Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Prospects and requirements of opaque detectors in accelerator neutrino experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.02792 v3 pith:56HFSYWL submitted 2020-03-04 physics.ins-det hep-exhep-ph

Prospects and requirements of opaque detectors in accelerator neutrino experiments

classification physics.ins-det hep-exhep-ph
keywords detectorsopaqueneutrinoexperimentsacceleratorenergyconfidencedetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Opaque detectors are a recently proposed novel detector concept where an opaque scintillator aligned with wavelength-shifting fibers is used to enable the discrimination of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos with a rather low energy threshold. In this work, we investigate the potential effects of the enhanced detection capabilities of the opaque detectors in accelerator neutrino experiments. Focusing on the energy threshold, energy resolution, detection efficiency and background suppression in the analysis of electron-like events, we determine whether using opaque detectors could lead to improvements in the CP violation and light sterile neutrino searches in the future accelerator neutrino experiments. We also identify the minimum requirements for the opaque detectors to reach the designated physics goals in the simulated experiments. We find that a 75.6% fraction of $\delta_{CP}$ values could be reached for CP violation discovery by 3$\sigma$ confidence level or better when opaque detectors of 120 kton and 130 kton fiducial masses are used together with neutrino beams from J-PARC and MOMENT, respectively, whereas near detectors placed about 250 m from sources are sufficient to exclude the gallium anomaly at 2$\sigma$ confidence level.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.