REVIEW 2 cited by
Snowmass'21 Accelerator Frontier Report
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Snowmass'21 Accelerator Frontier Report
read the original abstract
In 2020-2022, extensive discussions and deliberations have taken place in corresponding topical working groups of the Snowmass Accelerator Frontier (AF) and in numerous joint meetings with other Frontiers, Snowmass-wide meetings, a series of Colloquium-style Agoras, cross-Frontier Forums on muon and electron-positron colliders and the collider Implementation Task Force (ITF). The outcomes of these activities are summarized in this Accelerator Frontier report.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fundamental or Composite? The Higgs Enigma
Determining if the Higgs is composite would invalidate much of heterotic string model building and favor other quantum gravity approaches, best tested at a 50-60 TeV hadron collider.
-
Fundamental or Composite? The Higgs Enigma
Questions if the Higgs is fundamental or composite, arguing that compositeness would invalidate much of heterotic string model building and proposing a 50-60 TeV hadron collider to investigate.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.