pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02418 · v1 · pith:4XOBPTNNnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Intrinsic orbital Hall effect in a nonuniform electric field

Min Ju Park , Jongjun M. Lee , Hyun-Woo Lee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 06:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orbital Hall effectquantum geometryBerry curvaturequantum metricBloch statesnonuniform electric fieldintrinsic transporttransverse transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

The orbital Hall conductivity under a nonuniform electric field is given by the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric of the Bloch states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the intrinsic orbital Hall effect in a nonuniform electric field has a conductivity expressible through the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. This creates a term-by-term match with the geometric formulation of the intrinsic charge Hall effect. A reader would care because it indicates that orbital angular momentum transport is governed by the same universal quantum geometric quantities as charge transport, allowing similar analysis across systems. The work uses a tight-binding model to show that higher-order responses are sensitive to the orientation of anisotropic samples.

Core claim

Focusing on the intrinsic orbital Hall effect in the dc limit under a spatially nonuniform electric field, the conductivity can be expressed in terms of universal geometric quantities such as the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. This provides a term-by-term correspondence with the geometric description of intrinsic charge Hall transport.

What carries the argument

The orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric of Bloch states, which determine the orbital Hall conductivity geometrically.

If this is right

  • The orbital Hall response has a direct geometric correspondence with charge Hall transport.
  • Higher-order orbital Hall response exhibits enhanced sensitivity to the orientation of an anisotropic sample.
  • The formulation applies to diverse intrinsic transverse transport phenomena.
  • Quantum geometry plays a central role in orbital angular momentum transport.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could simplify material predictions for orbital Hall effects by relying on band geometry alone.
  • The geometric terms might connect to responses under other gradients like strain fields.
  • Similar geometric descriptions could apply to spin or other angular momentum transports.

Load-bearing premise

The dc-limit orbital Hall response under a spatially nonuniform electric field is fully captured by the intrinsic geometric quantities of the Bloch states without additional scattering or disorder terms.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the orbital Hall conductivity in a specific material with disorder that shows deviation from the geometric expression predicted by the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02418 by Hyun-Woo Lee, Jongjun M. Lee, Min Ju Park.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the intrinsic orbital Hall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Band structure of the model along the high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Geometric analysis of electronic Bloch states offers a universal framework for understanding electronic properties, yet its role in the transport of orbital angular momentum remains unexplored. In this work, we establish an analytic connection between orbital angular momentum transport and the geometric properties of Bloch wave functions in electronic systems. Focusing on the intrinsic orbital Hall effect in the dc limit under a spatially nonuniform electric field, we show that its conductivity can be expressed in terms of universal geometric quantities, such as the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. This formulation provides a term-by-term correspondence with the geometric description of intrinsic charge Hall transport established in previous studies. Using a tight-binding model, we further illustrate that the higher-order orbital Hall response can exhibit enhanced sensitivity to the orientation of an anisotropic sample. Our work deepens the understanding of diverse intrinsic transverse transport phenomena and the role of quantum geometry in electronic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish an analytic connection between the intrinsic orbital Hall effect (OHE) in the dc limit under a spatially nonuniform electric field and the geometric properties of Bloch states. It asserts that the orbital Hall conductivity can be expressed in terms of orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric, yielding a term-by-term correspondence with the geometric formulation of the intrinsic charge Hall effect. A tight-binding model is used to illustrate that the higher-order orbital Hall response exhibits enhanced sensitivity to the orientation of an anisotropic sample.

Significance. If the central derivation holds without extraneous terms, the result would extend the geometric framework from charge to orbital transport, offering a universal description of intrinsic transverse responses in terms of Bloch-state geometry. This could strengthen the role of quantum geometry in understanding orbital angular momentum phenomena in mesoscopic systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [analytic connection / Kubo response section] The derivation of the dc orbital Hall conductivity from the Kubo response to the nonuniform-field perturbation H' ~ r·(q·E) must be shown explicitly to confirm that no residual contributions arise from commutators [r, H] or interband matrix elements of the orbital current operator J_L = r × p beyond those already contained in the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. The abstract asserts the reduction but supplies no intermediate steps or formulas.
  2. [dc-limit analysis] The long-wavelength (q→0) and dc (ω→0) limit of the orbital Hall response requires explicit verification that the extension from uniform-field geometric formulas does not generate additional terms proportional to derivatives of the Berry connection or position-matrix elements. This is load-bearing for the claimed term-by-term correspondence.
  3. [tight-binding model section] The tight-binding illustration must include numerical checks (e.g., direct computation of the orbital Hall conductivity versus the geometric integrals) to confirm that the higher-order response is indeed captured by the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric without disorder or scattering corrections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract refers to 'universal geometric quantities' without defining the orbital Berry curvature or orbital quantum metric; these should be introduced with explicit expressions early in the manuscript.
  2. [Formalism] Clarify the precise definition of the orbital current operator used in the Kubo formula to avoid ambiguity with conventional definitions involving L = r × p.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. The central analytic connection is derived in the main text via the Kubo formula applied to the nonuniform perturbation, but we agree that additional explicit intermediate steps and numerical benchmarks will improve clarity and verifiability. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [analytic connection / Kubo response section] The derivation of the dc orbital Hall conductivity from the Kubo response to the nonuniform-field perturbation H' ~ r·(q·E) must be shown explicitly to confirm that no residual contributions arise from commutators [r, H] or interband matrix elements of the orbital current operator J_L = r × p beyond those already contained in the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. The abstract asserts the reduction but supplies no intermediate steps or formulas.

    Authors: We agree that the intermediate steps deserve explicit display. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Kubo-response section to include the full perturbative expansion of the orbital current response to H' ~ r·(q·E), showing term by term that commutators [r,H] and interband matrix elements of J_L = r × p reduce exactly to the orbital Berry curvature and quantum-metric contributions already identified; no extraneous residuals remain in the dc limit. The added algebra will be placed immediately after Eq. (3) of the current draft. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [dc-limit analysis] The long-wavelength (q→0) and dc (ω→0) limit of the orbital Hall response requires explicit verification that the extension from uniform-field geometric formulas does not generate additional terms proportional to derivatives of the Berry connection or position-matrix elements. This is load-bearing for the claimed term-by-term correspondence.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated paragraph in the dc-limit subsection that performs the explicit q→0, ω→0 expansion of the full Kubo expression. The calculation demonstrates that all terms involving derivatives of the Berry connection or position-matrix elements cancel identically once the orbital current operator is projected onto the geometric quantities, leaving only the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. This confirms the term-by-term match with the charge-Hall geometry without extra contributions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [tight-binding model section] The tight-binding illustration must include numerical checks (e.g., direct computation of the orbital Hall conductivity versus the geometric integrals) to confirm that the higher-order response is indeed captured by the orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric without disorder or scattering corrections.

    Authors: We accept the suggestion. The revised tight-binding section will contain a new figure and accompanying text that directly evaluates the orbital Hall conductivity from the finite-q Kubo formula on the lattice model and compares it numerically to the integrals over orbital Berry curvature and quantum metric. The comparison is performed in the clean limit (no disorder) and shows quantitative agreement within numerical precision, thereby confirming that the higher-order response is fully accounted for by the geometric quantities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: orbital Hall conductivity derived from Bloch geometry without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper derives an analytic connection between orbital angular momentum transport and Bloch-state geometric quantities (orbital Berry curvature, quantum metric) for the intrinsic orbital Hall effect under nonuniform E. The abstract and claimed correspondence to charge Hall transport are presented as results of this derivation rather than definitions or fits. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central result to prior unverified inputs appear in the provided text. The extension to nonuniform fields and orbital current is framed as a first-principles calculation whose validity rests on the Kubo response and commutator handling, not on tautological equivalence. This is the normal case of an independent geometric derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1091 out tokens · 22375 ms · 2026-07-03T06:33:17.708977+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. Go, D. Jo, H.-W. Lee, M. Kl¨ aui, and Y. Mokrousov, Orbitronics: Orbital currents in solids, Europhysics Let- ters135, 37001 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    D. Jo, D. Go, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Spintronics meets orbitronics: Emergence of orbital angular momen- tum in solids, npj Spintronics2, 19 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    K.-J. Lee, V. Cros, and H.-W. Lee, Electric-field-induced orbital angular momentum in metals, nature materials 23, 1302 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen,Introduction to solid state physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital hall effects from orbital texture, Physical Review Letters121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B98, 214405 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Hayashi, D

    H. Hayashi, D. Jo, D. Go, T. Gao, S. Haku, Y. Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, and K. Ando, Observation of long-range orbital transport and giant orbital torque, Communications Physics6, 32 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    D. Go, D. Jo, K.-W. Kim, S. Lee, M.-G. Kang, B.-G. Park, S. Bl¨ ugel, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, Long- range orbital torque by momentum-space hotspots, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 246701 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital hall effect in a light metal ti, Nature619, 52 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Moriya, M

    H. Moriya, M. Taniguchi, D. Jo, D. Go, N. Soya, H. Hayashi, Y. Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, and K. Ando, Ob- servation of long-range current-induced torque in ni/pt bilayers, Nano Letters24, 6459 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current in p-doped silicon, Physical review letters95, 066601 (2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    Tanaka, H

    T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hi- rashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin hall ef- 8 fect and orbital hall effect in 4dand 5dtransition metals, Phys. Rev. B77, 165117 (2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    A. Pezo, D. G. Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall effect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contri- butions, Physical Review B106, 104414 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Johansson, B

    A. Johansson, B. G¨ obel, J. Henk, M. Bibes, and I. Mertig, Spin and orbital edelstein effects in a two-dimensional electron gas: Theory and application to srtio 3 interfaces, Physical Review Research3, 013275 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    El Hamdi, J.-Y

    A. El Hamdi, J.-Y. Chauleau, M. Boselli, C. Thibault, C. Gorini, A. Smogunov, C. Barreteau, S. Gariglio, J.- M. Triscone, and M. Viret, Observation of the orbital inverse rashba–edelstein effect, Nature Physics19, 1855 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    J. M. Lee, M. J. Park, and H.-W. Lee, Orbital edel- stein effect of electronic itinerant orbital motion at edges, Physical Review B110, 134436 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    J. Sohn, J. M. Lee, and H.-W. Lee, Dyakonov-perel-like orbital and spin relaxations in centrosymmetric systems, Physical Review Letters132, 246301 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    V. V. Kabanov and A. V. Shumilin, Impact of the impu- rity symmetry on orbital momentum relaxation and or- bital hall effect studied by the quantum boltzmann equa- tion, Phys. Rev. B110, 235161 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular momentum of phonons and the einstein–de haas effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 085503 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    R. R. Neumann, A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Or- bital magnetic moment of magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117209 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phonon angular momentum hall effect, Nano Letters20, 7694 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    G. Go, D. An, H.-W. Lee, and S. K. Kim, Magnon or- bital nernst effect in honeycomb antiferromagnets with- out spin–orbit coupling, Nano Letters24, 5968 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    D. Lee, D. Go, H.-J. Park, W. Jeong, H.-W. Ko, D. Yun, D. Jo, S. Lee, G. Go, J. H. Oh,et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nature communications12, 6710 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Dutta and A

    S. Dutta and A. A. Tulapurkar, Observation of nonlocal orbital transport and sign reversal of dampinglike torque in nb/ni and ta/ni bilayers, Phys. Rev. B106, 184406 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Fukunaga, S

    R. Fukunaga, S. Haku, H. Hayashi, and K. Ando, Orbital torque originating from orbital hall effect in zr, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023054 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppeneer, and R. K. Kawakami, Magneto-optical detection of the orbital hall effect in chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156702 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    S. Ding, Z. Liang, D. Go, C. Yun, M. Xue, Z. Liu, S. Becker, W. Yang, H. Du, C. Wang, Y. Yang, G. Jakob, M. Kl¨ aui, Y. Mokrousov, and J. Yang, Observation of the orbital rashba-edelstein magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 067201 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    G. Sala, H. Wang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Or- bital hanle magnetoresistance in a 3dtransition metal, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156703 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Hayashi and K

    H. Hayashi and K. Ando, Orbital hall magnetoresis- tance in ni/ti bilayers, Applied Physics Letters123, 10.1063/5.0170654 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0170654 2023

  30. [30]

    Chen and L.-W

    Z. Chen and L.-W. Wang, Role of initial magnetic disor- der: A time-dependent ab initio study of ultrafast demag- netization mechanisms, Science advances5, eaau8000 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    S. R. Tauchert, M. Volkov, D. Ehberger, D. Kazenwadel, M. Evers, H. Lange, A. Donges, A. Book, W. Kreuzpaint- ner, U. Nowak,et al., Polarized phonons carry angular momentum in ultrafast demagnetization, Nature602, 73 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect as a topological fermi-liquid prop- erty, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  33. [33]

    Sinova, D

    J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jung- wirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Universal intrinsic spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 126603 (2004)

    2004

  34. [34]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137204 (2005)

    2005

  35. [35]

    T¨ orm¨ a, L

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, L. Liang, and S. Peotta, Quantum metric and effective mass of a two-body bound state in a flat band, Phys. Rev. B98, 220511 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    T¨ orm¨ a, S

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Rie- mannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nature Physics18, 290 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Souza, Multipole theory of op- tical spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    ´Oscar Pozo Oca˜ na and I. Souza, Multipole theory of op- tical spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Zhong, J

    S. Zhong, J. E. Moore, and I. Souza, Gyrotropic magnetic effect and the magnetic moment on the fermi surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 077201 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Kozii, A

    V. Kozii, A. Avdoshkin, S. Zhong, and J. E. Moore, In- trinsic anomalous hall conductivity in a nonuniform elec- tric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 156602 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Zhang and J.-W

    A. Zhang and J.-W. Rhim, Geometric origin of intrinsic spin hall effect in an inhomogeneous electric field, Com- munications physics5, 195 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Pi´ echon, A

    F. Pi´ echon, A. Raoux, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, Geometric orbital susceptibility: Quantum metric with- out berry curvature, Phys. Rev. B94, 134423 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    A. Pezo, D. G. Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall physics in two-dimensional dirac materials (2023), arXiv:2301.01126 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    X. Liu, S. S. Tsirkin, and I. Souza, Covariant derivatives of berry-type quantities: Application to nonlinear trans- port (2023), arXiv:2303.10129 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    J. M. Lee, Universal intrinsic orbital dynamics from berry curvature in electronic two-band systems, Physical Re- view B112, 054441 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    A. Urru, I. Souza, O. P. Oca˜ na, S. S. Tsirkin, and D. Van- derbilt, Optical spatial dispersion via wannier interpola- tion, Phys. Rev. B112, 045201 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    J. M. Luttinger, Quantum theory of cyclotron resonance in semiconductors: General theory, Phys. Rev.102, 1030 (1956)

    1956

  48. [48]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Microscopic study of orbital textures, Current Applied Physics50, 13 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Wu and S

    C. Wu and S. Das Sarma,p x,y-orbital counterpart of graphene: Cold atoms in the honeycomb optical lattice, Phys. Rev. B77, 235107 (2008)

    2008

  50. [50]

    I. V. Tokatly, Orbital momentum hall effect inp-doped graphane, Phys. Rev. B82, 161404 (2010)

    2010

  51. [51]

    J. Ahn, S. Park, D. Kim, Y. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Stiefel– 9 whitney classes and topological phases in band theory, Chinese Physics B28, 117101 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    J. Ahn, S. Park, and B.-J. Yang, Failure of nielsen- ninomiya theorem and fragile topology in two- dimensional systems with space-time inversion symme- try: application to twisted bilayer graphene at magic an- gle, Physical Review X9, 021013 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Communications in Math- ematical Physics76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  54. [54]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  55. [55]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    M. P. Marder,Condensed matter physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2010)

    2010

  57. [57]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  58. [58]

    [40] use opposite con- ventions for the electric-field and Hall-current directions

    Please note that our paper and Ref. [40] use opposite con- ventions for the electric-field and Hall-current directions

  59. [59]

    Thonhauser, D

    T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137205 (2005)

    2005

  60. [60]

    Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    H. Lee, I. Baek, M. Sastges, Y. Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, and D. Go, Anatomy of the modern theory of orbital magnetism from first principles: Term-by-term analysis in the gauge-covariant formalism, Phys. Rev. B113, 214449 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Raghu, X.-L

    S. Raghu, X.-L. Qi, C.-X. Liu, D. J. Scalapino, and S.-C. Zhang, Minimal two-band model of the superconducting iron oxypnictides, Phys. Rev. B77, 220503(R) (2008)

    2008

  63. [63]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, and K. Yamada, Intrinsic anoma- lous hall effect in ferromagnetic metals studied by the multi-d-orbital tight-binding model, Phys. Rev. B75, 184416 (2007)

    2007

  64. [64]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant orbital hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous hall effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 016601 (2009)

    2009

  65. [65]

    L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, A. Molina-Sanchez, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital hall insulating phase in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B101, 161409(R) (2020)

    2020