Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Image Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2601.00553 v2 pith:7QJVLBZD submitted 2026-01-02 cs.CV cs.AI

A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Image Detection

Rajarshi Roy , Ashhar Aziz , Shashwat Bajpai , Nasrin Imanpour , Gurpreet Singh , Shwetangshu Biswas , Kapil Wanaskar , Parth Patwa
show 12 more authors
Subhankar Ghosh Shreyas Dixit Nilesh Ranjan Pal Vipula Rawte Ritvik Garimella Amitava Das Amit Sheth Gaytri Jena Vasu Sharma Aishwarya Naresh Reganti Vinija Jain Aman Chadha
This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords datasetgeneratedimageimagessyntheticdiffusionstablebecome
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal generative AI systems like Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, and MidJourney have fundamentally changed how synthetic images are created. These tools drive innovation but also enable the spread of misleading content, false information, and manipulated media. As generated images become harder to distinguish from photographs, detecting them has become an urgent priority. To combat this challenge, we release MS COCOAI, a novel dataset for AI generated image detection consisting of 96000 real and synthetic datapoints, built using the MS COCO dataset. To generate synthetic images, we use five generators: Stable Diffusion 3, Stable Diffusion 2.1, SDXL, DALL-E 3, and MidJourney v6. Based on the dataset, we propose two tasks: (1) classifying images as real or generated, and (2) identifying which model produced a given synthetic image. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Rajarshi-Roy-research/Defactify_Image_Dataset.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Eyes Betray AI: Social Gaze Consistency as a Semantic Cue for AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Social gaze consistency between interacting people is proposed as a new semantic cue orthogonal to low-level artifacts for detecting AI-generated images, with reported accuracy gains on vision and vision-language models.

  2. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The Counter Turing Test competition finds F1-scores above 0.83 for binary real-vs-AI classification but only 0.4986 at best for identifying the specific generative model.

  3. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A competition using a new 50k-image dataset found high accuracy in binary real-vs-AI detection but only modest success in identifying the exact generative model.

  4. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Binary AI vs. real image classification reaches F1 > 0.83 while identifying the exact generative model achieves a highest F1 of 0.4986 on the MS COCOAI dataset.