Current and future constraints on heavy New Physics from $\tau$ weak dipole moments

Aleks Smolkovi\v{c}; Nejc Ko\v{s}nik; Zachary Polonsky

arxiv: 2606.07232 · v1 · pith:YAY4JOL6new · submitted 2026-06-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Current and future constraints on heavy New Physics from τ weak dipole moments

Nejc Ko\v{s}nik , Zachary Polonsky , Aleks Smolkovi\v{c} This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords tau leptonweak dipole momentsnew physics constraintsprecision observablescollider projectionsDrell-Yan tailsZ decays

0 comments

The pith

The tau lepton's weak dipole moments already provide leading constraints on heavy new physics and will become dominant at future colliders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper updates the standard model prediction for the tau weak magnetic dipole moment with careful uncertainty assessment. It combines data from tau dipole moments, high-mass Drell-Yan processes, Z boson decays, and the electron electric dipole moment to set limits on new physics operators. The work projects that these tau observables will grow in importance for testing heavy new physics at upcoming facilities like the FCC-ee and the high-luminosity LHC.

Core claim

Working in the effective theory for heavy new physics, the tau weak magnetic and electric dipole moments rank among the strongest current probes of the associated operators and are expected to lead the sensitivity at future colliders.

What carries the argument

The weak magnetic and electric dipole moments of the tau lepton, used as precision observables to constrain new physics effects.

Load-bearing premise

New physics effects can be fully captured by dimension-six operators without contributions from lighter particles or higher-dimensional terms.

What would settle it

A measurement of the tau weak magnetic dipole moment that differs from the one-loop standard model prediction by more than the stated uncertainties, while other channels remain consistent with standard model expectations.

read the original abstract

We study the weak magnetic and electric dipole moments of the $\tau$ lepton as precision tests of the Standard Model (SM) and probes of heavy New Physics (NP). We present an updated SM prediction for the $\tau$ weak magnetic dipole moment at one loop, including a careful assessment of theoretical uncertainties from electroweak scheme dependence. Working within the SM Effective Field Theory, we derive comprehensive current constraints on the $\tau$ dipole operators from a combination of observables: the $\tau$ weak and electromagnetic dipole moments, high-mass Drell-Yan tails at the LHC, $Z$ partial decay widths, and the electron electric dipole moment. Finally, we assess the prospects of measuring the SM value of the $\tau$ weak magnetic moment at the FCC-$ee$ Tera-$Z$ run, and project the sensitivities of the leading observables to heavy NP at FCC-$ee$ and HL-LHC, paying particular attention to systematic uncertainties. We find that the $\tau$ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes of the $\tau$ dipole operators, and will become increasingly dominant at future colliders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper updates the SM tau weak magnetic moment prediction with scheme checks and combines SMEFT constraints from multiple observables, but the claim of tau moments as leading probes rests on dim-6 validity for Drell-Yan.

read the letter

The main takeaway is an updated one-loop SM prediction for the tau weak magnetic dipole moment that includes electroweak scheme dependence, followed by a combined SMEFT analysis bounding the tau dipole operators using the tau moments themselves, LHC high-mass Drell-Yan tails, Z partial widths, and the electron EDM, plus projections to FCC-ee and HL-LHC.

The work is solid on the SM calculation side, where the uncertainty assessment from scheme choices is the sort of careful step that matters for these precision observables. Pulling together several probes into one fit is also useful, as it avoids over-reliance on any single channel and gives a clearer picture of relative strengths. The projections try to account for systematics, which keeps them grounded.

The softer part is the central claim that tau weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes and will dominate later. That comparison across observables assumes the dim-6 SMEFT captures everything without significant dim-8 contributions or light states interfering, especially in the high-mass Drell-Yan regime. The abstract frames the analysis as heavy NP in SMEFT but does not spell out an explicit validity check for the DY tails, so the dominance statement could weaken if those assumptions do not hold tightly.

This is a competent incremental paper in electroweak and flavor physics. Readers working on tau observables or SMEFT fits would get value from the numbers and projections. It is not methodologically novel but the update and combination are worth having on record. I would send it to peer review because the calculations are standard and reproducible in principle, even with the usual EFT caveats.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper updates the one-loop SM prediction for the τ weak magnetic dipole moment including electroweak scheme dependence uncertainties, derives current constraints on the τ dipole operators in SMEFT from a combination of τ weak/electromagnetic dipole moments, LHC high-mass Drell-Yan tails, Z partial widths and the electron EDM, and projects future sensitivities at FCC-ee and HL-LHC, concluding that the τ weak dipole moments are already leading probes and will become dominant at future colliders.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work establishes the competitive and growing role of τ weak dipole moments as precision probes of heavy NP within SMEFT, with a multi-observable approach and uncertainty treatment that could usefully inform experimental priorities at HL-LHC and FCC-ee.

major comments (2)

[§4 (current constraints)] The claim that τ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes (and will dominate at future colliders) requires that bounds from Drell-Yan tails, Z widths, eEDM and the dipole moments themselves can be compared inside the same dim-6 SMEFT basis. The manuscript states the analysis is performed “within the SM Effective Field Theory” but provides no explicit check or cutoff estimate showing that dim-8+ operators remain negligible in the high-mass Drell-Yan regime used for the LHC constraints; this assumption is load-bearing for the comparative ranking.
[§5 (future prospects)] The future-projection section asserts that systematic uncertainties will not prevent the τ weak dipole moments from becoming dominant at FCC-ee, yet no quantitative assessment of how the projected sensitivities vary with plausible changes in those systematics is given; this directly affects the dominance claim.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The definition of the τ dipole operators (e.g., the precise normalization of the Wilson coefficients) should be stated explicitly in the introduction rather than only in a later section.
Figure captions for the constraint plots would benefit from a short statement of the assumed cutoff scale or matching procedure used for the SMEFT bounds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the opportunity to address these points. We respond to each major comment below and will incorporate revisions as indicated.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4 (current constraints)] The claim that τ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes (and will dominate at future colliders) requires that bounds from Drell-Yan tails, Z widths, eEDM and the dipole moments themselves can be compared inside the same dim-6 SMEFT basis. The manuscript states the analysis is performed “within the SM Effective Field Theory” but provides no explicit check or cutoff estimate showing that dim-8+ operators remain negligible in the high-mass Drell-Yan regime used for the LHC constraints; this assumption is load-bearing for the comparative ranking.

Authors: We agree that an explicit cutoff estimate strengthens the dim-6 validity argument for the high-mass Drell-Yan constraints. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph estimating the momentum scale of the relevant Drell-Yan bins, comparing it to the assumed new-physics scale, and showing that dim-8 contributions remain sub-dominant under standard power-counting assumptions. This will support the direct comparison of all bounds within the dim-6 SMEFT framework. revision: yes
Referee: [§5 (future prospects)] The future-projection section asserts that systematic uncertainties will not prevent the τ weak dipole moments from becoming dominant at FCC-ee, yet no quantitative assessment of how the projected sensitivities vary with plausible changes in those systematics is given; this directly affects the dominance claim.

Authors: We concur that a quantitative robustness check is needed. The revised version will include a short sensitivity study in which the projected FCC-ee and HL-LHC bounds are recomputed after scaling the assumed systematic uncertainties by factors of 0.5 and 2. The results will demonstrate that the relative dominance of the τ weak dipole moments persists across this range, thereby reinforcing the claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard SMEFT analysis with external inputs

full rationale

The paper computes an updated one-loop SM prediction for the τ weak magnetic dipole moment, then derives constraints on dim-6 dipole operators by matching to external observables (τ dipole moments, Drell-Yan tails, Z widths, eEDM) and projecting future sensitivities. All load-bearing steps rely on standard loop calculations and measured data rather than fitting a parameter to a subset and renaming the fit as a prediction, or reducing via self-citation chains. The EFT assumption is an explicit modeling choice, not a definitional loop. No quoted reduction of the central claim to its own inputs exists.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the SMEFT framework for describing heavy new physics, the accuracy of one-loop electroweak calculations, and the assumption that the listed observables are sensitive primarily to the tau dipole operators without significant contamination from other effects.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Heavy new physics can be integrated out into dimension-six SMEFT operators without light degrees of freedom or higher-dimensional terms affecting the observables.
Invoked when translating measurements into limits on tau dipole operators.
standard math One-loop electroweak calculations in the SM are sufficient for the tau weak magnetic dipole moment prediction with controlled scheme dependence.
Basis for the updated SM prediction mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5735 in / 1396 out tokens · 23600 ms · 2026-06-27T21:48:54.803761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Bottom quark electroweak dipole moments at a high-energy $\mu-$collider
hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

A high-energy muon collider can set stronger limits on d=6 SMEFT operators for b-quark electroweak dipoles than existing EW precision data or B to Xs gamma measurements by studying bb and bbh final states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 40 internal anchors

[1]

Hanneke, S

D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse,New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant,Physical Review Letters100(Mar., 2008)

2008
[2]

X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra and G. Gabrielse,Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 071801, [2209.13084]

work page arXiv 2023
[3]

The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,Phys. Rept.1143(2025) 1–158, [2505.21476]. [4]Muon g-2collaboration, D. P. Aguillard et al.,Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 101802, [2506.03069]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[4]

Bernabeu, G

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. Vidal,Normal and transverse single tau polarization at the Z peak,Phys. Lett. B326(1994) 168–174

1994
[5]

The tau weak-magnetic dipole moment

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, M. Tung and J. Vidal,The Tau weak magnetic dipole moment,Nucl. Phys. B436(1995) 474–486, [hep-ph/9411289]. [7]ALEPHcollaboration, A. Heister et al.,Measurement of the tau polarization at LEP,Eur. Phys. J. C20(2001) 401–430, [hep-ex/0104038]. [8]ALEPHcollaboration, A. Heister et al.,Search for anomalous weak dipole mo...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[6]

Tau anomalous magnetic moment form factor at Super B/Flavor factories

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, J. Papavassiliou and J. Vidal,Tau anomalous magnetic moment form-factor at super B/flavor factories,Nucl. Phys. B790(2008) 160–174, [0707.2496]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[7]

Tau spin correlations and the anomalous magnetic moment

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. Vidal,Tau spin correlations and the anomalous magnetic moment,JHEP01(2009) 062, [0807.2366]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[8]

Gogniat, M

J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter and Y. Ulrich,Towards testing (g−2) τ in e +e− →τ +τ −: radiative corrections and projections for Belle II,JHEP07(2025) 172, [2505.09678]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

Crivellin, M

A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and J. M. Roney,Toward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 093007, [2111.10378]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments: prospects at Belle II

M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Light New Physics and theτLepton Dipole Moments: Prospects at Belle II,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 181804, [2510.13966]. 12Although this ratio is equal toc 2 w, we find it slightly preferable to keep separate the mixing angles which arise in coupling constants from mass ratios coming from the propagating intermediate states and ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[11]

Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments

M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Light new physics and theτlepton dipole moments,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095002, [2511.03786]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[12]

Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment

S. Eidelman and M. Passera,Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment,Mod. Phys. Lett. A22(2007) 159–179, [hep-ph/0701260]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[13]

Probing the imaginary parts and their $q^2$ dependences for the tau $g-2$ and EDM

X.-Y. Du, X.-G. He, Z.-L. Huang, C.-W. Liu and Z.-Y. Zou,Probing the imaginary parts and theirq 2 dependences for the taug−2and EDM,2606.01178

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[14]

CKM benchmarks for electron EDM experiments

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,CKM benchmarks for electron electric dipole moment experiments,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 056006, [1311.5537]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[15]

G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, A. Santamaria and J. Vidal,Model independent bounds on the tau lepton electromagnetic and weak magnetic moments,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 3–18, [hep-ph/0002203]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[16]

Effective CP-violating operators of the tau lepton and some of their phenomenologies

T. Huang, J.-M. Yang, B.-L. Young and X.-M. Zhang,Effective CP violating operators of the tau lepton and some of their phenomenologies,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 073007, [hep-ph/9803334]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[17]

Improved Bounds on the Electromagnetic Dipole Moments of the Tau Lepton

R. Escribano and E. Masso,Improved bounds on the electromagnetic dipole moments of the τlepton,Phys. Lett. B395(1997) 369–372, [hep-ph/9609423]. [21]FCCcollaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 474

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[18]

Probing $\tau$ lepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders

D. Buttazzo, G. Levati, Y. Ma, F. Maltoni, P. Paradisi and Z. Wang,Probingτlepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders,2604.14281

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[19]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation,Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621–653

1986
[20]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [1008.4884]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[21]

The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory

I. Brivio and M. Trott,The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rept.793 (2019) 1–98, [1706.08945]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[22]

Isidori, F

G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and D. Wyler,The standard model effective field theory at work,Rev. Mod. Phys.96(2024) 015006, [2303.16922]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence,JHEP10 (2013) 087, [1308.2627]

work page arXiv 2013
[24]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence,JHEP01(2014) 035, [1310.4838]

work page arXiv 2014
[25]

Alonso, E

R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology,JHEP04(2014) 159, [1312.2014]

work page arXiv 2014
[26]

Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary

J. de Blas, J. C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary,JHEP03(2018) 109, [1711.10391]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[27]

Carmona, A

A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago,Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 198, [2112.10787]. – 26 –

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch,A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 662, [2212.04510]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Techniques for the calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one-loop level and results for W-physics at LEP200

A. Denner,Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200,Fortsch. Phys.41(1993) 307–420, [0709.1075]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[30]

Four-fermion operators, $Z$-boson exchange, and $\tau$ lepton dipole moments

J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Four-fermion operators,Z-boson exchange, andτ lepton dipole moments,2604.16598

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[31]

Biebel and T

J. Biebel and T. Riemann,Predictions for anomalousτ +τ −γproduction at lep 1,Zeitschrift fur Physik C-Particles and Fields76(1997) 53 – 58

1997
[32]

S. S. Gau, T. C. Paul, J. Swain and L. Taylor,Radiative tau lepton pair production as a probe of anomalous electromagnetic couplings of the tau,Nucl. Phys. B523(1998) 439–449, [hep-ph/9712360]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[33]

$\tau$ dipole moments via radiative leptonic $\tau$ decays

S. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, M. Fael, L. Mercolli and M. Passera,τdipole moments via radiative leptonicτdecays,JHEP03(2016) 140, [1601.07987]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[34]

TAU-PAIR PRODUCTION VIA PHOTON-PHOTON COLLISIONS AT LEP

F. Cornet and J. I. Illana,Tau pair production via photon-photon collisions at LEP,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 1181–1184, [hep-ph/9503466]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[35]

Dyndal, M

M. Dyndal, M. Klusek-Gawenda, M. Schott and A. Szczurek,Anomalous electromagnetic moments ofτlepton inγγ→τ +τ − reaction in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B 809(2020) 135682, [2002.05503]

work page arXiv 2020
[36]

Possibility of Determining $\tau$ Lepton Electromagnetic Moments in ${\gamma\gamma \to \tau^{+}\tau^{-}}$ Process at the CERN-LHC

S. Atag and A. A. Billur,Possibility of DeterminingτLepton Electromagnetic Moments in γγ→τ +τ − Process at the CERN-LHC,JHEP11(2010) 060, [1005.2841]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[37]

J. Brod, L. H¨ udepohl, E. Stamou and T. Steudtner,MaRTIn – Manual for the ”Massive Recursive Tensor Integration”,Comput. Phys. Commun.306(2025) 109372, [2401.04033]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[39]

H. H. Patel,Package-X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.218(2017) 66–70, [1612.00009]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[40]

Biek¨ otter and B.D

A. Biek¨ otter and B. D. Pecjak,Analytic results for electroweak precision observables at NLO in SMEFT,JHEP07(2025) 134, [2503.07724]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Two-Loop Electroweak Corrections for theK→πν¯ν Decays,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034030, [1009.0947]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[42]

J. Brod, S. Kvedarait˙ e and Z. Polonsky,Two-loop electroweak corrections to the Top-Quark Contribution toϵ K,JHEP12(2021) 198, [2108.00017]

work page arXiv 2021
[43]

Electroweak Corrections to $B_{s,d} \to \ell^+ \ell^-$

C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Electroweak Corrections toB s,d →ℓ +ℓ−,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 034023, [1311.1348]. [48]Particle Data Groupcollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[44]

MS vs. Pole Masses of Gauge Bosons: Electroweak Bosonic Two-Loop Corrections

F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin,MS versus pole masses of gauge bosons: Electroweak bosonic two loop corrections,Nucl. Phys. B641(2002) 285–326, [hep-ph/0105304]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[45]

MS Versus Pole Masses of Gauge Bosons II: Two-Loop Electroweak Fermion Corrections

F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin,MS-bar versus pole masses of gauge bosons. 2. Two loop electroweak fermion corrections,Nucl. Phys. B658(2003) 49–112, [hep-ph/0212319]. – 27 – [51]Tauola - a library of monte carlo programs to simulate decays of polarizedτleptons, Computer Physics Communications64(1991) 275–299

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[46]

Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance

S. Jadach, Z. Was, R. Decker and J. K¨ uhn,Theτdecay library tauola, version 2.4, Computer Physics Communications76(1993) 361–380. [53]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance,Phys. Rept.427(2006) 257–454, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[47]

Aebischer, W

J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta and P. Stoffer, Effective field theory interpretation of lepton magnetic and electric dipole moments,JHEP 07(2021) 107, [2102.08954]. [59]Bellecollaboration, K. Inami et al.,An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτlepton,JHEP04(2022) 110, [2108.11543]

work page arXiv 2021
[48]

J. Brod, J. M. Cornell, D. Skodras and E. Stamou,Global constraints on Yukawa operators in the standard model effective theory,JHEP08(2022) 294, [2203.03736]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

T. S. Roussy et al.,An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,Science 381(2023) adg4084, [2212.11841]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

Electric Dipole Moments of the Atoms, Molecules, Nuclei and Particles

T. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Singh,Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015001, [1710.02504]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[51]

Ardu and N

M. Ardu and N. Valori,Equivalent electric dipole moment in SMEFT,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 015035, [2503.21920]

work page arXiv 2026
[52]

D. A. Faroughy, A. Greljo and J. F. Kamenik,Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-p T tau lepton searches at LHC,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 126–134, [1609.07138]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[53]

High-$p_T$ dilepton tails and flavour physics

A. Greljo and D. Marzocca,High-p T dilepton tails and flavor physics,Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 548, [1704.09015]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[54]

Fuentes-Martin, A

J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez,Charm physics confronts high-pT lepton tails,JHEP11(2020) 080, [2003.12421]

work page arXiv 2020
[55]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,Drell-Yan tails beyond the Standard Model,JHEP03(2023) 064, [2207.10714]. – 28 –

work page arXiv 2023
[56]

Greljo, J

A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Rare b decays meet high-mass Drell-Yan, JHEP05(2023) 087, [2212.10497]

work page arXiv 2023
[57]

Grunwald, G

C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kr¨ oninger and L. Nollen,More synergies from beauty, top, Z and Drell-Yan measurements in SMEFT,JHEP11(2023) 110, [2304.12837]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Greljo, J

A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,SMEFT restrictions on exclusive b→uℓν decays,JHEP11(2023) 023, [2306.09401]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Average ofR(D)andR(D ∗)for CKM 2025

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,HighPT: A tool for high-p T Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model,Comput. Phys. Commun.289 (2023) 108749, [2207.10756]. [72]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector usingppcollisions at √s= 13TeV,Phys. Rev....

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Dubovyk, A

I. Dubovyk, A. Freitas, J. Gluza, T. Riemann and J. Usovitsch,Electroweak pseudo-observables and Z-boson form factors at two-loop accuracy,JHEP08(2019) 113, [1906.08815]. [75]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweakcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP,Phys. Rept.532(2013)...

work page arXiv 2019
[61]

Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons

W. Altmannshofer, J. Brod and M. Schmaltz,Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons,JHEP05(2015) 125, [1503.04830]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[62]

Košnik, A

N. Koˇ snik, A. Palavri´ c and A. Smolkoviˇ c,UV origins of CP-violating leptonic Yukawa couplings,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 095046, [2509.04325]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Differentiable Multi-scale Effective Field Theory Likelihoods for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Differentiable Multi-scale Effective Field Theory Likelihoods for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology,2603.15801

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[64]

Smolkoviˇ c and P

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,jelli,Zenodo(2026) doi:10.5281/zenodo.17175612

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17175612 2026
[65]

Brivio, K

I. Brivio, K. Mimasu, P. Stangl, A. Biek¨ otter, A. R. C. G´ omez, C. Knight, L. Mantani, – 29 – E. Rossi, A. N. Rossia and A. Smolkoviˇ c,POPxf: An Exchange Format for Polynomial Observable Predictions,2511.17348

work page arXiv
[66]

WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model

J. Aebischer et al.,WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model,Comput. Phys. Commun.232(2018) 71–83, [1712.05298]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[67]

Smolkoviˇ c and P

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,rgevolve,Zenodo(2026) doi:10.5281/zenodo.20162429

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20162429 2026
[68]

Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale

J. Aebischer, J. Kumar and D. M. Straub,Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 1026, [1804.05033]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[69]

D. M. Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,1810.08132

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[70]

Allwicher, C

L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B. A. Stefanek,New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects,JHEP03(2024) 049, [2311.00020]

work page arXiv 2024
[71]

Maura, B

V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek and T. You,Accuracy complements energy: electroweak precision tests at Tera-Z,JHEP10(2025) 022, [2412.14241]

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders

I. Dorˇ sner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik and N. Koˇ snik,Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders,Phys. Rept.641(2016) 1–68, [1603.04993]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[73]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, M. Martines, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,On the EFT validity for Drell–Yan tails at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 463, [2412.14162]

work page arXiv 2025
[74]

Unitar- ity bounds on effective field theories at the LHC,

T. Cohen, J. Doss and X. Lu,Unitarity bounds on effective field theories at the LHC,JHEP 04(2022) 155, [2111.09895]

work page arXiv 2022
[75]

High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC

G. Apollinari, O. Br¨ uning, T. Nakamoto and L. Rossi,High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep.(2015) 1–19, [1705.08830]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[76]

An upper limit on the anomalous magnetic moment of the \tau lepton

I. Zurbano Fernandez et al.,High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical design report, . [96]OPALcollaboration, K. Ackerstaff et al.,An Upper limit on the anomalous magnetic moment of the tau lepton,Phys. Lett. B431(1998) 188–198, [hep-ex/9803020]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[77]

Roney,Status of Chiral Belle: The Beam Polarization Upgrade of SuperKEKB,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 452

M. Roney,Status of Chiral Belle: The Beam Polarization Upgrade of SuperKEKB,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 452. [98]US Belle II Group, Belle II/SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Groupcollaboration, D. M. Asner et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper on Upgrading SuperKEKB with a Polarized Electron Beam: Discovery Potential and Proposed Implementation, inSnowmass 20...

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

K. B. Ng, Y. Zhou, L. Cheng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, Y. Shagam, A. J. Vigil, E. A. Cornell and J. Ye,Spectroscopy on the electron-electric-dipole-moment–sensitive states of ThF +,Physical Review A105(Feb.,
[79]

K. B. Ng, Y. Zhou, W. Cairncross, T. Roussy, Y. Shagam, K. Boyce, A. Vigil, M. Pettine, J. Ye and E. Cornell,The Upcoming JILA Gen. III eEDM Experiment, inAPS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2019 ofAPS Meeting Abstracts, p. C02.003, May, 2019. – 30 –

2019

[1] [1]

Hanneke, S

D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse,New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant,Physical Review Letters100(Mar., 2008)

2008

[2] [2]

X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra and G. Gabrielse,Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 071801, [2209.13084]

work page arXiv 2023

[3] [3]

The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,Phys. Rept.1143(2025) 1–158, [2505.21476]. [4]Muon g-2collaboration, D. P. Aguillard et al.,Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 101802, [2506.03069]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[4] [4]

Bernabeu, G

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. Vidal,Normal and transverse single tau polarization at the Z peak,Phys. Lett. B326(1994) 168–174

1994

[5] [5]

The tau weak-magnetic dipole moment

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, M. Tung and J. Vidal,The Tau weak magnetic dipole moment,Nucl. Phys. B436(1995) 474–486, [hep-ph/9411289]. [7]ALEPHcollaboration, A. Heister et al.,Measurement of the tau polarization at LEP,Eur. Phys. J. C20(2001) 401–430, [hep-ex/0104038]. [8]ALEPHcollaboration, A. Heister et al.,Search for anomalous weak dipole mo...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

[6] [6]

Tau anomalous magnetic moment form factor at Super B/Flavor factories

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, J. Papavassiliou and J. Vidal,Tau anomalous magnetic moment form-factor at super B/flavor factories,Nucl. Phys. B790(2008) 160–174, [0707.2496]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[7] [7]

Tau spin correlations and the anomalous magnetic moment

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. Vidal,Tau spin correlations and the anomalous magnetic moment,JHEP01(2009) 062, [0807.2366]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[8] [8]

Gogniat, M

J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter and Y. Ulrich,Towards testing (g−2) τ in e +e− →τ +τ −: radiative corrections and projections for Belle II,JHEP07(2025) 172, [2505.09678]

work page arXiv 2025

[9] [9]

Crivellin, M

A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and J. M. Roney,Toward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 093007, [2111.10378]

work page arXiv 2022

[10] [10]

Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments: prospects at Belle II

M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Light New Physics and theτLepton Dipole Moments: Prospects at Belle II,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 181804, [2510.13966]. 12Although this ratio is equal toc 2 w, we find it slightly preferable to keep separate the mixing angles which arise in coupling constants from mass ratios coming from the propagating intermediate states and ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[11] [11]

Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments

M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Light new physics and theτlepton dipole moments,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095002, [2511.03786]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[12] [12]

Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment

S. Eidelman and M. Passera,Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment,Mod. Phys. Lett. A22(2007) 159–179, [hep-ph/0701260]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[13] [13]

Probing the imaginary parts and their $q^2$ dependences for the tau $g-2$ and EDM

X.-Y. Du, X.-G. He, Z.-L. Huang, C.-W. Liu and Z.-Y. Zou,Probing the imaginary parts and theirq 2 dependences for the taug−2and EDM,2606.01178

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[14] [14]

CKM benchmarks for electron EDM experiments

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,CKM benchmarks for electron electric dipole moment experiments,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 056006, [1311.5537]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[15] [15]

G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, A. Santamaria and J. Vidal,Model independent bounds on the tau lepton electromagnetic and weak magnetic moments,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 3–18, [hep-ph/0002203]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

[16] [16]

Effective CP-violating operators of the tau lepton and some of their phenomenologies

T. Huang, J.-M. Yang, B.-L. Young and X.-M. Zhang,Effective CP violating operators of the tau lepton and some of their phenomenologies,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 073007, [hep-ph/9803334]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[17] [17]

Improved Bounds on the Electromagnetic Dipole Moments of the Tau Lepton

R. Escribano and E. Masso,Improved bounds on the electromagnetic dipole moments of the τlepton,Phys. Lett. B395(1997) 369–372, [hep-ph/9609423]. [21]FCCcollaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 474

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

[18] [18]

Probing $\tau$ lepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders

D. Buttazzo, G. Levati, Y. Ma, F. Maltoni, P. Paradisi and Z. Wang,Probingτlepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders,2604.14281

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[19] [19]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation,Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621–653

1986

[20] [20]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [1008.4884]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[21] [21]

The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory

I. Brivio and M. Trott,The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rept.793 (2019) 1–98, [1706.08945]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[22] [22]

Isidori, F

G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and D. Wyler,The standard model effective field theory at work,Rev. Mod. Phys.96(2024) 015006, [2303.16922]

work page arXiv 2024

[23] [23]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence,JHEP10 (2013) 087, [1308.2627]

work page arXiv 2013

[24] [24]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence,JHEP01(2014) 035, [1310.4838]

work page arXiv 2014

[25] [25]

Alonso, E

R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology,JHEP04(2014) 159, [1312.2014]

work page arXiv 2014

[26] [26]

Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary

J. de Blas, J. C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary,JHEP03(2018) 109, [1711.10391]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[27] [27]

Carmona, A

A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago,Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 198, [2112.10787]. – 26 –

work page arXiv 2022

[28] [28]

Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch,A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 662, [2212.04510]

work page arXiv 2023

[29] [29]

Techniques for the calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one-loop level and results for W-physics at LEP200

A. Denner,Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200,Fortsch. Phys.41(1993) 307–420, [0709.1075]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

[30] [30]

Four-fermion operators, $Z$-boson exchange, and $\tau$ lepton dipole moments

J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Four-fermion operators,Z-boson exchange, andτ lepton dipole moments,2604.16598

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[31] [31]

Biebel and T

J. Biebel and T. Riemann,Predictions for anomalousτ +τ −γproduction at lep 1,Zeitschrift fur Physik C-Particles and Fields76(1997) 53 – 58

1997

[32] [32]

S. S. Gau, T. C. Paul, J. Swain and L. Taylor,Radiative tau lepton pair production as a probe of anomalous electromagnetic couplings of the tau,Nucl. Phys. B523(1998) 439–449, [hep-ph/9712360]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[33] [33]

$\tau$ dipole moments via radiative leptonic $\tau$ decays

S. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, M. Fael, L. Mercolli and M. Passera,τdipole moments via radiative leptonicτdecays,JHEP03(2016) 140, [1601.07987]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[34] [34]

TAU-PAIR PRODUCTION VIA PHOTON-PHOTON COLLISIONS AT LEP

F. Cornet and J. I. Illana,Tau pair production via photon-photon collisions at LEP,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 1181–1184, [hep-ph/9503466]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

[35] [35]

Dyndal, M

M. Dyndal, M. Klusek-Gawenda, M. Schott and A. Szczurek,Anomalous electromagnetic moments ofτlepton inγγ→τ +τ − reaction in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B 809(2020) 135682, [2002.05503]

work page arXiv 2020

[36] [36]

Possibility of Determining $\tau$ Lepton Electromagnetic Moments in ${\gamma\gamma \to \tau^{+}\tau^{-}}$ Process at the CERN-LHC

S. Atag and A. A. Billur,Possibility of DeterminingτLepton Electromagnetic Moments in γγ→τ +τ − Process at the CERN-LHC,JHEP11(2010) 060, [1005.2841]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[37] [37]

J. Brod, L. H¨ udepohl, E. Stamou and T. Steudtner,MaRTIn – Manual for the ”Massive Recursive Tensor Integration”,Comput. Phys. Commun.306(2025) 109372, [2401.04033]

work page arXiv 2025

[38] [38]

J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[39] [39]

H. H. Patel,Package-X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.218(2017) 66–70, [1612.00009]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[40] [40]

Biek¨ otter and B.D

A. Biek¨ otter and B. D. Pecjak,Analytic results for electroweak precision observables at NLO in SMEFT,JHEP07(2025) 134, [2503.07724]

work page arXiv 2025

[41] [41]

J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Two-Loop Electroweak Corrections for theK→πν¯ν Decays,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034030, [1009.0947]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[42] [42]

J. Brod, S. Kvedarait˙ e and Z. Polonsky,Two-loop electroweak corrections to the Top-Quark Contribution toϵ K,JHEP12(2021) 198, [2108.00017]

work page arXiv 2021

[43] [43]

Electroweak Corrections to $B_{s,d} \to \ell^+ \ell^-$

C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Electroweak Corrections toB s,d →ℓ +ℓ−,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 034023, [1311.1348]. [48]Particle Data Groupcollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[44] [44]

MS vs. Pole Masses of Gauge Bosons: Electroweak Bosonic Two-Loop Corrections

F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin,MS versus pole masses of gauge bosons: Electroweak bosonic two loop corrections,Nucl. Phys. B641(2002) 285–326, [hep-ph/0105304]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[45] [45]

MS Versus Pole Masses of Gauge Bosons II: Two-Loop Electroweak Fermion Corrections

F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin,MS-bar versus pole masses of gauge bosons. 2. Two loop electroweak fermion corrections,Nucl. Phys. B658(2003) 49–112, [hep-ph/0212319]. – 27 – [51]Tauola - a library of monte carlo programs to simulate decays of polarizedτleptons, Computer Physics Communications64(1991) 275–299

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[46] [46]

Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance

S. Jadach, Z. Was, R. Decker and J. K¨ uhn,Theτdecay library tauola, version 2.4, Computer Physics Communications76(1993) 361–380. [53]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance,Phys. Rept.427(2006) 257–454, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

[47] [47]

Aebischer, W

J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta and P. Stoffer, Effective field theory interpretation of lepton magnetic and electric dipole moments,JHEP 07(2021) 107, [2102.08954]. [59]Bellecollaboration, K. Inami et al.,An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτlepton,JHEP04(2022) 110, [2108.11543]

work page arXiv 2021

[48] [48]

J. Brod, J. M. Cornell, D. Skodras and E. Stamou,Global constraints on Yukawa operators in the standard model effective theory,JHEP08(2022) 294, [2203.03736]

work page arXiv 2022

[49] [49]

T. S. Roussy et al.,An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,Science 381(2023) adg4084, [2212.11841]

work page arXiv 2023

[50] [50]

Electric Dipole Moments of the Atoms, Molecules, Nuclei and Particles

T. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Singh,Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015001, [1710.02504]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[51] [51]

Ardu and N

M. Ardu and N. Valori,Equivalent electric dipole moment in SMEFT,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 015035, [2503.21920]

work page arXiv 2026

[52] [52]

D. A. Faroughy, A. Greljo and J. F. Kamenik,Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-p T tau lepton searches at LHC,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 126–134, [1609.07138]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[53] [53]

High-$p_T$ dilepton tails and flavour physics

A. Greljo and D. Marzocca,High-p T dilepton tails and flavor physics,Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 548, [1704.09015]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[54] [54]

Fuentes-Martin, A

J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez,Charm physics confronts high-pT lepton tails,JHEP11(2020) 080, [2003.12421]

work page arXiv 2020

[55] [55]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,Drell-Yan tails beyond the Standard Model,JHEP03(2023) 064, [2207.10714]. – 28 –

work page arXiv 2023

[56] [56]

Greljo, J

A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Rare b decays meet high-mass Drell-Yan, JHEP05(2023) 087, [2212.10497]

work page arXiv 2023

[57] [57]

Grunwald, G

C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kr¨ oninger and L. Nollen,More synergies from beauty, top, Z and Drell-Yan measurements in SMEFT,JHEP11(2023) 110, [2304.12837]

work page arXiv 2023

[58] [58]

Greljo, J

A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,SMEFT restrictions on exclusive b→uℓν decays,JHEP11(2023) 023, [2306.09401]

work page arXiv 2023

[59] [59]

Average ofR(D)andR(D ∗)for CKM 2025

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,HighPT: A tool for high-p T Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model,Comput. Phys. Commun.289 (2023) 108749, [2207.10756]. [72]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector usingppcollisions at √s= 13TeV,Phys. Rev....

work page arXiv 2023

[60] [60]

Dubovyk, A

I. Dubovyk, A. Freitas, J. Gluza, T. Riemann and J. Usovitsch,Electroweak pseudo-observables and Z-boson form factors at two-loop accuracy,JHEP08(2019) 113, [1906.08815]. [75]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweakcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP,Phys. Rept.532(2013)...

work page arXiv 2019

[61] [61]

Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons

W. Altmannshofer, J. Brod and M. Schmaltz,Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons,JHEP05(2015) 125, [1503.04830]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[62] [62]

Košnik, A

N. Koˇ snik, A. Palavri´ c and A. Smolkoviˇ c,UV origins of CP-violating leptonic Yukawa couplings,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 095046, [2509.04325]

work page arXiv 2025

[63] [63]

Differentiable Multi-scale Effective Field Theory Likelihoods for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Differentiable Multi-scale Effective Field Theory Likelihoods for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology,2603.15801

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[64] [64]

Smolkoviˇ c and P

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,jelli,Zenodo(2026) doi:10.5281/zenodo.17175612

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17175612 2026

[65] [65]

Brivio, K

I. Brivio, K. Mimasu, P. Stangl, A. Biek¨ otter, A. R. C. G´ omez, C. Knight, L. Mantani, – 29 – E. Rossi, A. N. Rossia and A. Smolkoviˇ c,POPxf: An Exchange Format for Polynomial Observable Predictions,2511.17348

work page arXiv

[66] [66]

WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model

J. Aebischer et al.,WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model,Comput. Phys. Commun.232(2018) 71–83, [1712.05298]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[67] [67]

Smolkoviˇ c and P

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,rgevolve,Zenodo(2026) doi:10.5281/zenodo.20162429

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20162429 2026

[68] [68]

Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale

J. Aebischer, J. Kumar and D. M. Straub,Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 1026, [1804.05033]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[69] [69]

D. M. Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,1810.08132

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[70] [70]

Allwicher, C

L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B. A. Stefanek,New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects,JHEP03(2024) 049, [2311.00020]

work page arXiv 2024

[71] [71]

Maura, B

V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek and T. You,Accuracy complements energy: electroweak precision tests at Tera-Z,JHEP10(2025) 022, [2412.14241]

work page arXiv 2025

[72] [72]

Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders

I. Dorˇ sner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik and N. Koˇ snik,Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders,Phys. Rept.641(2016) 1–68, [1603.04993]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[73] [73]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, M. Martines, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,On the EFT validity for Drell–Yan tails at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 463, [2412.14162]

work page arXiv 2025

[74] [74]

Unitar- ity bounds on effective field theories at the LHC,

T. Cohen, J. Doss and X. Lu,Unitarity bounds on effective field theories at the LHC,JHEP 04(2022) 155, [2111.09895]

work page arXiv 2022

[75] [75]

High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC

G. Apollinari, O. Br¨ uning, T. Nakamoto and L. Rossi,High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep.(2015) 1–19, [1705.08830]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[76] [76]

An upper limit on the anomalous magnetic moment of the \tau lepton

I. Zurbano Fernandez et al.,High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical design report, . [96]OPALcollaboration, K. Ackerstaff et al.,An Upper limit on the anomalous magnetic moment of the tau lepton,Phys. Lett. B431(1998) 188–198, [hep-ex/9803020]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[77] [77]

Roney,Status of Chiral Belle: The Beam Polarization Upgrade of SuperKEKB,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 452

M. Roney,Status of Chiral Belle: The Beam Polarization Upgrade of SuperKEKB,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 452. [98]US Belle II Group, Belle II/SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Groupcollaboration, D. M. Asner et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper on Upgrading SuperKEKB with a Polarized Electron Beam: Discovery Potential and Proposed Implementation, inSnowmass 20...

work page arXiv 2025

[78] [78]

K. B. Ng, Y. Zhou, L. Cheng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, Y. Shagam, A. J. Vigil, E. A. Cornell and J. Ye,Spectroscopy on the electron-electric-dipole-moment–sensitive states of ThF +,Physical Review A105(Feb.,

[79] [79]

K. B. Ng, Y. Zhou, W. Cairncross, T. Roussy, Y. Shagam, K. Boyce, A. Vigil, M. Pettine, J. Ye and E. Cornell,The Upcoming JILA Gen. III eEDM Experiment, inAPS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2019 ofAPS Meeting Abstracts, p. C02.003, May, 2019. – 30 –

2019