Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.00700 v3 pith:RB7DPLTW submitted 2020-05-02 cs.CL cs.AI

UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA System

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords unifiedqadatasetsformatsmodelsperformsboundariesevenformat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Question answering (QA) tasks have been posed using a variety of formats, such as extractive span selection, multiple choice, etc. This has led to format-specialized models, and even to an implicit division in the QA community. We argue that such boundaries are artificial and perhaps unnecessary, given the reasoning abilities we seek to teach are not governed by the format. As evidence, we use the latest advances in language modeling to build a single pre-trained QA model, UnifiedQA, that performs surprisingly well across 17 QA datasets spanning 4 diverse formats. UnifiedQA performs on par with 9 different models that were trained on individual datasets themselves. Even when faced with 12 unseen datasets of observed formats, UnifiedQA performs surprisingly well, showing strong generalization from its out-of-format training data. Finally, simply fine-tuning this pre-trained QA model into specialized models results in a new state of the art on 6 datasets, establishing UnifiedQA as a strong starting point for building QA systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

    cs.CL 2020-05 accept novelty 8.0

    GPT-3 shows that scaling an autoregressive language model to 175 billion parameters enables strong few-shot performance across diverse NLP tasks via in-context prompting without fine-tuning.

  2. StableSketcher: Enhancing Diffusion Model for Pixel-based Sketch Generation via Visual Question Answering Feedback

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    StableSketcher improves text-to-sketch generation by fine-tuning a diffusion VAE and adding a VQA-based RL reward, while releasing the SketchDUO dataset of sketches with captions and QA pairs.

  3. ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language models

    cs.CL 2023-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ART automatically generates multi-step reasoning programs with tool integration for LLMs, yielding substantial gains over few-shot and auto-CoT prompting on BigBench and MMLU while matching hand-crafted CoT on most tasks.

  4. Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science

    cs.CL 2022-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galactica, a science-specialized LLM, reports higher scores than GPT-3, Chinchilla, and PaLM on LaTeX knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and medical QA benchmarks while outperforming general models on BIG-bench.

  5. A Reproducibility Analysis of PO4ISR: Diagnosing and Mitigating Semantic Drift in LLM-Based Session Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reproducibility study diagnoses semantic drift in PO4ISR and introduces PO4ISR++ with reflexive prompting that restores performance with gains up to 54% on Games and 96% on Bundle.