Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.09451 v1 pith:ZYX6N3MC submitted 2019-01-27 cs.IR cs.LGstat.ML

Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting

classification cs.IR cs.LGstat.ML
keywords biasgendersemanticclassificationexplicitimbalancesindicatorsoccupation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. We analyze the potential allocation harms that can result from semantic representation bias. To do so, we study the impact on occupation classification of including explicit gender indicators---such as first names and pronouns---in different semantic representations of online biographies. Additionally, we quantify the bias that remains when these indicators are "scrubbed," and describe proxy behavior that occurs in the absence of explicit gender indicators. As we demonstrate, differences in true positive rates between genders are correlated with existing gender imbalances in occupations, which may compound these imbalances.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Estimating Grammatical Gender Directions in Contextual Embeddings under Controlled and Natural Contexts

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework estimates grammatical gender directions in contextual embeddings via controlled and natural contexts, finding unweighted controlled contexts and centroid estimators yield the purest directions.

  2. AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AgentFairBench is a multi-domain benchmark for demographic disparity in LLM agent actions, with a pilot showing no significant effect for Claude Haiku 4.5 after arity-matched noise correction.