Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

For N>=3 quantum systems, the Bures metric near rank-changing points reduces to a conical metric with genuine curvature singularities at pure states.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 12:19 UTC pith:FOXIQF2X

load-bearing objection The paper shows Bures metric singularities at rank changes are coordinate artifacts for qubits but genuine conical curvature for N>=3 under explicit restrictions, backed by Lindblad constructions.

arxiv 2605.27907 v2 pith:FOXIQF2X submitted 2026-05-27 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Geometry near rank-changing points on the mixed-state manifold: Bures metric, conical singularities, and Lindblad dynamics

Yu-Huan Huang , Xu-Yang Hou , Hao Guo , Chih-Chun Chien This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Bures metricconical singularitiesLindblad dynamicsrank-changing pointsmixed-state manifoldcurvature singularitiesquantum geometryopen quantum systems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the Bures metric behaves on the manifold of mixed quantum states near points where the density matrix rank changes. For two-level systems the apparent divergences turn out to be removable coordinate artifacts, and three distinct Lindblad evolutions are constructed that approach or depart from pure states in different ways. For systems with three or more levels, under restrictions on the density matrix and its approach to a pure state, the metric becomes that of a cone with the pure state at the tip; this produces real curvature singularities, a Dirac delta for the two-dimensional case and a power-law divergence in higher dimensions. A Lindblad dynamics realizing the conical geometry is given explicitly for three-level systems. Readers care because the geometry controls how open-system trajectories behave arbitrarily close to pure states.

Core claim

For N>=3, under suitable restrictions of the density matrix and its approach towards a pure state, the Bures metric reduces to a conical metric with the pure state at the cone tip. Such a conic geometry leads to genuine curvature singularities: a two-dimensional cone exhibits a Dirac delta-function curvature near the tip while a higher-dimensional cone shows a power-law divergence of the curvature towards the cone tip. A construction of Lindblad evolution for N=3 systems with conic singularities is presented.

What carries the argument

Reduction of the Bures metric to a conical metric near rank-changing points, with the pure state at the cone tip.

Load-bearing premise

Suitable restrictions exist on the density matrix and its approach to a pure state such that the Bures metric reduces to a conical metric.

What would settle it

Construct a three-level Lindblad evolution that stays inside the restricted family approaching a pure state and measure whether the integrated curvature near the tip matches a Dirac delta or power-law divergence rather than remaining finite.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For N=2 the three Lindblad processes exhibit geodesic approach, power-law scaling, and pure-state escape.
  • Genuine curvature singularities appear only for N>=3 under the stated restrictions.
  • A concrete Lindblad construction exists that realizes the conical geometry for N=3.
  • The distinction between coordinate artifacts and true singularities affects the global structure of the mixed-state manifold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The conical geometry may set limits on how fast a higher-dimensional system can reach a pure state under continuous Lindblad evolution.
  • Similar rank-changing points in other quantum information geometries could produce analogous singularities.
  • Experimental detection would require preparing restricted families of states in qutrit or higher systems and tracking curvature-sensitive observables.
  • The result suggests that dimension-dependent topological features of the state manifold become visible only when the rank drops.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the Bures metric on the manifold of mixed quantum states near rank-changing points of the density matrix. For N=2 systems the apparent divergences are shown to be coordinate artifacts, with three explicit Lindblad processes exhibiting geodesic approach, power-law scaling, and pure-state escape. For N≥3, under stated restrictions on the density matrix and its approach to a pure state, the Bures metric is reduced to a conical form with the pure state at the tip; the resulting curvature singularities are computed (Dirac delta for the 2D cone, power-law divergence for higher-dimensional cones), and a Lindblad construction realizing the conic geometry is given for N=3.

Significance. If the explicit reductions and curvature calculations hold, the work establishes a dimension-dependent geometric distinction near pure states that is directly tied to open-system dynamics. The provision of concrete Lindblad constructions and the separation of coordinate artifacts from genuine singularities for N=2 constitute clear strengths that make the central claims falsifiable and potentially relevant to both theoretical geometry of quantum states and experimental probes of near-pure-state evolution.

minor comments (2)
  1. The precise statement of the 'suitable restrictions' invoked for the N≥3 reduction should be collected in a single theorem or proposition (rather than distributed across the abstract and later sections) to make the domain of validity immediately verifiable.
  2. Notation for the coordinate charts used in the N=2 artifact proof and the conical embedding for N≥3 should be unified or cross-referenced to avoid ambiguity when comparing the two cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation of minor revision. The provided summary accurately reflects the manuscript's central results on the Bures metric near rank-changing points.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central derivation explicitly constructs the reduction of the Bures metric to a conical form under stated restrictions on the density matrix for N≥3, with separate coordinate analysis for N=2 showing artifacts rather than singularities. No load-bearing steps reduce by definition to inputs, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no self-citation chains or ansatzes imported from prior author work are invoked to force the result. The restrictions are part of the stated theorem, and curvature calculations (Dirac delta for 2D cone, power-law for higher D) follow from the metric reduction itself. The derivation is self-contained against the Bures metric geometry.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5739 in / 1156 out tokens · 43491 ms · 2026-06-29T12:19:33.618252+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We elucidate the Bures metric in quantum state space near a rank-changing point of the density matrix and show contrasting behavior for two-level ($N=2$) systems versus higher-level systems. Due to the smooth pure-state boundary for $N=2$, we prove the apparent metric divergences to be merely coordinate artifacts and present three Lindblad processes exhibiting qualitatively different evolution near rank-changing points, showing geodesic approach, power-law scaling, and pure-state escape law. For higher-dimensional ($N\ge 3$) systems, the geometry near a rank-changing point differs fundamentally. Under suitable restrictions of the density matrix and its approach towards a pure state, the Bures metric reduces to a conical metric with the pure state at the cone tip. Such a conic geometry leads to genuine curvature singularities: A two-dimensional cone exhibits a Dirac delta-function curvature near the tip while a higher-dimensional cone shows a power-law divergence of the curvature towards the cone tip. A construction of Lindblad evolution for $N=3$ systems with conic singularities is presented, along with possible implications for future experimental and theoretical research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27907 by Chih-Chun Chien, Hao Guo, Xu-Yang Hou, Yu-Huan Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) The Bloch vector norm r and the Bures metric components (b) grr,(C)gθθ, and(d)gφφ during the asymptotic purification evolution for p = 0.7 and γ = 2.0. finite-time purification, where the rank of the density ma￾trix drops from 2 to 1 at a specific finite time; (3) a de￾coherence process, in which a pure state evolves into a mixed state. We will first present the time evolution of the Bures metrics for … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Behaviors of (a) the Bloch vector norm and (b)-(d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Evolution path from pure to mixed state in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the geometry of N = 3 states. The full state space is an 8-dimensional convex body, represented schematically as a ball. The equilateral triangle ∆2 is the eigenvalue simplex of diagonal density matrices (Eq. (28)). Its corners are pure states (rank 1), its edges are rank-2 states, and its interior is full rank. Any density matrix is obtained by a unitary transformation of a point in ∆2. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the metric cone structure near a pu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) A 2D conical singularity described by Eq. (43) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Gaussian curvature K (red dashed curve) of the 2D cone with κ = 0.6, concentrated as a Dirac delta-function at the tip. The blue solid line shows the integrated deficit angle δ = 2π(1 − κ). (b) Scalar curvature R of the 3D cone as a function of u ′ for selected values of κ, displaying a 1/u′2 divergence as u ′ → 0. the Bures metric, i.e., the contribution from variations of the eigenvalues, we use the … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Unfolded view of the 2D cone as a planar sector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Defect Holonomy Near Rank-Deficient Mixed States

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Rank-deficient mixed states function as defects that induce an asymptotically robust Uhlmann holonomy on punctured submanifolds, depending only on eigenvalue ratios in an exactly solvable qutrit model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    cross-section

    Geometric picture of a metric cone A metric cone is a Riemannian manifold with a singu- larity at a point (the cone tip) with a coordinate real- ization of the conical metric d s2 = du2 +u2h (see, e.g., 8 Ref. [27]). The line element takes the explicit form ds2 = du2 +u2hab(θ)dθadθb, (29) with u ≥ 0 being the radial coordinate which measures the distance ...

  2. [2]

    axes” of the complement subspace while keeping its “shape

    Reduction of the Bures metric to a conical metric on a restricted submanifold We now construct a submanifold of the full density matrix space on which the Bures metric takes the form of a conical metric near a pure state. The construction is specific to the chosen constraint with fixed |ψ ⟩ and fixed spectrum, and under the conditions specified be- low, the B...

  3. [3]

    geodesic approaching/shooting

    Radial constraint from cone geometry Our analysis of two-level systems ( N = 2) revealed that near a rank-changing point, all three Lindblad evolu- tions proceed radially, i.e., along the direction determined by the smaller eigenvalue of the density matrix. Note that in those cases the pure-state boundary is smooth. ForN ≥ 3, however, the geometry near a ...

  4. [4]

    The initial state is the pure state |ψ ⟩ = |0⟩, i.e., ρ(0) = |0⟩⟨0|

    An explicit Lindblad example for N = 3 To illustrate the geometric picture, we consider a sim- ple N = 3 Lindblad model with the following jump op- erators L1 = √ γ |1⟩⟨0|, L 2 = √ γ |2⟩⟨0|, (31) and set H = 0 for simplicity. The initial state is the pure state |ψ ⟩ = |0⟩, i.e., ρ(0) = |0⟩⟨0|. Physically, these Lindblad operators describe the evolution of...

  5. [5]

    Let the eigenvalue spectrum of the density matrix be λ 0 =ǫ, λ 1 =ζǫ, λ 2 = 1 − (1 +ζ)ǫ, (35) with 0 <ζ < 1 being a constant and ǫ → 0+

    A reduced N = 3 model with one angular coordinate We first consider a reduced N = 3 example where only a single angular degree of freedom near the pure-state cone tip is retained. Let the eigenvalue spectrum of the density matrix be λ 0 =ǫ, λ 1 =ζǫ, λ 2 = 1 − (1 +ζ)ǫ, (35) with 0 <ζ < 1 being a constant and ǫ → 0+. As ǫ → 0, the density matrix tends to the...

  6. [6]

    For the radial part of 0 1 2 u' 0 20 40 Gaussian c rvat re K (a) 0 1 2 ' 20 60 100 Scalar c rvat re R (b) κ=0.4 κ=0.6 κ=0.8 2.4 2.5 2.6 Integrated C rvat re Figure 7

    Full angular structure for N = 3: A three-dimensional metric cone We present a more general example with a full met- ric cone for the N = 3 system. For the radial part of 0 1 2 u' 0 20 40 Gaussian c rvat re K (a) 0 1 2 ' 20 60 100 Scalar c rvat re R (b) κ=0.4 κ=0.6 κ=0.8 2.4 2.5 2.6 Integrated C rvat re Figure 7. (a) Gaussian curvature K (red dashed curve...

  7. [7]

    For given angles ( θ,φ ), one first applies the unitary transformation U (θ,φ ) defined in Eq

    Constructing Lindblad evolution for cone singularities An explicit Lindblad construction that can realize the prescribed density matrix family featuring the afore- mentioned cone singularities proceeds in two steps. For given angles ( θ,φ ), one first applies the unitary transformation U (θ,φ ) defined in Eq. (47) to rotate the reference basis {|0⟩, |1⟩, |2...

  8. [8]

    [24] has shown that in the zero-temperature limit, the thermal-equilibrium density matrix becomes the rank-1 ground-state

    Tangential versus transverse sectors Ref. [24] has shown that in the zero-temperature limit, the thermal-equilibrium density matrix becomes the rank-1 ground-state. The Bures metric following the limit reduces to the Fubini-Study metric, which is com- pletely regular on the pure-state manifold. Meanwhile, we show that there is another geometric sector nea...

  9. [9]

    They correspond to changes |ψ ⟩ → | ψ ⟩+|dψ ⟩, with normalization preserved and d|ψ ⟩ orthogonal to |ψ ⟩ (⟨ψ |dψ ⟩ = 0)

    T angential space T / / ρ D1: It consists of varia- tions of the state vector |ψ ⟩ that preserve the rank- 1 condition, i.e., keep the density matrix on the pure-state manifold. They correspond to changes |ψ ⟩ → | ψ ⟩+|dψ ⟩, with normalization preserved and d|ψ ⟩ orthogonal to |ψ ⟩ (⟨ψ |dψ ⟩ = 0). Thus d ρ has no |ψ ⟩⟨ψ |-component, avoiding any deviation...

  10. [10]

    Normal space T ⊥ ρ D1: It consists of variations that change the spectral structure, pushing the state off D1 into the full-rank interior. Examples in- clude increasing the smallest eigenvalue λ min > 0 or 15 rotating the orthonormal basis {|a⟩} of the orthog- onal complement while |ψ ⟩ is fixed; such variations increase the rank beyond 1. These directions ...

  11. [11]

    A com- plete proof can be found in Ref

    Tangential convergence to a rank-1 state We now provide a simplified derivation showing that the Bures metric reduces to the Fubini-Study metric un- der the tangential convergence to a rank-1 state. A com- plete proof can be found in Ref. [24]. According to Eq. (1), the Bures distance can be written as ds2 B = 1 2 ∑ i,j |⟨i|dρ|j⟩|2 λ i +λ j , (B4) where ρ ...

  12. [12]

    Here µ a are inde- pendent of ǫ

    Reduction of the Bures Metric to a Conical metric To prove that near a pure state the Bures metric re- duces to the conical form (29) in the transverse sector for 16 N ≥ 3, we parametrize the density matrices as ρ(ǫ,θ ) = (1 − ǫ)|ψ ⟩⟨ψ |+ǫ N − 1∑ a=1 µ a |a(θ)⟩⟨a(θ)|, (B10) with 0 < ǫ <1, µ a > 0, ∑ aµ a = 1, and {|a(θ)⟩} an orthonormal basis of the ortho...

  13. [13]

    Hence for generic ζ, one has κ ̸= 1

    However, such a situation lies outside the physical domain ζ >0. Hence for generic ζ, one has κ ̸= 1. Consequently, Rh = 2/κ 2 ̸= 2, and the scalar curvature R ∼ u′− 2 diverges as u′ → 0. The same conclusion holds for higher-dimensional base manifolds, such as CPN − 2 with the Fubini-Study metric, where Rh ̸=d(d − 1) generically. We remark that the above ...

  14. [14]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski, Geometry of Quan- tum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    Avron and O

    J. Avron and O. Kenneth, An elementary introduc- tion to the geometry of quantum states with pictures, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 32, 2030001 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X20300010

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x20300010 2020

  16. [16]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum geometry in condensed mat- ter, National Science Review 12, nwae334 (2025), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/12/3/nwae334/59204701/nwae334.pdf

    2025

  17. [17]

    J. Yu, A. B. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B. J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry and the hidden scales in materials, Nature Reviews Physics 8, 226 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Bures, An extension of Kakutani’s theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite W ∗ - algebras, Trans

    D. Bures, An extension of Kakutani’s theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite W ∗ - algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 135, 199 (1969)

    1969

  20. [20]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  21. [21]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estima- tion, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 023001 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  23. [23]

    Quantum Geometric Tensor (Fubini-Study Metric) in Simple Quantum System: A pedagogical Introduction

    R. Cheng, Quantum geometric tensor (fubini-study met- ric) in simple quantum system: A pedagogical introduc- tion (2010), arXiv:1012.1337

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. A 392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  25. [25]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  26. [26]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Physics Reports 697, 1 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Eguchi, P

    T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, Gravitation, gauge theories and differential geometry, Phys. Rep. 66, 213 (1980). 19

    1980

  28. [28]

    A. Bohm, A. Mostafazadeh, H. Koizumi, Q. Niu, and J. Zwanziger, The geometric phase in quantum systems (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003)

    2003

  29. [29]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  30. [30]

    M. Yu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, Q. Lu, H. Liu, S. Zhang, M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, T. Ozawa, N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Experimental measure- ment of the quantum geometric tensor using cou- pled qubits in diamond, National Science Review 7, 254 (2019), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/7/2/254/38881669/nwz193 supplemental file.pdf

    2019

  31. [31]

    Tan, D.-W

    X. Tan, D.-W. Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Chu, Y.-Q. Zhu, D. Li, X. Yang, S. Song, Z. Han, Z. Li, Y. Dong, H.-F. Yu, H. Yan, S.-L. Zhu, and Y. Yu, Experimental measure- ment of the quantum metric tensor and related topologi- cal phase transition with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 210401 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    C.-R. Yi, J. Yu, H. Yuan, R.-H. Jiao, Y.-M. Yang, X. Jiang, J.-Y. Zhang, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Extract- ing the quantum geometric tensor of an optical raman lattice by bloch-state tomography, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032016 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Porlles and W

    D. Porlles and W. Chen, Quantum geometry of singlet superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094508 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Neupert, C

    T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Measuring the quantum geometry of bloch bands with current noise, Phys. Rev. B 87, 245103 (2013)

    2013

  35. [35]

    R. L. Klees, G. Rastelli, J. C. Cuevas, and W. Belzig, Microwave spectroscopy reveals the quantum geometric tensor of topological josephson matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 197002 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    X.-Y. Hou, Z. Zhou, X. Wang, H. Guo, and C.-C. Chien, Local geometry and quantum geometric tensor of mixed states, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035144 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  39. [39]

    Manzano, A short introduction to the lindblad master equation, AIP Advances 10, 025106 (2020)

    D. Manzano, A short introduction to the lindblad master equation, AIP Advances 10, 025106 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    Petersen, Riemannian Geometry , 3rd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol

    P. Petersen, Riemannian Geometry , 3rd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 171 (Springer, New York, NY, 2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    M. P. do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976)

    1976

  42. [42]

    Seaton, Two gauss–bonnet and poincar´ e–hopf theo- rems for orbifolds with boundary, Differential Geometry and its Applications 26, 42 (2008)

    C. Seaton, Two gauss–bonnet and poincar´ e–hopf theo- rems for orbifolds with boundary, Differential Geometry and its Applications 26, 42 (2008)

    2008

  43. [43]

    J. B. Altepeter, D. Branning, E. Jeffrey, T. C. Wei, P. G. Kwiat, R. T. Thew, J. L. O’Brien, M. A. Nielsen, and A. G. White, Ancilla-assisted quantum process tomogra- phy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 193601 (2003)

    2003

  44. [44]

    M. G. A. Paris and J. ˇReh´ aˇ cek, eds.,Quantum State Es- timation, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 649 (Springer, Berlin, 2004)

    2004

  45. [45]

    Kolodrubetz, V

    M. Kolodrubetz, V. Gritsev, and A. Polkovnikov, Classi- fying and measuring geometry of a quantum ground state manifold, Phys. Rev. B 88, 064304 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    Ozawa and N

    T. Ozawa and N. Goldman, Extracting the quantum met- ric tensor through periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201117 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Yu and et al., Experimental measurement of the quan- tum geometric tensor using coupled qubits in diamond, National Science Review 7, 254 (2020)

    M. Yu and et al., Experimental measurement of the quan- tum geometric tensor using coupled qubits in diamond, National Science Review 7, 254 (2020)

    2020