Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CREPE: Open-Domain Question Answering with False Presuppositions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.17257 v1 pith:IFVCT2TK submitted 2022-11-30 cs.CL cs.AI

CREPE: Open-Domain Question Answering with False Presuppositions

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords presuppositionsansweringcrepefalsequestionquestionsexistingfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Information seeking users often pose questions with false presuppositions, especially when asking about unfamiliar topics. Most existing question answering (QA) datasets, in contrast, assume all questions have well defined answers. We introduce CREPE, a QA dataset containing a natural distribution of presupposition failures from online information-seeking forums. We find that 25% of questions contain false presuppositions, and provide annotations for these presuppositions and their corrections. Through extensive baseline experiments, we show that adaptations of existing open-domain QA models can find presuppositions moderately well, but struggle when predicting whether a presupposition is factually correct. This is in large part due to difficulty in retrieving relevant evidence passages from a large text corpus. CREPE provides a benchmark to study question answering in the wild, and our analyses provide avenues for future work in better modeling and further studying the task.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Emotion Consistency Analysis of Large Language Models in Emotional Conversational Contexts

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLMs show below-average consistency and vulnerability to false beliefs in emotional queries with false presuppositions, more so for moderate emotions.