Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learn to Forget: Machine Unlearning via Neuron Masking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.10933 v3 pith:QAOOJPLB submitted 2020-03-24 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

Learn to Forget: Machine Unlearning via Neuron Masking

classification cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML
keywords datamachineunlearningrateforgettinglearningmethodmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Nowadays, machine learning models, especially neural networks, become prevalent in many real-world applications.These models are trained based on a one-way trip from user data: as long as users contribute their data, there is no way to withdraw; and it is well-known that a neural network memorizes its training data. This contradicts the "right to be forgotten" clause of GDPR, potentially leading to law violations. To this end, machine unlearning becomes a popular research topic, which allows users to eliminate memorization of their private data from a trained machine learning model.In this paper, we propose the first uniform metric called for-getting rate to measure the effectiveness of a machine unlearning method. It is based on the concept of membership inference and describes the transformation rate of the eliminated data from "memorized" to "unknown" after conducting unlearning. We also propose a novel unlearning method calledForsaken. It is superior to previous work in either utility or efficiency (when achieving the same forgetting rate). We benchmark Forsaken with eight standard datasets to evaluate its performance. The experimental results show that it can achieve more than 90\% forgetting rate on average and only causeless than 5\% accuracy loss.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM Ghostbusters: Surgical Hallucination Suppression via Adaptive Unlearning

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Adaptive Unlearning suppresses package hallucinations in code-generating LLMs by 81% while preserving benchmark performance, using model-generated data and no human labels.

  2. SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation

    cs.LG 2023-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    SalUn uses gradient-based weight saliency to achieve effective machine unlearning of data, classes, or concepts in image classification and generation, narrowing the gap to exact retraining.

  3. Not Every Subject Should Stay: Machine Unlearning for Noisy Engagement Recognition

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Approximate subject-level unlearning recovers 89.3% and 92.5% of oracle performance gains on EngageNet and DAiSEE at roughly one-quarter the retraining cost in K=3 forget-set regimes.