REVIEW 4 cited by
LIFT: Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for Non-Language Machine Learning Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LIFT: Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for Non-Language Machine Learning Tasks
read the original abstract
Fine-tuning pretrained language models (LMs) without making any architectural changes has become a norm for learning various language downstream tasks. However, for non-language downstream tasks, a common practice is to employ task-specific designs for input, output layers, and loss functions. For instance, it is possible to fine-tune an LM into an MNIST classifier by replacing the word embedding layer with an image patch embedding layer, the word token output layer with a 10-way output layer, and the word prediction loss with a 10-way classification loss, respectively. A natural question arises: Can LM fine-tuning solve non-language downstream tasks without changing the model architecture or loss function? To answer this, we propose Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning (LIFT) and study its efficacy and limitations by conducting an extensive empirical study on a suite of non-language classification and regression tasks. LIFT does not make any changes to the model architecture or loss function, and it solely relies on the natural language interface, enabling "no-code machine learning with LMs." We find that LIFT performs comparably well across a wide range of low-dimensional classification and regression tasks, matching the performances of the best baselines in many cases, especially for the classification tasks. We also report experimental results on the fundamental properties of LIFT, including inductive bias, robustness, and sample complexity. We also analyze the effect of pretraining on LIFT and a few properties/techniques specific to LIFT, e.g., context-aware learning via appropriate prompting, calibrated predictions, data generation, and two-stage fine-tuning. Our code is available at https://github.com/UW-Madison-Lee-Lab/LanguageInterfacedFineTuning.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Collaborative Large and Small Language Models for Accurate and Scalable Data Repair
LasRepair++ pairs an LLM instructor with an SLM corrector, refines context via EM, and down-weights uncertain repairs using column-calibrated confidence, reporting 18.1% average F1 gain over baselines on data repair tasks.
-
ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold
ReSS uses decision-tree scaffolds to fine-tune LLMs for faithful tabular reasoning, reporting up to 10% gains over baselines on medical and financial data.
-
ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold
ReSS extracts decision paths from trees as scaffolds to guide LLM reasoning generation, fine-tunes the LLM on the resulting dataset with scaffold-invariant augmentation, and reports up to 10% gains on medical and fina...
-
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.