Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Confidential Deep Learning: Executing Proprietary Models on Untrusted Devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.10730 v1 pith:5C4D3ZDH submitted 2019-08-28 cs.CR cs.LG

Confidential Deep Learning: Executing Proprietary Models on Untrusted Devices

classification cs.CR cs.LG
keywords devicesmodelproprietarydeepend-userinformationlearninguntrusted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Performing deep learning on end-user devices provides fast offline inference results and can help protect the user's privacy. However, running models on untrusted client devices reveals model information which may be proprietary, i.e., the operating system or other applications on end-user devices may be manipulated to copy and redistribute this information, infringing on the model provider's intellectual property. We propose the use of ARM TrustZone, a hardware-based security feature present in most phones, to confidentially run a proprietary model on an untrusted end-user device. We explore the limitations and design challenges of using TrustZone and examine potential approaches for confidential deep learning within this environment. Of particular interest is providing robust protection of proprietary model information while minimizing total performance overhead.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Protecting On-Device AI Inference: A Systematic Review of Attacks and Defence Mechanisms

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A systematic review of on-device AI inference security finds defenses are imbalanced, with roughly half focused on IP theft while one-third of attacks (adversarial examples) lack any associated defenses.