNN attack strategies and to develop better defenses against them. Our ASK loss approach has two advantages. First, ASK loss can better approximate the kNN's probability of classification error than objectives proposed in previous works. Second, the ASK loss is interpretable: it preserves the mutual information between the perturbed input and the in-class-reference data. We use the ASK loss to generate a novel attack method called the ASK-Attack (ASK-Atk), which shows superior attack efficiency and accuracy degradation relative to previous kNN attacks. Based on the ASK-Atk, we then derive an ASK-\underline{Def}ense (ASK-Def) method that optimizes the worst-case training loss induced by ASK-Atk. Experiments on CIFAR-10 (ImageNet) show that (i) ASK-Atk achieves $\geq 13\%$ ($\geq 13\%$) improvement in attack success rate over previous kNN attacks, and (ii) ASK-Def outperforms the conventional adversarial training method by $\geq 6.9\%$ ($\geq 3.5\%$) in terms of robustness improvement.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.