pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02171 · v1 · pith:UXZ5PNRSnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.soft

Theory of collective learning in populations of adaptive agents

Gerhard Jung , Johann Asnacios , Misaki Ozawa , Olivier Dauchot , Eric Bertin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 04:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft
keywords collective learningadaptive agentskinetic theorypolicy distributioneffective rewarddecentralized learningswarm robotics
0
0 comments X

The pith

An effective reward function emerges from agent interactions to fully govern the evolution of policy distributions in learning populations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a kinetic theory for decentralized collective learning in homogeneous populations of adaptive agents that share policies and memories to reach a target macroscopic state. It derives evolution equations for the policy distribution whose form collapses all microscopic physical and memory details into one effective reward function that alone controls how the distribution changes over time. Under a Gaussian assumption on memories and policies, the equations close to yield explicit solutions for the mean policy and its variance. These results are tested on minimal models with varying time-scale separations and policy dimensions, matching agent-based simulations while showing how diversity and reward noise shape learning outcomes.

Core claim

We derive formal evolution equations for the distribution of policies across the population. A central outcome of our theory is the emergence of an effective reward function that fully determines the evolution of the policy distribution and encapsulates the microscopic details of the agents physical and memory dynamics. We obtain closed equations for the policy mean and variance which admit explicit time-dependent solutions under the assumption of Gaussian-distributed memories and policies.

What carries the argument

The effective reward function that encapsulates microscopic agent dynamics and solely determines the time evolution of the policy distribution.

If this is right

  • The effective reward captures how population diversity influences learning performance.
  • Fluctuations in the reward slow or alter convergence of the policy distribution toward the prescribed state.
  • The framework applies equally to models with perfect or partial separation of physical, memory, and policy time scales.
  • One- and two-dimensional policy spaces both reduce to the same effective-reward description.
  • The resulting equations recover limiting cases connected to the replicator equation and Moran model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reduction to a single effective reward suggests a route to simplify controller design in swarm robotics by tuning only that function rather than individual agent rules.
  • Because the effective reward links directly to evolutionary dynamics, the same formalism may quantify how learning populations respond to changing environmental targets.
  • Relaxing the Gaussian closure could expose whether learning exhibits abrupt transitions when memory distributions become heavy-tailed.

Load-bearing premise

Closed equations for policy mean and variance are obtained only when memories and policies are assumed to follow Gaussian distributions.

What would settle it

Numerical simulations of the microscopic agent models with deliberately non-Gaussian memory or policy distributions that produce mean and variance trajectories differing from the closed analytic solutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02171 by Eric Bertin, Gerhard Jung, Johann Asnacios, Misaki Ozawa, Olivier Dauchot.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the agent-based model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Illustration of the reduction/coarse-graining steps to derive the macroscopic theory of policy dynamics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Learning dynamics for the one-dimensional policy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Learning dynamics for the one-dimensional policy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Learning dynamics as predicted by kinetic theory (KT) in Eqs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Learning dynamics as predicted by kinetic theory (KT) in Eqs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate homogeneous populations of smart active agents that exchange information with their neighbors to perform a decentralized learning process aimed at achieving a prescribed macroscopic state. Such agents may, for example, represent simple microrobots. The exchanged information comprises tunable parameters governing the agent dynamics, referred to as the individual policy, together with an internal memory encoding previously visited states. This memory is used to evaluate a reward that quantifies the success of a policy to achieve the prescribed state. We extend the kinetic-theory description of collective learning in spatially homogeneous systems [Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 248302 (2025)] and derive formal evolution equations for the distribution of policies across the population. A central outcome of our theory is the emergence of an effective reward function that fully determines the evolution of the policy distribution and encapsulates the microscopic details of the agents physical and memory dynamics. We obtain closed equations for the policy mean and variance which admit explicit time-dependent solutions under the assumption of Gaussian-distributed memories and polices. To illustrate the framework, we present a series of minimal microscopic models, considering both perfect and partial separation of physical, memory and policy exchange time scales, as well as models with one- and two-dimensional policies. The obtained theoretical results compare well with agent-based numerical simulations. The theory captures key aspects of collective learning, including the influence of population diversity and reward fluctuations on learning performance. Finally, we discuss potential applications to swarm robotics and machine learning, and highlight connections with classical models of biological evolution, including the Replicator equation and the Moran model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends a prior kinetic-theory treatment of collective learning to homogeneous populations of adaptive agents that exchange policy parameters and internal memories to reach a prescribed macroscopic state. It derives formal evolution equations for the policy distribution across the population; a central result is the emergence of an effective reward function that governs the policy-distribution dynamics while encapsulating the microscopic physical and memory rules. Under the additional assumption of Gaussian-distributed memories and policies, closed equations for the policy mean and variance are obtained that admit explicit time-dependent solutions. The framework is illustrated on minimal models spanning perfect/partial time-scale separation and one-/two-dimensional policies; theoretical predictions are compared with agent-based simulations. Connections to the replicator equation and Moran model are noted, together with possible applications to swarm robotics and machine learning.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a systematic coarse-graining route from microscopic agent rules to an effective macroscopic description of collective learning, with the effective reward providing a reduced, closed dynamics. The explicit Gaussian solutions and direct simulation comparisons across multiple regimes constitute concrete strengths. The explicit links to classical evolutionary models add conceptual value. The approach could be useful for analyzing decentralized learning in robotic swarms or engineered populations.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract states that the formal evolution equations and effective-reward construction hold more generally while the Gaussian assumption is invoked only for closed moment equations; the manuscript should make this separation explicit in the main text (e.g., by labeling the general kinetic equations versus the Gaussian closure) so readers can immediately distinguish the two levels of approximation.
  2. [Results/illustrative models] Quantitative measures of agreement between theory and agent-based simulations (e.g., L2 errors on mean/variance trajectories or reported R² values) are mentioned but not shown in the provided abstract; adding a short table or inset in the relevant results section would strengthen the claim of “compare well.”
  3. [Theory section] Notation for the effective reward function (its functional dependence on policy moments, memory statistics, etc.) should be introduced once and used consistently; any redefinition between the general kinetic equations and the Gaussian case should be flagged.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the clear summary of its contributions, and the recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the significance of the effective reward function, the closed Gaussian equations, and the connections to evolutionary models were recognized. Since no specific major comments were raised, we have no points requiring rebuttal or revision at this stage, but we remain ready to incorporate any additional feedback.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained with external validation

full rationale

The paper extends its own prior kinetic-theory framework (cited PRL) to derive formal evolution equations for the policy distribution, from which an effective reward function is stated to emerge while encapsulating microscopic details. Closed moment equations are obtained under an explicit Gaussian assumption on memories and policies, with explicit solutions provided. The framework is tested against independent agent-based simulations in multiple regimes (perfect/partial timescale separation, 1D/2D policies), supplying external benchmarks that are not forced by the derivation itself. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim collapse to an unverified self-citation chain; the self-citation serves only as the starting point for an extension whose outputs are separately validated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters or invented entities; the sole identifiable assumption is the Gaussian form required for closure.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Memories and policies follow Gaussian distributions
    Invoked to obtain explicit time-dependent solutions for policy mean and variance

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5822 in / 1149 out tokens · 46119 ms · 2026-07-03T04:14:38.451053+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , Gn(S) and memoryM= (M1,

    Kinetic theory with multidimensional policy and memory A starting point is to consider a multidimensional observableG(S) = G1(S), . . . , Gn(S) and memoryM= (M1, . . . ,Mn). Equation (1) then generalizes to dMj dt =λ M (Gj(S)− M j) +ξ j(t) (j= 1, . . . , n),(B1) where the Gaussian noisesξ j(t) have zero mean and correlation⟨ξj(t)ξj′(t′)⟩noise = 2DMj(P)δ j...

  2. [2]

    ,Pq), the evolution equation forϕ(P) generalizing Eq

    Dynamics of the multidimensional policy distribution and moments For a multidimensional policyP= (P 1, . . . ,Pq), the evolution equation forϕ(P) generalizing Eq. (20) is obtained by integrating Eq. (B4) over the multidimensional memoryM, yielding ∂tϕ(P) = ˜λT ρ R(P)− R ϕ(P) + qX k=1 DPk ∂2ϕ ∂P 2 k .(B5) The effective reward R(P) remains formally defined ...

  3. [3]

    Closures of the dynamics of the policy mean vector and covariance matrix Equations (B9) and (B10) are in general not closed, and can be dealt with in at least two ways. A first procedure consists in assuming that the policy distribution takes the form of a multivariate Gaussian distribution, which is fully parameterized by the knowledge of the policy mean...

  4. [4]

    Bivariate Gaussian analysis of the two-dimensional policy dynamics of AOU agents We provide in this appendix a more detailed analysis of the two-dimensional policy dynamicsP= (b, D) of the AOU agents studied in Sec. V D, now taking into account correlations between the policy componentsbandDthrough a bivariate Gaussian ansatz,ϕ(b, D) =N(µ,Σ), withµ= (µ b,...

  5. [5]

    Drossel, Biological evolution and statistical physics, Advances in physics50, 209 (2001)

    B. Drossel, Biological evolution and statistical physics, Advances in physics50, 209 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    Sella and A

    G. Sella and A. E. Hirsh, The application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102, 9541 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    Houchmandzadeh and M

    B. Houchmandzadeh and M. Vallade, The fixation probability of a beneficial mutation in a geographically structured population, New Journal of Physics13, 073020 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Chia and N

    N. Chia and N. Goldenfeld, Statistical mechanics of horizontal gene transfer in evolutionary ecology, Journal of Statistical Physics142, 1287 (2011)

    2011

  9. [9]

    Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1819 (2007)

    J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1819 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    Castellano, S

    C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, Statistical physics of social dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 591 (2009). 34

    2009

  11. [11]

    R. A. Watson, S. G. Ficici, and J. B. Pollack, Embodied evolution: Distributing an evolutionary algorithm in a population of robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems39, 1 (2002)

    2002

  12. [12]

    Bredeche, E

    N. Bredeche, E. Haasdijk, and A. Prieto, Embodied evolution in collective robotics: A review, Frontiers in Robotics and AI5, 10.3389/frobt.2018.00012 (2018)

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00012 2018

  13. [13]

    P. Long, T. Fan, X. Liao, W. Liu, H. Zhang, and J. Pan, Towards optimally decentralized multi-robot collision avoidance via deep reinforcement learning, in2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA)(IEEE, 2018) pp. 6252–6259

    2018

  14. [14]

    Zheng, C

    Y. Zheng, C. Huepe, and Z. Han, Experimental capabilities and limitations of a position-based control algorithm for swarm robotics, Adaptive Behavior30, 19 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712320930418

    work page doi:10.1177/1059712320930418 2022

  15. [15]

    Bredeche and N

    N. Bredeche and N. Fontbonne, Social learning in swarm robotics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences377, 20200309 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    M. Y. Ben Zion, J. Fersula, N. Bredeche, and O. Dauchot, Morphological computation and decentralized learning in a swarm of sterically interacting robots, Science Robotics8, eabo6140 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Novkoski, M

    F. Novkoski, M. M´ elard, M. Delens, F. W´ ery, M. Noirhomme, J. Pande, A. Maier, A.-S. Smith, and N. Vandewalle, Graspion: An open-source, programmable brainbot for active matter research, Review of Scientific Instruments97, 014704 (2026)

    2026

  18. [18]

    Fersula, N

    J. Fersula, N. Bredeche, and O. Dauchot, Aggregating swarms through morphology handling design contingencies: from the sweet spot to a rich expressivity (2026), arXiv:2601.07610 [cond-mat.soft]

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Verdoucq, G

    M. Verdoucq, G. Theraulaz, R. Escobedo, C. Sire, and G. Hattenberger, Bio-inspired control for collective motion in swarms of drones, in2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS)(2022) pp. 1626–1631

    2022

  20. [20]

    J. Wang, G. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Wang, D. Yuan, X. Ma, X. Xu, Z. Cheng, B. Ji, M. Yang, J. Shuai, F. Ye, J. Wang, Y. Jiao, and L. Liu, Robo-matter towards reconfigurable multifunctional smart materials, Nat. Commun.15, 8853 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    D. Ma, J. Chen, S. Cutler, and K. Petersen, Smarticle 2.0: Design of scalable, entangled smart matter, inDistributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, edited by J. Bourgeois, J. Paik, B. Piranda, J. Werfel, S. Hauert, A. Pierson, H. Hamann, T. L. Lam, F. Matsuno, N. Mehr, and A. Makhoul (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024) pp. 509–522

    2024

  22. [22]

    Ozkan-Aydin, D

    Y. Ozkan-Aydin, D. I. Goldman, and M. S. Bhamla, Collective dynamics in entangled worm and robot blobs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA118, e2010542118 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    S. Li, B. Dutta, S. Cannon, J. J. Daymude, R. Avinery, E. Aydin, A. W. Richa, D. I. Goldman, and D. Randall, Program- ming active cohesive granular matter with mechanically induced phase changes, Science Advances7, eabe8494 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Y. Zhou, J. Zu, and J. Liu, Programmable intelligent liquid matter: material, science and technology, Journal of Microme- chanics and Microengineering32, 103001 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Kotikian, C

    A. Kotikian, C. McMahan, E. C. Davidson, J. M. Muhammad, R. D. Weeks, C. Daraio, and J. A. Lewis, Untethered soft robotic matter with passive control of shape morphing and propulsion, Science Robotics4, eaax7044 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Zeravcic, V

    Z. Zeravcic, V. N. Manoharan, and M. P. Brenner, Colloquium: Toward living matter with colloidal particles, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 031001 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Kaspar, B

    C. Kaspar, B. J. Ravoo, W. G. van der Wiel, S. V. Wegner, and W. H. P. Pernice, The rise of intelligent matter, Nature 594, 345 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Levine and D

    H. Levine and D. I. Goldman, Physics of smart active matter: integrating active matter and control to gain insights into living systems, Soft Matter19, 4204 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Majidi, Soft-matter engineering for soft robotics, Advanced Materials Technologies4, 1800477 (2019)

    C. Majidi, Soft-matter engineering for soft robotics, Advanced Materials Technologies4, 1800477 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    L. G. Mo C. and B. X., Challenges and attempts to make intelligent microswimmers, Front. Phys.11, 1279883 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Cazenille, M

    L. Cazenille, M. Toquebiau, N. Lobato-Dauzier, A. Loi, L. Macabre, N. Aubert-Kato, A. Genot, and N. Bredeche, Signaling and social learning in swarms of robots (2024), arXiv:2411.11616 [cs.RO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    L. G. Nava, R. Großmann, and F. Peruani, Markovian robots: Minimal navigation strategies for active particles, Phys. Rev. E97, 042604 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    Pishvar and R

    M. Pishvar and R. L. Harne, Foundations for soft, smart matter by active mechanical metamaterials, Advanced Science7, 2001384 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Cichos, K

    F. Cichos, K. Gustavsson, B. Mehlig, and G. Volpe, Machine learning for active matter, Nat. Mach. Intell.2, 94–103 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    D. I. Goldman and D. Z. Rocklin, Robot swarms meet soft matter physics, Science Robotics9, eadn6035 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Nasiri, E

    M. Nasiri, E. Loran, and B. Liebchen, Smart active particles learn and transcend bacterial foraging strategies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2317618121 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    te Vrugt,Artificial intelligence and intelligent matter(Springer, 2025)

    M. te Vrugt,Artificial intelligence and intelligent matter(Springer, 2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    L¨ owen and B

    H. L¨ owen and B. Liebchen, Towards intelligent active particles, inArtificial Intelligence and Intelligent Matter: Nanoscience, Soft Matter, Philosophy(Springer, 2026) pp. 257–271

    2026

  39. [39]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  40. [40]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  41. [41]

    Ramaswamy, Active fluids, Nat

    S. Ramaswamy, Active fluids, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 640–642 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    Janzen, G

    G. Janzen, G. Maselli, J. F. Jimenez, L. Garcia-Perez, D. Matoz Fernandez, and C. Valeriani, Active matter as a framework for living systems-inspired robophysics, Europhysics Letters154, 37001 (2026)

    2026

  43. [43]

    Liebchen and H

    B. Liebchen and H. L¨ owen, Optimal navigation strategies for active particles, Europhysics Letters127, 34003 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    L. Piro, E. Tang, and R. Golestanian, Optimal navigation strategies for microswimmers on curved manifolds, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023125 (2021). 35

    2021

  45. [45]

    L. Piro, B. Mahault, and R. Golestanian, Optimal navigation of microswimmers in complex and noisy environments, New Journal of Physics24, 093037 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    L. Piro, R. Golestanian, and B. Mahault, Efficiency of navigation strategies for active particles in rugged landscapes, Front. Phys.10, 1034267 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Nasiri, H

    M. Nasiri, H. L¨ owen, and B. Liebchen, Optimal active particle navigation meets machine learning, Europhysics Letters 142, 17001 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Floyd, A

    C. Floyd, A. R. Dinner, and S. Vaikuntanathan, Learning to control non-equilibrium dynamics using local imperfect gradients, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03798 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Cocconi, B

    L. Cocconi, B. Mahault, and L. Piro, Dissipation-accuracy tradeoffs in autonomous control of smart active matter (2024), arXiv:2409.12595 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Han and F

    T. Han and F. Meng, Fluctuation theorem and optimal control of an active tracking particle with information processing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.21487 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Echeverr´ ıa-Huarte and A

    I. Echeverr´ ıa-Huarte and A. Nicolas, Body and mind: Decoding the dynamics of pedestrians and the effect of smartphone distraction by coupling mechanical and decisional processes, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies157, 104365 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Bonnemain, M

    T. Bonnemain, M. Butano, T. Bonnet, I. n. Echeverr´ ıa-Huarte, A. Seguin, A. Nicolas, C. Appert-Rolland, and D. Ullmo, Pedestrians in static crowds are not grains, but game players, Phys. Rev. E107, 024612 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    Borra, M

    F. Borra, M. Cencini, and A. Celani, Optimal collision avoidance in swarms of active brownian particles, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2021, 083401 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    L. Yang, J. Jiang, X. Gao, Q. Wang, Q. Dou, and L. Zhang, Autonomous environment-adaptive microrobot swarm navigation enabled by deep learning-based real-time distribution planning, Nature Machine Intelligence4, 480 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    Ziepke, I

    A. Ziepke, I. Maryshev, I. Aranson, and E. Frey, Multi-scale organization in communicating active matter, Nat. Commun. 13, 6727 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    G. Jung, M. Ozawa, and E. Bertin, Kinetic theory of decentralized learning for smart active matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 248302 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Ariosto, J

    S. Ariosto, J. Garnier-Brun, L. Saglietti, and D. Straziota, Replication and information extraction in a minimal agent- environment model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23212 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    VanSaders, M

    B. VanSaders, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Measurement-induced phase transitions in informational active matter, PNAS Nexus5, pgag077 (2026)

    2026

  59. [59]

    Garnier-Brun, R

    J. Garnier-Brun, R. Zakine, and M. Benzaquen, Hydrodynamics of cooperation and self-interest in a two-population occupation model, Physical Review Letters135, 107402 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Bertin, M

    E. Bertin, M. Droz, and G. Gr´ egoire, Boltzmann and hydrodynamic description for self-propelled particles, Phys. Rev. E 74, 022101 (2006)

    2006

  61. [61]

    Bertin, M

    E. Bertin, M. Droz, and G. Gr´ egoire, Hydrodynamic equations for self-propelled particles: microscopic derivation and stability analysis, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 445001 (2009)

    2009

  62. [62]

    Ihle, Kinetic theory of flocking: Derivation of hydrodynamic equations, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics83, 030901 (2011)

    T. Ihle, Kinetic theory of flocking: Derivation of hydrodynamic equations, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics83, 030901 (2011)

    2011

  63. [63]

    Bertin, H

    E. Bertin, H. Chat´ e, F. Ginelli, S. Mishra, A. Peshkov, and S. Ramaswamy, Mesoscopic theory for fluctuating active nematics, New journal of physics15, 085032 (2013)

    2013

  64. [64]

    Ihle, Towards a quantitative kinetic theory of polar active matter, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 1293 (2014)

    T. Ihle, Towards a quantitative kinetic theory of polar active matter, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 1293 (2014)

    2014

  65. [65]

    G. Jung, J. Asnacios, M. Ozawa, O. Dauchot, and E. Bertin, Hydrodynamic description of collective learning in smart active matter (2026), in preparation

    2026

  66. [66]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, When are active brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles equivalent? consequences for motility-induced phase separation, Europhys. Lett.101, 20010 (2013)

    2013

  67. [67]

    Szamel, Self-propelled particle in an external potential: Existence of an effective temperature, Physical Review E90, 012111 (2014)

    G. Szamel, Self-propelled particle in an external potential: Existence of an effective temperature, Physical Review E90, 012111 (2014)

    2014

  68. [68]

    Bjedov, O

    I. Bjedov, O. Tenaillon, B. Gerard, V. Souza, E. Denamur, M. Radman, F. Taddei, and I. Matic, Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria, Science300, 1404 (2003)

    2003

  69. [69]

    P. L. Foster, Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology42, 373 (2007)

    2007

  70. [70]

    N. L. Komarova, Replicator–mutator equation, universality property and population dynamics of learning, Journal of theoretical biology230, 227 (2004)

    2004

  71. [71]

    A. M. Saxe, J. L. McClelland, and S. Ganguli, Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6120 (2013)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [72]

    P. D. Taylor and L. B. Jonker, Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics, Mathematical biosciences40, 145 (1978)

    1978

  73. [73]

    Hofbauer and K

    J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary game dynamics, Bulletin of the American mathematical society40, 479 (2003)

    2003

  74. [74]

    Ewens, An interpretation and proof of the fundamental theorem of natural selection, Theoretical Population Biology 36, 167 (1989)

    W. Ewens, An interpretation and proof of the fundamental theorem of natural selection, Theoretical Population Biology 36, 167 (1989)

    1989

  75. [75]

    L. L. Bonilla, Active ornstein-uhlenbeck particles, Physical Review E100, 022601 (2019)

    2019

  76. [76]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  77. [77]

    Boltzmann,Vorlesungen ¨ uber Gastheorie

    L. Boltzmann,Vorlesungen ¨ uber Gastheorie. Bd. 1(Barth, 1896)

  78. [78]

    N. V. Brilliantov and T. P¨ oschel,Kinetic theory of granular gases(Oxford University Press, USA, 2004)

    2004

  79. [79]

    Peshkov, E

    A. Peshkov, E. Bertin, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, Boltzmann-Ginzburg-Landau approach for continuous descriptions of generic Vicsek-like models, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 1315 (2014). 36

    2014

  80. [80]

    Pfeifer and G

    R. Pfeifer and G. G´ omez, Morphological computation–connecting brain, body, and environment, inCreating brain-like intelligence: From basic principles to complex intelligent systems(Springer, 2009) pp. 66–83

    2009

Showing first 80 references.