Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantum Estimation in Strong Fields: in situ ponderomotive sensing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.10070 v2 pith:SQBFASOA submitted 2020-08-23 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Quantum Estimation in Strong Fields: in situ ponderomotive sensing

classification quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords measurementsquantumlasersituuncertaintyintensityionizationmomentum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a new framework to optimize and understand uncertainty from in situ strong field measurements of laser field parameters. We present the first derivation of quantum and classical Fisher information for an electron undergoing strong-field ionization. This is used for parameter estimation and to characterize the uncertainty of the ponderomotive energy, directly proportional to laser intensity. In particular, the quantum and classical Fisher information for the momentum basis displays quadratic scaling over time. This can be linked to above-threshold ionization interference rings for measurements in the momentum basis and to the `ponderomotive phase' for the `ideal' quantum measurements. Preferential scaling is found for increasing laser pulse length and intensity. We use this to demonstrate for in situ measurements of laser intensity, that high resolution momentum spectroscopy has the capacity to reduce the uncertainty by over $25$ times compared to measurements employing the ionization rate, while using the `ideal' quantum measurement would reduce it by a further factor of $2.6$. A minimum uncertainty of the order $2.8 \times 10^{-3}~\%$ is theorized for this framework. Finally, we examine previous in situ measurements formulating a measurement that matches the experimental procedure and suggest how to improve this.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.