Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.12040 v1 pith:BR4TOJJ4 submitted 2025-08-16 cs.CL cs.AI

Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generation

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords confidenceestimationgenerationduringfine-grainedprocessscorestext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks, they fundamentally lack self-awareness and frequently exhibit overconfidence, assigning high confidence scores to incorrect predictions. Accurate confidence estimation is therefore critical for enhancing the trustworthiness and reliability of LLM-generated outputs. However, existing approaches suffer from coarse-grained scoring mechanisms that fail to provide fine-grained, continuous confidence estimates throughout the generation process. To address these limitations, we introduce FineCE, a novel confidence estimation method that delivers accurate, fine-grained confidence scores during text generation. Specifically, we first develop a comprehensive pipeline for constructing training data that effectively captures the underlying probabilistic distribution of LLM responses, and then train a model to predict confidence scores for arbitrary text sequences in a supervised manner. Furthermore, we propose a Backward Confidence Integration (BCI) strategy that leverages information from the subsequent text to enhance confidence estimation for the current sequence during inference. We also introduce three strategies for identifying optimal positions to perform confidence estimation within the generation process. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that FineCE consistently outperforms existing classical confidence estimation methods. Our code and all baselines used in the paper are available on GitHub.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Inference Time Optimization with Confidence Dynamics

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Correct reasoning traces exhibit positive confidence gain while incorrect traces show declining confidence, enabling CDG-based voting that boosts performance on AIME, HMMT and BRUMO benchmarks across multiple LLM arch...

  2. Diagnosing Multi-step Reasoning Failures in Black-box LLMs via Stepwise Confidence Attribution

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SCA framework applies Information Bottleneck to assign step-level confidence in black-box LLM reasoning traces, flagging errors and boosting self-correction success by up to 13.5% on math and QA tasks.

  3. Diagnosing Multi-step Reasoning Failures in Black-box LLMs via Stepwise Confidence Attribution

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SCA applies the Information Bottleneck principle via NIBS and GIBS methods to identify erroneous steps in black-box LLM reasoning and boosts self-correction success by up to 13.5%.