Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Auxiliary-Tasks Learning for Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Partial Differential Equations Solving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.06167 v1 pith:O57MNNMU submitted 2023-07-12 cs.LG physics.comp-ph

Auxiliary-Tasks Learning for Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Partial Differential Equations Solving

classification cs.LG physics.comp-ph
keywords learningauxiliary-taskmodesneuralphysics-informedpinnsnetworksoriginal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as promising surrogate modes for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Their effectiveness lies in the ability to capture solution-related features through neural networks. However, original PINNs often suffer from bottlenecks, such as low accuracy and non-convergence, limiting their applicability in complex physical contexts. To alleviate these issues, we proposed auxiliary-task learning-based physics-informed neural networks (ATL-PINNs), which provide four different auxiliary-task learning modes and investigate their performance compared with original PINNs. We also employ the gradient cosine similarity algorithm to integrate auxiliary problem loss with the primary problem loss in ATL-PINNs, which aims to enhance the effectiveness of the auxiliary-task learning modes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce auxiliary-task learning modes in the context of physics-informed learning. We conduct experiments on three PDE problems across different fields and scenarios. Our findings demonstrate that the proposed auxiliary-task learning modes can significantly improve solution accuracy, achieving a maximum performance boost of 96.62% (averaging 28.23%) compared to the original single-task PINNs. The code and dataset are open source at https://github.com/junjun-yan/ATL-PINN.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.