Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.02894 v2 pith:6V4UAMEI submitted 2020-03-05 math.OC cs.LGstat.ML

Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning

classification math.OC cs.LGstat.ML
keywords regularizationrobustlearningreinforcementdistributionallyrobustnesstextituncertainty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) has enabled to prove the equivalence between robustness and regularization in classification and regression, thus providing an analytical reason why regularization generalizes well in statistical learning. Although DRO's extension to sequential decision-making overcomes $\textit{external uncertainty}$ through the robust Markov Decision Process (MDP) setting, the resulting formulation is hard to solve, especially on large domains. On the other hand, existing regularization methods in reinforcement learning only address $\textit{internal uncertainty}$ due to stochasticity. Our study aims to facilitate robust reinforcement learning by establishing a dual relation between robust MDPs and regularization. We introduce Wasserstein distributionally robust MDPs and prove that they hold out-of-sample performance guarantees. Then, we introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function. We extend the result to linear value function approximation for large state spaces. Our approach provides an alternative formulation of robustness with guaranteed finite-sample performance. Moreover, it suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $\textit{external uncertainty}$ in reinforcement learning methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DR-SAC: Distributionally Robust Soft Actor-Critic for Reinforcement Learning under Uncertainty

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DR-SAC is the first actor-critic distributionally robust RL algorithm for offline continuous control that derives a convergent robust soft policy iteration and reports up to 9.8x higher rewards than SAC under perturbations.

  2. Reinforcement Learning Disrupts Gradient-Based Adversarial Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RL training disrupts gradient-based adversarial attacks by inducing unstable low-magnitude gradients that limit the effectiveness of methods like PGD within practical budgets.

  3. Robust Policy Optimization to Prevent Catastrophic Forgetting

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FRPO applies a max-min robust optimization over KL-bounded policy neighborhoods during RLHF to reduce catastrophic forgetting of safety and accuracy under subsequent SFT or RL fine-tuning.

  4. When Dynamics Shift, Robust Task Inference Wins: Offline Imitation Learning with Behavior Foundation Models Revisited

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Robust minimax task inference in BFMs achieves dynamics-shift robustness from nominal offline data alone and outperforms standard baselines.