pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04712 · v1 · pith:GACHD4JXnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

The Extreme Rarity and Physical Properties of Low-redshift AGNs with Balmer Absorption

Jinyi Shangguan , Chang-Hao Chen , Luis C. Ho , Jiwei Liao , Yanqing Liu , Chengzhou Wu , Ruancun Li , Kohei Inayoshi
show 1 more author
Linhua Jiang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords Balmer absorptiontype 1 AGNslow-redshiftpartially covering absorbercovering factorlow metallicityEddington ratiovariability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Balmer absorption lines are detected in only seven of 14,584 low-redshift type 1 AGNs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper searches for Balmer absorption in a homogeneous sample of 14,584 low-redshift type 1 AGNs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Only seven sources show robust absorption, indicating an occurrence rate of about 0.05 percent. These cases are modeled with a partially covering absorber that fits the optical depths of Hα, Hβ, and Hγ simultaneously, revealing optically thick absorption and moderate covering factors. Three objects stand out with high Eddington ratios, low metallicity, and weak Fe II emission, leading to the argument that low metallicity suppresses disk winds and retains dense neutral gas near the black hole. Multi-epoch spectra show variability in the absorption on short timescales.

Core claim

Seven sources exhibit robust Balmer absorption among 14,584 low-redshift type 1 AGNs, an occurrence of approximately 0.05%. Simultaneous fitting of Hα, Hβ, and Hγ with a partially covering absorber model, tying optical-depth ratios to theory, shows that all require optically thick Hα absorption with covering factors of 0.2-0.6 in most cases and higher in the LRD analog. The absorbers have velocity offsets of 150-850 km/s and narrow widths of 20-200 km/s. Multi-epoch data reveal variability on year and month timescales. Three objects with exceptionally weak Fe II, high Eddington ratio, and low gas-phase metallicity suggest that low-metallicity conditions suppress disk winds and retain dense n

What carries the argument

Partially covering absorber model applied to Balmer lines, constraining central optical depth and covering factor while accounting for spectral resolution.

If this is right

  • Balmer absorption occurs at a rate of ~0.05% in low-redshift type 1 AGNs.
  • Absorption requires optically thick Hα with covering factors typically 0.2-0.6.
  • Absorption varies on timescales of months to years.
  • High Eddington ratio combined with low metallicity and weak Fe II emission is associated with the presence of such absorption.
  • Low metallicity may help retain dense neutral gas by suppressing disk winds in high accretion rate systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The similarity to conditions in high-redshift little red dots suggests the mechanism may be more common earlier in cosmic time.
  • Balmer absorption could be used to identify metal-poor, high-accretion AGNs in larger surveys.
  • Further multi-epoch observations would help determine if the gas dynamics change with accretion state.

Load-bearing premise

The parent sample of 14,584 low-redshift type 1 AGNs from SDSS is representative of the population, and the criteria for identifying robust Balmer absorption do not introduce biases from noise, resolution, or continuum fitting.

What would settle it

Detection of Balmer absorption in a substantially higher fraction of a new low-redshift AGN sample or failure to confirm low metallicity in the identified sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04712 by Chang-Hao Chen, Chengzhou Wu, Jinyi Shangguan, Jiwei Liao, Kohei Inayoshi, Linhua Jiang, Luis C. Ho, Ruancun Li, Yanqing Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectra of the selected AGNs ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectral decomposition of J0925 for (a) the full spectrum and the regions around (b) Hγ, (c) Hβ, and (d) Hα. The data and the total model is in black and red, respectively. The broad emission lines are shown by colored curves. The residuals between the data and model are shown in the lower panels. Only the fitted regions are displayed in panel (a), while the lower three panels zoom into the three Balmer li… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Best-fit models with varying absorption parameters τ0, σ, and Cf , compared with the observed broad Hα emission line with the [NII] doublet, for (a) J0925, (b) J1025, (c) J1039, (d) J1126, (e) J1535-0, (f) J1545-0, (g) J1545-1, and (h) J2220-0. We only show one epoch for J1535 (J1535-0) and J2220 (J2220-0) because the data quality of the other two epochs is largely consistent. Both spectra are shown for J1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the input values of the mock spectra and the best-fit absorption-line parameters: (a) optical depth, (b) velocity dispersion, and (c) covering factor. The gray points show the individual fitting results. Open circles mark mock spectra with velocity dispersions below 10 km s−1 , in which the absorption lines are barely visible. The red and blue boxes represent the median values in each in… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Absorption features in the decomposed broad Hα, Hβ, and Hγ lines of J0925. Upper panels display the broad components with absorption, and the lower panels show the absorption profiles normalized by the best-fit emission-line model. The black dashed curves indicate the intrinsic emis￾sion without the absorption, while the red dashed curves are the full model. We thus construct the narrow-line template from … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Distribution of broad Hβ line width (FWHMHβ) versus (a) the Fe ii emission strength (RFe II) and (b) the EW of [OIII] λ5007 for the parent AGN sample. Sources with Balmer absorption are highlighted in color. Three sources (J0925, J1025, and J1545) stand out in the lower-left corner of panel (a) and the lower-right corner of panel (b), while J1039, J1126, J1535, and J2220 fall within the main locus of typi… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Variation with Eddington ratio of (a) L5100, (b) FWHMHβ, and (c) RFe II for the parent AGN sample. The sources with Balmer absorption, highlighted in color, show diverse properties. Four sources resemble the parent population, but three sources (dashed red box) occupy the regime of high Eddington ratio in panel (c). correlate with Eddington ratio in the parent sample, the observed Cf –RFe II relation is u… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The Balmer-absorption AGNs show diverse distribution on the optical line-intensity diagnostic diagrams of [O iii] λ5007/Hβ versus (a) [N ii] λ6584/Hα, (b) [S ii] λλ6716 6731/Hα, and (c) [O i] λ6300/Hα. The model curves of Kauffmann et al. (2003, red dashed) and Kewley et al. (2001, solid) separate star-forming galaxies from AGNs, with the latter being a more stringent “maximum starburst” boundary, while t… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The dependence on Eddington ratio of (a) the measured optical depth for Hα absorption (τ0,Hα) and (b) the EW of Hα and Hβ absorption. The Kendall’s rank cor￾relation coefficient (rK) and the p-value are given in the up￾per-right corner of each panel. We exclude J2220 in the cor￾relation tests because its absorption-line measurements are likely unreliable. Sources with lower τ0,Hα show larger EW difference… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The variation of covering factor (Cf ) with (a) Eddington ratio and (b) RFe II. The Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient (rK) and the p-value are given in the lower-right corner of each panel. The correlation test in (a) excludes J1025, which shows consistently high covering factor similar to values observed in the LRDs (Chen et al. 2026). We also exclude J2220 in the correlation tests in both (a) and (… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Far-UV to mid-infrared SEDs of the Balmer-ab￾sorption AGNs. The black open circles show the observed SED. These sources show UV slopes that are redder than that of the average SDSS SED (black thin curves; Richards et al. 2006) but comparable to or bluer than that of the typ￾ical LRD RUBIES-EGS-49140 (orange; Wang et al. 2024). The fitted power-law slopes of the UV (blue) and optical (red) SEDs are given i… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: The Balmer decrement of the (a) broad and (b) narrow lines. The colored symbols represent the Balmer-absorption AGNs. The red star indicates the line ratios expected for Case B recombination. The black dashed and dotted lines illustrate the effect of dust attenuation following the Milky Way (RV = 3.1; Cardelli et al. 1989) and Small Magellanic Cloud (Gordon et al. 2024) attenuation laws, respectively. The… view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Rest-frame optical spectra of J2220 from three SDSS epochs, shown in blue, orange, and green. The spectra illustrate the strong continuum and broad Balmer-line vari￾ability discussed in Section 5.3.2. inflowing absorber in epoch 1 appeared to be highly op￾tically thick (τ0,Hα ≳ 9) but to cover only a small frac￾tion of the emitting region (Cf ≈ 0.05); by epoch 2, it appeared to evolve into a state with a … view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: WISE mid-infrared light curves of J2220 in the W1 (3.4 µm) and W2 (4.6 µm) bands. The dates of the last two SDSS spectroscopic epochs are marked by the solid and dashed vertical lines, respectively. 5.4. Physical Implications This work is motivated by the high fraction of LRDs showing Balmer absorption lines. Recent theoretical models propose that the BH accretion flow in LRDs is enshrouded by a dense gas… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Balmer absorption lines are increasingly observed in the little red dots (LRDs) discovered by the James Webb Space Telescope, potentially tracing dense circumnuclear gas around rapidly accreting black holes. Motivated by this connection, we search for Balmer absorption using homogeneously analyzed spectra of a representative parent sample of 14,584 low-redshift ($z<0.35$) type 1 active galactic nuclei selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We identify seven sources with robust Balmer absorption (occurrence $\sim 0.05\%$) and model them with a partially covering absorber model, accounting for the spectral resolution. By fitting H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, and H$\gamma$ simultaneously and tying their optical-depth ratios to theoretical values, we constrain optical depth at the line center ($\tau_0$) and the covering factor ($C_f$). All sources with robust modeling require optically thick H$\alpha$ absorption and typically moderate covering factors ($C_f\approx 0.2-0.6$), while the LRD analog J1025 shows $C_f \gtrsim 0.8$ consistent with recent measurements of high-redshift LRDs. The absorbers have modest velocity offsets ($\sim 150-850\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$) and narrow intrinsic widths ($\sim 20-200\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$). Multi-epoch spectroscopy of three sources reveals Balmer-absorption variability on both year and month timescales. Three objects exhibit exceptionally weak Fe II emission, high Eddington ratio, and low gas-phase metallicity, an atypically rare combination of properties that might elevate the incidence of Balmer-absorption to $\sim$10%. We argue that low-metallicity conditions may suppress disk winds and help retain dense neutral gas along the line-of-sight in systems of high accretion rate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper searches for Balmer absorption in homogeneously analyzed SDSS spectra of 14,584 low-redshift (z<0.35) type 1 AGNs, identifying seven sources with robust absorption (occurrence ~0.05%). These are modeled with a partially covering absorber, fitting Hα/Hβ/Hγ simultaneously with tied optical-depth ratios to constrain τ₀ and C_f; all require optically thick Hα and typically C_f ≈ 0.2-0.6 (one LRD analog has C_f ≳ 0.8). Absorbers show modest velocity offsets and narrow widths; three sources vary on year/month timescales. Three objects show weak Fe II, high Eddington ratio, and low metallicity, which the authors argue may suppress disk winds and retain neutral gas, with implications for JWST LRDs.

Significance. If the seven detections are free of selection bias, the work supplies a valuable low-z benchmark for Balmer absorbers now seen in high-z LRDs and demonstrates the utility of simultaneous multi-line fitting with theoretical optical-depth ratios. The variability measurements and the suggestion that low metallicity plus high accretion can elevate the incidence to ~10% are potentially interesting, though the latter rests on a subsample of three.

major comments (2)
  1. [Detection criteria and sample selection] The quantitative thresholds used to declare the seven cases 'robust' (minimum Δχ², τ₀ significance, rejection criteria for noise or artifacts) are not stated. Because the ~0.05% occurrence rate is the central claim, this omission prevents assessment of whether the criteria interact with SDSS resolution (~150 km s⁻¹), S/N variations, or continuum placement and therefore whether the counted incidence is stable.
  2. [Parent sample definition] The claim that the 14,584-object parent sample is representative of low-redshift type 1 AGNs requires explicit justification of the parent catalog cuts and any biases they introduce; without this, the denominator of the occurrence rate remains unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Modeling section] The abstract states that spectral resolution is accounted for in the modeling, but the precise convolution kernel or resolution value adopted for each object should be tabulated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. The two major comments identify areas where additional methodological details are needed to support the central claims regarding the occurrence rate and sample representativeness. We address each point below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Detection criteria and sample selection] The quantitative thresholds used to declare the seven cases 'robust' (minimum Δχ², τ₀ significance, rejection criteria for noise or artifacts) are not stated. Because the ~0.05% occurrence rate is the central claim, this omission prevents assessment of whether the criteria interact with SDSS resolution (~150 km s⁻¹), S/N variations, or continuum placement and therefore whether the counted incidence is stable.

    Authors: We agree that the quantitative detection criteria require explicit documentation. Although the criteria (including minimum Δχ² improvement for the absorption model, τ₀ significance thresholds, and rejection rules for noise spikes or continuum artifacts) were applied during the analysis, they were not fully enumerated in the text. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection detailing these thresholds, along with an assessment of their robustness against SDSS resolution (~150 km s⁻¹), S/N variations across the sample, and continuum placement uncertainties. This will allow readers to evaluate the stability of the reported 0.05% incidence rate. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Parent sample definition] The claim that the 14,584-object parent sample is representative of low-redshift type 1 AGNs requires explicit justification of the parent catalog cuts and any biases they introduce; without this, the denominator of the occurrence rate remains unverified.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from a more detailed justification of the parent sample. The 14,584-object sample was drawn from SDSS with specific redshift (z < 0.35), magnitude, and spectral classification cuts intended to produce a representative set of low-redshift type 1 AGNs, but these cuts and any associated selection biases were not fully enumerated. In the revision we will expand the sample-selection section to list the exact catalog cuts, quantify potential biases (e.g., luminosity or redshift incompleteness), and discuss how these affect the denominator of the occurrence rate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: occurrence rate and absorber parameters obtained by direct spectral fitting

full rationale

The paper's central results are an empirical count of seven Balmer-absorbing sources in a parent sample of 14,584 SDSS spectra (yielding the ~0.05% rate) plus direct modeling of optical depth and covering factor via simultaneous multi-line fits to public data. No step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology. The selection and modeling procedures are described as applied to external spectra rather than derived from prior outputs of the same work. This is the normal case of an observational catalog paper whose incidence and parameter values are not forced by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the partially covering absorber model and the assumption that the SDSS parent sample selection does not bias the rarity statistic.

free parameters (2)
  • covering factor Cf = 0.2-0.6
    Fitted per source in the absorber model; typical values 0.2-0.6, one source >=0.8
  • optical depth tau0 at line center
    Fitted simultaneously for H-alpha, H-beta, H-gamma; required to be optically thick for H-alpha
axioms (1)
  • standard math Optical-depth ratios of Balmer lines fixed to theoretical values
    Invoked when fitting H-alpha, H-beta, and H-gamma simultaneously

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5913 in / 1321 out tokens · 38352 ms · 2026-06-28T05:36:38.588682+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Little Red Dots as Intermediate Mass, Super-Eddington Engines: Insights from Type IIn Supernovae and The 1837-1856 Great Eruption of $\eta$ Carinae

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LRDs are reinterpreted as intermediate-mass super-Eddington systems with wind-driven pseudo-photospheres that explain their spectra and imply engine masses below 10^5 solar masses rather than overmassive black holes.

  2. Little Red Dots at z~2 in EIGER reveal a gentle decline with respect to their peak number density at z~5

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Five LRDs at z≈2 yield number density ≈7×10^{-6} cMpc^{-3}, confirming a decline from the z≈5 peak but gentler than prior photometric estimates.

  3. Little Red and Blue Dots: AGN-excited narrow lines, Lyman-$\alpha$ emission, and resemblance to standard quasars

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    JWST data on LRDs and LBDs show AGN-like excitation, strong Lyα with broad components, and X-ray weakness, implying clumpy or equatorial geometries around growing black holes rather than complete gas envelopes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 3

    Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3

    2020

  2. [2]

    2006, ApJ, 651, 84 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Aoki, K., Iwata, I., Ohta, K., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 84 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    2006

  3. [3]

    A., Ferland, G

    Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Hamann, F., & LaCluyz´ e, A. 2004, ApJ, 615, 610

    2004

  4. [4]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    1981

  5. [5]

    A., Junkkarinen, V

    Barlow, T. A., Junkkarinen, V. T., Burbidge, E. M., et al. 1992, ApJ, 397, 81

    1992

  6. [6]

    2014, Advances in Space Research, 53, 900

    Bianchi, L., Conti, A., & Shiao, B. 2014, Advances in Space Research, 53, 900

    2014

  7. [7]

    A., & Green, R

    Boroson, T. A., & Green, R. F. 1992, ApJS, 80, 109

    1992

  8. [8]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, L167

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L167

    2025

  9. [9]

    J., Liu, X., Chen, Y.-C., Shen, Y., & Guo, H

    Burke, C. J., Liu, X., Chen, Y.-C., Shen, Y., & Guo, H. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 543

    2021

  10. [10]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

    1989

  11. [11]

    BlackTHUNDER strikes twice: rest-frame Balmer-line absorption and high Eddington accretion rate in a Little Red Dot at $z=7.04$

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Zhang, Z., et al. 2026 DESI Collaboration, Abdul Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 5, 285 D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Perna, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.11752 D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    2008, MNRAS, 383, 581

    Dong, X., Wang, T., Wang, J., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 581

    2008

  13. [13]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  14. [14]

    Filippenko, A. V. 1985, ApJ, 289, 475

    1985

  15. [15]

    V., & Halpern, J

    Filippenko, A. V., & Halpern, J. P. 1984, ApJ, 285, 458

    1984

  16. [16]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306

    2013

  17. [17]

    Gaskell, C. M. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 226

    2017

  18. [18]

    M., & Ferland, G

    Gaskell, C. M., & Ferland, G. J. 1984, PASP, 96, 393

    1984

  19. [19]

    2022, Astronomische Nachrichten, 343, e210112

    Gaskell, M., Thakur, N., Tian, B., & Saravanan, A. 2022, Astronomische Nachrichten, 343, e210112

    2022

  20. [20]

    2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023 30

    Gordon, K. 2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023 30

    2024

  21. [21]

    D., Fitzpatrick, E

    Gordon, K. D., Fitzpatrick, E. L., Massa, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 51

    2024

  22. [22]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122

    2005

  23. [23]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

    2024

  24. [24]

    A., Heckman, T

    Groves, B. A., Heckman, T. M., & Kauffmann, G. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1559

    2006

  25. [25]

    Hall, P. B. 2007, AJ, 133, 1271

    2007

  26. [26]

    B., Anderson, S

    Hall, P. B., Anderson, S. F., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2002, ApJS, 141, 267

    2002

  27. [27]

    Henry, R. B. C., Edmunds, M. G., & K¨ oppen, J. 2000, ApJ, 541, 660

    2000

  28. [28]

    C., Filippenko, A

    Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1996, ApJ, 462, 183 —. 1997, ApJS, 112, 315

    1996

  29. [29]

    C., & Kim, M

    Ho, L. C., & Kim, M. 2009, ApJS, 184, 398

    2009

  30. [30]

    G., & Storey, P

    Hummer, D. G., & Storey, P. J. 1987, MNRAS, 224, 801

    1987

  31. [31]

    B., Crenshaw, D

    Hutchings, J. B., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2543

    2002

  32. [32]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    S., & Noda, H

    Inayoshi, K., Kimura, S. S., & Noda, H. 2025, PASJ, 77, 811

    2025

  34. [34]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27

    2025

  35. [35]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 369

    Ji, T., Wang, T.-G., Zhou, H.-Y., & Wang, H.-Y. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 369

    2012

  36. [36]

    2013, ChA&A, 37, 17

    Ji, T., Zhou, H.-y., Wang, T.-g., & Wang, H.-y. 2013, ChA&A, 37, 17

    2013

  37. [37]

    2025, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Juneau, S., Jacques, A., Pothier, S., et al. 2025, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 541, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXXIII, ed. A. Jacques, R. Seaman, N. Gandilo, & T. Linder, 77

    2025

  38. [38]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055

    2003

  39. [39]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    2001

  40. [40]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961

    2006

  41. [41]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407

    2025

  42. [42]

    2024, A&A, 691, A52

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52

    2024

  43. [43]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4

    2023

  44. [44]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126

    2025

  45. [45]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38

    2024

  46. [46]

    Kong, M., & Ho, L. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 116

    2018

  47. [47]

    T., & Goad, M

    Korista, K. T., & Goad, M. R. 2004, ApJ, 606, 749

    2004

  48. [48]

    2024, A&A, 684, A52 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al

    Kuhn, L., Shangguan, J., Davies, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A52 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266

    2024

  49. [49]

    M., Gallagher, S

    Leighly, K. M., Gallagher, S. C., Choi, H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 129

    2025

  50. [50]

    Li, G., Ho, L., Wang, R., & et al. 2026

    2026

  51. [51]

    C., & Chen, C.-H

    Li, R., Ho, L. C., & Chen, C.-H. 2026, ApJ, 999, 70

    2026

  52. [52]

    C., Ricci, C., et al

    Li, R., Ho, L. C., Ricci, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 70

    2022

  53. [53]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 147

    Lin, X., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 147

    2024

  54. [54]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 364

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 364

    2026

  55. [55]

    (LRDs)$^2$: The Low-ReDshift Little Red Dots Survey. II. DESI DR1 Sample

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y. 2025, ApJ, 994, 113

    2025

  57. [57]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 21

    Liu, H.-Y., Liu, W.-J., Dong, X.-B., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 21

    2019

  58. [58]

    2015, ApJS, 217, 11

    Liu, W.-J., Zhou, H., Ji, T., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 11

    2015

  59. [59]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 1722

    Lu, K.-X., Zhao, Y., Bai, J.-M., & Fan, X.-L. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 1722

    2019

  60. [60]

    M., et al

    Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 30

    2014

  61. [61]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1

    2005

  62. [62]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129

    2024

  63. [63]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 457

    Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C., & Tominaga, N. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 457

    2013

  64. [64]

    M., Cohen, M

    Ogle, P. M., Cohen, M. H., Miller, J. S., et al. 1999, ApJS, 125, 1

    1999

  65. [65]

    Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    1989

  66. [66]

    J., Ho, L

    Park, D., Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C., & Laor, A. 2022, ApJS, 258, 38 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13

    2022

  67. [67]

    M., & Kallman, T

    Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R. 2000, ApJ, 543, 686

    2000

  68. [68]

    A., Richards, G

    Reichard, T. A., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2594

    2003

  69. [69]

    T., Hall, P

    Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Vanden Berk, D. E., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1131

    2003

  70. [70]

    T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L

    Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470

    2006

  71. [71]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574 31

    2026

  72. [72]

    Santos, D. J. D., Shimizu, T., Davies, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A30 Schnorr-M¨ uller, A., Davies, R. I., Korista, K. T., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 3570

    2025

  73. [73]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 167

    Schulze, A., Misawa, T., Zuo, W., & Wu, X.-B. 2018, ApJ, 853, 167

    2018

  74. [74]

    Shen, Y., & Ho, L. C. 2014, Nature, 513, 210

    2014

  75. [75]

    A., & Shaviv, G

    Shlosman, I., Vitello, P. A., & Shaviv, G. 1985, ApJ, 294, 96

    1985

  76. [76]

    Sigut, T. A. A., & Pradhan, A. K. 2003, ApJS, 145, 15

    2003

  77. [77]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

    2006

  78. [78]

    C., & Li, R

    Son, S., Kim, M., Ho, L. C., & Li, R. 2025, ApJ, 995, 37

    2025

  79. [79]

    2025, A&A, 700, A203

    Trefoloni, B., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A203

    2025

  80. [80]

    B., & Edmunds, M

    Vila-Costas, M. B., & Edmunds, M. G. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 199

    1993

Showing first 80 references.