Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Convolutional Radio Modulation Recognition Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.04105 v3 pith:VQXMYKJF submitted 2016-02-12 cs.LG cs.CV

Convolutional Radio Modulation Recognition Networks

classification cs.LG cs.CV
keywords convolutionalnetworksradiofeaturesmodulationneuralsignaltemporal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the adaptation of convolutional neural networks to the complex temporal radio signal domain. We compare the efficacy of radio modulation classification using naively learned features against using expert features which are widely used in the field today and we show significant performance improvements. We show that blind temporal learning on large and densely encoded time series using deep convolutional neural networks is viable and a strong candidate approach for this task especially at low signal to noise ratio.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Speculative GLRT-Backed ApproachRobust Deep Learning-Based Array Processing

    eess.SP 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A speculative DL classifier validated by GLRT on spatially robust second-order statistics provides adversarially resilient array processing.

  2. SurReal: Fr\'echet Mean and Distance Transform for Complex-Valued Deep Learning

    cs.CV 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SurReal architecture applies weighted Fréchet mean convolution and distance-based FC layers to complex data, improving accuracy on MSTAR (94% to 98%) and RadioML with 8-10% of baseline model size.