REVIEW 15 cited by
War and Peace (WarAgent): Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Simulation of World Wars
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
War and Peace (WarAgent): Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Simulation of World Wars
read the original abstract
Can we avoid wars at the crossroads of history? This question has been pursued by individuals, scholars, policymakers, and organizations throughout human history. In this research, we attempt to answer the question based on the recent advances of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs). We propose \textbf{WarAgent}, an LLM-powered multi-agent AI system, to simulate the participating countries, their decisions, and the consequences, in historical international conflicts, including the World War I (WWI), the World War II (WWII), and the Warring States Period (WSP) in Ancient China. By evaluating the simulation effectiveness, we examine the advancements and limitations of cutting-edge AI systems' abilities in studying complex collective human behaviors such as international conflicts under diverse settings. In these simulations, the emergent interactions among agents also offer a novel perspective for examining the triggers and conditions that lead to war. Our findings offer data-driven and AI-augmented insights that can redefine how we approach conflict resolution and peacekeeping strategies. The implications stretch beyond historical analysis, offering a blueprint for using AI to understand human history and possibly prevent future international conflicts. Code and data are available at \url{https://github.com/agiresearch/WarAgent}.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
Prompt Infection: LLM-to-LLM Prompt Injection within Multi-Agent Systems
Prompt injection attacks can self-replicate across LLM agents in multi-agent systems, enabling data theft, misinformation, and system disruption while propagating silently.
-
Can LLMs Think Like Consumers? Benchmarking Crowd-Level Reaction Reconstruction with ConsumerSimBench
ConsumerSimBench evaluates 13 LLMs on reconstructing crowd reactions from 1,553 Chinese social-media topics using 23,122 auditable yes-no criteria, finding maximum coverage of 47.8% by Gemini-3.1-Pro.
-
Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling
Introduces the Mechanism Plausibility Scale to distinguish generative sufficiency from mechanistic plausibility in LLM-based agent-based models.
-
The PIMMUR Principles: Ensuring Validity in Collective Behavior of LLM Societies
A systematic audit of LLM-based AI societies finds that 89.7% of 39 studies violate at least one of six PIMMUR validity principles, with reproductions showing that many claimed collective behaviors disappear when cont...
-
Reproducing human biases in route choice using large language models: Toward scalable behavioral modeling
LLM agents with demographic profiles reproduce CPT-style risk attitudes in route choice and yield fitted parameters (α=0.4, β=0.64, λ=1.43) that predict human data competitively.
-
Modeling U.S. Attitudes Toward China via an Event-Steered Multi-Agent Simulator
ES-MAS combines a new CURE dataset of 258 events and 14,000 news items with dual-stream integration and localized interaction modules to simulate opinion dynamics and claims better reproduction of historical U.S.-Chin...
-
Stop Drawing Scientific Claims from LLM Social Simulations Without Robustness Audits
Minor perturbations in persona format, instruction framing, and network structure shift cooperation by up to 76 percentage points and polarization metrics consistently, showing that LLM social simulations require per-...
-
OPT-BENCH: Evaluating the Iterative Self-Optimization of LLM Agents in Large-Scale Search Spaces
OPT-BENCH and OPT-Agent evaluate LLM self-optimization in large search spaces, showing stronger models improve via feedback but stay constrained by base capacity and below human performance.
-
Multi-Agent Strategic Games with LLMs
LLMs in extended security dilemma games show increased conflict with more players, unraveling in finite games, and reduced conflict with communication, providing a new way to probe IR mechanisms.
-
Evaluating LLMs as Human Surrogates in Controlled Experiments
LLMs reproduce several directional effects from a human accuracy perception experiment but show inconsistent effect magnitudes and moderation patterns across models.
-
IFPV: An Integrated Multi-Agent Framework for Generative Operational Planning and High-Fidelity Plan Verification
IFPV integrates multi-perspective hierarchical agents for generative planning with an adversarial cognitive simulation engine for verification, reporting 19.4% higher mission success, 41.7% lower cost versus LLM basel...
-
Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling
Introduces the Mechanism Plausibility Scale, a four-level framework separating generative sufficiency from mechanistic plausibility in LLM-based agent-based models.
-
Is a team only as strong as its weakest link? Quantifying the short-board effect with AI Agents
LLM multi-agent simulations reveal a cumulative product effect from multiple weak links on team performance and identify distinct capability regimes including a Sisyphus predicament.
-
MARS-SQL: A multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for Text-to-SQL
MARS-SQL trains a multi-agent RL system with ReAct-style interaction and generative validation to produce SQL queries, reaching 77.84% execution accuracy on BIRD dev and 89.75% on Spider test.
-
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
A systematic review of memory designs, evaluation methods, applications, limitations, and future directions for LLM-based agents.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.