Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of classical and Bayesian imaging in radio interferometry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.11435 v4 pith:7TV4DCTG submitted 2020-08-26 astro-ph.IM stat.AP

Comparison of classical and Bayesian imaging in radio interferometry

classification astro-ph.IM stat.AP
keywords cleanimagingresolvebayesianalgorithmcorrectionfluxinterferometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

CLEAN, the commonly employed imaging algorithm in radio interferometry, suffers from a number of shortcomings: in its basic version it does not have the concept of diffuse flux, and the common practice of convolving the CLEAN components with the CLEAN beam erases the potential for super-resolution; it does not output uncertainty information; it produces images with unphysical negative flux regions; and its results are highly dependent on the so-called weighting scheme as well as on any human choice of CLEAN masks to guiding the imaging. Here, we present the Bayesian imaging algorithm resolve which solves the above problems and naturally leads to super-resolution. We take a VLA observation of Cygnus~A at four different frequencies and image it with single-scale CLEAN, multi-scale CLEAN and resolve. Alongside the sky brightness distribution resolve estimates a baseline-dependent correction function for the noise budget, the Bayesian equivalent of weighting schemes. We report noise correction factors between 0.4 and 429. The enhancements achieved by resolve come at the cost of higher computational effort.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.