Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.03483 v3 pith:MBKND5XQ submitted 2021-04-08 cs.HC cs.AI

Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiences

classification cs.HC cs.AI
keywords designchallengesprocesstechniquesuserworkdesignersexplainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A pervasive design issue of AI systems is their explainability--how to provide appropriate information to help users understand the AI. The technical field of explainable AI (XAI) has produced a rich toolbox of techniques. Designers are now tasked with the challenges of how to select the most suitable XAI techniques and translate them into UX solutions. Informed by our previous work studying design challenges around XAI UX, this work proposes a design process to tackle these challenges. We review our and related prior work to identify requirements that the process should fulfill, and accordingly, propose a Question-Driven Design Process that grounds the user needs, choices of XAI techniques, design, and evaluation of XAI UX all in the user questions. We provide a mapping guide between prototypical user questions and exemplars of XAI techniques to reframe the technical space of XAI, also serving as boundary objects to support collaboration between designers and AI engineers. We demonstrate it with a use case of designing XAI for healthcare adverse events prediction, and discuss lessons learned for tackling design challenges of AI systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Differential Effects of Agreeableness and Extraversion on Older Adults' Perceptions of Conversational AI Explanations in Assistive Settings

    cs.HC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High agreeableness in LLM voice assistants increases older adults' empathy perceptions and real-time explanations outperform history-based ones, but personality does not affect perceived intelligence.

  2. Assessing Model-Agnostic XAI Methods against EU AI Act Explainability Requirements

    cs.CY 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A qualitative-to-quantitative scoring framework is proposed to evaluate how well model-agnostic XAI methods support EU AI Act explainability requirements.