Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Equitable Multi-task Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.09373 v2 pith:WYUSTE3D submitted 2023-06-15 cs.LG cs.AI

Equitable Multi-task Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords multi-tasktasksdifferentemtllearningmethodcontributiondomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-task learning (MTL) has achieved great success in various research domains, such as CV, NLP and IR etc. Due to the complex and competing task correlation, naive training all tasks may lead to inequitable learning, i.e. some tasks are learned well while others are overlooked. Multi-task optimization (MTO) aims to improve all tasks at same time, but conventional methods often perform poor when tasks with large loss scale or gradient norm magnitude difference. To solve the issue, we in-depth investigate the equity problem for MTL and find that regularizing relative contribution of different tasks (i.e. value of task-specific loss divides its raw gradient norm) in updating shared parameter can improve generalization performance of MTL. Based on our theoretical analysis, we propose a novel multi-task optimization method, named EMTL, to achieve equitable MTL. Specifically, we efficiently add variance regularization to make different tasks' relative contribution closer. Extensive experiments have been conduct to evaluate EMTL, our method stably outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the public benchmark datasets of two different research domains. Furthermore, offline and online A/B test on multi-task recommendation are conducted too. EMTL improves multi-task recommendation significantly, demonstrating the superiority and practicability of our method in industrial landscape.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.