Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Distinct Superconducting Gap on Two Bilayer-Split Fermi Surface Sheets in Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_(8+δ) Superconductor

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.04019 v1 pith:Q4BUY7YR submitted 2019-05-10 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Distinct Superconducting Gap on Two Bilayer-Split Fermi Surface Sheets in Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_(8+δ) Superconductor

classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords fermisurfacedopingsheetsheetssuperconductingantibondingbonding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High resolution laser-based angle-resolved photoemission measurements were carried out on an overdoped $Bi_2Sr_2CaCu_2O_{8+\delta}$ superconductor with a Tc of 75 K. Two Fermi surface sheets caused by bilayer splitting are clearly identified with rather different doping levels: the bonding sheet corresponds to a doping level of 0.14 which is slightly underdoped while the antibonding sheet has a doping of 0.27 that is heavily overdoped, giving an overall doping level of 0.20 for the sample. Different superconducting gap sizes on the two Fermi surface sheets are revealed for the first time. The superconducting gap on the antibonding Fermi surface sheet follows a standard d-wave form while it deviates from the standard d-wave form for the bonding Fermi surface sheet. The maximum gap difference between the two Fermi surface sheets near the antinodal region is $\sim$2 meV. These observations provide important information for studying the relationship between the Fermi surface topology and superconductivity, and the layer-dependent superconductivity in high temperature cuprate superconductors.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.