Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Orbifold equivalence and the sign problem at finite baryon density

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1009.1623 v4 pith:2YYG72NI submitted 2010-09-08 hep-th hep-lathep-ph

Orbifold equivalence and the sign problem at finite baryon density

classification hep-th hep-lathep-ph
keywords theoryequivalencefiniteorbifoldproblemsignbaryondensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We point out that SO(2N_{c}) gauge theory with N_{f} fundamental Dirac fermions does not have a sign problem at finite baryon number chemical potential \mu_{B}. One can thus use lattice Monte Carlo simulations to study this theory at finite density. The absence of a sign problem in the SO(2N_{c}) theory is particularly interesting because a wide class of observables in the SO(2N_{c}) theory coincide with observables in QCD in the large N_{c} limit, as we show using the technique of large N_{c} orbifold equivalence. We argue that the orbifold equivalence between the two theories continues to hold at \mu_{B} \neq 0 provided one adds appropriate deformation terms to the SO(2N_{c}) theory. This opens up the prospect of learning about QCD at \mu_{B} \neq 0 using lattice studies of the SO(2N_{c}) theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.