pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09726 · v1 · pith:ERON3CL2new · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

A Scaling Relation of LRDs between Broad Hα and Bolometric Luminosities: Enhanced Broad Hα Emission Relative to Low-z Type 1 AGN

Hiroto Yanagisawa , Masami Ouchi , Tomokazu Kiyota , Yuta Kageura , Makoto Ando , Yuichi Harikane , Minami Nakane , Yoshiaki Ono
show 1 more author
Yui Takeda
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords little red dotsbroad Hα luminositybolometric luminosityscaling relationType 1 AGNcovering factorphotoionization modelingbroad line region
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little red dots at high redshift show broad Hα luminosity enhanced by a factor of ~40 relative to their bolometric luminosity compared with low-z Type 1 AGN.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study compiles JWST spectra for 37 little red dots at z~3-7 and measures broad Hα and Hβ luminosities against bolometric luminosity from modified blackbody fits. It finds a tight scaling relation between these quantities that is offset upward by a factor of ~40 in broad Hα (and ~10 in broad Hβ) relative to the relation followed by nearby Type 1 AGN. Cloudy photoionization calculations in the locally optimally-emitting cloud framework reproduce the offset when the covering factor rises to ~100 percent, the hydrogen column density reaches at least 10^24 cm^{-2}, and the gas density sits near 10^10 cm^{-3}. These changes also reproduce the observed modified blackbody continuum shape.

Core claim

LRDs display a tight L_Hα,broad-L_bol scaling relation that is offset by a factor of ~40 in L_Hα,broad compared to low-z Type 1 AGN. This offset, along with a smaller ~10 factor for Hβ, is reproduced by Cloudy LOC models with covering factor increased to ~100%, hydrogen column density to >=10^24 cm^{-2}, and gas density ~10^{10} cm^{-3}, which also match the modified blackbody continuum. This points to a stuffed or giant broad line region.

What carries the argument

The locally optimally-emitting cloud (LOC) photoionization framework applied via Cloudy to relate broad-line luminosities to bolometric output through changes in covering factor and column density.

If this is right

  • The broad-line and continuum emissions in LRDs are powered primarily by the central engine.
  • The broad line region reaches a covering factor near 100 percent.
  • Gas column densities in the broad line region exceed 10^24 cm^{-2}.
  • A gas density near 10^10 cm^{-3} is required to match both lines and continuum.
  • The geometry corresponds to either a stuffed or giant broad line region.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the high covering factor is confirmed, black-hole mass estimates that rely on line widths may need recalibration for this population.
  • The same modeling approach could be applied to other high-redshift emission-line diagnostics to check consistency.
  • The relation offers a way to estimate L_bol from Hα alone for fainter LRDs where continuum fitting is difficult.
  • Similar offsets might appear in other lines once grating spectra become available for larger samples.

Load-bearing premise

Bolometric luminosity is correctly measured from the modified blackbody fit without significant host galaxy contamination, and the standard LOC photoionization model applies directly to LRD conditions.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that host-galaxy light contributes more than a few tens of percent to the near-infrared continuum used to derive L_bol, or a spectrum where line ratios cannot be reproduced by the proposed Cloudy parameters even at full covering factor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09726 by Hiroto Yanagisawa, Makoto Ando, Masami Ouchi, Minami Nakane, Tomokazu Kiyota, Yoshiaki Ono, Yuichi Harikane, Yui Takeda, Yuta Kageura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarizes the basic properties of our work￾ing sample by showing the rest-frame monochromatic luminosity at 5100 ˚A (L5100 = λLλ(5100˚A)) as a func￾tion of spectroscopic redshift. We classify each target as an LRD or a non-LRD based on a photometric classifi￾cation of F277W − F444W > 1.0 ∧ F150W − F200W < 1.0 (z < 4), F277W − F444W > 1.0 ∧ F150W − F200W < 1.0 (4 < z < 6), F277W − F444W > 1.0 ∧ F150W − F20… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representative examples of our spectral analysis. For each object (top: JADES-GN-73488; bottom: RU￾BIES-EGS-42046), the left panels show the NIRSpec/PRISM spectrum (black) together with the best-fit modified blackbody and power law UV continuum model (red solid curve). The red and blue dashed curves indicate the modified blackbody and power law continuum components, respectively. The blue shaded regions in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Scaling relations between broad Balmer line luminosities and continuum luminosities. The top and bottom rows present LHα,broad and LHβ,broad, respectively, while the left and right column show L5100 and Lbol, respectively. The red and blue points show luminosities of LRDs and non-LRDs measured in this work, respectively. The red solid line indicates our best-fit relation to the LRD data. The gray points an… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the observed broad Balmer-line luminosities and bolometric luminosity with Cloudy photoionization models. Left: LHα,broad versus Lbol. Right: LHβ,broad versus Lbol. The symbols are the same as Figures 3, 4, and 5. The gray and black lines show the models with fcov = 0.2, while the blue lines show those with fcov = 1. The dotted, dot-dashed, dashed, and solid lines correspond to log(NH/cm−2 ) … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Broad Balmer line to bolometric luminosity ratios as functions of density (left), column density (center), and ionization parameter (right). The blue and black lines show the Cloudy predictions of fcov = 1 and 0.2, respectively. The red shades show the 1σ ranges of the LRD sample in this work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mock JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectrum gener￾ated from the Cloudy model. The orange line shows the simulated spectrum, assuming fcov = 1, NH = 1025 cm−2 , nH = 1010 cm−3 , and log U = −2. The black line shows the observed PRISM spectrum of the LRD in our sample GN-9771. The gray shaded region indicate the region af￾fected by the Cloudy artifact due to the finite number of hydrogen energy levels considered in the… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic illustrations of the standard BLR (left), “stuffed BLR” (center), and “giant BLR” (right). The standard BLR typically have covering factor of fcov ∼ 0.2 (e.g., J. Baldwin et al. 1995; K. T. Korista & M. R. Goad 2004) and column density of log(NH/cm−2 ) = 22–23 (e.g., B. M. Peterson 2006), while our Cloudy modeling suggests that the BLR of the LRDs have very high covering factor (almost unity) and… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the demography of little red dots (LRDs) using 37 objects at $z\sim3$-$7$ with JWST/NIRSpec PRISM and grating spectra compiled from various JWST programs. We focus on spectroscopic quantities of the broad H$\alpha$ luminosity $L_\mathrm{H\alpha,broad}$ (and the broad H$\beta$ luminosity $L_\mathrm{H\beta,broad}$ where available) and the bolometric luminosity $L_\mathrm{bol}$ represented by modified blackbody emission, avoiding quantities contaminated by host-galaxy emission (e.g., total H$\alpha$ luminosity). We identifiy a tight scaling relation between $L_\mathrm{H\alpha,broad}$ and $L_\mathrm{bol}$, supporting the interpretation that these emissions are primarily powered by the central engine. Interestingly, the $L_\mathrm{H\alpha,broad}$-$L_\mathrm{bol}$ scaling relation of LRDs is enhanced by a factor of $\sim40$ in $L_\mathrm{H\alpha,broad}$ relative to that of low-$z$ Type 1 AGN. A similar trend is found in the $L_\mathrm{H\beta,broad}$-$L_\mathrm{bol}$ relation, although the enhancement in $L_\mathrm{H\beta,broad}$ is smaller, only by a factor of $\sim10$. We explore the physical origin of these enhancements and find that \textsc{Cloudy} photoionization modeling within the classic locally optimally-emitting cloud (LOC) framework can explain them through an increase in the covering factor from $\sim20$\% (Type 1 AGN) to $\sim100$\% (LRDs), together with an increase in the hydrogen column density from $N_\mathrm{H}\sim10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ to $\gtrsim10^{24}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$, with a preferred gas density of $\sim10^{10}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$, successfully reproducing the modified blackbody emission. Such a nearly unity covering factor without requiring a gas density increase may result from a significant increase in the BLR filling factor or size, corresponding to a ``stuffed BLR" or ``giant BLR," respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript compiles JWST/NIRSpec spectra for 37 little red dots (LRDs) at z~3-7 and reports a tight scaling relation between broad Hα luminosity (L_Hα,broad) and bolometric luminosity (L_bol, derived from modified blackbody fits chosen to minimize host contamination). This relation is offset by a factor of ~40 in L_Hα,broad relative to the corresponding relation for low-z Type 1 AGN (with a smaller ~10x offset for broad Hβ). The authors attribute the enhancement to an increase in BLR covering factor from ~20% to ~100%, hydrogen column density from ~10^23 to ≳10^24 cm^-2, and gas density ~10^10 cm^-3 within the classic LOC framework of Cloudy photoionization models, interpreting this as evidence for a 'stuffed BLR' or 'giant BLR'.

Significance. If the L_bol values are shown to be directly comparable, the result would indicate systematically different BLR properties in high-redshift LRDs, with implications for early supermassive black hole growth and AGN demographics. The compilation of 37 objects with both PRISM and grating spectra, together with the explicit focus on broad-line luminosities to avoid host contamination, constitutes a clear observational strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; L_bol definition and scaling-relation section] The factor-of-~40 enhancement claim (abstract) is load-bearing on the assumption that L_bol for the LRD sample (modified blackbody) is on the same scale as the low-z Type 1 AGN reference relation. The manuscript does not state the bolometric correction method or continuum luminosity used for the low-z comparison sample; if the low-z L_bol incorporates standard corrections (e.g., from 5100 Å or 2-10 keV) that differ systematically from the modified-blackbody definition, the apparent offset is not necessarily physical.
  2. [Cloudy LOC modeling paragraph] The LOC modeling (abstract) reproduces the observed enhancement only after tuning covering factor, N_H, and n_H to the data. No independent prior constraints on these parameters from LRD host or outflow properties are provided, so the physical explanation is post-hoc rather than predictive; this circularity directly affects the strength of the 'stuffed BLR' interpretation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction or methods] Notation for L_bol should be clarified when first introduced to distinguish the modified-blackbody definition from any continuum-based alternatives.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; L_bol definition and scaling-relation section] The factor-of-~40 enhancement claim (abstract) is load-bearing on the assumption that L_bol for the LRD sample (modified blackbody) is on the same scale as the low-z Type 1 AGN reference relation. The manuscript does not state the bolometric correction method or continuum luminosity used for the low-z comparison sample; if the low-z L_bol incorporates standard corrections (e.g., from 5100 Å or 2-10 keV) that differ systematically from the modified-blackbody definition, the apparent offset is not necessarily physical.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript should explicitly document the L_bol definition for the low-z Type 1 AGN reference sample to allow direct comparison. The reference relation is taken from the standard literature (typically using 5100 Å continuum luminosity with established bolometric corrections). In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph in the scaling-relation section stating the exact method used for the comparison sample and discussing possible systematic differences arising from the distinct SED shapes. We maintain that the offset remains physical because the modified-blackbody L_bol for LRDs is deliberately constructed to isolate the central-engine contribution while minimizing host contamination, consistent with the red, AGN-dominated spectra of the sample. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Cloudy LOC modeling paragraph] The LOC modeling (abstract) reproduces the observed enhancement only after tuning covering factor, N_H, and n_H to the data. No independent prior constraints on these parameters from LRD host or outflow properties are provided, so the physical explanation is post-hoc rather than predictive; this circularity directly affects the strength of the 'stuffed BLR' interpretation.

    Authors: The LOC modeling is presented as an exploratory exercise within the standard framework to test whether plausible parameter adjustments can reproduce both the enhanced line luminosities and the modified-blackbody continuum. The near-unity covering factor and high column density are motivated by independent LRD observables (red colors implying heavy obscuration and minimal host-galaxy signatures). We acknowledge that the modeling is not fully predictive and will revise the relevant section to (i) state the physical motivations drawn from LRD demographics more explicitly and (ii) add a caveat on the exploratory nature of the parameter search. No additional independent priors on BLR gas density are currently available in the literature for LRDs, but future multi-wavelength constraints can be incorporated. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical relation and modeling are independent

full rationale

The paper measures the L_Hα,broad-L_bol scaling directly from JWST spectra of 37 LRDs (with L_bol from modified blackbody fits) and compares the offset to an external low-z Type 1 AGN sample. The Cloudy LOC modeling is then used post hoc to identify parameter values (covering factor, N_H, n_H) that can reproduce the observed offset and continuum shape. This is standard explanatory modeling rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described chain. The result remains falsifiable against the external AGN benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the observed scaling from 37 objects plus three fitted parameters in the photoionization model and the assumption that modified blackbody represents L_bol cleanly.

free parameters (3)
  • covering factor = ~100%
    Adjusted from 20% (Type 1 AGN) to ~100% to reproduce the factor-40 enhancement
  • hydrogen column density = >=10^24 cm^-2
    Increased from 10^23 to >=10^24 cm^-2 to match modified blackbody and line strengths
  • gas density = ~10^10 cm^-3
    Preferred value chosen to reproduce observations in Cloudy runs
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cloudy photoionization modeling in the LOC framework applies directly to LRDs
    Invoked to explain the scaling relation
invented entities (1)
  • stuffed BLR or giant BLR no independent evidence
    purpose: To achieve near-unity covering factor without further density increase
    Suggested as possible physical interpretation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6010 in / 1379 out tokens · 22481 ms · 2026-06-27T16:14:42.431011+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Little Red Dots as Intermediate Mass, Super-Eddington Engines: Insights from Type IIn Supernovae and The 1837-1856 Great Eruption of $\eta$ Carinae

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LRDs are reinterpreted as intermediate-mass super-Eddington systems with wind-driven pseudo-photospheres that explain their spectra and imply engine masses below 10^5 solar masses rather than overmassive black holes.

  2. Little Red and Blue Dots: AGN-excited narrow lines, Lyman-$\alpha$ emission, and resemblance to standard quasars

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    JWST data on LRDs and LBDs show AGN-like excitation, strong Lyα with broad components, and X-ray weakness, implying clumpy or equatorial geometries around growing black holes rather than complete gas envelopes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  3. [3]

    Ando, M., Harikane, Y., Katz, H., Inayoshi, K., & Tanaka, T. S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.03522. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03522 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Scaling Relation of LRDs15 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2026

  4. [4]

    , eprint =

    Baldwin, J., Ferland, G., Korista, K., & Verner, D. 1995, ApJL, 455, L119, doi: 10.1086/309827

    work page doi:10.1086/309827 1995

  5. [5]

    The Low-Luminosity End of the Radius-Luminosity Relationship for Active Galactic Nuclei

    Bentz, M. C., Denney, K. D., Grier, C. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 149, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/149

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/2/149 2013

  6. [6]

    Brammer, Grizli (2023), doi:10.5281/zenodo.1146904

    Brammer, G. 2023a, grizli, 1.9.11 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1146904

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1146904

  7. [7]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018 , version =

    Brammer, G. 2023b, grizli, 1.9.11 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018

  8. [8]

    J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F

    Burke, C. J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.16082

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16082 2025

  9. [9]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.24700

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24700 2026

  10. [10]

    1979, Reviews of Modern Physics, 51, 715, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.715 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al

    Davidson, K., & Netzer, H. 1979, Reviews of Modern Physics, 51, 715, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.715 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A189, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452186 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Nai...

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.715 1979

  11. [11]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163 2026

  12. [12]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e 2022

  13. [13]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 4568, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1627

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1627 2023

  15. [15]

    E., Mendoza, C., & Zeippen, C

    Galavis, M. E., Mendoza, C., & Zeippen, C. J. 1997, A&AS, 123, 159, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997344

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1997344 1997

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Gloudemans, A. J., Duncan, K. J., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9 2025

  17. [17]

    Estimating Black Hole Masses in Active Galaxies Using the Halpha Emission Line

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/431897 2005

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  19. [19]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05434, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.05434

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.05434 2025

  20. [20]

    Ferland, G. J. 2023, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 7, 246, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad0e75

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad0e75 2023

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e 2023

  22. [22]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  23. [23]

    Science , keywords =

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.adj0343

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj0343 2024

  24. [24]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  25. [25]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03130

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03130 2025

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  27. [27]

    Spectral Uniformity of Little Red Dots: A Natural Outcome of Coevolving Seed Black Holes and Nascent Starbursts

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19422, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.19422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19422 2025

  28. [28]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf376 2023

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  30. [30]

    S., Netzer, H., et al

    Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 631, doi: 10.1086/308704

    work page doi:10.1086/308704 2000

  31. [31]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  32. [32]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1cc3

    Kiyota, T., Ouchi, M., Xu, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1cc3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1cc3 2025

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 2023

  34. [34]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e 2025

  36. [36]

    1997, ApJS, 108, 401, doi: 10.1086/312966

    Korista, K., Baldwin, J., Ferland, G., & Verner, D. 1997, ApJS, 108, 401, doi: 10.1086/312966

    work page doi:10.1086/312966 1997

  37. [37]

    T., & Goad, M

    Korista, K. T., & Goad, M. R. 2004, ApJ, 606, 749, doi: 10.1086/383193

    work page doi:10.1086/383193 2004

  38. [38]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557 , keywords =

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04557 2024

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551 2025

  40. [40]

    (LRDs)$^2$: The Low-ReDshift Little Red Dots Survey. II. DESI DR1 Sample

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21574

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21574 2026

  41. [41]

    How I Wonder What You Are -- JWST's Little Red Dots do not TWINKLE

    Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.13000 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13000 2026

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf359 2025

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  45. [45]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17667 2026

  46. [46]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  47. [47]

    Osterbrock, D. E. 1991, Reports on Progress in Physics, 54, 579, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/54/4/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/54/4/002 1991

  48. [48]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  49. [49]

    The Structure and Evolution of LRDs: Insights from JWST NIRSpec Medium and High Resolution Spectroscopy at $z\sim4$

    Pang, Y., Wang, X., Cheng, C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12548, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.12548

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12548 2026

  50. [50]

    Peterson, B. M. 2006, in Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales, ed. D. Alloin, Vol. 693, 77, doi: 10.1007/3-540-34621-X 3

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-34621-x 2006

  51. [51]

    Central Masses and Broad-Line Region Sizes of Active Galactic Nuclei. II. A Homogeneous Analysis of a Large Reverberation-Mapping Database

    Peterson, B. M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert, K. M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 682, doi: 10.1086/423269 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/423269 2004

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Price, S. H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1 2025

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Rinaldi, P., Bonaventura, N., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfa10

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfa10 2025

  54. [54]

    The Way We Tally Becomes the Tale: the Impact of Selection Strategies on the Inferred Evolution of Little Red Dots Across Cosmic Time

    Rinaldi, P., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.07138, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.07138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.07138 2026

  55. [55]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08643-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08643-8 2026

  56. [56]

    2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8

    Sacchi, A., & Bogd´ an,´A. 2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8 2025

  57. [57]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277

    Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.22277

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.22277 2026

  58. [58]

    S., Jiang, Y.-F., et al

    Secunda, A., Somerville, R. S., Jiang, Y.-F., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1f08

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1f08 2026

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b 2025

  60. [60]

    2012, ApJ, 753, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/125

    Shen, Y., & Liu, X. 2012, ApJ, 753, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/125

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/125 2012

  61. [61]

    A., & Gaskell, C

    Snedden, S. A., & Gaskell, C. M. 1999, ApJL, 521, L91, doi: 10.1086/312188

    work page doi:10.1086/312188 1999

  62. [62]

    Paschen Jumps in Little Red Dots: Evidence for Nebular Continua

    Sneppen, A., Matthews, J. H., Watson, D., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.09399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.09399

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.09399

  63. [63]

    H., et al

    Sneppen, A., Watson, D., Matthews, J. H., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18864, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18864

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18864

  64. [64]

    I., Rowell , G

    Stern, J., & Laor, A. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 423, 600, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x 2012

  65. [65]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19585

    Stone, Z., Shen, Y., Zhuang, M.-Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19585, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.19585

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19585 2025

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Suess, K. A., Weaver, J. R., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe 2024

  67. [67]

    S., Akins, H

    Tanaka, T. S., Akins, H. B., Harikane, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f 2025

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Tee, W. L., Fan, X., Wang, F., & Yang, J. 2025, ApJL, 983, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc5e3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc5e3 2025

  69. [69]

    BlackTHUNDER: Evidence of three massive black holes in a z~5 galaxy

    Torralba, A., Matthee, J., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557537 ¨Ubler, H., Mazzolari, G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.21575, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.21575

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557537 2026

  70. [70]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Umeda, H., Inayoshi, K., Harikane, Y., & Murase, K. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.04208, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.04208

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04208 2025

  71. [71]

    Valentino, F., Brammer, G., Gould, K. M. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa 2023

  72. [72]

    E., Brammer, G., et al

    Valentino, F., Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A358, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553908

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553908 2025

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Weaver, J. R., Cutler, S. E., Pan, R., et al. 2024, ApJS, 270, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad07e0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad07e0 2024

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    Wu, Q., & Shen, Y. 2022, ApJS, 263, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9ead

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9ead 2022

  75. [75]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Ananna, T. T., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba 2024

  76. [76]

    Zhang, Z., Jiang, L., Liu, W., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 985, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3e 2025