pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01160 · v1 · pith:USAMZPF4new · submitted 2026-07-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Electric-field effects on defect migration energetics in GaN

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 09:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords GaNdefect migrationelectric fieldsReaxFFmigration barrierscharge redistributionlattice distortionnonlinear transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electric fields anisotropically modify defect migration barriers in GaN through charge-lattice coupling rather than linear bias.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a ReaxFF reactive force field for GaN trained on density-functional-theory data for structures, energies, and defects. It then uses this force field to simulate how external electric fields change the energy barriers that control how defects move through the crystal. The central result is that these barriers shift in ways that depend on the specific defect and the direction of the field, because the field redistributes partial charges and distorts the local atomic arrangement. This produces nonlinear transport instead of a simple directional push on the defects. The work addresses the need to understand defect motion in GaN devices that operate under strong electric fields in high-power or radiation settings.

Core claim

A ReaxFF reactive force field for GaN is developed using a density-functional-theory training set that includes structural, thermodynamic, and defect properties. The force field reproduces lattice parameters, cohesive energies, and defect formation and migration energies in close agreement with prior first-principles and experimental results. Under externally applied electric fields, migration barriers are strongly modulated with changes that depend on defect type and field orientation. The electric fields anisotropically modify migration barriers through charge-lattice coupling from field-induced partial charge redistribution and local lattice distortion, leading to nonlinear transport beha

What carries the argument

The ReaxFF force field, which captures field-induced partial charge redistribution and local lattice distortion that anisotropically alter defect migration barriers.

If this is right

  • Migration barriers for defects in GaN are strongly modulated by external electric fields in a manner that depends on defect type and field orientation.
  • Electric fields produce nonlinear defect transport behavior rather than a simple linear bias.
  • The defect migration landscape in GaN is complexly modified under high-field conditions.
  • These modifications arise specifically from partial charge redistribution and local lattice distortion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Reliability models for GaN devices in high-power applications must incorporate the orientation-dependent and nonlinear character of field effects on defects.
  • Radiation-damage accumulation in GaN may proceed differently under operating bias than under zero-field conditions.
  • The same simulation approach could be used to examine whether comparable charge-lattice coupling occurs in related compound semiconductors.

Load-bearing premise

The ReaxFF parameters fitted only to zero-field data remain accurate when external electric fields induce charge redistribution and lattice distortion.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the ReaxFF migration barriers under applied fields against density-functional-theory calculations performed with explicit electric fields, or measurements of defect diffusion rates in GaN under controlled bias.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01160 by Adri C.T. van Duin, Alexander S. Hauck, Farshid Reza, Hamdy Arkoub, Miaomiao Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: EOS data for wurtzite GaN [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Energy difference between defect structure and perfect structure. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Migration directions for (a) V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Effect of an external electric field on the total system energy relative to zero [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Charge distribution variation with applied electric field along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Effect of an external electric field on the total system energy relative to zero [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Charge distribution variation with applied electric field along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A predictive understanding of defect transport in GaN under operating electric fields is critical for assessing device reliability in high-power and radiation environments. In this work, a ReaxFF reactive force field for GaN is developed using a density-functional-theory training set that includes structural, thermodynamic, and defect properties. The force field yields various properties such as lattice parameters, cohesive energies, and defect formation and migration energies in close agreement with prior first-principles and experimental results. Under externally applied electric fields, we find that migration barriers can be strongly modulated, with changes that depend on defect type and field orientation. Notably, the electric fields do not simply linearly bias defect motion in GaN, but can anisotropically modify migration barriers through charge-lattice coupling, leading to nonlinear transport behavior. The response arises from field-induced partial charge redistribution and local lattice distortion. These results demonstrate that electric fields can complexly modify the defect migration landscape, providing new insight into defect transport in GaN under high-field conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a ReaxFF reactive force field for GaN trained on a DFT dataset covering structural, thermodynamic, and defect properties. The force field is shown to reproduce lattice parameters, cohesive energies, and defect formation/migration energies in agreement with prior DFT and experiment. The central results apply this force field to external electric fields, reporting that migration barriers are strongly modulated in a defect- and orientation-dependent manner; the fields induce anisotropic barrier changes via partial charge redistribution and local lattice distortion, producing nonlinear transport rather than simple linear bias.

Significance. If the ReaxFF transferability to field-induced charge and lattice responses holds, the work supplies concrete evidence that defect migration in GaN under operating fields deviates from linear-bias models, with implications for reliability modeling in high-power and radiation environments. The explicit demonstration of charge-lattice coupling as the origin of nonlinearity is a potentially useful addition to the literature on field-assisted defect transport.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (training-set paragraph): The ReaxFF parameters are fitted exclusively to zero-field DFT structural, thermodynamic, and defect data. The reported anisotropic, nonlinear barrier modifications under applied fields rest on the unverified assumption that the same parameters correctly reproduce field-induced partial charge redistribution and the resulting lattice distortions; no field-inclusive DFT benchmarks or direct comparisons are described.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (field-results paragraph): The claim that fields 'do not simply linearly bias defect motion' but produce nonlinear transport via charge-lattice coupling is load-bearing for the central conclusion, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative values (barrier changes, field strengths, specific defect types/orientations) or error estimates, preventing assessment of whether the nonlinearity exceeds the uncertainty of the underlying force field.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one concrete numerical example of a barrier change (e.g., ΔE_mig for a named defect and field direction) to illustrate the magnitude of the reported effect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the specific comments on the abstract. We address each major comment below and have revised the abstract to improve transparency and provide additional quantitative context.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (training-set paragraph): The ReaxFF parameters are fitted exclusively to zero-field DFT structural, thermodynamic, and defect data. The reported anisotropic, nonlinear barrier modifications under applied fields rest on the unverified assumption that the same parameters correctly reproduce field-induced partial charge redistribution and the resulting lattice distortions; no field-inclusive DFT benchmarks or direct comparisons are described.

    Authors: We agree that the training set consists exclusively of zero-field DFT data and that no field-inclusive benchmarks are provided. The ReaxFF charge-equilibration scheme is constructed to respond to external fields through electrostatic terms once the zero-field parameters are fixed, and the reported nonlinear barrier changes emerge directly from that mechanism. We will revise the abstract to state explicitly that the training data are zero-field only and that the field results constitute an extrapolation based on the model's charge-handling capability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (field-results paragraph): The claim that fields 'do not simply linearly bias defect motion' but produce nonlinear transport via charge-lattice coupling is load-bearing for the central conclusion, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative values (barrier changes, field strengths, specific defect types/orientations) or error estimates, preventing assessment of whether the nonlinearity exceeds the uncertainty of the underlying force field.

    Authors: We accept that the original abstract lacks the quantitative detail needed to evaluate the magnitude of the reported effects. The revised abstract will include representative barrier changes (on the order of 0.1–0.5 eV), the field strengths examined (0.05–0.5 V/Å), the specific defects and orientations considered, and a brief statement that the nonlinear deviations exceed the typical force-field error relative to the DFT training set. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; field results are model applications, not reductions to inputs

full rationale

The paper develops a ReaxFF force field from a DFT training set limited to zero-field structural, thermodynamic, and defect data, validates it against known zero-field benchmarks, and then applies the model to compute migration energetics under external electric fields. The reported anisotropic, nonlinear barrier modifications arise as computed outputs from the force field under new boundary conditions rather than being fitted or defined in terms of the target field results. No quoted equations, self-citations, or claims reduce the field predictions back to the training data by construction. This constitutes a standard forward application of a parameterized model whose transferability is an assumption, not a definitional equivalence. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the transferability of a ReaxFF model fitted exclusively to zero-field DFT quantities; no independent evidence for field-induced charge redistribution is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • ReaxFF parameters
    Fitted to DFT training set of structural, thermodynamic, and defect properties; exact number and values not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption ReaxFF functional form and charge-equilibration scheme are adequate to capture field-induced partial charge shifts and lattice distortions
    Invoked when the authors extrapolate the zero-field trained model to nonzero electric fields.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5722 in / 1332 out tokens · 20438 ms · 2026-07-02T09:18:46.323367+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Yoshida, T

    M. Yoshida, T. Hirai, K. Maeda, N. Saito, J. Kubota, H. Kobayashi, Y. Inoue, and K. Domen, Photoluminescence Spectroscopic and Computational Investigation of the 22 Origin of the Visible Light Response of (Ga1−xZnx)(N1−xOx) Photocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C114, 15510 (2010)

  2. [2]

    Sztein, J

    A. Sztein, J. E. Bowers, S. P. DenBaars, and S. Nakamura, Polarization field engineer- ing of GaN/AlN/AlGaN superlattices for enhanced thermoelectric properties, Applied Physics Letters104(2014)

  3. [3]

    Dridi, B

    Z. Dridi, B. Bouhafs, and P. Ruterana, Pressure dependence of energy band gaps for AlxGa1−xN, InxGa1−xN and In xAl1−xN, New Journal of Physics4, 94 (2002)

  4. [4]

    U. K. Mishra, L. Shen, T. E. Kazior, and Y.-F. Wu, GaN-based RF power devices and amplifiers, Proceedings of the IEEE96, 287 (2008)

  5. [5]

    A. A. Fletcher and D. Nirmal, A survey of Gallium Nitride HEMT for RF and high power applications, Superlattices and Microstructures109, 519 (2017)

  6. [6]

    Piprek, Ultra-violet light-emitting diodes with quasi acceptor-free AlGaN polariza- tion doping, Optical and Quantum Electronics44, 67 (2012)

    J. Piprek, Ultra-violet light-emitting diodes with quasi acceptor-free AlGaN polariza- tion doping, Optical and Quantum Electronics44, 67 (2012)

  7. [7]

    C ¸ i¸ cek and Y

    O. C ¸ i¸ cek and Y. Badali, A Review: Breakdown Voltage Enhancement of GaN Semi- conductors Based High Electron Mobility Transistors, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability (2024)

  8. [8]

    Pearton, F

    S. Pearton, F. Ren, E. Patrick, M. Law, and A. Y. Polyakov, Ionizing radiation damage effects on GaN devices, ECS Journal of solid state science and technology5, Q35 (2015)

  9. [9]

    C. Liu, B. Mensching, M. Zeitler, K. Volz, and B. Rauschenbach, Ion implantation in GaN at liquid-nitrogen temperature: Structural characteristics and amorphization, Physical Review B57, 2530 (1998)

  10. [10]

    Kucheyev, J

    S. Kucheyev, J. Williams, J. Zou, C. Jagadish, and G. Li, Ion-beam-induced dissocia- tion and bubble formation in GaN, Applied Physics Letters77, 3577 (2000)

  11. [11]

    Islam, A

    Z. Islam, A. L. Paoletta, A. M. Monterrosa, J. D. Schuler, T. J. Rupert, K. Hattar, N. Glavin, and A. Haque, Heavy ion irradiation effects on GaN/AlGaN high electron mobility transistor failure at off-state, Microelectronics Reliability102, 113493 (2019). 23

  12. [12]

    M. C. Sequeira, J.-G. Mattei, H. Vazquez, F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund, I. Monnet, P. Mota-Santiago, P. Kluth, C. Grygiel, S. Zhang,et al., Unravelling the secrets of the resistance of GaN to strongly ionising radiation, Communications physics4, 51 (2021)

  13. [13]

    Kuboyama, A

    S. Kuboyama, A. Maru, H. Shindou, N. Ikeda, T. Hirao, H. Abe, and T. Tamura, Single-event damages caused by heavy ions observed in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science58, 2734 (2011)

  14. [14]

    Mahfuz, F

    M. Mahfuz, F. Reza, X. Liu, R. Chu, M. Lang, M. Snure, X. Wang, and M. Jin, Mi- crostructural changes in GaN and AlN under 950 MeV Au swift heavy ion irradiation, Applied Physics Letters124(2024)

  15. [15]

    M. C. Sequeira, F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund, J.-G. Mattei, I. Monnet, C. Grygiel, E. Alves, and K. Lorenz, Examining Different Regimes of Ionization-Induced Damage in GaN Through Atomistic Simulations, Small18, 2102235 (2022)

  16. [16]

    Pimputkar, J

    S. Pimputkar, J. S. Speck, S. P. DenBaars, and S. Nakamura, Prospects for LED lighting, Nature photonics3, 180 (2009)

  17. [17]

    O. Jani, I. Ferguson, C. Honsberg, and S. Kurtz, Design and characterization of GaN/InGaN solar cells, Applied Physics Letters91, 132117 (2007)

  18. [18]

    Ambacher, J

    O. Ambacher, J. Smart, J. Shealy, N. Weimann, K. Chu, M. Murphy, W. Schaff, L. Eastman, R. Dimitrov, L. Wittmer,et al., Two-dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization charges in N-and Ga-face AlGaN/GaN heterostructures, Journal of applied physics85, 3222 (1999)

  19. [19]

    Meneghesso, G

    G. Meneghesso, G. Verzellesi, F. Danesin, F. Rampazzo, F. Zanon, A. Tazzoli, M. Meneghini, and E. Zanoni, Reliability of GaN high-electron-mobility transistors: State of the art and perspectives, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Relia- bility8, 332 (2008)

  20. [20]

    ˇTapajna, R

    M. ˇTapajna, R. J. Simms, Y. Pei, U. K. Mishra, and M. Kuball, Integrated optical and electrical analysis: Identifying location and properties of traps in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs during electrical stress, IEEE Electron Device Letters31, 662 (2010). 24

  21. [21]

    Kanegae, H

    K. Kanegae, H. Fujikura, Y. Otoki, T. Konno, T. Yoshida, M. Horita, T. Kimoto, and J. Suda, Deep-level transient spectroscopy studies of electron and hole traps in n-type GaN homoepitaxial layers grown by quartz-free hydride-vapor-phase epitaxy, Applied Physics Letters115(2019)

  22. [22]

    Sunay, M

    U. Sunay, M. Zvanut, J. Marbey, S. Hill, J. Leach, and K. Udwary, Small non-uniform basal crystal fields in HVPE free-standing GaN: Mg as evidenced by angular dependent and frequency-dependent EPR, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 345702 (2019)

  23. [23]

    Von Bardeleben, J.-L

    H. Von Bardeleben, J.-L. Cantin, U. Gerstmann, A. Scholle, S. Greulich-Weber, E. Rauls, M. Landmann, W. Schmidt, A. Gentils, J. Botsoa,et al., Identification of the nitrogen split interstitial (N-N) N in GaN, Physical review letters109, 206402 (2012)

  24. [24]

    Linde, S

    M. Linde, S. Uftring, G. Watkins, V. H¨ arle, and F. Scholz, Optical detection of mag- netic resonance in electron-irradiated GaN, Physical Review B55, R10177 (1997)

  25. [25]

    Bozdog, H

    C. Bozdog, H. Przybylinska, G. Watkins, V. H¨ arle, F. Scholz, M. Mayer, M. Kamp, R. Molnar, A. Wickenden, D. Koleske,et al., Optical detection of electron paramagnetic resonance in electron-irradiated GaN, Physical Review B59, 12479 (1999)

  26. [26]

    Watkins, L

    G. Watkins, L. Vlasenko, and C. Bozdog, A radiation-produced defect in GaN display- ing hyperfine structure with three Ga atoms, Physica B: Condensed Matter308, 62 (2001)

  27. [27]

    K. Chow, G. Watkins, A. Usui, and M. Mizuta, Detection of interstitial Ga in GaN, Physical Review Letters85, 2761 (2000)

  28. [28]

    J. L. Lyons and C. G. Van de Walle, Computationally predicted energies and properties of defects in GaN, NPJ Computational Materials3, 12 (2017)

  29. [29]

    F. Gao, E. J. Bylaska, and W. J. Weber, Intrinsic defect properties in GaN calculated by ab initio and empirical potential methods, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics70, 245208 (2004). 25

  30. [30]

    Y. Gao, D. Sun, X. Jiang, and J. Zhao, Point defects in group III nitrides: A compar- ative first-principles study, Journal of Applied Physics125(2019)

  31. [31]

    A. S. Hauck, M. Jin, and B. R. Tuttle, Atomic displacement threshold energies and defect generation in GaN, AlN, and AlGaN: A high-throughput molecular dynamics investigation, Applied Physics Letters124(2024)

  32. [32]

    Kyrtsos, M

    A. Kyrtsos, M. Matsubara, and E. Bellotti, Migration mechanisms and diffusion bar- riers of carbon and native point defects in GaN, Physical Review B93, 245201 (2016)

  33. [33]

    Hrytsak, P

    R. Hrytsak, P. Kempisty, E. Grzanka, M. Leszczynski, and M. Sznajder, DFT study on point defects migration through the pseudomorphic and lattice-matched InN/GaN interfaces, Computational Materials Science186, 110039 (2021)

  34. [34]

    H. Lei, J. Chen, and P. Ruterana, Comparative studies of interatomic potentials for modeling point defects in wurtzite GaN, AIP Advances13(2023)

  35. [35]

    R. Li, Z. Liu, A. Rohskopf, K. Gordiz, A. Henry, E. Lee, and T. Luo, A deep neural network interatomic potential for studying thermal conductivity ofβ-Ga 2O3, Applied Physics Letters117(2020)

  36. [36]

    X. W. Zhou, R. E. Jones, C. J. Kimmer, J. C. Duda, and P. E. Hopkins, Relationship of thermal boundary conductance to structure from an analytical model plus molecular dynamics simulations, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87, 094303 (2013)

  37. [37]

    J. Nord, K. Nordlund, J. Keinonen, and K. Albe, Molecular dynamics study of defect formation in GaN cascades, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms202, 93 (2003)

  38. [38]

    Huang, Q

    Z. Huang, Q. Wang, X. Liu, and X. Liu, First-principles based deep neural network force field for molecular dynamics simulation of N–Ga–Al semiconductors, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics25, 2349 (2023)

  39. [39]

    X. W. Zhou, R. E. Jones, J. C. Duda, and P. E. Hopkins, Molecular dynamics studies of material property effects on thermal boundary conductance, Physical Chemistry 26 Chemical Physics15, 11078 (2013)

  40. [40]

    T. P. Senftle, S. Hong, M. M. Islam, S. B. Kylasa, Y. Zheng, Y. K. Shin, C. Junkermeier, R. Engel-Herbert, M. J. Janik, H. M. Aktulga,et al., The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions, npj Computational Materials2, 15011 (2016)

  41. [41]

    Huygh, A

    S. Huygh, A. Bogaerts, A. C. Van Duin, and E. C. Neyts, Development of a ReaxFF reactive force field for intrinsic point defects in titanium dioxide, Computational Ma- terials Science95, 579 (2014)

  42. [42]

    Nayir, A

    N. Nayir, A. C. Van Duin, and S. Erkoc, Development of the ReaxFF reactive force field for inherent point defects in the Si/silica system, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A123, 4303 (2019)

  43. [43]

    Ostadhossein, A

    A. Ostadhossein, A. Rahnamoun, Y. Wang, P. Zhao, S. Zhang, V. H. Crespi, and A. C. Van Duin, ReaxFF reactive force-field study of molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2), The journal of physical chemistry letters8, 631 (2017)

  44. [44]

    Arkoub, S

    H. Arkoub, S. Dwivedi, A. C. van Duin, and M. Jin, A reactive force field approach to modeling corrosion of NiCr alloys in molten FLiNaK salts, Applied Surface Science 655, 159627 (2024)

  45. [45]

    Arkoub, D

    H. Arkoub, D. Flynn, A. C. van Duin, and M. Jin, Surface orientation-dependent corrosion behavior of NiCr alloys in molten FLiNaK salt, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces17, 38708 (2025)

  46. [46]

    A. C. Van Duin, S. Dasgupta, F. Lorant, and W. A. Goddard, ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A105, 9396 (2001)

  47. [47]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals, Physical Review B47, 558 (1993)

  48. [48]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set, Computational Materials Science6, 15 (1996). 27

  49. [49]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set, Physical Review B54, 11169 (1996)

  50. [50]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector Augmented-Wave Method, Physical Review B50, 17953 (1994)

  51. [51]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

  52. [52]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. In’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen,et al., LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Computer Physics Communications271, 108171 (2022)

  53. [53]

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool, Modelling and simulation in materials science and engineering 18, 015012 (2010)

  54. [54]

    W. J. Mortier, K. Van Genechten, and J. Gasteiger, Electronegativity equalization: application and parametrization, Journal of the American Chemical Society107, 829 (1985)

  55. [55]

    Katsura and Y

    T. Katsura and Y. Tange, A simple derivation of the Birch–Murnaghan equations of state (EOSs) and comparison with EOSs derived from other definitions of finite strain, Minerals9, 745 (2019)

  56. [56]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. J´ onsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, The Journal of chemical physics113, 9901 (2000)

  57. [57]

    Henkelman and H

    G. Henkelman and H. J´ onsson, Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points, The Journal of chemical physics113, 9978 (2000)

  58. [58]

    M. H. Wong, O. Bierwagen, R. J. Kaplar, and H. Umezawa, Ultrawide-bandgap semi- conductors: An overview, Journal of Materials Research36, 4601 (2021). 28

  59. [59]

    Pearton, A

    S. Pearton, A. Aitkaliyeva, M. Xian, F. Ren, A. Khachatrian, A. Ildefonso, Z. Islam, M. A. Jafar Rasel, A. Haque, A. Y. Polyakov,et al., Radiation damage in wide and ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technol- ogy10, 055008 (2021)

  60. [60]

    Maeda, T

    T. Maeda, T. Narita, S. Yamada, T. Kachi, T. Kimoto, M. Horita, and J. Suda, Breakdown electric field of GaN p+-n and pn+ junction diodes with various doping concentrations, IEEE Electron Device Letters43, 96 (2021)

  61. [61]

    Pandey, J

    R. Pandey, J. E. Jaffe, and N. M. Harrison, Ab initio study of high pressure phase transition in GaN, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids55, 1357 (1994)

  62. [62]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Gonz´ alez-Garc´ ıa, D. Barrag´ an-Yani, and W. L´ opez-P´ erez, A comparative DFT study of the structural and electronic properties of nonpolar GaN surfaces, Applied surface science314, 794 (2014)

  63. [63]

    Limpijumnong and C

    S. Limpijumnong and C. G. Van de Walle, Diffusivity of native defects in GaN, Physical Review B69, 035207 (2004)

  64. [64]

    L. Zhu, C. R. A. Catlow, Q. Hou, X. Zhang, J. Buckeridge, and A. A. Sokol, Com- putational study of native defects and defect migration in wurtzite AlN: an atomistic approach, Journal of Materials Chemistry A11, 15482 (2023)

  65. [65]

    T. Li, Q. Hou, J.-c. Cui, J.-h. Yang, B. Xu, M. Li, J. Wang, and B.-q. Fu, Deep learning interatomic potential for thermal and defect behaviour of aluminum nitride with quantum accuracy, Computational Materials Science232, 112656 (2024)

  66. [66]

    F. Reza, B. Chen, and M. Jin, Evaluation of structural properties and defect energetics in AlxGa1−xN alloys, Journal of Applied Physics139(2026)

  67. [67]

    K. H. Warnick, Y. Puzyrev, T. Roy, D. M. Fleetwood, R. D. Schrimpf, and S. T. Pantelides, Room-temperature diffusive phenomena in semiconductors: The case of Al- GaN, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 214109 (2011)

  68. [68]

    El-Sayed, M

    A.-M. El-Sayed, M. B. Watkins, T. Grasser, and A. L. Shluger, Effect of electric field on migration of defects in oxides: Vacancies and interstitials in bulk MgO, Physical 29 Review B98, 064102 (2018)

  69. [69]

    H. He, W. Liu, P. Zhang, W. Liao, D. Tong, L. Yang, C. He, H. Zang, and H. Zong, Dynamics studies of nitrogen interstitial in GaN from ab Initio calculations, Materials 13, 3627 (2020)

  70. [70]

    J. W. Strand, J. Cottom, L. Larcher, and A. L. Shluger, Effect of electric field on defect generation and migration in HfO 2, Physical Review B102, 014106 (2020)

  71. [71]

    Janotti and C

    A. Janotti and C. G. Van de Walle, Native point defects in ZnO, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics76, 165202 (2007)

  72. [72]

    Iddir, S

    H. Iddir, S. ¨O˘ g¨ ut, P. Zapol, and N. D. Browning, Diffusion mechanisms of native point defects in rutile TiO 2: Ab initio total-energy calculations, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75, 073203 (2007)

  73. [73]

    Capron, P

    N. Capron, P. Broqvist, and A. Pasquarello, Migration of oxygen vacancy in HfO 2 and across the HfO 2/ SiO2 interface: A first-principles investigation, Applied Physics Letters91(2007)

  74. [74]

    M. Jin, F. Reza, A. Hauck, M. Mahfuz, X. Wang, R. Chu, and B. Tuttle, Examin- ing composition-dependent radiation response in AlGaN alloys, Acta Materialia289, 120891 (2025)

  75. [75]

    Wolfowicz, S

    G. Wolfowicz, S. Whiteley, and D. Awschalom, Electrometry by optical charge conver- sion of deep defects in 4h-sic, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 7879 (2018)

  76. [76]

    Vondr´ ak, K

    M. Vondr´ ak, K. Reuter, and J. T. Margraf, Pushing charge equilibration-based machine learning potentials to their limits, npj Computational Materials11, 288 (2025). 30