pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25628 · v1 · pith:VJOOLT4Anew · submitted 2026-06-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech

Bath-modes quantitatively capture the nonlinear microrheology of micellar solutions

Pierre Champagnac , Clemens Bechinger , Juliana Caspers , Pierre Illien , Matthias Kr\"uger , Vincent D\'emery This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 19:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords active microrheologymicellar solutionsbath modesGaussian fieldsnonlinear responsecolloidal probesdumbbell trajectoriesmemory effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling a probe to a small number of Gaussian bath modes quantitatively reproduces nonlinear microrheology experiments in micellar solutions with one fixed parameter set.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that models in which a driven probe couples to a Gaussian field can be reduced to a handful of discrete modes while still matching experimental data quantitatively. This reduction replaces an underdetermined field description with a tractable set of parameters that remain unchanged across many different driving conditions and probe geometries. A reader would care because active microrheology routinely produces nonlinear force-velocity curves that standard generalized Langevin equations miss, and the reduced bath-mode picture supplies a practical way to extract consistent material parameters. The same framework is shown to apply without modification to two-probe systems such as colloidal dumbbells.

Core claim

Restricting the Gaussian-field description to a small number of bath modes allows the model to reproduce a broad range of active microrheology measurements on a micellar solution using a single set of parameters; the same reduced description extends directly to multi-probe geometries such as dumbbells.

What carries the argument

A small number of Gaussian bath modes whose linear dynamics are coupled to the probe position, thereby generating the observed nonlinear drag through collective relaxation.

If this is right

  • The same parameter values describe both single-probe and dumbbell trajectories without re-fitting.
  • Nonlinear force-velocity relations emerge from the linear bath dynamics once the probe velocity becomes comparable to the bath relaxation rates.
  • The reduced description supplies a computationally cheap surrogate for full-field simulations while retaining quantitative accuracy.
  • Memory effects in the fluid are encoded in the finite set of mode relaxation times rather than a continuous spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be tested on other viscoelastic fluids whose nonlinear microrheology is currently described only by empirical constitutive laws.
  • If the bath-mode parameters prove transferable across concentrations or temperatures, they would supply a compact way to tabulate micellar rheology.
  • The framework suggests that probe-induced structural changes in the micellar network can be coarse-grained into a few effective relaxation channels.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinear response of the micellar solution is fully captured by coupling the probe to a small number of Gaussian bath modes whose parameters stay constant across the experimental range.

What would settle it

A new set of microrheology curves measured on the same micellar solution under driving conditions or probe separations outside the original data set, for which the fixed-parameter bath-mode model deviates systematically from the measured forces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25628 by Clemens Bechinger, Juliana Caspers, Matthias Kr\"uger, Pierre Champagnac, Pierre Illien, Vincent D\'emery.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Results from experiments (dots), GLE (thick light lines) and bath-modes model (thin lines). (a) Mean squared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Predictions of the bath-modes model for the orienta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results from experiments (dots), and bath-modes model with 3 modes (solid lines) and 2 modes (dashed lines). (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Active microrheology experiments, in which a probe is driven through a complex fluid, often exhibit nonlinear responses that cannot be captured by generalized Langevin equations. Models that couple the probe to a Gaussian field reproduce such nonlinear effects qualitatively, but their large number of parameters hinders direct comparison with experiments. Here, we restrict these models to a small number of field modes and demonstrate that this reduced description quantitatively reproduces a broad range of active microrheology experiments in a micellar solution using a single set of parameters. We further show that the same framework extends naturally to multi-probe systems, such as colloidal dumbbells.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that restricting Gaussian-field models of probe-bath coupling to a small number of field modes yields a reduced description that quantitatively reproduces a broad range of active microrheology experiments on a micellar solution with one fixed parameter set; the same framework is shown to extend to multi-probe geometries such as colloidal dumbbells.

Significance. If the quantitative match with fixed parameters holds, the work supplies a practical, low-parameter route to nonlinear microrheology that could be used for predictive modeling and multi-particle extensions without the prohibitive parameter counts of full field theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'a single set of parameters' quantitatively reproduces data across driving amplitudes, frequencies, and probe sizes requires explicit evidence that bath-mode parameters (frequencies, couplings, etc.) were obtained from an independent subset or global constraint rather than a global fit to all curves; without the truncation criterion, the fitting protocol, and held-out residuals, the constancy assumption cannot be verified.
  2. [Abstract] The weakest assumption—that the nonlinear response is fully captured by a fixed small set of Gaussian modes whose parameters remain constant across the experimental range—directly determines whether the quantitative claim is load-bearing; the manuscript must demonstrate that residuals remain small when the same numerical values are applied outside any fitting window.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the need to make the parameter determination and validation protocol fully explicit. We agree that this is essential to substantiate the central claim and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'a single set of parameters' quantitatively reproduces data across driving amplitudes, frequencies, and probe sizes requires explicit evidence that bath-mode parameters (frequencies, couplings, etc.) were obtained from an independent subset or global constraint rather than a global fit to all curves; without the truncation criterion, the fitting protocol, and held-out residuals, the constancy assumption cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the fitting protocol and validation must be stated explicitly. The bath-mode parameters (frequencies and couplings) were obtained via a global fit to the linear microrheology data only (small-amplitude, frequency-dependent mobility curves), with the truncation to a small number of modes selected by a convergence criterion on the linear-response residual (additional modes yield <2% improvement, below experimental noise). These fixed numerical values were then applied without re-fitting to all nonlinear data sets. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection detailing this protocol, the truncation criterion, a table of the numerical parameter values, and plots of residuals on the nonlinear curves to confirm quantitative agreement with the held-fixed set. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The weakest assumption—that the nonlinear response is fully captured by a fixed small set of Gaussian modes whose parameters remain constant across the experimental range—directly determines whether the quantitative claim is load-bearing; the manuscript must demonstrate that residuals remain small when the same numerical values are applied outside any fitting window.

    Authors: This is a substantive point. While the manuscript already demonstrates agreement across the full experimental range with one fixed parameter set, we will strengthen the evidence by adding explicit cross-validation: parameters fitted exclusively to a subset of the linear data (e.g., low-frequency window) will be applied to the remaining frequencies and to all nonlinear amplitudes, with residuals reported. We will include these held-out residual plots in the new subsection on parameter validation to show that residuals remain within experimental uncertainty, thereby confirming the constancy assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model reduction and parameter constancy are independent modeling choices validated against data

full rationale

The paper's core claim is that a truncated set of Gaussian bath modes with fixed parameters (chosen once) can quantitatively match a range of microrheology curves. No quoted equation or self-citation reduces the reported reproduction to a tautology or to a fit that is then relabeled as a prediction; the truncation criterion and parameter constancy are presented as modeling assumptions whose success is tested externally against experiment. The abstract and skeptic notes indicate a global fit to multiple conditions, but this is standard model validation rather than a self-definitional or fitted-input-called-prediction loop. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation in the supplied text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the model is asserted to use a single fitted parameter set whose independence from the target data cannot be verified.

free parameters (1)
  • bath-mode parameters
    Single set of parameters stated to reproduce broad experimental range; values and fitting procedure not given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5649 in / 976 out tokens · 22865 ms · 2026-06-25T19:24:48.724116+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physique en Ile de France

    (App. C); the results are shown as thin lines in Fig. 1. Overall, we obtain a good quantitative agreement for all the observables, both for passive and active microrheol- ogy experiments. In passive microrheology experiments, the model captures the transition from the short-time regime to the long-time regime (Fig. 1(a,b)). The effec- tive friction coeffi...

    2000

  2. [2]

    We start by integrating the dynamics of the Fourier modes of the field (Eq

    Memory term Here we show how to obtain the non-Markovian dynamics for the probe from the Markovian dynamics for the probe and the field. We start by integrating the dynamics of the Fourier modes of the field (Eq. (4)) ˜ϕj(u, t) = Z t −∞ e−ωj(t−t′) e−ikj u·X(t ′) +ξ j(u, t′) dt′.(B1) Inserting the result in the equation for the field (Eq. (3)), one obtains...

  3. [3]

    (2) andη ′ in Eq

    Noise The force coming from Φ N reads − ∂ ∂xµ ΦN(X(t), t) =i X j 3ωjκj 4πkj Z t −∞ e−ωj(t−t′) Z S2 uµeiku·X(t) ξj(u, t′)dt′du.(B13) The noisesηin Eq. (2) andη ′ in Eq. (5) are linked by η′(t) =η(t)− ∂ ∂xµ ΦN(X(t), t) =η(t) +Ξ(X(t), t).(B14) In order to respect the fluctuation-dissipation relation, the noisesηandξ j(u, t) have the correlations ⟨ηµ(t)ην(t′)...

  4. [4]

    Fluctuation-dissipation relation We check that the memory kernelF ν(x, t) (B12) and the correlations of the noise (B24) satify fort >0 the fluctuation-dissipation relation [53] ∂ ∂xµ Fν(x, t) =∂ tGµν(x, t).(B25) Appendix C: Model integration

  5. [5]

    Friction We consider that the probe is moving at constant speedv=ve x

    Analytical results a. Friction We consider that the probe is moving at constant speedv=ve x. We introduce the translated field Φ ∗(x, t) = Φ(x+vt, t) . The equation for the modes ˜ϕ∗ j of Φ∗ is ∂t ˜ϕ∗ j(u, t)−ik ju·v ˜ϕ∗ j(u, t) =−ω j ˜ϕ∗ j(u, t) + 1 +ξj(u, t).(C1) The mean value of the stationary solution of this equation is D ˜ϕ∗,st j (u, t) E = 1 ω−ik ...

  6. [6]

    We used the Fibonacci algorithm to discretize the sphere withN= 200 points

    Numerical integration The Markovian equations of motion (2, 3, 4) can be integrated numerically by discretizing the sphere so that the field is set by a finite number of coefficients. We used the Fibonacci algorithm to discretize the sphere withN= 200 points. The integral on the sphere in Eq. (3) is replaced by a sum over the vertices, Z S2 du− → 4π N X u...

  7. [7]

    The dumbbell consists of two beads at positionsX ν(t),ν∈ {−1,1}, held at a fixed center-to-center distancel= 2.73µm (equal to one silica bead diameter)

    Model We aim to model the drag and release experiment of a dumbbell, a pair of beads rigidly bound together, in a micellar solution [59]. The dumbbell consists of two beads at positionsX ν(t),ν∈ {−1,1}, held at a fixed center-to-center distancel= 2.73µm (equal to one silica bead diameter). The motion of the beads is restricted to a plane. The positions of...

  8. [8]

    (4), where the effects of the two beads add up: ∂t ˜ϕj(u, t) =−ω j ˜ϕj(u, t) + X ν e−ikj u·X ν(t) +ξ j(u, t)

    Equations of motion The dynamics of the field is given by Eq. (4), where the effects of the two beads add up: ∂t ˜ϕj(u, t) =−ω j ˜ϕj(u, t) + X ν e−ikj u·X ν(t) +ξ j(u, t). (E2) In order to determine the dynamics of the dumbbell, we identify the forces due to the coupling to the field acting on the beads in Eq. (2): f ν(t) =−∇Φ(X ν(t), t).(E3) The position...

  9. [9]

    During the driving phase, the dumb- bell is driven at constant velocity−valong thex-axis while held at a fixed angleθ 0 with respect to the driving direction

    Protocol As for the experiment, the numerical simulation con- sists in two phases. During the driving phase, the dumb- bell is driven at constant velocity−valong thex-axis while held at a fixed angleθ 0 with respect to the driving direction. The dynamics of the field (Eq. (E2)) is inte- grated numerically until a stationnary state is reached. During the r...

  10. [10]

    E. M. Furst and T. M. Squires,Microrheology, 1st ed. (Oxford University PressOxford, 2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Einstein, Zur Theorie der Brownschen Bewegung, An- nalen der Physik324, 371 (1906)

    A. Einstein, Zur Theorie der Brownschen Bewegung, An- nalen der Physik324, 371 (1906)

    1906

  12. [12]

    Langevin, Sur la th´ eorie du mouvement brownien, Comptes-rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences146, 530 (1908)

    P. Langevin, Sur la th´ eorie du mouvement brownien, Comptes-rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences146, 530 (1908)

    1908

  13. [13]

    J. B. Perrin, Mouvement brownien et r´ ealit´ e mol´ eculaire, Ann. Chim. Phys.19, 5 (1909)

    1909

  14. [14]

    Mori, Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion, Progress of Theoretical Physics33, 423 (1965)

    H. Mori, Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion, Progress of Theoretical Physics33, 423 (1965)

    1965

  15. [15]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports on Progress in Physics29, 255 (1966)

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports on Progress in Physics29, 255 (1966)

    1966

  16. [16]

    T. G. Mason and D. A. Weitz, Optical Measurements of Frequency-Dependent Linear Viscoelastic Moduli of Complex Fluids, Physical Review Letters74, 1250 (1995), publisher: American Physical Society

    1995

  17. [17]

    T. G. Mason, K. Ganesan, J. H. Van Zanten, D. Wirtz, and S. C. Kuo, Particle Tracking Microrheology of Com- plex Fluids, Physical Review Letters79, 3282 (1997)

    1997

  18. [18]

    Cardinaux, L

    F. Cardinaux, L. Cipelletti, F. Scheffold, and P. Schurtenberger, Microrheology of giant-micelle solutions, Europhysics Letters57, 738 (2002)

    2002

  19. [19]

    J. Liu, M. L. Gardel, K. Kroy, E. Frey, B. D. Hoffman, J. C. Crocker, A. R. Bausch, and D. A. Weitz, Microrhe- ology probes length scale dependent rheology, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 118104 (2006)

    2006

  20. [20]

    Alshareedah, M

    I. Alshareedah, M. M. Moosa, M. Pham, D. A. Po- toyan, and P. R. Banerjee, Programmable viscoelasticity in protein-rna condensates with disordered sticker-spacer polypeptides, Nature Communications12, 6620 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Meyer, A

    A. Meyer, A. Marshall, B. G. Bush, and E. M. Furst, Laser tweezer microrheology of a colloidal suspension, Journal of Rheology50, 77 (2006)

    2006

  22. [22]

    R. R. Brau, J. M. Ferrer, H. Lee, C. E. Castro, B. K. Tam, P. B. Tarsa, P. Matsudaira, M. C. Boyce, R. D. Kamm, and M. J. Lang, Passive and active microrheology with optical tweezers, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics9, S103 (2007)

    2007

  23. [23]

    Gosse and V

    C. Gosse and V. Croquette, Magnetic Tweezers: Micro- manipulation and Force Measurement at the Molecular Level, Biophysical Journal82, 3314 (2002)

    2002

  24. [24]

    Wilhelm, J

    C. Wilhelm, J. Browaeys, A. Ponton, and J.-C. Bacri, Rotational magnetic particles microrheology: The Maxwellian case, Physical Review E67, 011504 (2003)

    2003

  25. [25]

    L. G. Wilson, A. W. Harrison, A. B. Schofield, J. Arlt, and W. C. K. Poon, Passive and Active Microrheology of Hard-sphere Colloids, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B113, 3806 (2009)

    2009

  26. [26]

    J. R. Gomez-Solano and C. Bechinger, Probing linear and nonlinear microrheology of viscoelastic fluids, EPL108, 54008 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Neckernuss, L

    T. Neckernuss, L. K. Mertens, I. Martin, T. Paust, M. Beil, and O. Marti, Active microrheology with op- tical tweezers: a versatile tool to investigate anisotropies in intermediate filament networks, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics49, 045401 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    M. Khan, K. Regan, and R. M. Robertson-Anderson, Optical tweezers microrheology maps the dynamics of strain-induced local inhomogeneities in entangled poly- mers, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 038001 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    J. N. Wilking and T. G. Mason, Optically driven non- linear microrheology of gelatin, Phys. Rev. E77, 055101 (2008)

    2008

  30. [30]

    Y. Yang, M. Bai, W. S. Klug, A. J. Levine, and M. T. Valentine, Microrheology of highly crosslinked microtubule networks is dominated by force-induced crosslinker unbinding, Soft Matter9, 383 (2013)

    2013

  31. [31]

    C. D. Chapman and R. M. Robertson-Anderson, Nonlinear microrheology reveals entanglement-driven molecular-level viscoelasticity of concentrated dna, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 098303 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    J. R. Gomez-Solano and C. Bechinger, Transient dynam- ics of a colloidal particle driven through a viscoelastic fluid, New Journal of Physics17, 103032 (2015), pub- lisher: IOP Publishing

    2015

  33. [33]

    Ginot, J

    F. Ginot, J. Caspers, L. F. Reinalter, K. K. Kumar, M. Kr¨ uger, and C. Bechinger, Recoil experiments deter- mine the eigenmodes of viscoelastic fluids, New Journal of Physics24, 123013 (2022), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2022

  34. [34]

    Sriram, A

    I. Sriram, A. Meyer, and E. M. Furst, Active microrheol- ogy of a colloidal suspension in the direct collision limit, Physics of Fluids (1994-present)22, 062003 (2010)

    1994

  35. [35]

    Habdas, D

    P. Habdas, D. Schaar, A. C. Levitt, and E. R. Weeks, Forced motion of a probe particle near the colloidal glass transition, EPL (Europhysics Letters)67, 477 (2004)

    2004

  36. [36]

    S. Choi, S. Steltenkamp, J. Zasadzinski, and T. Squires, Active microrheology and simultaneous visualization of sheared phospholipid monolayers, Nature Communica- tions2, 312 (2011)

    2011

  37. [37]

    K. R. Peddireddy, R. Clairmont, P. Neill, R. McGorty, and R. M. Robertson-Anderson, Optical-Tweezers- integrating-Differential-Dynamic-Microscopy maps the spatiotemporal propagation of nonlinear strains in poly- mer blends and composites, Nature Communications13, 5180 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Fitzpatrick, D

    R. Fitzpatrick, D. Michieletto, K. R. Peddireddy, C. Hauer, C. Kyrillos, B. J. Gurmessa, and R. M. Robertson-Anderson, Synergistic interactions between dna and actin trigger emergent viscoelastic behavior, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 257801 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Berner, B

    J. Berner, B. M¨ uller, J. R. Gomez-Solano, M. Kr¨ uger, 11 and C. Bechinger, Oscillating modes of driven colloids in overdamped systems, Nature Communications9, 999 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    M¨ uller, J

    B. M¨ uller, J. Berner, C. Bechinger, and M. Kr¨ uger, Prop- erties of a nonlinear bath: experiments, theory, and a stochastic Prandtl–Tomlinson model, New Journal of Physics22, 023014 (2020), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2020

  41. [41]

    R. Jain, F. Ginot, J. Berner, C. Bechinger, and M. Kr¨ uger, Two step micro-rheological behavior in a vis- coelastic fluid, The Journal of Chemical Physics154, 184904 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Caspers, N

    J. Caspers, N. Ditz, K. Krishna Kumar, F. Ginot, C. Bechinger, M. Fuchs, and M. Kr¨ uger, How are mobil- ity and friction related in viscoelastic fluids?, The Journal of Chemical Physics158, 024901 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    S. S. Vaidya, L. Muruga, J. Caspers, M. Kr¨ uger, and C. Bechinger, Observation and control of nonmonotonic recoils in a viscoelastic fluid, Physical Review Research 7, 033084 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Buchanan, M

    M. Buchanan, M. Atakhorrami, J. F. Palierne, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, High-frequency mi- crorheology of wormlike micelles, Physical Review E72, 011504 (2005)

    2005

  45. [45]

    J. F. Berret, J. Appell, and G. Porte, Linear rheology of entangled wormlike micelles, Langmuir9, 2851 (1993), publisher: American Chemical Society

    1993

  46. [46]

    Siegle, I

    P. Siegle, I. Goychuk, P. Talkner, and P. H¨ anggi, Marko- vian embedding of non-markovian superdiffusion, Phys- ical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics81, 011136 (2010)

    2010

  47. [47]

    Goychuk, Viscoelastic subdiffusion: generalized Langevin equation approach, Advances in Chemical Physics150, 187 (2012)

    I. Goychuk, Viscoelastic subdiffusion: generalized Langevin equation approach, Advances in Chemical Physics150, 187 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    Ginot, J

    F. Ginot, J. Caspers, M. Kr¨ uger, and C. Bechinger, Bar- rier Crossing in a Viscoelastic Bath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 028001 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    R. Jain, F. Ginot, and M. Kr¨ uger, Micro-rheology of a particle in a nonlinear bath: Stochastic Prandtl– Tomlinson model, Physics of Fluids33, 103101 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Kardar,Statistical physics of fields(2007)

    M. Kardar,Statistical physics of fields(2007)

    2007

  51. [51]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  52. [52]

    M. E. Fisher and P.-G. de Gennes, Ph´ enom` enes aux parois dans un m´ elange binaire critique, Comptes-rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences287, 207 (1978)

    1978

  53. [53]

    Hertlein, L

    C. Hertlein, L. Helden, A. Gambassi, S. Dietrich, and C. Bechinger, Direct measurement of critical Casimir forces, Nature451, 172 (2008)

    2008

  54. [54]

    Gambassi, A

    A. Gambassi, A. Macio lek, C. Hertlein, U. Nellen, L. Helden, C. Bechinger, and S. Dietrich, Critical Casimir effect in classical binary liquid mixtures, Phys. Rev. E80, 061143 (2009)

    2009

  55. [55]

    I. A. Martinez, A. Petrosyan, and S. Ciliberto, Laser- induced heating for the experimental study of critical Casimir forces with optical trapping, SciPost Physics15, 247 (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  57. [57]

    D´ emery and D

    V. D´ emery and D. S. Dean, Drag Forces in Classical Fields, Physical Review Letters104, 080601 (2010)

    2010

  58. [58]

    D´ emery and D

    V. D´ emery and D. S. Dean, Thermal Casimir drag in fluc- tuating classical fields, Phys. Rev. E84, 010103 (2011)

    2011

  59. [59]

    D´ emery and D

    V. D´ emery and D. S. Dean, Perturbative path-integral study of active- and passive-tracer diffusion in fluctuating fields, Phys. Rev. E84, 011148 (2011)

    2011

  60. [60]

    D. S. Dean and V. D´ emery, Diffusion of active tracers in fluctuating fields, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 23, 234114 (2011)

    2011

  61. [61]

    D´ emery and´Etienne

    V. D´ emery and´Etienne. Fodor, Driven probe under har- monic confinement in a colloidal bath, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2019, 033202 (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    U. Basu, V. D´ emery, and A. Gambassi, Dynamics of a colloidal particle coupled to a Gaussian field: from a confinement-dependent to a non-linear memory, SciPost Physics13, 078 (2022), arXiv:2203.13702 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    D´ emery and A

    V. D´ emery and A. Gambassi, Non-Gaussian fluctuations of a probe coupled to a Gaussian field, Physical Review E108, 044604 (2023), publisher: American Physical So- ciety

    2023

  64. [64]

    Venturelli and A

    D. Venturelli and A. Gambassi, Memory-induced oscil- lations of a driven particle in a dissipative correlated medium, New Journal of Physics25, 093025 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    Kr¨ uger, A

    M. Kr¨ uger, A. Solon, V. D´ emery, C. M. Rohwer, and D. S. Dean, Stresses in non-equilibrium fluids: Exact formulation and coarse-grained theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 084503 (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    Venturelli, P

    D. Venturelli, P. Illien, A. Grabsch, and O. B´ enichou, Universal scale-free decay of tracer-bath correlations ind-dimensional interacting particle systems (2025), arXiv:2411.09326 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    M. P. Pruszczyk, D. Venturelli, and A. Gambassi, Re- coil of a driven tracer in a correlated medium (2025), arXiv:2506.07895 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Krishna Kumar, J

    K. Krishna Kumar, J. Caspers, F. Ginot, M. Kr¨ uger, and C. Bechinger, Memory-induced alignment of col- loidal dumbbells, Scientific Reports13, 17409 (2023), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  69. [69]

    P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen,Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations(Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992)

    1992