pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30295 · v1 · pith:PGXTB3E4new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Exact Helicity-Orbital Coupled Dynamics in Chiral Media: An Optical Dirac Framework for Photonic Rabi Oscillations

Xuhui Cheng , Longlong Feng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords chiral mediaoptical Dirac equationRabi oscillationsspin-orbit couplinghelicityorbital angular momentumphotonic modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Light in chiral media obeys an exact two-level helicity-orbital model that produces coherent Rabi-like oscillations after positive-frequency projection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that Maxwell's equations for light in reciprocal chiral photonic media can be recast as a four-component non-Hermitian Dirac equation in helicity space. The magnetoelectric response enters as a helicity-dependent background that breaks spin degeneracy and creates spin-orbit coupling. Projection onto the positive-frequency sector then yields an exactly solvable two-level model whose closed-form solutions describe coherent oscillations between vector modes. Chirality sets the splitting and detuning while electromagnetic mismatch sets the coupling strength, and total angular momentum remains conserved during the reversible spin-orbital conversion.

Core claim

Starting from Maxwell's equations, the electromagnetic field in reciprocal chiral photonic media is reformulated as a four-component spinor governed by an effective non-Hermitian optical Dirac equation. In this representation the magnetoelectric response appears as a helicity-dependent background that modifies the spectrum and eigenmodes, while breaking of the spin-degenerate condition generates intrinsic spin-orbit coupling between helicity and orbital degrees of freedom. After projection onto the positive-frequency sector the theory reduces to an exact two-level helicity-orbital model with an analytical solution that describes coherent Rabi-like oscillations between spin-orbit-coupled vect

What carries the argument

The two-level helicity-orbital model obtained after projecting the non-Hermitian optical Dirac equation onto the positive-frequency sector, whose analytical solutions govern the coherent oscillations.

If this is right

  • Chirality directly sets the helicity splitting and detuning parameters of the oscillations.
  • Electromagnetic mismatch of the medium fixes the coupling strength that drives the spin-orbit conversion.
  • Total angular momentum is exactly conserved, enforcing reversible conversion with definite selection rules.
  • The framework supplies closed-form predictions for chirality-controlled polarization dynamics and orbital angular momentum exchange in structured fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The closed-form solutions could be used to predict exact oscillation frequencies for given chiral parameters without full numerical Maxwell solving.
  • The same projection technique might apply to other symmetry-broken media if the positive-frequency sector remains cleanly separable.
  • Structured light beams carrying defined orbital angular momentum could serve as probes of the predicted helicity-dependent splitting in experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetoelectric term can be treated as a simple helicity-dependent background and the projection onto the positive-frequency sector preserves exact solvability of the resulting two-level system.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of polarization and orbital angular momentum evolution in a reciprocal chiral slab that shows non-oscillatory or irreversible conversion between the predicted modes would falsify the exact two-level reduction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30295 by Longlong Feng, Xuhui Cheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Photon-antiphoton schematic diagram. Label [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Eigenvalues as functions of the chirality-dominant parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of polarization eigenstates on the Poincar´e sphere driven by transverse impedance mismatch. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of the amplitude factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Higher-order Poincar´e sphere (HOPS) representation of the spin-orbit-coupled vector beam for the intermediate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Intensity and phase distributions demonstrating the annihilation of orbital angular momentum (OAM) in a vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that light propagation in reciprocal chiral photonic media admits a unified description in terms of an emergent Dirac structure in helicity space. Starting from Maxwell's equations, we reformulate the electromagnetic field as a four-component spinor governed by an effective non-Hermitian optical Dirac equation. In this representation, the magnetoelectric response of the chiral medium appears as a helicity-dependent background that modifies the spectrum and eigenmodes, while the breaking of the spin-degenerate condition generates the intrinsic spin-orbit coupling between helicity and orbital degrees of freedom. After projection onto the positive-frequency sector, the theory reduces to an exact two-level helicity-orbital model. This model is found to have an analytical solution and describes coherent Rabi-like oscillations between spin-orbit-coupled vector modes. Chirality controls the helicity splitting and detuning, whereas the electromagnetic mismatch of the medium determines the coupling strength responsible for oscillatory spin-orbit conversion. The resulting dynamics is constrained by exact conservation of the total angular momentum, leading to reversible conversion between spin and orbital angular momentum with well-defined selection rules. Our work establishes an optical Dirac framework for structured light in chiral media, and provides experimentally accessible predictions for chirality-controlled oscillations, polarization dynamics, and orbital angular momentum conversion in structured optical fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that Maxwell's equations in reciprocal chiral media can be recast as a four-component non-Hermitian optical Dirac equation whose magnetoelectric term acts as a helicity-dependent background; after projection onto the positive-frequency sector this yields an exactly solvable two-level helicity-orbital Hamiltonian whose analytical solution describes coherent Rabi-like oscillations between spin-orbit-coupled modes, with chirality setting the detuning and the medium mismatch setting the coupling, all while conserving total angular momentum.

Significance. If the projection is shown to be exact and free of residual couplings, the work supplies a parameter-free, Maxwell-derived framework that unifies helicity and orbital dynamics in chiral media and yields falsifiable predictions for polarization conversion and OAM exchange; the explicit conservation law and analytical solvability would be notable strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, paragraph 2] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central claim that 'after projection onto the positive-frequency sector, the theory reduces to an exact two-level helicity-orbital model' with an analytical solution is load-bearing. The non-Hermitian Dirac operator and the spin-orbit terms arising from the magnetoelectric background must be shown to produce no residual negative-frequency or cross-sector couplings under the projection; without an explicit demonstration (e.g., via the form of the projection operator and the resulting 2 imes2 block), the asserted exactness and Rabi solvability cannot be verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the need to verify the exactness of the projection, which is indeed central to our claims. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, paragraph 2] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central claim that 'after projection onto the positive-frequency sector, the theory reduces to an exact two-level helicity-orbital model' with an analytical solution is load-bearing. The non-Hermitian Dirac operator and the spin-orbit terms arising from the magnetoelectric background must be shown to produce no residual negative-frequency or cross-sector couplings under the projection; without an explicit demonstration (e.g., via the form of the projection operator and the resulting 2×2 block), the asserted exactness and Rabi solvability cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required to substantiate the exactness claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated derivation of the projection operator onto the positive-frequency sector, followed by the explicit 2×2 block obtained after projection. This will show that the non-Hermitian terms and magnetoelectric-induced spin-orbit couplings produce no residual negative-frequency or cross-sector matrix elements, thereby confirming that the dynamics reduce exactly to the two-level helicity-orbital Hamiltonian whose analytical Rabi solution is presented. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation starts from Maxwell's equations with independent projection step

full rationale

The paper's central chain begins from Maxwell's equations, reformulates into a four-component non-Hermitian Dirac operator, and projects onto the positive-frequency sector to obtain the two-level model. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or analytical solution to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The abstract and described structure treat the projection as a mathematical operation preserving exact solvability without circular reduction to inputs. This is the most common honest finding for a first-principles reformulation paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on Maxwell's equations as the starting point, the validity of the four-component spinor reformulation, and the legitimacy of the positive-frequency projection; no free parameters or invented particles are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations in reciprocal chiral media
    Explicitly stated as the starting point of the derivation in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • four-component spinor representation of the electromagnetic field no independent evidence
    purpose: To recast Maxwell's equations into an effective non-Hermitian optical Dirac equation
    Introduced as an emergent structure in helicity space; no independent experimental signature is claimed in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5761 in / 1346 out tokens · 50879 ms · 2026-06-30T04:42:05.758162+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references

  1. [1]

    to structured light propagating in chiral optical me- dia. The central novelty of our formulation is a helicity- space reformulation of Maxwell’s equations based on a complex electromagnetic field vector distinct from the conventional Riemann-Silberstein representation. This construction naturally organizes the electromagnetic field into a Dirac-like spin...

  2. [2]

    Here ˆk=−i∇ is the momentum operator, andsis the spin-1 operator in the adjoint representation ofSO(3), i.e.,{s i}jk =−iϵ ijk

    Accordingly, for a given vectorV, its Cartesian components are related to its components in helicity space by the unitary transformation ˆU, (Vx, Vy, Vz)T = ˆU(V+, V−, Vz)T , with ˆU= 1√ 2   1 1 0 i−i 0 0 0 √ 2   .(A5) 17 Moreover, each curl operation in Maxwell’s equations, Eq.(A4), can be expressed as ˆH◦=∇ ×(Π◦) = [( ˆk·s)·Π]◦,(A6) where Π ={Π ij, ...

  3. [3]

    electric

    Here σ0 denotes the 2×2 identity matrix;Q 0 andq 0 are the monopole moments;q={Q +1, Q−1}T is the dipole mo- ment; andQ≡ {Q ⊥, Qz}T ={Q +2, Q−2, Qz}T denotes the quadrupole moments, with components Q0 = 1 2(Π11 + Π22), q 0 = Π33,(A8) Q±1 = (Π13 ∓iΠ 23)/ √ 2,(A9) Q±2 = 1 2(Π11 −Π 22)∓ i 2(Π12 + Π21),(A10) Qz = i 2(Π12 −Π 21),(A11) whereσ={σ ⊥, σ3}, andσ ⊥ ...

  4. [4]

    Rubinsztein-Dunlop, A

    H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, A. Forbes, M. V. Berry, M. R. Dennis, D. L. Andrews, M. Mansuripur,et al., Journal of Optics19, 013001 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    O. V. Angelsky, A. Y. Bekshaev, S. G. Hanson, C. Y. Zenkova, I. I. Mokhun, and J. Zheng, Frontiers in Physics 8, 114 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    M. R. Dennis, A. Forbes, and D. L. Andrews, Nature Photonics15, 529 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, Nature Photonics9, 796 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Z. Shao, J. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, and S. Yu, Nature communications9, 926 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    M. Wang, H. Zhang, T. Kovalevich, R. Salut, M.-S. Kim, M. A. Suarez, M.-P. Bernal, H.-P. Herzig, H. Lu, and T. Grosjean, Light: Science & Applications7, 24 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Karabali and V

    D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, Phys. Rev. D90, 105018 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    Spavieri and M

    G. Spavieri and M. Mansuripur, Physica Scripta90, 085501 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Ebran, A

    J.-P. Ebran, A. Mutschler, E. Khan, and D. Vretenar, Phys. Rev. C94, 024304 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    D. A. Smirnova, V. M. Travin, K. Y. Bliokh, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. A97, 043840 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    Z. G. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 106602 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    Z. G. Yu, Phys. Rev. B85, 115201 (2012)

    2012

  16. [16]

    J.-R. Li, J. Lee, W. Huang, S. Burchesky, B. Shteynas, F. C ¸ . Top, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Nature543, 91 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    R. A. Beth, Phys. Rev.50, 115 (1936)

    1936

  18. [18]

    K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 073903 (2006)

    2006

  19. [19]

    Korger, A

    J. Korger, A. Aiello, V. Chille, P. Banzer, C. Wittmann, N. Lindlein, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 113902 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    X. Ling, X. Zhou, K. Huang, Y. Liu, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 066401 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Luo, M.-B

    X.-G. Luo, M.-B. Pu, X. Li, and X.-L. Ma, Light: Science & Applications6, e16276 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    M. A. Oancea, J. Joudioux, I. Y. Dodin, D. E. Ruiz, C. F. Paganini, and L. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D102, 024075 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    X. Yu, X. Wang, Z. Li, L. Zhao, F. Zhou, J. Qu, and J. Song, Nanophotonics10, 3031 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    K. Y. Bliokh, D. Smirnova, and F. Nori, Science348, 1448 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Zhang, X

    J. Zhang, X. X. Zhou, X. H. Ling, S. Z. Chen, H. L. Luo, and S. C. Wen, Chinese Physics B23, 064215 (2014)

    2014

  26. [26]

    S. Fu, C. Guo, G. Liu, Y. Li, H. Yin, Z. Li, and Z. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 243904 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Porfirev, S

    A. Porfirev, S. Khonina, A. Ustinov, N. Ivliev, and I. Golub, Opto-Electronic Science2, 230014 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Nature619, 52 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    H. Luo, S. Wen, W. Shu, and D. Fan, Optics Communi- cations285, 864 (2012)

    2012

  30. [30]

    Marrucci, C

    L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 163905 (2006)

    2006

  31. [31]

    Y. Zhao, J. S. Edgar, G. D. M. Jeffries, D. McGloin, and D. T. Chiu, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 073901 (2007)

    2007

  32. [32]

    B´ erard and H

    A. B´ erard and H. Mohrbach, Physics Letters A352, 190 (2006)

    2006

  33. [33]

    Barone, F

    V. Barone, F. Bradamante, and A. Martin, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics65, 267 (2010)

    2010

  34. [34]

    J. J. Santos, M. Bailly-Grandvaux, M. Ehret, A. Are- fiev, D. Batani, F. Beg, A. Calisti, S. Ferri, R. Florido, P. Forestier-Colleoni,et al., Physics of Plasmas25 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Cardano and L

    F. Cardano and L. Marrucci, Nature Photonics9, 776 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    P. Shi, L. Du, and X. Yuan, Nanophotonics10, 3927 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Nature pho- tonics8, 821 (2014)

    2014

  38. [38]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    S. Ma, B. Yang, and S. Zhang, Photonics Insights1, R02 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    B. Wang, J. Zhou, T. Koschny, M. Kafesaki, and C. M. Soukoulis, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 11, 114003 (2009)

    2009

  41. [41]

    Z. Wang, F. Cheng, T. Winsor, and Y. Liu, Nanotech- nology27, 412001 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    M. Xiao, Q. Lin, and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 057401 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    S. M. Bhattacharjee, M. Mj, and A. Bandyopad- hyay,Topology and Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 19 (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Shen,Topological insulators, Vol

    S.-Q. Shen,Topological insulators, Vol. 174 (Springer, 2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  46. [46]

    Raghu and F

    S. Raghu and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. A78, 033834 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    J. Hou, Z. Li, X.-W. Luo, Q. Gu, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 073603 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    W. Gao, M. Lawrence, B. Yang, F. Liu, F. Fang, B. B´ eri, J. Li, and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 037402 (2015)

    2015

  49. [49]

    Wang, S.-K

    L. Wang, S.-K. Jian, and H. Yao, Phys. Rev. A93, 061801 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    Raman and S

    A. Raman and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 087401 (2010)

    2010

  51. [51]

    A. B. Khanikaev and G. Shvets, Nature Photonics11, 763 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 114301 (2015)

    2015

  53. [53]

    S. D. Huber and A. Al` u, Nature Reviews Materials7, 446 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    Zhang, Z

    Q. Zhang, Z. Xie, L. Du, P. Shi, and X. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023109 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    Hosten and P

    O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science319, 787 (2008)

    2008

  56. [56]

    Haefner, S

    D. Haefner, S. Sukhov, and A. Dogariu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 123903 (2009)

    2009

  57. [57]

    Hermosa, A

    N. Hermosa, A. Nugrowati, A. Aiello, and J. Woerdman, Optics letters36, 3200 (2011)

    2011

  58. [58]

    Feng and Q

    L. Feng and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. A106, 043513 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    Yang and L

    L. Yang and L. Feng, Phys. Rev. A112, 013515 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Q. Wu, W. Zhu, and L. Feng, Universe8, 535 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    A. B. Khanikaev, S. Hossein Mousavi, W.-K. Tse, 19 M. Kargarian, A. H. MacDonald, and G. Shvets, Nature materials12, 233 (2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    Zhang, Y.-S

    S. Zhang, Y.-S. Park, J. Li, X. Lu, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 023901 (2009)

    2009

  63. [63]

    Chern, Scientific Reports13, 13934 (2023)

    R.-L. Chern, Scientific Reports13, 13934 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    Andrews and M

    D. Andrews and M. Babiker,The Angular Momentum of Light(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics70, 026605 (2004)

    2004

  66. [66]

    K. Y. Bliokh, A. Niv, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Nature Photonics2, 748 (2008)

    2008

  67. [67]

    M. Kim, Y. Yang, D. Lee, Y. Kim, H. Kim, and J. Rho, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2200046 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    I. I. Rabi, Phys. Rev.51, 652 (1937)

    1937

  69. [69]

    Rempe, H

    G. Rempe, H. Walther, and N. Klein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 353 (1987)

    1987

  70. [70]

    Shandarova, C

    K. Shandarova, C. E. R¨ uter, D. Kip, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, O. Peleg, and M. Segev, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 123905 (2009)

    2009

  71. [71]

    G. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Hu, Z. Li, Z. Chen, and S. Fu, Light: Science & Applications12, 205 (2023)

    2023

  72. [72]

    L. Q. Chen, G.-W. Zhang, C.-l. Bian, C.-H. Yuan, Z. Y. Ou, and W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 133603 (2010)

    2010

  73. [73]

    Zhang, Q

    P. Zhang, Q. Kang, Y. Pei, Z. Wang, Y. Hu, Z. Chen, and J. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 123201 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    Zhong, Y

    H. Zhong, Y. V. Kartashov, Y. Zhang, D. Song, Y. Zhang, F. Li, and Z. Chen, Optics Letters44, 3342 (2019)

    2019

  75. [75]

    Stalder and M

    M. Stalder and M. Schadt, Opt. Lett.21, 1948 (1996)

    1948

  76. [76]

    Bomzon, G

    Z. Bomzon, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Opt. Lett.27, 285 (2002)

    2002

  77. [77]

    M. A. Gorlach, X. Ni, D. A. Smirnova, D. Korobkin, D. Zhirihin, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, P. A. Belov, A. Al` u, and A. B. Khanikaev, Nature communications9, 909 (2018)

    2018

  78. [78]

    Liang, W

    H. Liang, W. C. Wong, T. An, and J. Li, Advanced Pho- tonics7, 026006 (2025)

    2025

  79. [79]

    Alarc´ on, S

    A. Alarc´ on, S. G´ omez, D. Spegel-Lexne, J. Argillander, J. Cari˜ ne, G. Ca˜ nas, G. Lima, and G. B. Xavier, ACS Photonics10, 3700 (2023)

    2023

  80. [80]

    T. Qiu, H. Li, M. Xie, Q. Liu, H. Ma, and R. Xu, Optics Express28, 19750 (2020)

    2020

Showing first 80 references.