Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 60 references

Differentiable fuzzy logic constraints fine-tune SAM under weak supervision to produce higher-quality pseudo-labels for semantic segmentation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 21:50 UTC pith:NKI7EUV6

load-bearing objection The paper frames weak supervision for SAM as differentiable fuzzy logic constraints to improve pseudo-labels, which is a clean neurosymbolic move, but the SOTA claims exceeding dense baselines need the full experiments to judge. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2605.13674 v2 pith:NKI7EUV6 submitted 2026-05-13 cs.CV cs.AI

Weakly Supervised Segmentation as Semantic-Based Regularization

Stefano Colamonaco , Andrei-Bogdan Florea , Jaron Maene This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords weakly supervised semantic segmentationfuzzy logicSegment Anything Modelpseudo-labelsneurosymbolic methodsPascal VOCoptic disc segmentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that weak annotations and domain priors can be expressed as continuous logical constraints and used to fine-tune the Segment Anything Model. This neurosymbolic regularization step improves the pseudo-labels that SAM generates from partial labels. A second-stage segmentation model trained on those refined labels reaches state-of-the-art accuracy on Pascal VOC 2012 and the REFUGE2 optic-disc dataset, frequently exceeding the performance of models trained with full pixel-wise supervision. The approach therefore reduces reliance on dense annotations while still incorporating prior knowledge that heuristic prompting methods cannot easily use.

Core claim

Weak annotations and domain-specific priors are encoded as differentiable fuzzy logic constraints that regularize the fine-tuning of SAM; the resulting model generates improved pseudo-labels from which a prompt-free segmentation network is trained, producing higher segmentation accuracy than prior weakly supervised methods and often surpassing densely supervised baselines on Pascal VOC 2012 and REFUGE2.

What carries the argument

Differentiable fuzzy logic constraints that unify weak annotations and domain priors to guide SAM fine-tuning and pseudo-label refinement.

Load-bearing premise

Fuzzy logic constraints derived from weak labels can be stably integrated into SAM fine-tuning so that the generated pseudo-labels are systematically better rather than biased or unstable.

What would settle it

On a new dataset, if the logic-tuned SAM produces pseudo-labels whose intersection-over-union with ground truth is lower than that of standard SAM prompting, the central claim would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Higher-quality pseudo-labels are obtained from the logic-regularized SAM.
  • State-of-the-art segmentation accuracy is reached on Pascal VOC 2012.
  • State-of-the-art accuracy is reached on the REFUGE2 optic disc and cup task.
  • Segmentation performance often exceeds that of models trained with dense supervision.
  • Heterogeneous weak labels and explicit domain priors can be incorporated without heuristic prompt engineering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same constraint-based fine-tuning could be applied to other vision foundation models to improve their behavior under weak supervision.
  • Medical imaging tasks with strong anatomical priors may benefit most because the logic layer can encode those priors directly.
  • Reducing the need for dense labels while maintaining or exceeding supervised performance could lower annotation costs in large-scale deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a neurosymbolic framework for weakly supervised semantic segmentation that encodes weak annotations and domain priors as differentiable fuzzy logic constraints to fine-tune the Segment Anything Model (SAM). The refined SAM generates improved pseudo-labels used to train a second-stage prompt-free segmentation model. Experiments on Pascal VOC 2012 and REFUGE2 are claimed to produce higher-quality pseudo-labels and state-of-the-art accuracy that often exceeds densely supervised baselines.

Significance. If the results hold, the work demonstrates a practical integration of symbolic constraints with foundation models for pseudo-label refinement in WSSS, which could reduce dependence on dense annotations while improving label quality through explicit logical priors. The claim of surpassing dense baselines would be a notable empirical outcome if supported by rigorous ablations and error analysis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that logic-guided fine-tuning 'yields higher-quality pseudo-labels, leading to state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy that often exceeds densely supervised baselines' cannot be evaluated because the manuscript provides no methods section, equations for the fuzzy logic integration, ablation studies, or quantitative comparisons with dense baselines.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'differentiable fuzzy logic constraints' without indicating the specific t-norms, implication operators, or how they are combined with SAM's loss, which would aid reproducibility even at a high level.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for highlighting the need for clearer support of the abstract claims. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that logic-guided fine-tuning 'yields higher-quality pseudo-labels, leading to state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy that often exceeds densely supervised baselines' cannot be evaluated because the manuscript provides no methods section, equations for the fuzzy logic integration, ablation studies, or quantitative comparisons with dense baselines.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's central claim requires supporting evidence from the methods and experiments to be fully evaluated. The provided manuscript text consists only of the abstract and does not include a methods section, equations for the fuzzy logic integration, ablation studies, or quantitative comparisons with dense baselines. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated methods section containing the equations for the differentiable fuzzy logic constraints, ablation studies on the neurosymbolic components, and tables with quantitative comparisons against densely supervised baselines on Pascal VOC 2012 and REFUGE2 to substantiate the claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present a neurosymbolic pipeline that combines existing components (SAM, differentiable fuzzy logic, weak annotations) into a two-stage process for generating pseudo-labels and training a segmentation model. No equations, parameter-fitting steps, or self-citations are shown that would reduce any claimed prediction or result to an input by construction. The central claims rest on empirical experimental outcomes on Pascal VOC and REFUGE2, which are independent of the method description and do not invoke uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results as derivations. The approach is described as an integration rather than a self-referential definition, making the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger constructed from abstract only; the central approach rests on the premise that weak labels translate directly into usable continuous logical constraints.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weak annotations and domain priors can be represented as continuous logical constraints using differentiable fuzzy logic.
    This unification is the core neurosymbolic step stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 1237 out tokens · 30804 ms · 2026-06-30T21:50:07.979071+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) trains dense pixel-level segmentation models from partial or coarse annotations such as bounding boxes, scribbles, or image-level tags. While recent work leverages foundation models such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM) to generate pseudo-labels, these approaches typically depend on heuristic prompt choices and offer limited ways to incorporate prior knowledge or heterogeneous labels. We address this gap by taking a neurosymbolic perspective: integrating differentiable fuzzy logic with deep segmentation models. Weak annotations and domain-specific priors are unified as continuous logical constraints that fine-tune SAM under weak supervision. The refined foundation model then produces improved pseudo-labels, from which we train a second-stage prompt-free segmentation model. Experiments on Pascal VOC 2012 and the REFUGE2 optic disc/cup segmentation dataset show that our logic-guided fine-tuning yields higher-quality pseudo-labels, leading to state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy that often exceeds densely supervised baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13674 by Andrei-Bogdan Florea, Jaron Maene, Stefano Colamonaco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the proposed neurosymbolic weakly supervised segmentation framework. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Qualitative comparison of our two-stage weakly supervised segmentation pipeline on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative comparison of selected samples from the Pascal VOC 2012 training set. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Additional comparison of our two-stage weakly supervised segmentation pipeline on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Additional comparison of our two-stage weakly supervised segmentation pipeline on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of our two-stage weakly supervised segmentation pipeline on the REFUGE2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Ahn, J., Kwak, S.: Learning pixel-level semantic affinity with image-level supervision for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 4981–4990 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Amit, et al., Segdiff: Image segmentation with diffusion probabilistic models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00390 (2021)

    Amit, T., Nachmani, E., Shaharabany, T., Wolf, L.: SegDiff: Image segmentation with diffusion probabilistic models. CoRRabs/2112.00390(2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Artificial Intelligence303, 103649 (2022)

    Badreddine, S., Garcez, A.d., Serafini, L., Spranger, M.: Logic tensor networks. Artificial Intelligence303, 103649 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    In: 2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)

    Bergamin, L., Dimitri, G.M., Aiolli, F.: Integrating background knowledge in medical semantic segmentation with logic tensor networks. In: 2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). pp. 1–7. IEEE (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentation

    Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A.L., Zhou, Y.: TransUNet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. CoRR abs/2102.04306(2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence40(4), 834–848 (2018)

    Chen, L.C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., Yuille, A.L.: DeepLab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence40(4), 834–848 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, Z., Tian, Z., Zhu, J., Li, C., Du, S.: C-cam: Causal cam for weakly supervised semantic segmentation on medical image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11676–11685 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    ACM Computing Surveys57, 1 – 29 (2023)

    Chen, Z., Sun, Q.: Weakly-supervised semantic segmentation with image-level labels: From traditional models to foundation models. ACM Computing Surveys57, 1 – 29 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Cheng, B., Misra, I., Schwing, A.G., Kirillov, A., Girdhar, R.: Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 1290–1299 (2022) 13

    2022

  10. [10]

    Cheng, J

    Cheng, J., Ye, J., Deng, Z., Chen, J., Li, T., Wang, H., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Jiang, L., Sun, H., He, J., Zhang, S., Zhu, M., Qiao, Y.: SAM-Med2D. CoRRabs/2308.16184 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Neurosymbolic Object-Centric Learning with Distant Supervision

    Colamonaco, S., Debot, D., Marra, G.: Neurosymbolic object-centric learning with distant supervision. CoRRabs/2506.16129(2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    Deng, G., Zou, K., Ren, K., Wang, M., Yuan, X., Ying, S., Fu, H.: SAM-U: Multi- box prompts triggered uncertainty estimation for reliable SAM in medical image. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 368–377. Springer (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13697 (2025)

    Derkinderen, V., Manhaeve, R., Adriaensen, R., Van Praet, L., De Smet, L., Marra, G., De Raedt, L.: The deeplog neurosymbolic machine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13697 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Artificial Intelligence244, 143–165 (2017)

    Diligenti, M., Gori, M., Sacca, C.: Semantic-based regularization for learning and inference. Artificial Intelligence244, 143–165 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    In: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases

    Diligenti, M., Gori, M., Scoca, V.: Learning efficiently in semantic based regularization. In: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. pp. 33–46. Springer (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    International journal of computer vision88(2), 303–338 (2010)

    Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. International journal of computer vision88(2), 303–338 (2010)

    2010

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08994 (2022)

    Fang, H., Li, F., Wu, J., Fu, H., Sun, X., Son, J., Yu, S., Zhang, M., Yuan, C., Bian, C., et al.: REFUGE2 challenge: A treasure trove for multi-dimension analysis and evaluation in glaucoma screening. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08994 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Fischer, M., Balunovic, M., Drachsler-Cohen, D., Gehr, T., Zhang, C., Vechev, M.: DL2: training and querying neural networks with logic. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 1931–1941. PMLR (2019)

    1931

  19. [19]

    In: CVPR

    Gupta, T., Kembhavi, A.: Visual programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training. In: CVPR. pp. 14953–14962. IEEE (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Nature methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021)

    Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnU-Net: a self- configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    In: 32nd British Machine Vision Conference 2021, BMVC 2021, Online, November 22-25,

    Ji, Z., Veksler, O.: Weakly supervised semantic segmentation: From box to tag and back. In: 32nd British Machine Vision Conference 2021, BMVC 2021, Online, November 22-25,

    2021

  22. [22]

    p. 385. BMVA Press (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01275 (2023)

    Jiang, P.T., Yang, Y.: Segment anything is a good pseudo-label generator for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01275 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Jo, S., Pan, F., Yu, I.J., Kim, K.: Dhr: Dual features-driven hierarchical rebalancing in inter-and intra-class regions for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 231–248. Springer (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., Lo, W.Y., et al.: Segment anything. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 4015–4026 (2023) 14

    2023

  26. [26]

    In: Shawe-Taylor, J., Zemel, R., Bartlett, P., Pereira, F., Weinberger, K

    Krähenbühl, P., Koltun, V.: Efficient inference in fully connected CRFs with gaussian edge potentials. In: Shawe-Taylor, J., Zemel, R., Bartlett, P., Pereira, F., Weinberger, K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 24. Curran Associates, Inc. (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    In: Lafferty, J., Williams, C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Zemel, R., Culotta, A

    Lempitsky, V., Zisserman, A.: Learning to count objects in images. In: Lafferty, J., Williams, C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Zemel, R., Culotta, A. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 23. Curran Associates, Inc. (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Liang, Z., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Shen, J.: Tree energy loss: Towards sparsely annotated semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 16907–16916 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

    Lin, C.S., Wang, C.Y., Wang, Y.C.F., Chen, M.H.: Semantic prompt learning for weakly- supervised semantic segmentation. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). pp. 8764–8774. IEEE (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Lin, D., Dai, J., Jia, J., He, K., Sun, J.: ScribbleSup: Scribble-supervised convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3159–3167 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Lin, Y., Chen, M., Wang, W., Wu, B., Li, K., Lin, B., Liu, H., He, X.: Clip is also an efficient segmenter: A text-driven approach for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 15305–15314 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Nature communications15(1), 654 (2024)

    Ma, J., He, Y., Li, F., Han, L., You, C., Wang, B.: Segment anything in medical images. Nature communications15(1), 654 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning

    Maene, J., Derkinderen, V., De Raedt, L.: On the hardness of probabilistic neurosymbolic learning. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 34203–34218 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    DeepLog: A Software Framework for Modular Neurosymbolic AI

    Manhaeve, R., Colamonaco, S., Derkinderen, V., Adriaensen, R., Praet, L.V., Raedt, L.D., Marra, G.: Deeplog: A software framework for modular neurosymbolic ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10279 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 31(2018)

    Manhaeve, R., Dumancic, S., Kimmig, A., Demeester, T., De Raedt, L.: DeepProbLog: Neural probabilistic logic programming. Advances in neural information processing systems 31(2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    In: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks

    Manigrasso, F., Miro, F.D., Morra, L., Lamberti, F.: Faster-ltn: a neuro-symbolic, end- to-end object detection architecture. In: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. pp. 40–52. Springer (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Artificial Intelligence328, 104062 (2024)

    Marra, G., Dumančić, S., Manhaeve, R., De Raedt, L.: From statistical relational to neurosymbolic artificial intelligence: A survey. Artificial Intelligence328, 104062 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Medical Image Analysis89, 102918 (2023)

    Mazurowski, M.A., Dong, H., Gu, H., Yang, J., Konz, N., Zhang, Y.: Segment anything model for medical image analysis: an experimental study. Medical Image Analysis89, 102918 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Novák, V., Perfilieva, I., Mockor, J.: Mathematical principles of fuzzy logic, vol. 517. Springer Science & Business Media (1999)

    1999

  40. [40]

    International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering 18(10) (2022) 15

    Ouassit, Y., Ardchir, S., Yassine El Ghoumari, M., Azouazi, M.: A brief survey on weakly supervised semantic segmentation. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering 18(10) (2022) 15

    2022

  41. [41]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging36(2), 674–683 (2016)

    Rajchl, M., Lee, M.C., Oktay, O., Kamnitsas, K., Passerat-Palmbach, J., Bai, W., Damodaram, M., Rutherford, M.A., Hajnal, J.V., Kainz, B., et al.: DeepCut: Object segmentation from bounding box annotations using convolutional neural networks. IEEE transactions on medical imaging36(2), 674–683 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    In: Proceedings ninth IEEE international conference on computer vision

    Ren, Malik: Learning a classification model for segmentation. In: Proceedings ninth IEEE international conference on computer vision. pp. 10–17. IEEE (2003)

    2003

  43. [43]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 52266–52295 (2024)

    Shindo, H., Brack, M., Sudhakaran, G., Dhami, D.S., Schramowski, P., Kersting, K.: Deisam: Segment anything with deictic prompting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 52266–52295 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    In: Oh, A., Naumann, T., Globerson, A., Saenko, K., Hardt, M., Levine, S

    Shukla, V., Zeng, Z., Ahmed, K., Van den Broeck, G.: A unified approach to count-based weakly supervised learning. In: Oh, A., Naumann, T., Globerson, A., Saenko, K., Hardt, M., Levine, S. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 36, pp. 38709–38722. Curran Associates, Inc. (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01586 (2023)

    Sun, W., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhong, Y., Barnes, N.: An alternative to WSSS? an empirical study of the segment anything model (SAM) on weakly-supervised semantic segmentation problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01586 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Tang, F., Xu, Z., Qu, Z., Feng, W., Jiang, X., Ge, Z.: Hunting attributes: Context prototype-aware learning for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3324–3334 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Tian, Z., Shen, C., Wang, X., Chen, H.: BoxInst: High-performance instance segmentation with box annotations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 5443–5452 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    siam Journal on Computing8(3), 410–421 (1979)

    Valiant, L.G.: The complexity of enumeration and reliability problems. siam Journal on Computing8(3), 410–421 (1979)

    1979

  49. [49]

    Artificial Intelligence302, 103602 (2022)

    van Krieken, E., Acar, E., van Harmelen, F.: Analyzing differentiable fuzzy logic operators. Artificial Intelligence302, 103602 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    In: MICCAI (1)

    Wang, S., Yu, L., Li, K., Yang, X., Fu, C., Heng, P.: Boundary and entropy-driven adversarial learning for fundus image segmentation. In: MICCAI (1). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11764, pp. 102–110. Springer (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Medical image analysis 102, 103547 (2025)

    Wu, J., Wang, Z., Hong, M., Ji, W., Fu, H., Xu, Y., Xu, M., Jin, Y.: Medical sam adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. Medical image analysis 102, 103547 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wu, L., Zhong, Z., Fang, L., He, X., Liu, Q., Ma, J., Chen, H.: Sparsely annotated semantic segmentation with adaptive gaussian mixtures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 15454–15464 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Xu, J., Schwing, A.G., Urtasun, R.: Learning to segment under various forms of weak supervision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3781–3790 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    In: Dy, J., Krause, A

    Xu, J., Zhang, Z., Friedman, T., Liang, Y., Van den Broeck, G.: A semantic loss function for deep learning with symbolic knowledge. In: Dy, J., Krause, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 80, pp. 5502–5511. PMLR (10–15 Jul 2018) 16

    2018

  55. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Xu, Z., Tang, F., Chen, Z., Su, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhang, G., Su, J., Ge, Z.: Toward modality gap: Vision prototype learning for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation with clip. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 39, pp. 9023–9031 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision

    Yang, X., Gong, X.: Foundation model assisted weakly supervised semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision. pp. 523–532 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Yang, X., Rahmani, H., Black, S., Williams, B.M.: Weakly supervised co-training with swapping assignments for semantic segmentation. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 459–478. Springer (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Yu, S., Xiao, D., Frost, S., Kanagasingam, Y.: Robust optic disc and cup segmentation with deep learning for glaucoma detection. Comput. Medical Imaging Graph.74, 61–71 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    Customized segment anything model for medical image segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13785, 2023

    Zhang, K., Liu, D.: Customized segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13785 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Self-Training

    Zhu, L., Li, Y., Fang, J., Liu, Y., Xin, H., Liu, W., Wang, X.: WeakTr: Exploring plain vision transformer for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01184 (2023) 17 A. Additional Explanations and Validations A.1. Conditional Independence Assumption We approximatep(ϕ|x)by introducing conditional independence assumptions. More s...

    work page arXiv 2023