REVIEW 7 cited by
HALO: Hierarchical Autonomous Logic-Oriented Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
HALO: Hierarchical Autonomous Logic-Oriented Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated tremendous potential in diverse task scenarios. Nonetheless, existing agentic systems typically rely on predefined agent-role design spaces and static communication structures, limiting their adaptability as well as flexibility in complex interaction environments and leading to subpar performance on highly specialized and expert-level tasks. To address these issues, we introduce HALO, a multi-agent collaboration framework based on a hierarchical reasoning architecture. Specifically, we incorporate a high-level planning agent for task decomposition, mid-level role-design agents for subtask-specific agent instantiation, and low-level inference agents for subtask execution. Particularly, subtask execution is reformulated as a structured workflow search problem, where Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) systematically explores the agentic action space to construct optimal reasoning trajectories. Additionally, as the majority of users lack expertise in prompt engineering, we leverage an Adaptive Prompt Refinement module to transform raw queries into task-specific prompts. Empirical evaluations on Code Generation (HumanEval), General Reasoning (MMLU), and Arithmetic Reasoning (MATH) benchmark datasets highlight the effectiveness of HALO, yielding a 14.4% average improvement over state-of-the-art baselines. Notably, HALO achieves up to 13.3% performance gain on the Moral Scenarios subject in the MMLU benchmark and up to 19.6% performance gain on the Algebra subarea in the MATH benchmark, indicating its advanced proficiency in tackling highly specialized and expert-level tasks. The code repository is available at https://github.com/23japhone/HALO.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Autogenesis: A Self-Evolving Agent Protocol
Autogenesis Protocol defines structured resource management and closed-loop self-evolution for multi-agent LLM systems, with the resulting AGS showing gains over baselines on long-horizon benchmarks.
-
Multi-Agent LLMs Fail to Explore Each Other
Modern multi-agent LLM systems fail to explore peers effectively; explicit LinUCB-style peer selection (MACE) cuts regret and lifts task performance, with gains scaling in agent diversity.
-
What to Format and How: A Benchmark and Workflow Approach for Document Formatting
Presents DocFormBench benchmark and DocFormFlow workflow for content-aware LLM document formatting, claiming higher accuracy and lower token use via decoupled localization and modification.
-
Autogenesis: A Self-Evolving Agent Protocol
AGP decouples agent resources from a closed-loop self-evolution interface; AGS using it reports consistent gains on long-horizon multi-resource agent benchmarks.
-
Autogenesis: A Self-Evolving Agent Protocol
Autogenesis Protocol defines resource and evolution layers for LLM agents, enabling a system that shows performance gains on long-horizon planning benchmarks.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems
A comprehensive review of self-evolving AI agents that improve themselves over time, organized via a framework of inputs, agent system, environment, and optimizers, with domain-specific and safety discussions.
-
Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems through Orchestration Traces
This survey organizes RL for LLM multi-agent systems into reward families, credit units, and five orchestration sub-decisions, notes the absence of explicit stopping-decision training in its paper pool, and releases a...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.