Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Counterfactual Inference for Eliminating Sentiment Bias in Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.03655 v1 pith:5YLHP5AI submitted 2025-05-06 cs.IR cs.AI

Counterfactual Inference for Eliminating Sentiment Bias in Recommender Systems

classification cs.IR cs.AI
keywords biassentimentinferencecounterfactualusersitemsmodelrecommendations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender Systems (RSs) aim to provide personalized recommendations for users. A newly discovered bias, known as sentiment bias, uncovers a common phenomenon within Review-based RSs (RRSs): the recommendation accuracy of users or items with negative reviews deteriorates compared with users or items with positive reviews. Critical users and niche items are disadvantaged by such unfair recommendations. We study this problem from the perspective of counterfactual inference with two stages. At the model training stage, we build a causal graph and model how sentiment influences the final rating score. During the inference stage, we decouple the direct and indirect effects to mitigate the impact of sentiment bias and remove the indirect effect using counterfactual inference. We have conducted extensive experiments, and the results validate that our model can achieve comparable performance on rating prediction for better recommendations and effective mitigation of sentiment bias. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to employ counterfactual inference on sentiment bias mitigation in RSs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Factorized Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FLR factorizes latent reasoning into multiple preference factors using multi-factor attention and regularizations, outperforming baselines on recommendation benchmarks while adding robustness and interpretability.